Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/31 May, 2023.html

433 lines
60 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2023-05-31 13:48:07 +01:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>31 May, 2023</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Rise of Latino White Supremacy</strong> - At a time of rising racial violence, Latinos are potential perpetrators and potential victims. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-rise-of-latino-white-supremacy">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>E. Jean Carroll Discusses Trumps Comeuppance</strong> - Since losing a civil case to the journalist, who accused him of sexual abuse and defamation, Trump has doubled down on his attacks. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/e-jean-carroll-discusses-trumps-comeuppance">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>More Latino Americans Are Losing Their Religion</strong> - And, according to a new study, even those who arent are defying convention and stereotypes. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/more-latino-americans-are-losing-their-religion">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Turkish Elections Swung from Hope to Despair</strong> - The corrupt state that President Erdoğan built essentially guaranteed his reëlection. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/the-turkish-elections-swung-from-hope-to-despair">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Debt-Ceiling Deal Could Be a Lot Worse</strong> - If House Republicans were trying to create a draconian new fiscal framework that would dominate American politics for the next decade, they failed to achieve their goal. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-debt-ceiling-deal-could-be-a-lot-worse">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>Is Apples weird headset the future?</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="A drawing of a pair of goggle bearing an Apple logo." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/r6MWuemugyMX6UW50pBEupjqdUo=/160x0:1600x1080/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72327001/AppleARset_Vox.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Paige Vickers / Vox
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Apples new goggles arent for normals. Not yet, anyway. So why does Apple want to show them off?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cRWDzs">
Every big, new <a href="https://www.vox.com/apple">Apple</a> Product Launch follows a template, one the company pioneered and perfected with the iPhone and then the iPad.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XCItQC">
First,<strong> </strong>long-running rumors and speculation about a mystery device — a version of existing products made by competitors but presumably much better because Apple is making it — percolate among the Apple-obsessed tech set. Then a somewhat clearer picture emerges, courtesy of reporting by mainstream media outlets. The hype crests as Apple unveils The Product at A Big Deal launch event, and then customers flock to buy The Product by the millions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="g5gfvJ">
And thats kind of whats happening with the new “mixed-reality” headset the tech world expects Apple to unveil at its developer conference on June 5, in what would arguably be its most ambitious launch since the iPad in 2010. There has been reporting for years about Apples efforts to make the devices, and now outlets like the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/26/technology/apple-augmented-reality-dissent.html">New York Times</a> and <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-05-18/apple-s-mixed-reality-headset-may-define-tim-cook-s-legacy?sref=qYiz2hd0#xj4y7vzkg">Bloomberg</a> have given us a pretty good idea of what to expect.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmXQzG">
But this one feels different<strong>. </strong>The coming headset reveal seems deflated and muddled, without anything like the anticipation that accompanied earlier products. There are also real questions about whether anyone will want to buy what Apple is reportedly selling: an ungainly piece of equipment that will cost around $3,000, make the wearer look extremely uncool, and with<strong> </strong>a utility that is completely theoretical.
</p>
<aside id="KGkP1Y">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uMHCIA">
Its a weird place for Apple to be: It has put billions of dollars into this tech (its competitors are doing the same) in the hope that this will be a platform on the level of<strong> </strong>the next smartphone and that Apples headset will be the equivalent of the iPhone. But even headset boosters dont think the device Apple will likely show off in June will be anything like the iPhone former CEO Steve Jobs unveiled in 2007.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uEcyRO">
In the best-case scenario, its an early version of tech that hints at the promise to come, when we get a better, cheaper, lighter version … someday down the road.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MHmmOQ">
So on the one hand, Apple is set to unveil a device that could say a lot about its future and the future of consumer tech. But its also a bit of a daydream, which will make it very hard to determine whether its a hit or a dud. And in the meantime, Apple will very much remain the company that sells iPhones, which is a <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/03/07/apples-iphone-dominated-2022-smartphone-sales">very good business to be in</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xKqFzN">
Okay. So what, exactly, should we expect from Apples headset? And, more importantly, what does Apple expect us to do once the company announces it?
</p>
<h3 id="PgaJkK">
What is Apples new headset actually going to do?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="h7C62y">
In private meetings this spring, Apple has been showing off the headset. The device looks familiar, since it resembles and functions the way earlier headsets created by rivals like <a href="https://www.vox.com/meta">Meta</a> and <a href="https://www.vox.com/microsoft">Microsoft</a> do. Its also novel because it will do things other headsets dont, for better and worse.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gbduTJ">
While Apple CEO <a href="https://www.vox.com/tim-cook">Tim Cook</a> has previously <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/apple-ceo-tim-cook-thinks-151949215.html">hinted</a> about creating a computerized version of glasses — lightweight and unobtrusive things that look like real-world objects many people already wear — the new Apple headset is not it. Its a relatively bulky thing that straps onto your face and requires so much power that users will have to wear a battery pack on their waist or in their pocket.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Juzfp0">
The headset is supposed to have two different functions. One is a virtual reality mode, where users see a complete digital landscape — similar to the VR Oculus devices Meta has been making for years. There other is a so-called mixed reality mode — although theres speculation Apple may use the term “extended reality” when it talks about this — where users can see the real world through the headset, but also see and even interact with digital objects projected onto the real world. Thats an idea that headset startup Magic Leap promised, when it showed off <a href="https://world.magicleap.com/en-us/details/magicleap.icon.whale">a video of a whale rising out of a school gym</a> nearly a decade ago, but never really delivered.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/jt4Tx2PzEE8CweuYvZLQyDOitmo=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24691545/whale.png"/> <cite>Magic Leap</cite>
<figcaption>
An image from marketing material headset-maker Magic Leap used to tease its technology.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Pft0Sm">
Apple is likely to add two tweaks it thinks will distinguish its headsets from the pack.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2eolXX">
The first is a “copresence” feature, which Ive heard described in a couple different ways. In one, someone wearing a headset can share video of the thing theyre looking at with another person wearing a headset, and they can both experience the same thing at the same time. Say, youre walking on the beach, and you want someone whos across the country to virtually join you while you walk. The other version is closer to something weve seen before: You put on a headset and talk to a computer-generated avatar of another person appearing in your field of view.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gSH5y8">
And perhaps most confusingly, Apple is supposedly going to place exterior screens on the front of headsets, so people who arent wearing the headset can see a video display of the eyes of the person wearing the headset. Does that sound like a straight-up nightmare to you? Me too. But people whove heard Apples pitch say the company thinks it will make the device more social and less dystopian than the zombie-with-computer-on-face image that <a href="https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10102665126861201">Mark Zuckerberg proudly showed off in 2016</a> as part of a marketing push for his Oculus headsets.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/91h3Ru038HGA3TZOvfD9vimxDA4=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24691555/zombies_.jpeg"/> <cite>Facebook</cite>
<figcaption>
Mark Zuckerberg at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, 2016.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SOXUHz">
What will you actually do with these things once theyre on your face? Good question. <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-18/apple-vr-ar-headset-apps-sports-tv-fitness-gaming-wellness-ipad-features?sref=qYiz2hd0">Mark Gurmans reporting</a> for Bloomberg has suggested that Apple intends to port lots of its existing iOS apps to the new device — but the likes of a calculator app certainly wont convince anyone to use it, let alone buy it. Last year, the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/04/business/apple-virtual-reality-headset.html">New York Times</a> reported that Jon Favreau, the director behind <em>Elf</em> and <em>Iron Man</em>, as well as the creator of the <a href="https://www.vox.com/star-wars">Star Wars</a> series <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/21534638/the-mandalorian-disney-plus-explained-do-i-need-to-watch-star-wars-baby-yoda"><em>The Mandalorian</em></a> on <a href="https://www.vox.com/disney">Disney</a>+, was going to make content for the device. Ive also heard, but havent confirmed, that Disney itself will be making stuff for the headset; a Disney rep declined to comment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nRr2aQ">
All of which suggests that Apple is being quite literal about announcing the new device at its <em>developers</em> conference: Its hoping that once it shows this thing off to the world, other people will think up fun or at least useful things to do with it, and build up apps to make that happen. That<strong> </strong>will make the headsets more popular, which will then encourage more developers to build cool apps, which will make them more popular. Repeat.
</p>
<h3 id="Ih5oGJ">
But … why?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XB4Kbz">
This is where things get very strained if youre trying to imagine Apple creating another dent-in-the-universe product like the iPhone — or even just a thing that many people buy, like the iPad, and later on the Apple Watch (<a href="https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2021/2/11/apple-watch-is-now-worn-on-100-million-wrists">more than 100 million sold</a>) and AirPods (<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-09-22/apple-airpods-sales-bode-well-for-vr-headset?sref=qYiz2hd0">hundreds of millions sold</a>).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fvhgfe">
Thats because, despite the collective efforts of <a href="https://www.vox.com/google">Google</a>, Meta, Microsoft, and other tech companies, no one has been able to convince very large numbers of people that virtual reality headsets or augmented headsets or any kind of headsets are things they want to use. Thats different, by the way, from selling headsets; they have been able to do that over the years. Tech research shop CCS insights predicts that <a href="https://www.ccsinsight.com/company-news/extended-reality-pace-slowed-by-economic-woes/">consumers will buy 11 million headsets in 2023 alone</a> — a tally it describes as a “slow year.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Y7l27D">
But they have never really taken off beyond a gaming novelty or an industrial tool <a href="https://mixed-news.com/en/ups-relies-on-vr-training-for-more-safety-on-the-road/">some workers are obliged to use</a>. You can see the disappointment in the behavior of the companies that launched them. Google, which kicked off <a href="https://www.vox.com/big-tech">Big Tech</a>s augmented and virtual reality phase with its Glass device in 2012, eventually conceded that they were too weird for normals to wear and tried turning them into devices for industrial use; it is <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/15/google-discontinues-google-glass-enterprise-end-to-early-ar-project.html">formally pulling the plug on the gadgets this fall</a>. Microsoft launched its HoloLens <a href="https://www.vox.com/augmented-reality">AR</a> headset in 2016 but never broke through; the company has recently been reduced to <a href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/mixed-reality-blog/microsoft-committed-to-hololens-2-and-mixed-reality/ba-p/3732405">issuing blog posts insisting that it still cares about the device</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dLpBYq">
Meta, meanwhile, has <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/03/metas-reality-labs-lost-13-7-billion-on-vr-and-ar-last-year/">poured billions</a> into goggles of all kinds and insists it will do so for years to come. But earlier this year, a Meta executive conceded that consumers dont love the devices Meta is selling them: “<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/28/23619730/meta-vr-oculus-ar-glasses-smartwatch-plans">We need to be better at growth and retention and resurrection</a>,” Mark Rabkin, the companys vice president for VR, said in February.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ByXgRJ">
So how is Tim Cook going to convince consumers that this time is different? Its going to be tough. For starters, while Cook has been a highly successful CEO — under his tenure, Apples <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/24/tim-cook-10-years-at-apple-in-charts.html">stock has soared</a>, and the company is once again <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL/key-statistics/">approaching $3 trillion in total value</a> — he is not a charismatic salesman in the Steve Jobs mode.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="63g03m">
And even Steve Jobs would struggle to sell the benefits of AR or VR goggles. Thats because, by their very nature, you can only see what they do when you wear them yourself. And if you stand on a stage telling people how great they are, youll just look like someone onstage with a computer strapped to your face.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9GCzjx">
“I call it the TV on the radio problem,” says Magic Leap founder Rony Abovitz: Its hard to describe a “television” to an audience that has never seen one and is listening to you talk about it on the radio. Abovitz thinks Apple will solve this by sending devices out for hands-on demonstrations at its hundreds of retail stores.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cWZYtr">
Meanwhile, Cook, who initially dismissed the idea of goggles in favor of glasses, now says he was wrong, and that, theoretically<em>, </em>goggles could be awesome. Heres his test run for his pitch, which he floated to <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/tim-cook-global-creativity-awards-cover-2023">GQ magazine</a> earlier this year:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jgMEON">
It could empower people to achieve things they couldnt achieve before. We might be able to collaborate on something much easier if we were sitting here brainstorming about it and all of a sudden we could pull up something digitally and both see it and begin to collaborate on it and create with it. And so its the idea that there is this environment that may be even better than just the real world—to overlay the virtual world on top of it might be an even better world. And so this is exciting. If it could accelerate creativity, if it could just help you do things that you do all day long and you didnt really think about doing them in a different way.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9ZtXqu">
I mean, maybe? Im in favor of collaboration. But Ive spent three years being forced to collaborate with people using technology, and my strong preference right now is to collaborate with them in person whenever I can. And when I do have to call or Zoom or Google Meet with people, I already<strong> </strong>have tech that lets me do it. Like a phone, or a computer.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="s2wyzm">
Asking me to wear a device to do it better — and asking someone else to do the same — means that it has to be way, way better than what we have now.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OISRYE">
And maybe Apples headsets will be way, way better at this. (At various points, people who worked at Meta have tried to tell me that the companys devices are actually pretty good for collaboration, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsztO5eLg5k">just like their boss says they are</a>. But their hearts have <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/6/23391895/meta-facebook-horizon-worlds-vr-social-network-too-buggy-leaked-memo">never seemed into it.</a>)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OCGuAG">
Reports suggest that <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/26/technology/apple-augmented-reality-dissent.html">even Apple executives arent fully on board for this launch</a> — and thats not anything weve ever heard before as Apple prepares one of these things. (To be fair, that could also indicate that Apple in 2023 is a different company than it used to be, where very little of the companys inner workings ever showed up in print — to say nothing of dissent.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iUEPvB">
The most logical argument is that Apple doesnt really think it will sell tens of millions of these things, in this form, at $3,000 a pop. Rather, it thinks the initial buyers will be developers, hobbyists, and Apple super fans. And Apple believes it will learn a lot about the devices potential once theyre out in the wild, with real people testing them and providing feedback. And that years down the road, when costs come down and the tech improves and there are multiple killer apps for this stuff, Apples headset will take off.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FetTew">
Industry experts say Apple may have no choice but to put out AR/VR tech thats not completely refined because it needs to see how the things perform in the real world and to see how developers and consumers react to them.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="O5vjwf">
“Theres nothing to replace being in the field, being in the dirt, just grinding it out,” says Abovitz. “I think theyve been on the sidelines way too long. At some point, you have to go into the wild.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qvJ3CK">
That is decidedly not how Apple has done things in the past: Normally, Apple announces a product, then tells you you can buy it very soon, and sales go up and to the right.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6qCaC3">
Apple boosters will note that the original iPhone wasnt a gangbusters hit from the get-go: It took a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/07/technology/07apple.html">price cut</a> and the eventual introduction of the App Store to really get things going. The Apple Watch also took a while to find its footing: Apple initially positioned it as a fashion item, but most people ended up using it as a high-tech pedometer, so now Apple markets it as a “fitness” product.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FBHOxC">
But the phone, the watch, the earbuds — and going very far back, the iPod — these were all things that had real-world analogs and real-world use cases, and didnt require people to make word salad to pitch them. Maybe the goggles simply require a different timetable before theyre really, truly ready, and Apple is starting now because it has to eventually. But Id feel more confident about the prospects for this tech at show time if I thought the show was ready.
</p></li>
<li><strong>Whats in the debt ceiling deal, and why it matters, explained</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Kevin McCarthy surrounded by reporters" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/MXRoj545wSgDklQ_k2pbY2Yk790=/454x0:7739x5464/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72325470/1258295128.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy speaks to members of the media at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2023. Republican and Democratic leaders scrambled on May 29 to secure congressional support for a bill aimed at avoiding a US debt default. | Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
How the legislation to avert an economic crisis would affect student loans, food aid, the IRS, and more.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="meuEO2">
House Republicans took the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2023/5/9/23715753/debt-ceiling-limit-default-deal-crisis">debt ceiling</a> hostage — but now Speaker Kevin McCarthy has agreed to set the hostage free for a relatively small ransom payment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pUAwIk">
The deal struck by negotiators for <a href="https://www.vox.com/joe-biden">President Biden</a> and McCarthy on Saturday night is no major overhaul of American public policy. The White House managed to avert sweeping cuts to domestic spending, which will instead effectively be held at something close to the status quo (though a cut when accounting for inflation). And on a set of other policy issues where Republicans <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/4/19/23690167/debt-ceiling-bill-house-republicans">made big demands</a>, Democrats granted only some limited concessions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UN3iiG">
The deal certainly includes some policy changes progressives do not like — theyd prefer domestic spending not be cut at all, and they dislike new work requirements for food stamp beneficiaries ages 50 to 54, among other things.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mchc2Z">
But if you keep in mind that Democrats and Republicans were always going to have to negotiate over spending levels at some point this year (to avert a government shutdown this fall), its not clear that Republicans use of the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip even got them anything they wouldnt have won later anyway.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vnBDRg">
Rather than an extremist GOPs attempt to force Democrats into unthinkable concessions or else trigger an economic crisis, the outcome here looks a whole lot like an ordinary congressional deal reached with the help of an imminent deadline.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="st26EY">
Can such a deal pass the GOP-controlled House? There has been <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/29/mccarthy-debt-deal-biden-00099175">some grumbling from the right</a>, though few are talking about <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2023/05/30/why-mccarthys-gavel-is-safe-for-now-00099203">an outright revolt</a> against McCarthy. The bill could face a challenge in getting to the House floor because of the House Rules Committee, where McCarthy <a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/01/24/house-rules-committee-roy-normal-massie">granted some seats</a> to the far right.<strong> </strong>But there are <a href="https://twitter.com/ringwiss/status/1663494400167624704">ways around that</a>, and if the bill does make it to the House floor, it will likely pass with a combination of Democratic and Republican votes, and Senate passage is a sure thing.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="domCGk">
If House Republicans can get to yes, it will signify a shift in the party compared to the last major debt ceiling showdown in 2011. Back then, the GOP majority brought to power in the Tea Party wave sought extreme spending cuts, including big changes to Medicare and Social Security. That GOP conference also proved chaotic and nearly ungovernable by its leaders.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gxvXTs">
Yet true-believing anti-spending ideologues have seen their influence dwindle in the Trump and post-Trump eras. GOP leaders decided early on not to demand any Medicare and Social Security cuts in these talks, and the eventual deal leaves Medicaid untouched, too.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vXDKNS">
Most in the party would still like to be <em>seen</em> as spending cutters, but in practice the energy is around culture war fights. That made the current deal — which uses various gimmicks and accounting tricks that will let Republicans claim they made substantial cuts to domestic spending, while letting Democrats avert many of the actual consequences of those cuts — possible.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sWQ617">
The Biden White House, meanwhile, deflated liberal commentators and activists pleas that the president <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/1/10/23542845/joe-biden-debt-ceiling-kevin-mccarthy">use executive authority</a> in some way to effectively raise the debt ceiling on his own. Officials <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/05/08/debt-ceiling-14th-amendment-biden/">saw</a> <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/janet-yellen-dismisses-minting-1-trillion-coin-to-avoid-default-11674417541">various</a> practical, legal, and political drawbacks that made them very reluctant to go down that road. Instead — after climbing down from an initial stance that they wouldnt negotiate at all — Bidens team engaged with Republicans in hopes they could get a reasonable deal. And they think theyve succeeded.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9iRhSq">
Heres whats in the deal. —<em>Andrew Prokop</em>
</p>
<h3 id="zKGyVT">
How big are the budget cuts?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BwHuAL">
The deal negotiated by the Biden White House and House Republicans cuts some domestic programs in 2024 and limits spending growth to 1 percent in fiscal year 2025. That will still amount to a cut, after accounting for inflation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="IBDU90">
Almost two-thirds of the $6 trillion federal budget is mandatory spending on programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid that will happen without any action by <a href="https://www.vox.com/congress">Congress</a>. The rest is determined by Congress, and that is the bucket that will be affected by the debt limit deal.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="s4hQje">
The cuts are going to land disproportionately on programs that help the poor and on administration, which also affects the people who rely on government programs. Some discretionary spending — on the military and for veterans — is actually going to increase. But the rest, including funding for <a href="https://www.vox.com/child-care">child care</a>, low-income housing, the national parks, and more, will be subject to a cut for the next two years.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yjIbcM">
The exact cuts are supposed to be set by legislation that Congress will pass later this year. Should lawmakers fail to pass those spending bills, automatic spending cuts of 1 percent across the board would occur instead. (The incentive for Congress to pass the spending bills is that these automatic cuts would include the military, which all parties involved want to exempt.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OXxkW9">
<a href="https://twitter.com/LisaDNews/status/1663233962783789056">Assorted accounting tricks </a>could also reduce the actual spending cuts and hold federal spending effectively flat — though in a time of inflation, flat spending is really a cut when considering the purchasing power of each dollar.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Cz8VaX">
This might sound familiar: In 2011, an earlier debt limit crisis led to the Budget Control Act of 2011, which set spending caps for the rest of the decade. In this case, the spending limits apply only for two years.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JUHYsL">
And while this cut is shallower than the automatic cuts of the last decade, it applies to programs that already have been feeling the squeeze: According to <a href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/congress-should-reject-proposals-to-cut-non-defense-program-funding">the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities</a>, spending for discretionary domestic programs (excluding veterans <a href="https://www.vox.com/health-care">health care</a>) is 10 percent below 2010 levels when adjusted for inflation and increases in the US population.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0SNDUs">
The long-running neglect has led to <a href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/unmet-needs-and-the-squeeze-on-appropriations">shortages in the services they provide</a>. Child care assistance has fallen for the better part of two decades. The primary grant program served 373,000 more children in 2006, even though now there are an additional 1 million American children living <a href="https://www.vox.com/poverty">in poverty</a>. Likewise, 3 out of 4 US families that should be eligible for federal housing assistance dont actually receive any aid because there is no funding available. Cuts to the Social Security Administration have been going on for years, while wait times for assistance have been increasing. Investments in water infrastructure have been stagnant, even after clean water crises in Flint, Michigan, and Jackson, Mississippi.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GW6sF6">
Cuts were inevitable — even to <a href="https://www.vox.com/social-programs">social programs</a> that were already underfunded — once Republicans took control of the House and therefore the appropriations process. The question was always how much of the major programs Democrats could protect given Republican threats to hold the debt ceiling hostage. <em>—Dylan Scott</em>
</p>
<h3 id="mfCXqm">
What are the new work requirements, and what are they likely to do?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TdrNo9">
The debt ceiling deal includes increased work requirements for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP, commonly known as food stamps) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF, or cash welfare), both of which already include substantial work requirements.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Z2qyKl">
One thing notably missing? Work requirements for Medicaid, which had been a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy/2023/5/12/23712447/medicaid-work-requirements-us-debt-ceiling">key demand of House Republicans</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2IhyFl">
<a href="https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/work-requirements">SNAP</a> has a set of general work requirements, and a narrower set of requirements for nondisabled adults without dependents. The changes in the new deal concern the latter. Currently, childless adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have a physical or mental condition affecting their ability to work are generally required to work or volunteer for 80 hours a month. If they fail to, they face a time limit: They can only receive SNAP benefits for a maximum of three months over a three-year period. The debt ceiling deal <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/29/us/politics/debt-limit-deal-food-stamps.html">expands the age range</a> for these rules to apply to 50- to 54-year-olds.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8oN8XU">
While that change may not seem significant, it could have a <a href="https://donmoynihan.substack.com/p/new-snap-work-requirements-are-a">major impact on people applying for disability support</a> unable to work. People get sicker in their 50s, and <a href="https://izajolp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2193-9004-3-1#Tab4">SNAP has historically been a major source of support</a> for applicants during the long process of applying for disability benefits.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="08PcNi">
Possibly offsetting these changes are new exemptions from work requirements for houseless people, veterans, and former foster children. A <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/30/politics/whats-in-the-debt-ceiling-deal">White House official told CNN</a> that because of these exemptions, the total number of people subject to work requirements will be roughly the same after the bill. Advocates for SNAP counter that many houseless people and veterans should have <a href="https://www.cbpp.org/press/statements/debt-ceiling-agreement-reflects-improvements-over-house-bill-harmful-provisions">already been exempt from work requirements under current law</a>, which is being misapplied.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bycO9m">
TANF, meanwhile, was created by the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11789988/clintons-welfare-reform">1996 welfare reform law</a>, replacing a program that offered guaranteed cash for low-income parents with a block grant giving <a href="https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL32760.pdf">$16.5 billion annually</a> to states to spend on anti-poverty programs (though in practice the money is used for <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2022/9/24/23368759/mississippi-welfare-fraud-scandal-brett-favre-reform">all manner of things</a>). Because its appropriation has never been adjusted for inflation over its 27 years of existence, the program has effectively been cut in half over time, and now <a href="https://www.cbpp.org/research/family-income-support/temporary-assistance-for-needy-families">only about 21 percent of poor families with children</a> get help from it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UPhqMH">
States getting money from TANF have to meet a work-participation standard, requiring that 50 percent of families and 90 percent of two-parent families receiving benefits are working. However, these percentages can be reduced if the state has seen its TANF caseload fall over time (or if the state reports spending more of its own funds than is required by federal law), which is known as a <a href="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12150">“caseload reduction credit.”</a> Thirty-two states have used these credits to <a href="https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ofa/wpr2021table01a.pdf">reduce the work participation percentage they have to hit on TANF to 0 percent</a>, as of fiscal year 2021.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="L41CVE">
Currently, these credits are calculated by seeing how much caseloads have fallen relative to fiscal year 2005, meaning states can get credit for nearly two decades of reductions. The debt ceiling deal <a href="https://twitter.com/meredithllee/status/1662659994414710784">changes this baseline to fiscal year 2015</a>, which is laxer than what Republicans wanted (fiscal year 2022).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aS8ozY">
While in theory this could incentivize states to push TANF recipients toward work, the last time a change like this was tried in 2005, it <a href="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12150#page=3">did not result in a higher share of recipients </a>due to states <a href="https://time.com/6282245/job-requirements-debt-ceiling/">exploiting other loopholes</a>. In other words, while the new policy undoubtedly tries to chip away at the welfare state, its actual impact may be a bit muted. <em>—Dylan Matthews</em>
</p>
<h3 id="Foe6FW">
What does the student loan provision mean for borrowers?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1685468596.727879">
Heres the bottom line: Youre probably going to need to start paying back your <a href="https://www.vox.com/student-loan-debt">student loans</a> again at the end of this summer. The pause on loan payments, and the hold on interest accruing on that debt, is set to end after August 29, with interest on loans beginning to accrue again on August 30, if the current proposal becomes law. Thats 60 days after June 30 — the same deadline that the president and the Education Department had set for repayments to begin, if the <a href="https://www.vox.com/scotus">Supreme Court</a> had not made a final decision on the Biden administrations student loan forgiveness plan by then.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Vpotg8">
The court still hasnt made a pronouncement on that <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2022/9/18/23356614/midterms-2022-student-loan-forgiveness-polls-congressional-races">plan</a>, though a decision is expected in June — and its <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/2/13/23587751/supreme-court-student-loan-debt-forgiveness-joe-biden-nebraska-department-education-brown">not likely to be positive</a> for the nearly 43 million Americans who owe some kind of student debt. Should they rule against the plan, the debt ceiling deal would prevent the president from issuing a ninth extension of the payment pause, which began in March 2020. —<em>Christian Paz</em>
</p>
<h3 id="SP6cnL">
What actually changes about energy permitting?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XzNK51">
The biggest surprise of the deal might be its approval of the 300-mile <a href="https://www.mountainvalleypipeline.info/">Mountain Valley Pipeline</a>, which will carry <a href="https://www.vox.com/fossil-fuels">natural gas</a> from West Virginia to southern Virginia.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="IAInHc">
The pipeline, held up for years by federal lawsuits, has long been a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2022/9/27/23375059/joe-manchin-permitting-reform-progressives-republicans">top priority</a> for Sen. Joe Manchin. But the pipelines role in debt ceiling talks largely flew under the radar. The deal would give a green light to outstanding permits for the pipeline and shields its construction from court intervention, to the frustration of environmentalists worried about the pipelines impact on <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/28052023/environmentalists-in-virginia-and-west-virginia-regroup-to-stop-the-mountain-valley-pipeline-eyeing-a-white-house-protest/">rural and low-income areas </a>and the 1,000 streams and wetlands along its way.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="kgUVUX">
There are a few other modest changes to permitting for energy projects in the deal, mostly affecting the bedrock 1970s-era environmental protection law, the <a href="https://ceq.doe.gov/#:~:text=President%20Nixon%20signed%20the%20National,)%2C%20and%20for%20other%20purposes.">National Environmental Policy Act</a>. It sets a one-year deadline for agencies to complete an environmental assessment, and a two-year deadline for the more thorough environmental impact statement, an expensive review requiring community input. (Progressives argue that, rather than time limits, <a href="https://prospect.org/environment/biggest-permitting-reform-would-be-more-money/">federal agencies need more staffing</a> to complete reviews quickly.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0v1EBs">
Neither Democrats nor Republicans are going to walk away from the debt ceiling compromise feeling satisfied. House Republicans didnt get a majority of their demands, such as fast-tracking fossil fuel infrastructure and repealing <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy">clean energy</a> tax credits in the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2022/8/8/23296951/inflation-reduction-act-biden-democrats-climate-change">Inflation Reduction Act</a>. Democrats didnt get any major wins in expanding transmission lines, an <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/09/manchin-permitting-reform-power-lines/671496/">important piece of infrastructure</a> for the clean energy grid. Instead, the deal agrees to a study on transmission, punting the bigger issues holding back transmission lines to another time. —<em>Rebecca Leber</em>
</p>
<h3 id="R0rRV6">
Whats up with unspent Covid aid?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4jqMS4">
Republicans have been fixated for a while on clawing back money that Congress authorized during the pandemic but that has not yet been spent. They secured a win in the debt-limit deal, with the White House agreeing to reclaim some of that funding in the name of reducing spending.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rXxd6W">
The deal exempts some of remaining Covid funding, including money set aside to fund a next generation of vaccine development as well as funding that pays for Covid vaccines and treatment for uninsured Americans. “It is really important that these were protected,” said Jennifer Kates, director of global health at KFF.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="n9kxXq">
Obviously, billions of dollars have been spent over the past three years on assistance to people and businesses, as well as funding for vaccines and other <a href="https://www.vox.com/public-health">public health</a> efforts. So whats left? There has not been a thorough public accounting for what money is left for specific projects, according to Kates. But with the pandemic winding down and important funding streams unaffected, public health experts dont sound too worried about this aspect of the deal. —<em>DS</em>
</p>
<h3 id="ydGM0m">
Are the IRS cuts symbolic or significant?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="flqzeo">
The scope of the IRS funding cuts in the debt ceiling deal was notable: Roughly $20 billion of $80 billion that Congress previously approved will be repurposed for other programs in 2024 and 2025. This will help Democrats offset some of the deals cuts to domestic spending.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="olbEKH">
White House officials have <a href="https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/irs-funding-cut-wont-hurt-near-term-tax-collection-officials-say-2023-05-28/">told Reuters</a> that the short-term impact could actually be minimal, however, since the funding for the agency was approved over 10 years. Effectively, that means that the IRS might not feel these funding cuts in the near term, and that lawmakers could put in more requests for agency funding when needed in the future.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RmgIS1">
Making these cuts, though, allows Republicans to claim a win on the issue: Theyve long targeted the IRS and argued that its resources should be clawed back. <em>—Li Zhou</em>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1685461451.268249">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3GzXlY">
</p></li>
<li><strong>What you need to know about the debt ceiling deal</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/fxmdb6uFwrXeB-eJZMtxGDLWNn4=/556x0:5000x3333/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72263229/AP23116579440513.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
A staffer with the Republican leadership holds a guide to Speaker Kevin McCarthys debt ceiling package during a news conference on April 26, 2023.  | J. Scott Applewhite/AP
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3CSODa">
The White House and congressional Republicans have reached a <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/5/28/23734460/debt-ceiling-deal-crisis-default-biden-mccarthy">deal in principle to raise the debt ceiling</a>,<strong> </strong>which caps the total amount of money that the US can borrow to fund the federal government. The tentative deal would also cap government spending for two years.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NyIxh0">
The full details of the bill have not emerged, but it defuses fears that the <a href="https://www.vox.com/money/2023/5/24/23736112/debt-ceiling-economy-default-treasury-janet-yellen-stock-market">US could default on its loans</a>,<strong> </strong>which would likely cause a massive economic crisis. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen previously warned that a default could happen as early as June 5.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5X2yzT">
A simple majority of 218 votes will be needed to pass debt ceiling legislation in the narrowly divided House, where Republicans hold a 222-person majority while Democrats control 213 seats. Some members from both parties are expected to defect, and <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/5/30/23742472/debt-ceiling-deal-agreement-biden-mccarthy-republicans-snap-student-loans">Republicans are currently divided over the bill</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="U8VcIo">
Follow here for all of Voxs coverage on the debt ceiling crisis, including <a href="https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/5/8/23709530/debt-ceiling-limit-default">what a deal might look like</a>.
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Thailand Open badminton: Kiran stuns Shi Yuqi; Saina, Ashmita too win</strong> - Ashmita will next face Rio Olympics gold-medallist and Rio Olympic gold medallist fourth seed Carolina Marin, seeded fourth, while Saina is likely to meet He Bing Jiao of China</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Dont take any step that would undermine sports: Sports Minister to protesting wrestlers</strong> - Sports Minister Anurag Thakurs remarks come a day after the countrys top wrestlers reached Har ki Pauri to immerse their medals in the river Ganga</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Indian bowlers focus on building workload ahead of WTC final against Australia</strong> - The Indian team is expected to have a few practice sessions at the Arundel Castle Cricket Club in Sussex ahead of the big final</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Wrestlers protest | Naresh Tikait announces mahapanchayat in Muzaffarnagar on June 1</strong> - BKU leader Naresh Tikait said several representatives of different khaps will be participating in the mahapanchayat to decide the next course of action in the wrestlers protest</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Olympic sports leaders meet amid uncertainty over Russians competing at 2024 Paris Games</strong> - IOC President Bach addresses 32-sport Paris program governing bodies</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Bengal finally decides to implement NEP, but drops introduction of centralised admission</strong> - The move has drawn mixed reactions from teachers — while one set questioned the delay in the announcement, the other said it was better late than never</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Trawling ban from June 10 at midnight</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ex gratia payment for families of Vandana, Renjith</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Sign language expert to interpret speeches at government functions</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Kavitha supports women wrestlers cause</strong> - Wrestlers should not be defeated: MLC</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ukraine war: The mothers going to get their children back from Russia</strong> - Russia is taking Ukrainian children. Their mothers are travelling into enemy territory to save them.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Moscow drone attack: Putin says Ukraine trying to frighten Russians</strong> - The Russian president says drone attacks on Moscow targeted civilians, as Ukraine denies direct involvement.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ukraine war: Russian air strikes target Kyiv for third night running</strong> - Ukraines air defences intercept more than 20 drones in the 17th attack on the capital this month.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Polish probe into Russian influence angers EU</strong> - Opposition MPs say the new panel probing Russia links aims to bar its leader Donald Tusk from office.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Kosovo-Serbia row leaves Nato peacekeepers under attack</strong> - The leaders of Kosovo and Serbia trade accusations after Nato soldiers are hurt in fierce clashes.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Critical Barracuda 0-day was used to backdoor networks for 8 months</strong> - Attackers then went on to steal data from infected systems. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1943076">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>mRNA technology for vaccines and more: An Ars Frontiers recap</strong> - The tech has lots of applications beyond the one weve already been injected with. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1943062">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Beating the heat: These plant-based iridescent films stay cool in the sun</strong> - Cellulose is sustainable, biocompatible, and ideal for radiative cooling applications. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1927235">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>What to expect at WWDC 2023: Reality Pro, iOS 17, and new MacBooks</strong> - Apple is set to announce its first new major platform in years. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1942968">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Arm announces the Cortex X4 for 2024, plus a 14-core M2-fighter</strong> - Will anyone build Arms 14-core mega chip? Will Arm have to do it itself? - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1942885">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>My friend said she couldnt afford to pay her huge water bill</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
So I sent her a “get well soon” card.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ElderCunningham"> /u/ElderCunningham </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13w8a0y/my_friend_said_she_couldnt_afford_to_pay_her_huge/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13w8a0y/my_friend_said_she_couldnt_afford_to_pay_her_huge/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Three friends were bragging about who has the most sex. The first guy starts, “Yall aint got nothing on me! I can go to any bar and bring home a new woman every night! Not only that, but I drive a corvette and have an 8 inch penis! Ive slept with more than 1,000 women!”</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Second guy fires back, “Oh yeah? Well Im a top gynecologist at the highest rated hospital in the world. I make $800,000 a year, have patients and nurses who have sex with me every hour Im at work. All the women compliment me on my 12 inch penis and Ive slept with well over 5,000 women.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Last guy chuckles, “I have you all beat. I fucked over all the Redditors who were expecting a punchline to this joke.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/OffendedDishwasher"> /u/OffendedDishwasher </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13w1kby/three_friends_were_bragging_about_who_has_the/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13w1kby/three_friends_were_bragging_about_who_has_the/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>My father believed that men learn by just doing things and figuring it out so when I was 3 my dad threw me into the ocean.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
To teach himself CPR.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/tkdart19"> /u/tkdart19 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13wg8h4/my_father_believed_that_men_learn_by_just_doing/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13wg8h4/my_father_believed_that_men_learn_by_just_doing/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Why did the Grim Reaper schedule an appointment with his eye doctor?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He was having issues with his death perception.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/vishuskitty"> /u/vishuskitty </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13whh7c/why_did_the_grim_reaper_schedule_an_appointment/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13whh7c/why_did_the_grim_reaper_schedule_an_appointment/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>I was fired from the keyboard factory.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
They said I wasnt putting in enough shifts.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/sureshot9999"> /u/sureshot9999 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13vux55/i_was_fired_from_the_keyboard_factory/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/13vux55/i_was_fired_from_the_keyboard_factory/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>