Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/01 October, 2023.html

481 lines
59 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2023-10-01 13:42:16 +01:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>01 October, 2023</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Latino Question at the Second Republican Debate</strong> - At an event featuring Univisions Ilia Calderón, the candidates showed little interest in speaking to Latino concerns. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-latino-question-at-the-second-republican-debate">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>“Thank You for Speaking While Im Interrupting”: The Crosstalk Chaos of the Second Republican Debate</strong> - The event, which was billed as a chance for Donald Trumps rivals to change their fortunes, only reinforced the confusion and aimlessness of their candidacies. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/thank-you-for-speaking-while-im-interrupting-the-crosstalk-chaos-of-the-second-republican-debate">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Peter Daous Theory of Election Interference—by Democrats</strong> - The former Clinton aide, now running the third-party Presidential campaign of Cornel West, on his recent political awakening. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/peter-daous-theory-of-election-interference-by-democrats">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Worrying Democratic Erosions in South Korea</strong> - In recent months, authorities have raided offices of press outlets publishing critical reports on President Yoon Suk-yeol. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-worrying-democratic-erosions-in-south-korea">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Powerful New York Law That Finally Brought Trump to Book</strong> - In investigating the former President, New Yorks attorney general relied on legislation passed at the behest of one of her Republican predecessors, Jacob Javits. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-powerful-new-york-law-that-finally-brought-trump-to-book">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>The messy art of posting through it</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="An illustration of 12 yellow emoticons melting. Some have smiles, some are frowning." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/wQHgt299kJis5_qltI0MWuE4rCk=/134x0:5467x4000/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72708183/GettyImages_1415094830.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Getty Images/iStockphoto
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Social media is our public diary — and its only getting more intimate.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1Q6Ca7">
Oversharing in conversation is nothing new. Throughout thousands of years of social interaction, people have divulged certain secrets, vulnerabilities, and desires to perhaps the wrong listener, with results ranging from mild embarrassment to shattered reputations. Thanks to social media, the ability to make these confessions to a potentially much wider audience is easier than ever.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zJ7TYk">
What isnt as straightforward is defining what constitutes oversharing online. Each platform has its specific norms and users who have their own opinions on what content they consider too cringe or vulnerable for public consumption. For instance, when people express negative emotions on <a href="https://www.vox.com/facebook">Facebook</a>, it doesnt seem so out of place, according to <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444817707349">a 2017 study</a>. On the contrary, <a href="https://www.vox.com/instagram-news">Instagram</a> is where users expect to see positive content — albeit <a href="https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jola.12224">content that isnt particularly authentic</a>. One<a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3479574"> study, from 2021</a>, suggests the norms on <a href="https://www.vox.com/tiktok">TikTok</a> empower users to embrace both difficult and positive experiences when they post.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="PuW5oT">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Y6eULd">
However, as social media continues to occupy an increasingly intimate space in our lives, as <a href="https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/socstudies/people/academic-staff/ysabel-gerrard">Ysabel Gerrard</a>, a senior lecturer in digital communication at the University of Sheffield, thinks it will, what we post — and how audiences interpret it — will shift. Gerrard, who studies young peoples experiences of social media and digital identities, says that when social platforms become a place to store meaningful memories, the way we post will only become more personal. But does this give us permission to post through it?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WTE05u">
<em>This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.</em>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3c9p1y">
<strong>On one hand, I see sharing details online of something difficult or frustrating as being cathartic</strong>. <strong>But what is too much?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2XEMCg">
The thing about any digital phenomenon is that everything has a pre-social media alternative. Loads of sociologists have talked about what is acceptable communication and conduct. But now, were re-asking those questions in relation to social media. What is actually new here and what has stayed the same from previous social norms?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oTMMuz">
There is something that is distinctive and new, which is that it really depends on what a persons account is for. Social media has become so embedded in so many peoples lives — not everybodys, obviously not everybody uses it — that people tend to do what <a href="https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1379">Emily van der Nagel calls compartmentalizing your identity</a> across different accounts on different platforms and sometimes across multiple accounts within the same platform. What might be an overshare on one account might feel completely different to your audience on another. For a lot of people, how you interpret an overshare is based on what you imagine that persons account to be for, and that might conflict with what that person intends their account to be for. If youre talking to someone face-to-face, youre in that specific context. Those contextual cues are lost and dispersed when it comes to social media.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W5o4Pu">
<strong>How much do the norms of each platform play into how much people are comfortable sharing?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eqC8Oa">
That, to me, is the crux. Theres <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152">an article by Martin Gibbs and a few other authors</a> about funerals and grief. But actually, thats a vehicle for them to discuss what they call platform vernaculars, about how each platform is a really complex combination of policies, technologies, visual aesthetics, finance models — everything that combines to make a platform a platform. What theyre saying is each platform is so distinct that your identity manifests differently across each platform. You could have the same username and profile picture across all the same platforms but your behavior and your emotional connection to that platform, the people you speak to or the people you dont speak to, is so fundamentally different across platforms. Thats why we often see this tension in how people interpret other peoples content. Is it an overshare? Is it not an overshare?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7ZV9ki">
If I say to you, “Pick a post on a platform that you think is an overshare and show it to me.” If you surveyed X number of people with loads of different identity markers — age, gender, ethnicity, social class, religious background — I would be really shocked if you got consensus on that. It would be really tricky.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="l21QF7">
<strong>I recently saw a very vulnerable post on Instagram about a breakup and I remember thinking, “This feels like too much for Instagram.” But I think if I saw it on TikTok, it wouldnt have felt so out of place.</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DUUk8L">
How each of us goes into a specific platform not only shapes how you post and what you do there, but it shapes how you receive other peoples content. That person who shared that, maybe for them, their Instagram occupies a really, really intimate and personal place in their life, but yours doesnt and thats where you get that mismatch of expectations versus understanding.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KRZ48l">
I feel, in my own life and research, that social media is occupying an even more intimate role in our lives now. Were using platforms that are really familiar to us, particularly Instagram, in way more intimate ways than we ever have — and there are quite a few trends to back that up, for instance, finstas and photo dumps. Thats all signposting us toward a place where the platform has a really intimate role in our lives, and perhaps that shapes what we share and therefore how people interpret that.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m5qKzi">
<strong>Could you elaborate more on how that intimacy manifests? </strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="66wrV4">
I <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-are-photo-dumps-so-popular-a-digital-communications-expert-explains-210486">wrote a piece for the Conversation about the photo dumps</a> trend on Instagram. It got me looking back at literature on tangible photo albums: how people craft them, why they use them, how they interpret them. One of the things I realized was that the photo dump trend is showing us that were wanting to curate a set of photographs and reflect on important pieces of our lives — maybe its a holiday, maybe its a season, maybe its an event — instead of just putting that one powerful aesthetic picture. That has resonance with photo albums and how we would craft and carefully place photographs in tangible albums. That shift, to me, signifies that were using the platform more intimately, which means that we are using it more as a form of archival. It means that we have relationships on certain accounts with certain people that feel intimate, that feel like youd want to share those moments of your life with. Instagram in particular is becoming more meaningful and <a href="https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/3/28/17054848/smartphones-photos-memory-research-psychology-attention">a form of memory</a>, and it may be suggested that we think its going to be around for a while if were willing to put these pieces of our histories in there.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZrPvbr">
<strong>We all are aware of the fact that theres usually an audience when were posting in this public way. How does the way people interact with or potentially perceive us play into what we choose to share?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tHdFCP">
Theres an understanding that certain forms of intimacy will generate more clicks, more likes, more views, more virality. You do need to go into these things with a healthy degree of skepticism and think, “What was the motivation behind that?”<em> </em>Theres a lot of<a href="https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1449&amp;context=hwlj"> discourse around</a> the <a href="https://time.com/5857023/karen-meme-history-meaning/">weaponization of tears</a>, <a href="https://www.papermag.com/white-women-fake-cry-tiktok#rebelltitem11">especially in terms of race</a>. There are forms of intimacy that are not innocent.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="x26u4L">
But to me, I think a good chunk of content out there is genuinely people who want to use social media as an outlet to express their emotions, to share stories from their lives. There are lots of stories where social media has saved peoples lives because people got access to communities where they feel seen and they feel heard and they can find people with common experiences. A lot of people wouldnt admit this, but [maybe] theyve created a throwaway account on Reddit, and theyve gone on to a subreddit and theyve shared the most harrowing, intimate personal details about their lives because they need help and they get that support. Because thats in a really bounded context — in a subreddit, where its supposed to be — its not considered an overshare because the norms of that space dictate that it should be there.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KMmmME">
When youve got something like Instagram or TikTok, it really depends on who you are and who uses the platform. Youve got all these different audiences from different parts of your lives that have been collapsed into one: youve got your work colleagues, youve got your one-night stand, youve got your partner, youve got your partners family, youve got your parents. Its really hard to post anything without someone somewhere having something to say about it, whether it was an overshare, inappropriate. Thats why subreddits and more niche spaces are so valuable and so powerful, and theyre not really the places where people get accused of oversharing. The places we accuse people of doing this on are your more mainstream, generalized platforms.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jlK51G">
<strong>How can oversharing backfire?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qciJcd">
Theres a very obvious way it can go wrong, which is when a person says something objectively harmful or hurtful and then it escalates from there. But to me, there are two main micro-ways that it can go wrong. One of the ways oversharing goes wrong is when you post something, and someone is in your audience who isnt really the intended receiver and it backfires. Another way that it can go wrong is when you post to the wrong place. Itd be fair game on this platform, but not this platform.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZO35Yw">
<strong>So should we be posting through it?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jEzJ44">
Ive done a lot of research into how people with, for example, depression and who have eating disorders are sharing, what theyre talking about, and how theyre using different platforms. Ive tended to focus on people who do this anonymously. Ive written a lot about how people conceal their identities in order to talk about these things, partly, for a lot of people, because they are stigmatized, and people dont want their legal identity being linked to what are essentially their innermost thoughts on their health conditions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1Hu1KK">
On the flip side, youve got a lot of people who are putting their names and faces to lots of different things. I saw this TikTok the other day of this girl whose partner had died. She was sobbing and the first words that came out of her mouth were “I dont know why Im doing this.” I thought it was a really powerful sentence. We assume theres so much craft and thought that goes into these moments. A word that gets bandied around a lot is “attention-seeking.” Theres a lot of disparagement of people who do that, but like I said, social media has become so intimate as part of our lives. It is probably getting to a point in society where it does feel more normal and more natural to talk about how you feel and post it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yo6Fmp">
Theres a really simple explanation where you can say it might benefit someone else who is going through that. Theres lots of evidence to suggest that is the case, that its helping to destigmatize certain things and that its been really helpful. But that, to me, is a simple explanation. What else is happening on top of that is that we are having, as a society, a very different level of intimacy toward social media that we might not be comfortable admitting at this stage. I dont think it is as easy anymore to just say, “Thats an overshare,” or, “Thats cringe.”
</p></li>
<li><strong>The 2010s was a decade of protests. Why did so many revolutions fail?</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Protesters in a dark street with illuminated smoke at their feet." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/K3Bb9kN7ba7LAPQUh6Nn0Hqvz1E=/108x0:3023x2186/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72708073/171566782.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
A demonstrator kicks a tear gas shell during clashes with the police outside the Mineirao stadium in Belo Horizonte, on June 26, 2013. | Christophe Simon/AFP via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Journalist Vincent Bevins grapples with failed revolutions from Egypt to Brazil to Hong Kong.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cCFIIp">
When a street vendor named Mohamed Bouazizi self-immolated in protest of the Tunisian government in 2010, he inspired a revolution in his country and ultimately a cascade of revolt across the Middle East, Europe, Asia, Latin America, and even in the United States.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Qgi04n">
The 2010s was a decade of mass protest, as the journalist <a href="https://www.northsouthnotes.org/">Vincent Bevins</a> writes in his new book <a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/vincent-bevins/if-we-burn/9781541788978/?lens=publicaffairs"><em>If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and the Missing Revolution</em></a><em>. </em>But the movements demonstrating in public squares in world capitals lost out, and many countries ended up with leaders even more repressive than the autocrats that protests toppled.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NrCfPS">
Figuring out why many of the revolutions never materialized has bedeviled activists since.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BgcjU9">
This is the task that Bevins, a former correspondent for the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, sets out to explore in over 250 interviews across 12 countries. The result is the kind of broad survey that was impossible for reporters to capture in the middle of these uprisings. There are trends and shared triggers: that after governments crack down on an initially small group of protesters, the squares swell with more and more demonstrators; that in the midst of a leftist eruption, the far right often quickly coopts the momentum; that <a href="https://www.vox.com/media">the media</a> itself bears some responsibility for the movements shortcomings; that, now, activists are eager to tell the intricacies of their efforts so that the next generation of protesters can get things right.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="A huge outdoor protest, photographed from on high." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/X-8jQDgqvO2mTum8ssRcYWKTD68=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24962951/108694085.jpg"/> <cite>Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Protesters gather in Tahrir Square on February 1, 2011, in Cairo, Egypt.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HUV0LJ">
On the medias role, he looks back at when he was covering <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/brazil-protest-june-2013-rousseff-lula-bolsonaro-election-workers-party-temer/563165/">Brazils 2013 protests</a> from the vantage point of an American. “People like me ended up in this position that we did not earn and we did not deserve, of being called upon to explain to the world what was actually happening in the streets,” Bevins told me. “We did not have the intellectual or material resources to do this properly. … And we too often saw what we wanted to see in the mass protest explosions.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qjAOEb">
Are there lessons for those ready to rise up today or tomorrow? “If you look back on the decade with this wide lens as I do, you see the copying and pasting of tactics that were developed in wildly different circumstances,” he says. “One of the many lessons that comes out of these conversations is: Pay very, very close attention to what your society is, how youre trying to change it, and the applicability of the tactics youre adopting to your given situation.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XKmOsj">
Somehow, despite all the loss and the failed revolutions, its a hopeful story.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XWIHpz">
<em>Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.</em>
</p>
<h4 id="lIw3ku">
Jonathan Guyer
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pdYhOM">
What struck me in this book is just how many of these protests were happening concurrently. Just to speak from my own experience, I was in Egypt during the 2013 coup that was in part sparked by an astroturf movement, and I left the country for Istanbul, <a href="https://www.vox.com/turkey">Turkey</a>, as the Gezi Park protests were happening. And the umbrella protests in Hong Kong were inspired by Occupy Wall Street. Tell me about the connections between these movements.
</p>
<h4 id="l0HoUc">
Vincent Bevins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="S2Pg8m">
Connectivity provided unexpected benefits and unexpected dangers when it came to the possibility of observing, learning from, and transferring knowledge and solidarity across national borders.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4QKBNk">
Because on the one hand, the great thing about the internet is that you could see what was happening anywhere, immediately. Movements can be in contact with each other.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8ILcvW">
I unexpectedly went viral in Brazil when I tweeted about a protest chant that was about Turkey, and Turkish people are sending me messages to pass on to the protesters in Brazil. I was very uncomfortable with this dynamic at the time, not only because I was a journalist in the mainstream corporate media and I was supposed to be objective about this movement, and Im not supposed to be a part of it. And number two, Im thinking, “Well, wait a minute, these are really different countries.”
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/ZY4Y1AJtPEfDECxDhqfR0T1w6PM=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24962942/171725554.jpg"/> <cite>Luis Felipe Muller/Contributor</cite>
<figcaption>
On June 17, 2013, an estimated 65,000 people marched through São Paulo streets to voice a range of frustrations.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="Masked protesters stand outside near a spray-painted wall." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/cRT1Jk8gJD2Vo-l2Bxoz04L4V-s=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24962947/529255676.jpg"/> <cite>Monique Jaques/Corbis via Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A woman gives out a solution of milk and antacid that relieves eyes from the sting of tear gas on Istiklal Caddesi in Istanbul, Turkey, on June 1, 2013.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eZLKIO">
If you look back on the decade with this wide lens as I do, you see the copying and pasting of tactics that were developed in wildly different circumstances. You see the application of something that was developed to, for example, try to remove an autocratic leader in North Africa being employed in imperfect democracies — but democracies — like Brazil and Ukraine.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VtA2Zk">
You also saw it happening after it became clear in the original country that this particular tactic didnt even work.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="neISCZ">
The Umbrella Movement in 2014 in Hong Kong was inspired by Occupy Wall Street, which was inspired by Egypt, which was inspired by Tunisia. Really, this is the globalization of the Tahrir Square model. But by the time they put it into practice in Hong Kong in 2014, Egypt had already ended in disaster; Egypt had already experienced the Sisi coup, which arguably installs a dictator, which is even worse than the Mubarak government that the protest movement initially sought to overthrow.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vfv1Yc">
The idea of writing a book which identifies this mismatch between tactics and targets is to identify the way that you can fix that mismatch. So what looks like a pessimistic reading of history can quickly become an optimistic project that looks toward the future because all you have to do is match the tactics to this huge, demonstrable desire for change in the global system; then you have something that you can work on in the next decade.
</p>
<h4 id="mobzJN">
Jonathan Guyer
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3o0Lo3">
Since you started writing this book, social media has fundamentally been transformed, you might even say it has died. How central was social media to the series of protests that you were covering? Could they happen with social media in the state its in today?
</p>
<h4 id="uLXm0S">
Vincent Bevins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DFEyWz">
The types of mass protest movements that I look at in this book are the explosions which become so large, in which so many people enter the streets that governments are either toppled or fundamentally destabilized. And often getting over that line requires many, many factors to come into play, and to act upon each other and to combine in an explosive manner. And without social media, I think a lot less of them would have gotten across that line.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="60bI4s">
The reason that social media did not work as promised is not because we misunderstood the nature of the internet and the possibilities of digital connectivity, but because oligarchs took over the digital space.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7ayYe6">
Often when Im explaining this book to younger people, my cousins and nieces and nephews, theyre often shocked to hear something that you or I might remember that 10-15 years ago, the common-sense wisdom, the mainstream opinion, and basically, this is what was shared almost across the board in the English-language media, was that anything that happened as a result in social media was going to be fundamentally, necessarily progressive, more democratic, and lead to a better world.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Cbax4u">
Now, 10-15 years later, if one can imagine a movement of young men storming the capital of a country because of something they saw on the internet, our first reaction is probably going to be the exact opposite. Our first reaction is going to be whoa, hold on, this might be very dangerous. Our first reaction is to think of all of the ways that that can go wrong. And again, I think thats not because the internet does not have the promise that we believe that it did. Its because oligarchs conquered it and murdered the best parts of it.
</p>
<h4 id="SffpHo">
Jonathan Guyer
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oVOmfZ">
I liked this line where you said, “Getting tear-gassed is great for engagement.” I wonder if you could step back and talk to me about how you fit yourself into this story. This is more personal than your last book, <a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/vincent-bevins/the-jakarta-method/9781541724013/?lens=publicaffairs"><em>The Jakarta Method: Washingtons Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program That Shaped Our World</em></a>.
</p>
<h4 id="Fpz09v">
Vincent Bevins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0Bi1QP">
It is a little bit more personal than <em>The Jakarta Method</em>, I think, for two reasons. One is because I lived through the events of this decade, especially in Brazil. And I think that at some points, I was so close to the unfolding events as to require my inclusion in order to be fully honest.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="akxy6z">
But a fuller answer, the more difficult answer, is that this particular type of response to perceived injustice; this type of explosion; this repertoire of contention; the apparently spontaneous, digitally coordinated, horizontally organized mass protests in public spaces ends up meeting, relying on, handing the privilege of interpreting these events to people like me.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XsaoYD">
People like me ended up in this position that we did not earn and we did not deserve, of being called upon to explain to the world what was actually happening in the streets.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lFS8Ww">
The participants and the original organizers of these mass protest events, many of them now recognize that this is a fundamental flaw of this particular type of contention, that it relies on somebody else to impose meaning upon it from outside, because the meaning of the movement itself is incapable of speaking in one coherent voice. But whatever the reason for this, people like me, foreign correspondents, especially from the most powerful countries in the world, especially from the dominant corporate outlets, which have the biggest microphone on the global stage, were called upon to explain an endlessly complex set of explosions around the world, and we failed.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/q-54rLuNObkdFpX-BkHUZjWgdR0=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24962955/459567356.jpg"/> <cite>Chris McGrath/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A pro-democracy activist holds a yellow umbrella in front of a police line on a street in Mongkok district on November 25, 2014, in Hong Kong.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yiVOTO">
We did not have the intellectual or material resources to do this properly. We too often were guided by narrow ideological or careerist concerns. We often do not have the depth of knowledge required to place these movements in context. And we too often saw what we wanted to see in the mass protest explosions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7dcjBI">
So in order to tell this story honestly, I think we do have to talk about the role of media representation, not only in defining the sort of world-historical significance of these explosions, but indeed in reconfiguring the concrete form of the movements on the street. Because often the particular type of coverage that these movements got, whether in traditional media or on social media, dictated who went out to the street and what they understood that they were going to find there. The gap between what the original organizers thought they were doing and what the later arrivals thought they were going to find often ended in violence or tragedy.
</p>
<h4 id="OdvQWN">
Jonathan Guyer
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gAxX8Z">
What do you think is the big takeaway of these varied stories of activists across many different contexts organizing in a whole lot of different societies?
</p>
<h4 id="FtzhRv">
Vincent Bevins
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vbDpHF">
This book is not structured as an argument, its really a work of history. And I think that by reading what happens, following chronologically how the decade starts in Tunisia and how things unfold throughout the decade, different readers will come to different conclusions and different interpretations of what really happened.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="d80U4O">
One of the many lessons that comes out of these conversations is: Pay very, very close attention to what your society is, how youre trying to change it, and the applicability of the tactics youre adopting to your given situation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="52hMzb">
The mass protest decade, as I call it, demonstrates that theres a huge amount of desire to change the world for the better, to affect transformations to our global system. And the entire point of this book, the reason that hundreds of people wanted to sit down and talk to me, was to help future generations match the right tactics with the right goals and succeed at creating a better world.
</p></li>
<li><strong>Congress avoided a shutdown. What happens now?</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="House Speaker Kevin McCarthy points emphatically while speaking." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/iPX5-zBV7EwM3nRkGDcyOnk-ANI=/45x0:4806x3571/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72707181/1699000079.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Kevin McCarthy teamed with Democrats to keep the government open. Will he keep his job? | Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Kevin McCarthy faced either a shutdown or a right-wing push to kick him out of his job. He chose the latter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Lmip4C">
With only hours to spare, Congress on Saturday narrowly avoided a government shutdown. The Senate approved a bill to keep the government open for the next 45 days by a vote of 88 to 9<em> </em>after a dramatic reversal by House Speaker <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/10/2022-midterms-kevin-mccarthy-is-the-man-in-the-maga-middle.html">Kevin McCarthy </a>ensured an overwhelming House vote to keep the government open.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ntL1R6">
McCarthy had spent weeks trying to find a path that would both keep the government open and protect himself from an internal coup by hardliners within the House Republican Conference. Ultimately, McCarthy opted to fund the government and challenge the hardliners to do their worst — opening him up to attempts to remove him from the Houses top job.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eAsCpN">
McCarthy had tried Friday to get his caucus to support a short-term measure — known as a continuing resolution — that was loaded up with major spending cuts to appeal to House right wingers. But after that failed, the California Republican punted on Saturday after accepting that he could not pass any short-term funding measure with Republican votes alone.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fIpfh5">
Instead, he allowed the House to vote on legislation that would continue current government spending for the next 45 days along with disaster aid. The only major provision desired by Democrats not included in the legislation is additional aid to Ukraine. The short-term bill passed with all but one Democrat supporting it. However, 90 Republicans were opposed.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hRIVtT">
For many of those Republicans, they were opposed to a continuing resolution on principle. They believed McCarthy had made a commitment to funding the government through twelve individual appropriations bills rather than a single legislative vehicle. As Rep Wesley Hunt (R-TX) put it on Friday. “We got to break the fever. This is how business has been conducted for the past 33 years in this country, which coincidentally are close to $30 trillion in debt.” He added “if we dont break this right now, if you dont do this right now, its gonna be business as usual next year, and the year after the year after.”
</p>
<h3 id="X275hM">
Will Kevin McCarthy stay the GOP speaker?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sNUaCU">
The challenge for McCarthy is whether he can survive his shift in tactics. Speaking to reporters after the vote, he offered a challenge to those dissidents. “If someone is going to bring a motion against me. Bring it.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yebSJB">
McCarthys position has always been a precarious one from the start. The California Republican <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/1/7/23543163/kevin-mccarthy-speaker-of-the-house-vote-elected">had only been elected Speaker after fifteen ballots</a> and had a four-seat majority in the House. If a motion to oust McCarthy was brought to the floor, only five dissident Republicans would be enough to remove him if no Democrats came to his aid.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fZJuDy">
Matt Gaetz, a longtime critic of McCarthy and one of the ringleaders of the effort to block him from becoming Speaker in January, told reporters: “Ive said that whether or not Kevin McCarthy faces a motion to vacate is entirely within his control because all he had to do was comply with the agreement that he made with us in January. And putting this bill on the floor and passing it for Democrats would be such an obvious, blatant and clear violation of that, we would have to deal with it.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Uanw8p">
But not all of the skeptics of continuing resolutions in the conference were ready to strip McCarthy of the Speakers gavel.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tyitq0">
Rep Troy Nehls (R-TX), who was one of the 21 Republicans who voted against McCarthy on Friday, expressed sympathy for the Speaker. He told reporters that McCarthy had the “most impossible job in the world and the United States.”
</p>
<h3 id="LSNseZ">
So what happens now?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5ihqix">
A potential government shutdown will be averted for the next six weeks. That gives Republicans more time to try to advance the remaining appropriations bills through the House. But anything they pass will go to a Democratic controlled Senate with very different priorities and without the same attachment to the traditional appropriations process possessed by doctrinaire House conservatives.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="o3Jtb4">
But it also means McCarthy will have to thread the same needle then. The tension that he will face is he will continue to be able to both keep the government open and remain Speaker. One longtime conservative critic, Bob Good of Virginia, expressed fundamental dissatisfaction with McCarthys leadership on Saturday morning to reporters. As he described the Speakers approach “the bus is going 100 miles off the cliff with the Democrats, lets slow it down to 95 and we get to drive the bus off the cliff.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nLJAdm">
Speaking to <em>Vox</em> earlier this week, Liam Donovan, a longtime Republican operative and Washington lobbyist, thought that the goal of Republican dissidents was to force a showdown and have McCarthy face a reckoning within his conference. After all, regardless of whether it happened without a shutdown or with one, McCarthys exit strategy was always to work with Democrats to pass legislation that would fund the government. It was simply a question of which parliamentary approach that he would take and what the collateral damage would be. As of late Saturday night, the showdown had happened and the government would remain open. But, at least for a day, the reckoning would wait.
</p>
<h3 id="eXkK9o">
What happens next on additional funding for Ukraine?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WKEElv">
There are still a number of other possibilities for Congress to provide additional funding to Ukraine, including through a supplemental appropriations request as well as attaching it to future must pass legislation including the next resolution to fund the government.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wK0TpH">
But this bill marks a key demarcation in the political debate over Ukraine on Capitol Hill. Coming only days after, for the first time, a majority of Republicans voted for an amendment to strip funding for Ukraine, its a clear indication that there is a growing sentiment on the right against further US aid to the Eastern European country. While McCarthy was willing to punt on almost every other issue in order to avoid a government shutdown, he still didnt include additional funding for Ukraine in the continuing legislation.
</p>
<h3 id="ZfYz8i">
Wait, but why am I hearing about a fire alarm?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jXn683">
While there were rhetorical fireworks among Republicans on Saturday, there was a literal fire alarm pulled by a Democrat. Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulled an alarm in a House office building on Saturday. In a statement, a spokesman for the Democrat said: “Congressman Bowman did not realize he would trigger a building alarm as he was rushing to make an urgent vote. The Congressman regrets any confusion.” He later told reporters: “I thought the alarm would open the door.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2bljbj">
However, Republicans suggested that Bowman may have done so intentionally. The alarm was pulled at a time when Democrats were trying to delay a House vote in order to read the legislation introduced by Republicans and ensure they found it acceptable.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3L9XTx">
Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) was already preparing legislation to expel the New York Democrat. Such a proposal would require a 2/3rds vote which would require significant Democratic support. Other possibilities for discipline, including a formal reprimand or censure, would only require simple majorities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GOj0Ha">
McCarthy condemned Bowman. “This should not go without punishment,” he said. The Speaker added that he expected the House Ethics Committee to investigate and that he planned to speak with Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York about Bowmans behavior.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1SeWJz">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="akqtz4">
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hangzhou Asian Games athletics | Sable becomes first Indian to win 3,000m steeplechase gold, Toor defends shot put title</strong> - The 29-year-old national record holder thus earned India its first gold medal in athletics at the ongoing Games</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hangzhou Asian Games boxing | Parveen seals Olympic berth; Nikhat settles for bronze</strong> - Nikhat Zareen (50kg), Preeti Pawar (54kg), Lovlina Borgohain (75kg ) and Narender Berwal (+92kg) have already secured Olympic quotas</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hangzhou Asian Games | Indian shooters return with best ever haul of 22 medals</strong> - Indian mens trap shooting team won a gold and womens team clinched a silver and Kynan Chenai finished the day with bronze</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hangzhou Asian Games | Aditi Ashok slips on final day, signs off with silver in womens golf</strong> - Aditi saw the advantage evaporate as she stumbled upon four bogeys and a double bogey against a lone birdie to slip to the second position</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Morning Digest | Afghanistan Embassy in India to cease operation from today; Threat of government shutdown ends as Congress passes a temporary funding plan and sends it to Biden</strong> - Here is a select list of stories to start the day</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Tamil Nadu Governor takes part in beach cleaning activity</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Police conduct surprise checks at lodges, dhabas in Anantapur of Andhra Pradesh</strong> - Lodge and dhaba owners told to install CCTV cameras on their premises without fail</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sidhu bats for INDIA bloc amid Punjab Congresss opposition to allying with AAP</strong> - “The I.N.D.I.A alliance stands like a tall mountain,” he tweeted.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>AFSPA extended in four districts of Assam, withdrawn from four others</strong> - The AFSPA has been withdrawn from Jorhat, Golaghat, Karbi Anglong and Dima Hasao with effect from October 1, said DGP Gyanendra Pratap Singh</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Interview with ISRO Chairman Somanath on Chandrayaan-3, Aditya-L1, and more</strong> - An interview with Dr. Somanath about the Chandrayaan-3 mission, the Aditya-L1 mission, and Indias plans to explore space.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Spain: Nightclub fire kills 11 in Murcia</strong> - Four others are injured in the blaze at the Teatre club in Murcia, authorities say.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Turkey: Two officers injured in blast outside interior ministry</strong> - The interior minister says two people in a commercial vehicle were involved, one blew himself up.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Slovakia elections: Populist party wins vote but needs allies for coalition</strong> - Former PM Robert Fico, who opposes military support for Ukraine, will try to form a government.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Russia police crisis: Burned out, disappointed and demoralised</strong> - Russias police force is in crisis, with officers are quitting to become taxi-drivers and couriers.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Nagorno-Karabakh: Armenia says 100,000 refugees flee region</strong> - Almost the entire ethnic Armenian population has fled the region since Azerbaijan seized it last week.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A revelation about trees is messing with climate calculations</strong> - Scientists are learning more about “sesquiterpenes” vapors made from trees. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1972385">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Archaeologists discover ancient sandals buried in a bat cave 6000 years ago</strong> - Some basketry from same site is even older, dating back 9,500 years to Mesolithic period. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1972204">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Critical vulnerabilities in Exim threaten over 250k email servers worldwide</strong> - Remote code execution requiring no authentication fixed. 2 other RCEs remain unpatched. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1972409">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>WHO says flu vaccines should ditch strain that vanished during COVID</strong> - Influenza viruses in the B/Yamagata lineage have not been seen since March 2020. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1972394">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google wanted to hide</strong> - Google exec said users get hooked on search engine like “cigarettes or drugs.” - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1972364">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Choking Lady</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Two hillbillies walked into a local restaurant as they had decided to stop by for a bite to eat. While they dined, they talked about their moonshine operation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
All of a sudden, one woman sitting next to them (she had been eating a sandwich just right across their table) begun to cough. After one minute or so, she continued to do so. It became apparent that she was, actually in real distress.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
One of the hillbillies became concerned, looked at her and asked: “Kin ya swallar?” The woman shook her head, signaling a no. Then he asks: “Kin ya breathe?” The woman has begun to turn blue in the face, but still somehow manages to shake her head once more.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The hillbilly then walked over to the woman, lifted up her dress, yanked down her drawers, and gave her right b-utt cheek a swift lick with his tongue.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The woman became very shocked, so much so that she has a violent spasm, which caused her food obstruction to fly out of her mouth and out of her gullet. As she tries to breathe slowly and normally, the hillbilly walks away and back to his table.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
His friend then told him: “Ya know, Id heard of that there Hind Lick Maneuver but I never seed anybody done it.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/pash5050"> /u/pash5050 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wmp40/choking_lady/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wmp40/choking_lady/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sad news. I broke up with my girlfriend Lorraine because I was seeing another girl named Claire Lee…</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
But the good news is that I can see Claire Lee now Lorraine has gone
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/hellarios852"> /u/hellarios852 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wjhaj/sad_news_i_broke_up_with_my_girlfriend_lorraine/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wjhaj/sad_news_i_broke_up_with_my_girlfriend_lorraine/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Joke from Tony Soprano</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Two bulls are grazing on the mountain: an old one and a young one, and under the mountain there is a herd of cows. The old bull is peacefully nibbling the grass, but the young bull has no time for this, he keeps admiring the cows. And so he walked, walked, came up to the old bull and said:<br/> - Listen, stop eating! Lets quickly go down and fuck that red-haired chick over there!<br/> “No,” the old man answers and continues to chew. The young man walks around again, looks out, again turns to the old one:<br/> - Okay, if you dont want the red-haired one, lets quickly go down and fuck that little black one over there!<br/> “No,” the old man continues to chew. The young man is nervous again:<br/> - Damn, lets quickly go down and fuck that little white over there!<br/> - No! We will go down slowly, slowly and fuck the whole herd…
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/GirlBestYouKnow"> /u/GirlBestYouKnow </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wy1j3/joke_from_tony_soprano/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wy1j3/joke_from_tony_soprano/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Two day ago, my wife watched a romance movie.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
That night, we had a romantic dinner.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Yesterday, she watched an erotic movie, and last night was fantastic.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Today, Im deleting all the horror movie channels.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/MudakMudakov"> /u/MudakMudakov </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wma3n/two_day_ago_my_wife_watched_a_romance_movie/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wma3n/two_day_ago_my_wife_watched_a_romance_movie/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The animal brothel</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A little mouse, after a tiring week of work, decides to visit an animal brothel for some entertainment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The fox madam, upon seeing him arrive, offers, If youd like, theres Sarah the pythoness, a new arrival.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The mouse accepts and goes to Sarahs room. As soon as she sees him enter, the pythoness mistakes him for dinner and swallows him whole.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
After a while, the madam comes to inform the mouse that his time is up, and not finding him, she senses the situation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Sarah, spit him out immediately, hes a paying customer! The snake spits out the mouse, who, once free, exclaims
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Oh my God! Best blowjob of my life!
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/SirOleopanza"> /u/SirOleopanza </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wxmd5/the_animal_brothel/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/16wxmd5/the_animal_brothel/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>