Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/30 September, 2022.html

545 lines
52 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2022-09-30 14:17:04 +01:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>30 September, 2022</title>
<style type="text/css">
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>“Im a Woman, Im a Mother, Im Christian”: How Giorgia Meloni Took Control in the Italian Election</strong> - The country has chosen its most right-wing government since the Second World War. Will political dysfunction temper extremism? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/im-a-woman-im-a-mother-im-christian-how-giorgia-meloni-took-control-in-the-italian-election">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>“Hurricane Maria Never Finished Leaving Us”: The Aftermath of Fiona in a Puerto Rican Town</strong> - “Youre seeing the most dramatic display of inequality,” a Puerto Rican teacher and independence activist said, after Hurricane Fiona. “It hurts.” - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/as-told-to/hurricane-maria-never-finished-leaving-us-the-aftermath-of-fiona-in-a-puerto-rican-town">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Fine Economic Mess in the United Kingdom</strong> - With the pound hitting record lows, financial analysts are questioning the competence of Britains new government. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/a-fine-economic-mess-in-the-united-kingdom">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Thorny Problem of Keeping the Internets Time</strong> - An obscure software system synchronizes the networks clocks. Who will keep it running? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-thorny-problem-of-keeping-the-internets-time">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sandra Cisneros Reads José Antonio Rodríguez</strong> - The poet joins Kevin Young to read and discuss “Shelter,” by José Antonio Rodríguez, and her own poem “Tea Dance, Provincetown, 1982.” - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/poetry/sandra-cisneros-reads-jose-antonio-rodriguez">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>The 2022 midterm elections, explained</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/VX863FWJfP3q0sJhQWeFfMbbdY0=/0x142:2995x2388/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71431201/GettyImages_1350833520c.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
A person votes in Brooklyn, New York, in November 2021. | Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Weoy5W">
The 2022 midterms are coming up on November 8, when voters across the US will decide the makeup of Congress, determine who will hold key offices in their states and cities, and weigh in on policies directly via ballot measures.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Xdmmg5">
Democrats currently have narrow majorities in both chambers, and because the same party holds the White House, conditions are ideal for them to pass bills President Joe Biden will sign. But forecasts suggest Democrats are likely to lose control of the House and keep the Senate this fall — though many key races are so close that anything is possible.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Hzzh93">
Beyond Washington, governors, secretaries of state, and attorneys general, along with members of the legislature, are up for election in dozens of states. The winners of those contests will affect state policies on issues as varied as abortion, voting rights, and Covid-19.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KXHezI">
Vox has been digging into the stakes of individual races and the entire country and will continue to through and even after Election Day. If youre just starting to follow the elections, you can get a better understanding of whats on the line <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2022/9/12/23344632/midterms-2022-elections-key-house-senate-races-control-congress">here</a>, and if youre trying to figure out what you need to do to vote, <a href="https://www.vox.com/even-better/23363748/voting-guide-registration-polling-place-voter-suppression">start here</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RslRk5">
Do you have something you want explained that you dont see on this page? Ask a Vox reporter your questions about Congress <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6isuraAwbdnBBVVKorqU-b6TdYQFuHmQKqcrW5TC-N1Y4bg/viewform">here</a>, about whats going on in the states <a href="http://vox.com/ask-nicole-narea.">here</a>, and about the politics of the midterms <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfgKliYTFIvitGbPSxGzMyiB1PnfUWBq_Ef81sdv0y5-R8qGw/viewform">here</a>.
</p></li>
<li><strong>The Bros and cons of being a huge, gay Hollywood rom-com</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/f8AzjLo8IFu1m6R3RFq_G0CazUA=/51x0:1584x1150/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71434850/Screen_Shot_2022_09_29_at_9.39.32_AM.0.png"/>
<figcaption>
Billy Eichner and Luke MacFarlane in Bros, a movie about gay dudes (not brothers). | Bros/Universal Pictures
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Bros wants to be a gay love story that doesnt play it straight.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hRqM4I">
Billy Eichner seems like the fun kind of grumpy — like a person who will say the mean stuff youd wish you could say out loud. Eichner rocketed to success and visibility based on his ability to charmingly <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XP5zczzJwY">harangue New Yorkers</a> on sidewalks. Then on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIr0FpAuOnI"><em>Difficult People</em></a>, he sharpened that crankiness and pop culture savvy into an acidic, narcissistic lead also named Billy, in a <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-billy-eichner-and-julie-klausner-tvs-most-difficult-people">show thats loosely based</a> on his and his friend Julie Klausners lives.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7LjsNm">
The underlying irony of Eichners humor is that the crankiness is blazing insecurity, the meanness is neurosis, and his self-absorption is a symptom of being his own biggest critic. Hes hilarious and caustic, but you probably wouldnt assume hes a romantic.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WZDl8F">
Eichner is now starring as Bobby in<em> Bros</em>,<em> </em>which he co-wrote with director Nicholas Stoller. In it, he flexes a similar smart irritability that we saw in <em>Difficult People</em> and <em>Billy on the Street</em> — this time, in a rom-com. (Eichner has maintained that the movie isnt strictly autobiographical but that it does borrow from his own life.)
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="eH387Z">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FktmUL">
Romantic comedies are rare at this point, and romantic comedies about two gay men, starring two gay men (and an <a href="https://variety.com/2022/scene/news/billy-eichner-bros-queer-cast-1235286489/">all-LGBTQ cast</a>) are even rarer. <em>Bros</em> has the unfortunate pressure of being revolutionary by simply existing. Never mind that “revolutionary” in this case is more about how slow mainstream Hollywood can be when it comes to depicting LBGTQ relationships rather than any genuinely groundbreaking concepts that <em>Bros</em> contains. Thats an incredible amount of pressure to place on a movie about two conventionally attractive (one looking like a Marvel superhero) cis, gay white men who fall in love.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="C9N3cs">
Its not a particularly easy position to be in.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ijXP5E">
Eichner has drawn fire for trying to talk about the importance of <em>Bros</em> while simultaneously, and perhaps inadvertently, <a href="https://www.thewrap.com/billy-eichner-streaming-films-fire-island-bros/">putting other LGBTQ movies down</a>. He also has <a href="https://www.gawker.com/celebrity/billy-eichner-is-the-first-gay-man-ever-bros">described the act</a> of seeing the movie as a form of active resistance against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomass view on gay rights. I do not believe <em>Bros</em> box office will necessarily determine the future of <em>Obergefell v. Hodges.</em>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EmjhAN">
But the movie is concerned with the specifics, meaning, and pressures of gay culture. As its title suggests, Eichners script roasts gay male culture and its obsessiveness with masculinity and muscles. The way traditional, heterosexual masculinity is lauded in gay male culture is a gay conundrum that <em>should</em> be made fun of more, and Eichner is more than skilled at doing so.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qlVZbN">
What caught me off-guard, though, is how thoughtful Eichner is when it comes to mapping out his own characters vulnerability. In a way that his comedy often elides, <em>Bros</em> has Bobby connecting the dots between cynicism and a pursuit of happiness. Its terrifyingly intimate territory. I thought I knew Billy Eichner to be someone cynical, whod written off romance, but <em>Bros</em> reflects a curiosity about how love functions in the heads and hearts of gay men. Its a question worth exploring.
</p>
<h3 id="oV27aY">
<em>Bros</em> is a story of a neurotic boy standing in front of another boy, asking him to love him
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nXeH3K">
<em>Bros</em> operates on a gimmick: It asks explicitly what a gay love story could look like, free from hetero norms, and then, by coincidence, its hero has a chance to answer that question.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ilayro">
The question comes to Bobby at work. Hes an award-winning podcaster who lands a dream gig of curating the countrys first LGBTQ+ museum in New York City. The museum gig is a vehicle for the movie to talk about queer history. Specifically, its a chance for Bobby to wrestle with the idea of how much same-sex marriage — the biggest pop culture touchstone when it comes to gay rights — factors into the identity of the museum and his own identity as a gay man.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ef9A54">
Bobby is an intellectual and political crank, an antithesis to the movies title. “Bro” itself implies a simpleness of being. Bros are part of the same genus as himbos, a laid-back species of masculine men. Bobbys never laid-back; hes argument-prone and hyper-aware. Hes funny in a way that complaints about failing bodies are funny, and watching him navigate through the world of gay male desire — hookup apps, flirty texts, DMs slides, and circuit parties — is sometimes hilarious, often at his own expense.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E2IASX">
Same-sex marriage ushered in a wave of tolerance and economic benefits for LGBTQ people, but Bobbys a bit skeptical. To him, the advantages of gay marriage have also come at a price: the sanding down of the edges of gay life (even if hes not partaking in those edges) into something more palatable for straight consumption. The years and years spent trying to convince straight people that LGBTQ people are just like them was maybe too effective, particularly when it comes to sex and romance.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/7t2-Yqjc_YsGUoZvoZuyFc2j3dE=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24064245/Screen_Shot_2022_09_29_at_9.39.22_AM.png"/> <cite>Bros/Universal Pictures</cite>
<figcaption>
Luke MacFarlane probably does push-ups!
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DrgKU7">
To Bobby, straight people love <em>Schitts Creek</em> and its earnest gay romance because its egregiously, dopily unsexy — also the big reason he hates it so much. And oh my god, does Bobby really hate <em>Schitts Creek</em>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="V58a8L">
Since he doesnt want the museum to pretend that same-sex marriage is the final, happy ending for queer rights, Bobby challenges his colleagues and his friends to imagine what an actual gay love story for gay people looks like. Its a clever nod to the problem of creating a gay rom-com that doesnt look like the same old straight stuff.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Uyjcor">
Then, at a shirtless party, Bobby meets Aaron (Luke MacFarlane), a lawyer specializing in estate planning. That means that Aaron helps people draw up paperwork and decide where their money will go when they die. But Aaron doesnt look like the kind of person who would have this job, gently guiding people to death. Aaron looks like a Barrys Bootcamp instructor, someone you pay to be mean to you in a fitness way. Hes the kind of handsome that you cant tell if youre attracted to him or just want to have his pecs.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bgexqE">
Bobby and Aarons meet-cute isnt really a conversation since the music is too loud (one of my homosexual friends refers to the music played at shirtless gay dance parties as “bing bong stuff”). Its also not really a conversation because Bobby is mostly just yelling complaints about the party at Aaron. It works though, and Bobby and Aaron spend the rest of the movie figuring out whether and how much the other one likes them.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7fYehN">
Theres plenty of guy-on-guy sex happening in <em>Bros</em>, some of it hot and fun, some of it silly, and some of it both. Again, because of the relative lack of big Hollywood movies centering gay men and the sex they have, showing gay group sex might be seen as audacious or groundbreaking. But the most daring thing <em>Bros</em> does is trace the psychology of Bobbys emotional intimacy.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dBy2ep">
Bobby is hesitant to open up to Aaron, in large part, due to not feeling handsome or muscular or successful enough to warrant the affection of someone who is as handsome, as muscular, or as successful as Aaron. Admittedly, Im not up to date on the latest heterosexual trends and best practices, but I dont believe feeling like someone is out of your league is exclusively a queer problem.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ys6KMe">
Theres plenty going on beneath the surface, though.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Hn90Cj">
As Bobby tells Aaron, he spent his whole childhood and adolescence being told to be anyone but the person he was. Its a common experience for many little gay boys. Those kids grow up and that message takes its toll. Many gay men then spend an inordinate amount of their adult lives unraveling that damage, cleaving away the artificial parts of themselves theyve built to find acceptance and finally rediscovering, sometimes too late, the tender bits that they discarded.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gPEX4z">
A lot of the movie and a lot of Eichners comedy satirizes this trauma, stretching it to the point of neurotic derangement —<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11BOOsypvDI"> Eichner once told James Corden</a> and a slightly unamused Riley Keough about not feeling handsome enough to warrant a happy ending after a massage. Bobbys insecurity, his deep belief that everything — Aaron, his job, his success — can be yanked away at a moments notice, comes from the same place as the stress of not being hot enough for a hand job, but its delivered without the defense humor provides.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TqUJ3c">
When the movie gives us a glimpse into Aarons life, we see what these very different men have in common. They have the same experience of hiding themselves, but just broke in different ways. Aaron compensated by following a career path and workout regimen that was supposed to get him to a place where hed be happy. Despite the abs, wealth, and validation, his happiness is also unfortunately tethered to a fear of losing it all.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/gwmboDqkZEpow03CPQa-5EKSqRs=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24064254/Screen_Shot_2022_09_29_at_9.45.24_AM.png"/> <cite>Bros/Universal Pictures</cite>
<figcaption>
This is the staff in the movie thats in charge of curating a museum of LGBTQ culture. Its quite likely that they are making fun of <em>Schitts Creek</em> in this moment.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="v6e3fp">
Love, then, is a surreal thing for two men who have constantly been told its conditional. Its somehow even more fragile when they come to the realization that they want it. Bobby and Aarons relationship is as much a negotiation of their own hangups and feelings of desire as it is wading through each others fears and insecurity to better understand each other. And of course, thats exactly the kind of complicated gay love story that Bobby would love to see reflected in his museum exhibit.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m6hcl5">
The pressures of gay life — whether thats adhering to and later breaking norms in search of happiness, navigating sexual and aesthetic expectations, trying to forge an authentic life, or even speaking for the community through a museum exhibit or a de facto revolutionary movie — can feel enormous. And its thrilling to see it explored in romantic comedies like <em>Bros</em>. Hopefully, though, therell be a time where theres not so much pressure to be “revolutionary.”
</p></li>
<li><strong>What we get wrong about being in love</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Collage of a couple with their arms around each other gesturing toward a large seated statue of a Greek philosopher." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/ZwFLJ7n-bzC63FU0lWnd7Z8jffY=/177x0:1528x1013/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71434747/wrong_love_board_1.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Christina Animashaun/Vox; Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Carrie Jenkins on what philosophy can teach us about love and heartbreak.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iB965N">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2jQzeB">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sRyFMj">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0SMazT">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oONQV3">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aJCQuH">
Do we need a new vision of romantic love?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WB9wDS">
When you think of romantic love in popular culture, you probably think of one of two things: limitless joy or unspeakable sorrow.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K0YeXv">
Pick your favorite stereotype: obsessed teenagers who cant leave each others side until some youthful misdeed leads to a cry-fest. Or maybe its the romance novel depictions of infatuated adults tangled up in passionate love triangles.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PTHRSr">
The point is, even if we know real relationships are much more complicated than this, were still drawn to misleading models of romantic love.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qMs7gj">
A new book by the philosopher Carrie Jenkins, called <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Sad-Love-Romance-Search-Meaning/dp/150953959X/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;qid=&amp;sr="><em>Sad Love: Romance and the Search for Meaning</em></a>, wants to scrap these simplistic stories and replace them with something richer and more complicated. For Jenkins, the problem isnt that we imagine love as either blissful or tragic; it can certainly be both.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="h0A6mD">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="55MuMz">
The problem is that we expect love to mean happiness. And if were not happy, we think weve failed. But Jenkins says we should recognize that the pain and difficulties of love are not just unavoidable — theyre actually part of what makes love worthwhile. So the way we talk about love should reflect this.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K0V07o">
Theres so much to chew on in this book, and ultimately what it offers is more than a theory of love. Its a philosophy of life. Thats why I invited Jenkins to join me for an episode of <a href="https://tools.applemediaservices.com/podcast/1081584611?country=us"><em>Vox Conversations</em></a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RuDZCC">
Below is an excerpt, edited for length and clarity. As always, theres much more in the full podcast, so listen and follow <em>Vox Conversations</em> on <a href="https://apps.apple.com/us/app/vox-conversations/id1215557536">Apple Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://podcasts.google.com/search/vox%20conversations">Google Podcasts</a>, <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6NOJ6IkTb2GWMj1RpmtnxP">Spotify</a>, <a href="https://www.stitcher.com/show/vox-conversations">Stitcher</a>, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
</p>
<div id="T8oGT3">
</div>
<h4 id="ULDqSK">
</h4>
<h4 id="6pQ3R0">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="f6BBWE">
You say that we tend to imagine love as a “failure condition.” What does that mean?
</p>
<h4 id="kakaYq">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YPQE8w">
I say that if we are sad when were in love, its seen as a failure because loves supposed to be about being happy ever after. If your relationships going well, we say were happy with the person, or were happy together. Happiness has just come to stand in for your love life going well.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0w1s6t">
If were sad or if were angry, where does that leave us? Does that mean our relationships arent working? Does it mean we are not in love? Or even worse, does it mean were unlovable? What if were depressed?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m12kzz">
When I started writing this book, I was really depressed, and I was genuinely worried about how that left me for being capable of love and capable of being loved, because I didnt think I was gonna be happy ever after. At some points, I had no hope of that even.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oIOPNH">
I still thought I could love someone. I still thought someone could love me. So I wanted to know why we think of happiness as the success state for love and anything else as a failure condition.
</p>
<h4 id="ruiO9K">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="95XkgZ">
Its either a Greek tragedy or just unspeakable bliss. And that seems a little too neat.
</p>
<h4 id="BKN7yb">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SWR0Iv">
Well, its all extremes, right? We are either ecstatic, waking up every morning, singing. Or they dont love you back or theyve left you or something, and its a complete tragedy, drama.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="v0Ve8E">
Nothing in the middle, nothing normal, nothing boring.
</p>
<h4 id="v956TY">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vSmuav">
And what you call “sad love” — how is that different from the myth of romantic love?
</p>
<h4 id="5npOsh">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uPg0oP">
What I try to do is talk about a kind of love that has space for the full range of human emotions. That includes happiness, of course, but also sadness and anger. And also just the day-to-day, grayscale grind of getting up and going to work and not feeling particularly any kind of way about that, just doing it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jY4RVM">
Those are most peoples lives day to day. Most people are not particularly happy all the time. Most people are not particularly sad all the time, although some of us have experienced that.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YT64At">
But what I want to say is all of these emotions are valid. All of these feelings are part of being human and being alive. And I think that means they should be part of love. I want to move away from defining love in terms of happiness, the way that that romantic myth tends to do, the “happy ever after” love.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tmQCVc">
Now, sometimes, you could be sad for reasons that do indicate theres a problem. And we can talk about that as well, but just being sad by itself doesnt mean theres something wrong with your love life or with your life in general — sometimes being sad is the right response to the world.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DLLi1G">
Sometimes the world is a sad place, you know?
</p>
<h4 id="A7h1Vu">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K1hz6h">
You point out that we seem so much more willing to accept sad parental love than we are sad romantic love. Sad parental love, as you say, is not seen as a failure. Thats just what it is, its just baked into the cake.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tYmnAs">
Whereas romantic love, if youre experiencing sadness, something must have gone wrong. And thats therefore an indictment maybe of the whole relationship.
</p>
<h4 id="msRO2F">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DiovzS">
And this temptation to externalize it and say, “The other person is not making me happy.” That can be really toxic, too. Like its anyone elses job to make you happy. Thats not necessarily what love is for or what love is about.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TfDn2T">
One way I sometimes think about it is, I dont think that the most valuable thing in my life is me being happy. Dont get me wrong. I like being happy. Ill take it if thats available, but there are things that mean much more to me.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="V14eGH">
And I think when people have children, we tend to understand this. Youre gonna have a rough time, but theres something about that that means much more to you. And theres something about that goal of raising your kids that is valuable and meaningful in a way thats not really about happiness or your happiness.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tprSlN">
That is a useful way to think about this stuff sometimes.
</p>
<h4 id="UU5IHo">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TLtnaa">
Its a very existentialist book because its trying to map out a vision of love thats truly compatible with freedom. I think thats also what makes it very hard for people to practice in real life.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zWEth3">
We all want to love someone. We all want someone to love us. But the truth is that we often want someone to love us on our terms. And thats problematic, if Im reading you right.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hv2wEE">
You write: “The other human being involved in such a relationship is presumably an autonomous agent with their own free will, not a prize you get for being a good person.”
</p>
<h4 id="ck9Evg">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UOSfam">
Id go so far as to question whether that can even count as love. Because its almost like youre not really loving that person. You are just loving something that happens inside of you when you are around that person.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SzZKSK">
If you are not working in a collaborative spirit with them on things that are meaningful to them and to both of you, then yeah, Im not really sure that I would wanna say thats love at all.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gbQc5v">
Theres also another risk thats close to that one, which is where we tend to see a partner as a kind of social status symbol. Like, “Look at me, Ive been able to attract <em>this</em> person.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mQUZhO">
When were thinking about it in that way, that again can be incredibly toxic. Not only because were not seeing the other person — we are just thinking about how being with them is a benefit to us.
</p>
<h4 id="Yb0Doy">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JtvRBp">
Im married; Ive been with my wife for 11 years now. Were in a pretty challenging stage of life. We have a 3-year-old in the house, and thats its own kind of tornado.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="omnMSL">
But like everyone, were — both of us — changing and evolving. Hopefully productively, as we get older, often in unexpected ways. Anyone whos a parent knows that it changes you.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XJzPR5">
And the question were always asking is, how do we allow each other to grow and change without imposing our own expectations, or our own desires, on each other? And its really hard. There are inevitable clashes.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="q5YXtC">
And my biggest worry is that we might allow ourselves to believe the lie that love consists in the loss of our own agency, our own freedom. And thats not really true. It only appears true if youre attached to an unhealthy vision of love.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jXzMMh">
But at the same time, if youre going to love someone in a way that respects their autonomy, that means youre not in control of them, and they dont exist just for you, to make you feel secure or whatever. And that means you have to let go.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="okaV6r">
And thats hard and scary.
</p>
<h4 id="81Iee6">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7p2slS">
Yeah. Its scary. And I get it. I do.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lmoLFP">
The thing about that is, if we dont face that fact about needing to respect a partners own autonomy, it doesnt make it not a fact. They still might grow and change in ways that pull them, maybe, away from us.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="AWhmJq">
We actually cant stop that from happening whatever we try to do. But if we dont look it in the face, we can kind of kid ourselves that its not true. So then, whats gonna happen if we do that? I mean, maybe well get lucky and nothing bad will happen.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dLqYzF">
Another possibility, though, is were gonna be blindsided when that day comes because weve been ignoring the fact that our partner is their own person. We might even have brought it on by doing that, if weve been treating the person as though theyre just there for us.
</p>
<h4 id="Iof1O3">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HEmVAF">
So if romantic love is this rich, dynamic thing that involves the entire spectrum of emotion, and its full of all these contradictory needs and desires, how do we know when its just not working? How do we know when its time to move on?
</p>
<h4 id="eBeqWi">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZAyXvU">
Theres a lot to be said about thinking, not necessarily just in terms of when to move on, but to think about how things can change. So an individual person grows and changes over time, and relationships, if they are healthy, will grow and change over time as well.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="04NGbb">
Part of what worries me about the romantic myth is that were supposed to be just the same way we are now forever. That never happens. Everybody changes. And if your relationship doesnt change, then its going to die. Anything alive is gonna grow and is gonna change.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W1X0ge">
So what Im sometimes tempted to think about is how a relationship to another person needs to change, rather than what needs to end or be removed. And Im not talking here about if youre in an abusive relationship, or if things have gotten bad enough that youre being harmed. That situation needs to end. Dont get me wrong.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Y1tgAk">
But if youre just realizing youve grown apart from someone in certain kinds of ways, and youre no longer really engaged in the same lives anymore — once weve stepped away from thinking theres only one story for how a loving relationship can look, were at liberty to say, “Okay, well, how could our loving relationship look if we only overlap in this much of our lives instead of that much like we used to? And what does that look like?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Xfkf5l">
And then you can have a conversation about, does it look like being friends? Does it look like being lovers who only see one another somewhat occasionally? Does it look like becoming non-monogamous?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="of8mi1">
Theres lots of ways that relationships can change that were just kind of trained out of considering as options. I just wish we were more aware of those possibilities for ways that love can change and grow over time. Because actually I think the “happy ever after” mythology and its associated conception that romantic love never changes is the exact thing that leads to all kinds of heartbreak and unnecessary separations and devastating breakups.
</p>
<h4 id="uR45Bu">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jzY2Dh">
One of the things I most appreciate about the argument you make in the book is that you emphasize love as a verb, not a noun. We have this idea of love as a passive thing, that its about feeling something rather than doing something.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xpy6mB">
But thats wrong. Love is not something you have — its something you do.
</p>
<h4 id="lOq1d7">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3wxFCF">
Its not something you just fall in, like a hole in the ground, right? You dont just find yourself in a loving relationship one day. You can have some feelings, then, what do you do with that?
</p>
<h4 id="vPiL5P">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LSH566">
You reference Victor Frankl quite a bit in the book, the famous Austrian psychiatrist who survived the Nazi concentration camps. And we both agree that hes right when he says that the goal that makes life meaningful has to be something that points beyond ourselves.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QE6atf">
But for that exact reason, it means we cant do this alone. So whatever form of love we aim at, it cant just be about individual happiness. And part of figuring out how to love and, really, how to live, is knowing ourselves: what we value, what we want, what really matters.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nYoZ61">
But if you accept this very existentialist insight — and I do; I think you do as well — if you accept that our identities arent fixed, that were making it up as we go, then you also have to accept that theres no one-size-fits-all model of love. And what you need from people and what they need from you will constantly change. If the person you love or the people you love dont recognize that, then you have to really ask yourself if thats the kind of love you want, or if its even love at all.
</p>
<h4 id="WgNDND">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Io9902">
Right. If theyre loving something that they had in mind that you might be, but its not you, then theyre loving something that really is inside of them all along, and not the self, the being that you are, which is a living thing that grows and changes.
</p>
<h4 id="LtJ3ZV">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sZBBqt">
Or if they love a version of yourself that youve grown past.
</p>
<h4 id="9dutwS">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5DcJdF">
Exactly. Right. They love a past time-slice of you.
</p>
<h4 id="QBesrh">
Sean Illing
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FZUWmS">
I think that happens a lot.
</p>
<h4 id="PaWaih">
Carrie Jenkins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="kJMp74">
Youre right that Victor Frankls a huge influence here. Hes actually the reason for the subtitle of this book. So its <em>Sad, Love: Romance and the Search for Meaning</em>, and Frankls book was called <em>Mans Search For Meaning</em>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X4zFeY">
But thats why I chose that phrase for my subtitle: to respect what Frankl is saying about how you have to place meaningfulness and what you actually value at the center, and not happiness, in order to survive difficult situations.
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Time to move on, says Harmanpreet on the Charlie Dean run-out</strong> - “Whatever we did was within the rules. There have been too many discussions and now we want to move on,” says the Indian womens team skipper</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>New look MGC golf links all set to host Sportstar Open</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Speed Air, Storm Breaker, Zaneta, Kings Walk and Glorious Destiny please</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Emperor Roderic, Finch and Turmeric Tower impress</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sucre, De Villiers, The Sovereign Orb, Ascoval and Tranquilo please</strong> -</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Bharat Jodo Yatra should not be linked to one party, says Yogendra Yadav</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>ED freezes crypto currency, Tether worth ₹47.64 lakh</strong> - The ED initiated the money laundering investigation on the basis of an FIR registered on February 15, 2021.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sitar symphony at palace today</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Christ College in Thrissur awarded A+ grading by SAAC</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>BJP will cover every village in Telugu States before next elections: Laxman</strong> -</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>What Russian annexation means for Ukraines regions</strong> - How will Russia annex four occupied regions it does not fully control, while in the middle of a war?</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ukraine war: Survivors speak of horror as Zaporizhzhia convoy hit</strong> - At least 23 civilians were reportedly killed as they tried to enter Russian-held territory to deliver aid.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>US suggests Russia could be behind Nord Stream gas leaks</strong> - US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm tells the BBC its unlikely Nord Stream leaks are coincidence.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>UK to go to first meeting of European nations club</strong> - More than 40 leaders, including from all EU countries, were invited to discuss security and energy issues.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>NI Protocol: Cleverly to speak to Šefčovič amid fresh hopes for talks</strong> - Foreign Secretary James Cleverly will speak to his EU counterpart Maroš Šefčovič on Friday.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Qubits surf sound waves between quantum nodes</strong> - Sound waves in a piezoelectric material can steer electrons to precise destinations. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1885499">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Rocket Report: BE-4 engine breathes fire; Delta IV Heavy puts on a show</strong> - “Getting back out there might be a challenge.” - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1885393">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>FDAs rotten definition of “healthy” food is finally getting tossed</strong> - For now, salmon, nuts are not eligible for “healthy” label, but sugary cereals are. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1885776">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>NASA and SpaceX are studying a Hubble telescope boost, adding 15 to 20 years of life</strong> - “Its doing great science as we speak.” - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1885669">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>This underwater camera operates wirelessly without batteries</strong> - New ultra low-power imaging method employs underwater backscatter imaging. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1885419">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>I hired a transgender prostitute</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I had never been to a brothel before, so the first thing I did was talk to several prostitutes to compare prices. One was much cheaper than the rest, and I asked her why. “Im giving a discount right now because Im basically relearning to have sex. I was assigned male at birth and just completed reassignment surgery. Im looking for feedback on my performance.” I decided to give her a chance. I paid her, and we had amazing sex. She asked me to fill out a questionnaire before I left. I picked one up from the table and read the question “Were you satisfied with your trans action?”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/AnimusNoctis"> /u/AnimusNoctis </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrdmcf/i_hired_a_transgender_prostitute/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrdmcf/i_hired_a_transgender_prostitute/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Why did the dog cross the road, roll in the dirt, and cross the road again?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Because hes a dirty, double-crossing son of a b*tch.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
<em>edit</em> And a such GOOD one, yes he IS!
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/TimeLuckBug"> /u/TimeLuckBug </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xronj1/why_did_the_dog_cross_the_road_roll_in_the_dirt/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xronj1/why_did_the_dog_cross_the_road_roll_in_the_dirt/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>You can tell that Wolverine is a Canadian character written by an American</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
His superpower is healthcare
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/LiesOfTheSith"> /u/LiesOfTheSith </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrfqcj/you_can_tell_that_wolverine_is_a_canadian/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrfqcj/you_can_tell_that_wolverine_is_a_canadian/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Monastery Spelling Mistake</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A new monk arrives at the monastery. He is assigned to help the other monks in copying the old texts by hand. He notices, however, that they are copying copies, and not the original books.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
So, the new monk goes to the head monk to ask him about this. He points out that if there was an error in the first copy, that error would be continued in all of the other copies. The head monk says, “We have been copying from the copies for centuries, but you make a good point, my son.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
So, he goes down into the cellar with one of the copies to check it against the original. Hours later, nobody has seen him. So, one of the monks goes downstairs to look for him. He hears sobbing coming from the back of the cellar and finds the old monk leaning over one of the original books crying. He asks whats wrong.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“You fuckers”, he says, with anger and sadness in his eyes, “the word was celebrate!”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/EmergencyLeading8137"> /u/EmergencyLeading8137 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrsr05/monastery_spelling_mistake/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrsr05/monastery_spelling_mistake/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>My wife asked why I was whispering.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I told her that Mark Zuckerburg might be listening.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Then she laughed, and Siri laughed, and Alexa laughed.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Clazzo524"> /u/Clazzo524 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrvia6/my_wife_asked_why_i_was_whispering/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/xrvia6/my_wife_asked_why_i_was_whispering/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>