193 lines
49 KiB
HTML
193 lines
49 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
|
||
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
|
||
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
|
||
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
|
||
<title>11 April, 2022</title>
|
||
<style type="text/css">
|
||
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
|
||
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
|
||
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
|
||
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
|
||
</style>
|
||
<title>Covid-19 Sentry</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
|
||
<body>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="covid-19-sentry">Covid-19 Sentry</h1>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li><a href="#from-preprints">From Preprints</a></li>
|
||
<li><a href="#from-clinical-trials">From Clinical Trials</a></li>
|
||
<li><a href="#from-pubmed">From PubMed</a></li>
|
||
<li><a href="#from-patent-search">From Patent Search</a></li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-preprints">From Preprints</h1>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li><strong>What prevents the adoption of regenerative agriculture and what can we do about it? Lessons from a behaviorally- attuned Participatory Modelling exercise in Australia</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
Regenerative agricultural methods (RegenAg) can help farmers attune their agricultural practices to the natural design of earth’s cycles and support systems. Their adoption hinges not only on a good understanding of biophysical processes but perhaps more importantly on farmers’ values and beliefs, which can become an obstacle for triggering widespread transitions towards synergistic relationships with the land. We conducted a Participatory Modelling exercise with RegenAg stakeholders in Australia—the aim was to provide a blueprint of how challenges and opportunities could be explored in alignment with stakeholders’ personal views and perspectives. A participatory Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping exercise was undertaken to unpack stakeholder perspectives into a formal representation or ‘mental model’ of the barriers and enablers for adoption of RegenAg practices, and to subsequently identify actions that might close the gap between the two. To promote a better understanding and internalization of the outcomes of the engagement, we extracted the dominant narratives which encode the key drivers and pain points in the system. The process relied on a suite of innovative virtual delivery methods that were designed to conduct the stakeholder engagement under COVID-19 lockdown restrictions. For the first time, our Participatory Modelling exercise reveals the key drivers of RegenAg in Australia, highlighting the complex forces at work and the need for coordinated actions at the institutional, social, and individual levels, across long timescales (decades). Such actions are necessary for RegenAg to play a greater role in national economies, to bring balancing relationships to systems currently reliant on conventional agriculture with few internal incentives to change. Our methods and findings are relevant not only for those seeking to promote adoption of RegenAg in Australia, but more broadly for governments and agriculturalists seeking to take a behaviorally-attuned stance to engage with farmers on issues of sustainable and resilient agriculture.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://osf.io/asxr2/" target="_blank">What prevents the adoption of regenerative agriculture and what can we do about it? Lessons from a behaviorally-attuned Participatory Modelling exercise in Australia</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Measuring the Learning Outcomes of Study Abroad Using Natural Experiment Data under the Influences of the COVID-19</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
This study used the covid-19 determination of participation or non-participation in study abroad to estimate the effect of study abroad.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/zxh7b/" target="_blank">Measuring the Learning Outcomes of Study Abroad Using Natural Experiment Data under the Influences of the COVID-19</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 immune response in naive and prior infected persons</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
The highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant has replaced previous variants and is less susceptible to neutralizing antibodies elicited by vaccination or infection. Currently, BA.2 is the dominant omicron sublineage. Vaccinated individuals with BA.1 infection develop measurable neutralizing antibody titers against BA.1 and BA.2. The ability of BA.2 infection to induce neutralizing antibodies in unvaccinated individuals, either without or with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, is pending definition.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.07.22273565v1" target="_blank">Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 immune response in naive and prior infected persons</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Doses against Omicron and Delta-Related Outpatient Illness among Adults, October 2021 – February 2022</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Background: We estimated SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron-specific effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses in adults against symptomatic illness in US outpatient settings. Methods: Between October 1, 2021, and February 12, 2022, research staff consented and enrolled eligible participants who had fever, cough, or loss of taste or smell and sought outpatient medical care or clinical SARS-CoV-2 testing within 10 days of illness onset. Using the test- negative design, we compared the odds of receiving 2 or 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses among SARS-CoV-2 cases versus controls using logistic regression. Regression models were adjusted for study site, age, onset week, and prior SARS- CoV-2 infection. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as (1-adjusted odds ratio) x 100%. Results: Among 3847 participants included for analysis, 574 (32%) of 1775 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta predominant period and 1006 (56%) of 1794 participants tested positive during the Omicron predominant period. When Delta predominated, VE against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings was 63% (95% CI: 51% to 72%) among mRNA 2-dose recipients and 96% (95% CI: 93% to 98%) for 3-dose recipients. When Omicron predominated, VE was 21% (95% CI: -6% to 41%) among 2-dose recipients and 62% (95% CI: 48% to 72%) among 3-dose recipients. Conclusions: In this adult population, 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses provided substantial protection against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings when the Omicron variant became the predominant cause of COVID-19 in the U.S. These findings support the recommendation for a 3rd mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.06.22273535v1" target="_blank">Effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Doses against Omicron and Delta-Related Outpatient Illness among Adults, October 2021 – February 2022</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on systemic immune responses in people living with HIV</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and an ongoing global pandemic. Despite the development of vaccines, which protect healthy people from severe and life- threatening COVID-19, the immunological responses of people with secondary immunodeficiencies to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are currently not well understood. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), causing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), targets CD4+ T helper (Th) cells that orchestrate the immune response. Anti-retroviral therapy suppresses HIV burden and restores Th cell numbers. Here, we investigated the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by the BTN162b2 vaccine in a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH), who receive anti-retroviral therapy. While antibody responses in PLWH increased progressively after the first and second vaccination compared to baseline, they were reduced compared to HIV negative study participants (controls). CD8+ T cells exhibited a general activated phenotype and increased effector and effector memory compartments. In contrast, CD4+ Th cell responses exhibited a vaccination-dependent increase and were comparable between PLWH and controls. In line with their reduced humoral response, the correlation between neutralizing antibodies and the CD4+ T cell response was decreased in PLWH compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, CD4+ T cell activation negatively correlated with the CD4 to CD8 ratio, indicating that low CD4 T cell numbers do not necessarily interfere with cellular immune responses. Taken together, our data demonstrate that COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in PLWH results in potent cellular immune responses, but the reduced antibody responses suggest that booster vaccination might be required for preventing disease.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.08.22273605v1" target="_blank">Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on systemic immune responses in people living with HIV</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during B.1.1.529 (Omicron) dominance compared to B.1.617.2 (Delta) in 89 German hospitals</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern B.1.1.529 (Omicron) was first described in November 2021 and soon became the dominant variant worldwide. Existing data suggests a reduced disease severity in comparison to B.1.617.2 (Delta). Differences in characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with COVID-19 in Germany during the Omicron period compared to Delta are not thoroughly studied. Surveillance for severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) represents an integral part of infectious disease control in Germany. Methods: Administrative data from 89 German Helios hospitals was retrospectively analysed. Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified by ICD-10-code U07.1 and SARI cases by ICD-10-codes J09-J22. COVID-19 cases were stratified by concomitant SARI. A nine-week observational period between December 6, 2021 and February 6, 2022 was defined and divided into three phases with respect to the dominating virus variant (Delta, Delta to Omicron transition, Omicron). Regression analyses adjusted for age, gender and Elixhauser comorbidities were applied to assess in-hospital patient outcomes. Results: A total cohort of 4,494 inpatients was analysed. Patients in the Omicron dominance period were younger (mean age 61.6 vs. 47.8; p<0.01), more likely to be female (54.7% vs. 47.5%; p<0.01) and characterized by a lower comorbidity burden (mean Elixhauser comorbidity index 8.2 vs. 5.4; p<0.01). Comparing Delta and Omicron periods, patients were at significantly lower risk for intensive care treatment (adjusted odds ratio 0.64 [0.51-0.8]; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio 0.38 [0.28-0.51]; p<0.001), and in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.42 [0.32-0.56]; p<0.001). This also applied to the separate COVID-SARI group. During the Delta to Omicron transition, case numbers of COVID-19 without SARI exceeded COVID-SARI. Conclusion: Patient characteristics and outcomes differ during the Omicron dominance period as compared to Delta suggesting a reduced disease severity with Omicron infections. SARI surveillance might play a crucial role in assessing disease severity of future SARS-CoV-2 variants.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article- html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.09.22273420v1" target="_blank">Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during B.1.1.529 (Omicron) dominance compared to B.1.617.2 (Delta) in 89 German hospitals</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>DecentTree: Scalable Neighbour-Joining for the Genomic Era</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
Neighbour-Joining is one of the most widely used distance-based phylogenetic inference methods. However, current implementations do not scale well for datasets with more than 10,000 sequences. Given the increasing pace of generating new sequence data, particularly in outbreaks of emerging diseases, and the already enormous existing databases of sequence data for which NJ is a useful approach, new implementations of existing methods are warranted. Here we present DecentTree, which provides highly optimised and parallel implementations of Neighbour-Joining and several of its variants. DecentTree is designed as a stand-alone application and a header-only library easily integrated with other phylogenetic software (e.g. it is integral in the popular IQ-TREE software). We show that DecentTree shows similar or improved performance over existing software (BIONJ, Quicktree, FastME, and RapidNJ), especially for handling very large alignments. For example, DecentTree is up to 6-fold faster than the fastest existing Neighbour-Joining software (e.g. RapidNJ) when generating a tree of 64,000 SARS-CoV-2 genomes.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.10.487712v1" target="_blank">DecentTree: Scalable Neighbour-Joining for the Genomic Era</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Brain resident memory T cells rapidly expand and initiate neuroinflammatory responses following CNS injury and viral infection</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
The contribution of circulating verses tissue resident memory T cells (TRM) to clinical neuropathology is an enduring question due to a lack of mechanistic insights. The prevailing view is TRM cells are protective against pathogens in the brain. However, the extent antigen-specific TRM cells can induce neuropathology upon reactivation has not been determined. Using the described phenotype of TRMs, we found that brains of naive mice harbor populations of CD69+ CD103- T cells. Notably, numbers of CD69+ CD103- TRM cells rapidly increase following neurological insults of physical, cancerous, or viral origins. This TRM expansion precedes infiltration of virus specific CD8 T cells and is due to proliferation of T cells within the brain. In contrast, the CD69+ CD103+ TRMs in the brain are generated after the initial expansion of CD69+ CD103- cells following injury and are antigen-specific. We next evaluated the capacity of antigen-specific TRMs in the brain to induce significant neuroinflammation post virus clearance, including infiltration of inflammatory monocytes, activation of T cells in the brain, and significant blood brain barrier disruption. These neuroinflammatory events were induced by TRMs, as depletion of peripheral T cells or blocking T cell trafficking using FTY720 did not change the neuroinflammatory course. Reactivation of antigen-specific TRMs in the brain also induced profound lymphopenia within the blood compartment. We have therefore determined that antigen-specific TRMs can induce significant neuroinflammation, neuropathology, and peripheral immune suppression. Importantly, understanding functions of brain TRMs is crucial in investigating their role in neurodegenerative disorders, CNS cancers, and long- term complications associated with viral infections including COVID-19.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html- link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.08.487707v1" target="_blank">Brain resident memory T cells rapidly expand and initiate neuroinflammatory responses following CNS injury and viral infection</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Getting the blues: negative affect dynamics mediate the within-person association of maladaptive emotion regulation and depression</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
Temporal patterns of affective functioning such as emotional inertia and instability may predict increases in depressive symptoms. However, the investigation of maladaptive emotion regulation’s role in affect dynamics and depressive symptoms at the within-individual level is still lacking. We collected intensive longitudinal data regarding momentary maladaptive emotion regulation strategies (rumination and expressive suppression) and negative affective states (NA) (measured multiple times a day), perceived stressors and depressive symptoms (measured every three days) from a general population sample during the COVID-19 pandemic’s first wave in Hungary. The final dataset included 7117 affective states surveys from 125 participants, which were aggregated in 460 three-day measurement windows. Multilevel SEM models were fit to test whether affect dynamics mediate the association between maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, negative affect intensity, and two domains of depression, anhedonia, and negative mood and thoughts. Within and between individuals, rumination indirectly predicted NA intensity and negative mood and thoughts through elevated NA instability and NA inertia. Expressive suppression had a negative indirect effect on NA intensity via NA inertia at the within-person level, while this mediation effect was positive at the between-person level. Moreover, affect dynamics were positively connected to depressive symptoms and these associations were mediated by NA intensity. These suggest that disturbances in emotion regulation are indirectly connected to depressive symptoms, mediated by specific temporal patterns in affective functioning. These findings hold both at the within- and the between-individual level. Our findings may facilitate automated depression risk assessment based on simple affective and emotion regulation time series.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/he53c/" target="_blank">Getting the blues: negative affect dynamics mediate the within-person association of maladaptive emotion regulation and depression</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>A Critical Review of COVID 19 Vaccines: Past, Present and Future</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
In December 2019, the city of Wuhan in China witnessed the first episode of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), brought on by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV- 2). And after more than two years, it has become a global pandemic, crossing boundaries and spreading across countries and continents. Many nations have reported different Waves of COVID-19. As per World Health Organization (WHO), confirmed cases of COVID-19, as of 9th February 2022, stood at 396,558,014 with 5,745,032 deaths globally and increasing with every passing hour. Various SARS CoV-2 variants have been recognized and categorized by the WHO as Variants of Interest (VOIs) and Variants of Concern (VOCs). There is no stopping the rise in the number of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients throughout the world, despite authorities announcing and following strict precaution, containment, and preventive measures. Antiviral therapeutic approaches have proven to be merely supportive and have shown limited efficacy. It has since been established that vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection can potentially trigger several immune responses of the body and thus preventing the severity of COVID-19 infection. The race for the development and deployment of vaccines has already started, and this paper provides a discussion upon the bioethical angle of Covid vaccines – their development, deployment, and distribution ethics. There are also several ethical implications and concerns about issues like the necessity of vaccines, compulsory vaccination, and vaccine mandates. This paper also addresses some questions about the dilemma of the earliest developed and the most effective vaccines and also focuses upon the updated ethical concerns about the different kinds of Covid vaccines.
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://osf.io/7rv5y/" target="_blank">A Critical Review of COVID 19 Vaccines: Past, Present and Future</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Web Pharmacovigilance to Monitor and Predict Epidemiological Trends: Paracetamol Web Searches in Lombardy Before and During COVID-19 First Wave</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
Infodemiology is a widely applied field in epidemiological and public health investigations. Massive research efforts have been made to predict epidemiological trends based on users’ web queries on specific symptoms or pathologies. Nonetheless, a growing literature denounces that health-related web searches are more determined by mediatic clamor than diseases incidence and prevalence. This paper shows that well targeting the search topics on Google Trends can overcome this problem. In particular, selecting keywords related to pharmacological substances and drugs can provide essential information on monitoring known pathologies and detecting new diseases outbreaks such as COVID-19. Indeed, it is shown that the media hype around COVID-19 has influenced web searches related to symptoms such as fever much more markedly than those on paracetamol, significantly lowering a historical correlation between these two online topics. Moreover, during the beginning of February 2020, there was an anomalous increase in web searches related to paracetamol – not linked to the media hype – that could have signaled the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Lombardy at least 20 days before the official outbreak of Codogno. Furthermore, observing the coefficient of variability in a 4-day retrospective moving window would have made it possible to easily identify an irregularity between 10 and 14 February</div></li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<ol start="2020" type="1">
|
||
<li>If this anomaly had been discovered timely, authorities would have had the time necessary to implement appropriate control strategies, avoiding the uncontrolled circulation of SARS-CoV-2. Finally, there is evidence that the paracetamol-related web interest was causally correlated to COVID-19 evolution and historical influenza trends. Therefore, we suggest that the Italian Ministry of Health and international health authorities adopt this new infodemiological approach to preserve public health. Further research is needed to refine these methods.
|
||
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://osf.io/4w7mn/" target="_blank">Web Pharmacovigilance to Monitor and Predict Epidemiological Trends: Paracetamol Web Searches in Lombardy Before and During COVID-19 First Wave</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
</ol>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li><strong>SARS-CoV-2 reinfections with BA.1 (Omicron) variant among fully vaccinated individuals in the northeast of Brazil</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Background: The first case of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Rio Grande do Norte, northeast Brazil, was diagnosed on March 12, 2020; thereafter, the pattern of COVID-19 followed the multiple waves as seen elsewhere. The waves were mostly due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus mutations leading to emergence of variants of concern (VoC). The introduction of new VoCs in a population context of prior SARS-CoV-2 infections or after vaccination has been a challenge in understanding the kinetics of the protective immune response against SARS-CoV-2 . The aim of this study was to investigate the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections observed in mid-January 2022 in Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil when the omicron variant was introduced. Methodology/Principal findings: From a total of 172,965 individuals with mild to severe respiratory symptoms, 58,097 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 2020 through mid-February 2022. Of those previously infected, 444 had documented a second SARS-CoV-2 infection and 9 of these reinfection cases were selected for sequencing. Genomic analysis revealed that virus lineages diverged between primary and the reinfection, with the latter caused by the Omicron (BA.1) variant among individuals fully vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions/Significance: Once all subjects whose samples were sequenced had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and were also fully vaccinated, our data suggest that the Omicron variant evades natural and vaccine-induced immunities, confirming the continuous need to decrease transmission and to develop effective blocking vaccines.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.08.22272726v1" target="_blank">SARS-CoV-2 reinfections with BA.1 (Omicron) variant among fully vaccinated individuals in the northeast of Brazil</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Background: Government enforced restrictions on movement during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to have had profound impacts on the daily behaviours of many individuals, including physical activity (PA). Given the pre-pandemic evidence for associations between PA and other health behaviours, changes in PA during the pandemic may have been detrimental for other health behaviours. This study aimed to evaluate whether changes in PA during and after the first national lockdown in the United Kingdom (UK) were associated with concurrent changes in other health behaviours, namely alcohol consumption, sleep, nutrition quality, diet quantity and sedentary time. Methods: Data were derived from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study. The analytical sample consisted of 52,784 adults followed weekly across 22 weeks of the pandemic from 23rd March to 23rd August 2020. Data were analysed using fixed effects regression. Results: There was significant within-individual variation in both PA and other health behaviours throughout the study period. Increased PA was positively associated with improved sleep and nutrition quality. However, increases in PA also showed modest associations with increased alcohol consumption and sedentary time. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that, whilst the first wave of COVID-19 restrictions were in place, increases in PA were associated with improved sleep and better diet. Encouraging people to engage in PA may therefore lead to positive change in other health behaviours in times of adversity. However, increases in PA were also associated with more engagement in the negative health behaviours of alcohol consumption and sedentary time. These associations could be a result of increases in available leisure time for many people during COVID-19 restrictions and require further investigation to inform future public health guidance.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.07.22273555v1" target="_blank">Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>Self-Reported Mask Use in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Wearing a facemask can help to decrease the transmission of COVID– 19. We investigated self-reported mask use among subjects aged 18 years and older participating in the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership (CRP), a prospective longitudinal COVID– 19 surveillance study. We included those participants who completed ≥5 daily surveys each month from December 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021. Mask use was defined as self-reported use of a face mask or face covering on every interaction with others outside the household within a distance of less than 6 feet. Participants were considered vaccinated if they reported receiving ≥1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Participants (n=17,522) were 91% non- Hispanic White, 68% female, median age 57 years, 26% healthcare workers, with 95% self-reported receiving ≥1 COVID– 19 vaccine dose through August; mean daily survey response was 85%. Mask use was higher among vaccinated than unvaccinated participants across the study period, regardless of the month of the first dose. Mask use remained relatively stable from December 2020 through April (range 71– 80% unvaccinated; 86– 93% vaccinated) and declined in both groups beginning in mid– May 2021 to 34% and 42% respectively in June 2021; mask use has increased again since July 2021. Mask use by all was lower during weekends and on Christmas and Easter, regardless of vaccination status. Independent predictors of higher mask use were vaccination, age ≥65 years, female sex, racial or ethnic minority group, and healthcare worker occupation, whereas a history of self-reported prior COVID-19 illness was associated with lower use.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.06.22273448v1" target="_blank">Self-Reported Mask Use in SARS- CoV-2 Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
<li><strong>THEMIS: A Framework for Cost-Benefit Analysis of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions</strong> -
|
||
<div>
|
||
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
|
||
Since December 2019, the world has been ravaged by the COVID-19 pandemic, with over 150 million confirmed cases and 3 million confirmed deaths worldwide. To combat the spread of COVID-19, governments have issued unprecedented non- pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), ranging from mass gathering restrictions to complete lockdowns. Despite their proven effectiveness in reducing virus transmission, the policies often carry significant economic and humanitarian cost, ranging from unemployment to depression, PTSD, and anxiety. In this paper, we create a data-driven system dynamics framework, THEMIS, that allows us to compare the costs and benefits of a large class of NPIs in any geographical region across different cost dimensions. As a demonstration, we analyzed thousands of alternative policies across 5 countries (United States, Germany, Brazil, Singapore, Spain) and compared with the actual implemented policy. Our results show that moderate NPIs (such as restrictions on mass gatherings) usually produce the worst results, incurring significant cost while unable to sufficiently slow down the pandemic to prevent the virus from becoming endemic. Short but severe restrictions (complete lockdown for 4-5 weeks) generally produced the best results for developed countries, but only if the speed of reopening is slow enough to prevent a resurgence. Developing countries exhibited very different trade-off profiles from developed countries, and suggests that severe NPIs such as lockdowns might not be as suitable for developing countries in general.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="article-link article-html-link">
|
||
🖺 Full Text HTML: <a href="https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.09.22273656v1" target="_blank">THEMIS: A Framework for Cost- Benefit Analysis of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions</a>
|
||
</div></li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-clinical-trials">From Clinical Trials</h1>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of Healthtone as Prophylaxis for COVID-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Dietary Supplement: Rhea® Health Tone<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Indonesia University<br/><b>Completed</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Aerobic Exercise in People With Post-COVID-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Other: Conventional rehabilitation; Other: Aerobic exercise<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Effect of Home-based Rehabilitation Program After COVID-19 Infection</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Behavioral: Add-on telerehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation; Behavioral: Home-based rehabilitation alone<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: <br/>
|
||
National Taiwan University Hospital<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of COVID-19 Protein Subunit Recombinant Vaccine</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Biological: SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit recombinant vaccine; Biological: placebo<br/><b>Sponsors</b>: PT Bio Farma; Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta; Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang; Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang; Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hassanudin, Makassar<br/><b>Not yet recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of SCTV01E (a Recombinant Protein COVID-19 Vaccine) in Population Aged ≥12 Years</strong> - <b>Conditions</b>: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 Infection<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Biological: SCTV01E; Biological: CoronaVac; Biological: Sinopharm inactivated COVID-19 vaccine; Biological: other approved COVID-19 vaccines<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Sinocelltech Ltd.<br/><b>Not yet recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Tele-Rehabilitation in Individuals With Covid-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Other: Exercise<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: <br/>
|
||
Hacettepe University<br/><b>Completed</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of SCTV01C and SCTV01E (Two Recombinant Protein COVID-19 Vaccines) in Population Aged ≥12 Years</strong> - <b>Conditions</b>: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 Infection<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Biological: SCTV01C; Biological: SCTV01E; Biological: mRNA vaccine manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna; Biological: Sinopharm inactivated COVID-19 vaccine<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Sinocelltech Ltd.<br/><b>Not yet recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>COVID-19 Treatment Cascade Optimization Study</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Behavioral: Navigation Services; Behavioral: Brief Counseling; Behavioral: Critical Dialogue; Behavioral: Referral and Digital Brochure<br/><b>Sponsors</b>: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Comprehensive Behavioral Health Center; North Jersey Community Research Initiative; University of Michigan<br/><b>Not yet recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled IBIO123 in Participants With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Illness</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Biological: IBIO123; Other: Placebo<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Immune Biosolutions Inc<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin and Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19 Pandemic<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Drug: Enoxaparin, Hydroxychloroquine<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Beni-Suef University<br/><b>Completed</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Phase 1&2 Study to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of Inhaled IBIO123 in Severe COVID-19 Illness</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Biological: IBIO123; Other: Placebo<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: Immune Biosolutions Inc<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Clinical Evaluation of Rapid RNA Test for Covid-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Diagnostic Test: rapid RT-LAMP test to detect SARS-COV-2 RNA<br/><b>Sponsors</b>: University of Southampton; West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust; University of Oxford<br/><b>Completed</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Clinical Evaluation of Rapid Antibody Test for Covid-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Diagnostic Test: Livzon Rapid Antibody Test for COVID-19<br/><b>Sponsors</b>: University of Southampton; West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust<br/><b>Completed</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Non-inferiority Trial on Treatments in Early COVID-19</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Drug: Sotrovimab; Drug: Tixagevimab Cilgavimab; Drug: Nirmatrelvir Ritonavir<br/><b>Sponsors</b>: Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco; Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ivermectin in COVID-19 Prevention</strong> - <b>Condition</b>: COVID-19<br/><b>Interventions</b>: Drug: Ivermectin Tablets; Drug: Matching placebo tablets<br/><b>Sponsor</b>: MedinCell S.A<br/><b>Recruiting</b></p></li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-pubmed">From PubMed</h1>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>In silico, in vitro screening of plant extracts for anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity and evaluation of their acute and sub- acute toxicity</strong> - CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro and safety of plant extracts in both in vitro and in vivo experimental conditions.</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Effects of theaflavin-gallate in-silico binding with different proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and host inflammation and vasoregulations referring an experimental rat-lung injury</strong> - Background SARS-CoV-2 claimed 5,209,104 lives, infected 260,997,910 individuals, globally. Infection is caused due to exposure or susceptibility; deaths occur due to age,comorbidity,higher-viral-load, immuno-suppression, inflammation, and multi-organ failure. Theaflavin-gallate, the major black tea component, showed previous evidence to inhibit HIV-1. Purpose As theaflavin-gallate prevents experimental rat-lung injury, the study of inhibitory effects of theaflavin- gallate was done, on…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Research on the mechanism of berberine in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia pulmonary fibrosis using network pharmacology and molecular docking</strong> - Purpose Pulmonary fibrosis caused by COVID-19 pneumonia is a serious complication of COVID-19 infection, there is a lack of effective treatment methods clinically. This article explored the mechanism of action of berberine in the treatment of COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019, COVID-19) pneumonia pulmonary fibrosis with the help of the network pharmacology and molecular docking. Methods We predicted the role of berberine protein targets with the Pharmmapper database and the 3D structure of…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Phytoconstituents from ten natural herbs as potent inhibitors of main protease enzyme of SARS-COV-2: In silico study</strong> - CONCLUSION: Laurolitsine, an active constituent of roots of Lindera aggregata, was found to be having good ADMET profile and have capabilities to halt the activity of the enzyme. Therefore, this makes laurolitsine a good drug candidate for the treatment of COVID-19.</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Computational screening of phytochemicals from three medicinal plants as inhibitors of transmembrane protease serine 2 implicated in SARS-CoV-2 infection</strong> - CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potentials of niazirin, quercetin, and moringyne from M. oleifera, to inhibit the activities of human TMPRSS2, thus probably being good candidates for further development as new drugs for the treatment or management of COVID-19.</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The potential of BEN815 as an anti-inflammatory, antiviral and antioxidant agent for the treatment of COVID-19</strong> - CONCLUSION: BEN815 is an anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and antioxidant natural agent that can be used to prevent and improve inflammation-related diseases, COVID-19.</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Cold atmospheric plasma for preventing infection of viruses that use ACE2 for entry</strong> - Rational: The mutating SARS-CoV-2 potentially impairs the efficacy of current vaccines or antibody-based treatments. Broad-spectrum and rapid anti-virus methods feasible for regular epidemic prevention against COVID-19 or alike are urgently called for. Methods: Using SARS-CoV-2 virus and bioengineered pseudoviruses carrying ACE2-binding spike protein domains, we examined the efficacy of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) on virus entry prevention. Results: We found that CAP could effectively inhibit…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>An engineered nano-liposome-human ACE2 decoy neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein-induced inflammation in both murine and human macrophages</strong> - Rationale: Macrophages are the frontline immune cells in response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) serves as the binding receptor to SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein for fusion and internalization into the human host cells. However, the mechanisms underlying SARS- CoV-2-elicited macrophage inflammatory responses remain elusive. Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 by human ACE2 (hACE2) decoys has been proposed as a therapeutic…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Anti-Fungal Drug Anidulafungin Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Induced Syncytia Formation by Targeting ACE2-Spike Protein Interaction</strong> - Drug repositioning continues to be the most effective, practicable possibility to treat COVID-19 patients. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus enters target cells by binding to the ACE2 receptor via its spike (S) glycoprotein. We used molecular docking-based virtual screening approaches to categorize potential antagonists, halting ACE2-spike interactions by utilizing 450 FDA-approved chemical compounds. Three drug candidates (i.e., anidulafungin, lopinavir, and…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Cannabidiol and SARS-CoV-2 Infection</strong> - Cannabidiol (CBD) can prevent the inflammatory response of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in Caco-2-cells. This action is coupled with the inhibition of IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-alpha, responsible for the inflammatory process during SARS-CoV-2 infection. CBD can act on the different proteins encoded by SARS-CoV-2 and as an antiviral agent to prevent the viral infection. Furthermore, recent studies have shown the possible action of CBD as an antagonist of cytokine release syndromes. In the…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and Huangqi (Astragalus membranaceus) Suppress SARS-CoV-2 Entry and COVID-19 Related Cytokine Storm in Vitro</strong> - COVID-19 is threatening human health worldwide but no effective treatment currently exists for this disease. Current therapeutic strategies focus on the inhibition of viral replication or using anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory compounds to improve host immunity, but not both. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compounds could be promising candidates due to their safety and minimal toxicity. In this study, we have developed a novel in silico bioinformatics workflow that integrates multiple…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>In silico approach for the development of novel antiviral compounds based on SARS-COV-2 protease inhibition</strong> - The COVID-19 pandemic emerged in 2019, bringing with it the need for greater stores of effective antiviral drugs. This paper deals with the conformation-independent, QSAR model, developed by employing the Monte Carlo optimization method, as well as molecular graphs and the SMILES notation-based descriptors for the purpose of modeling the SARS-CoV-3CLpro enzyme inhibition. The main purpose was developing a reproducible model involving easy interpretation, utilized for a quick prediction of the…</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>In silico discovery of non-psychoactive scaffolds in Cannabis halting SARS-CoV-2 host entry and replication machinery</strong> - Aim: Coronavirus disease still poses a global health threat which advocates continuous research efforts to develop effective therapeutics. Materials & methods: We screened out an array of 29 cannabis phytoligands for their viral spike- ACE2 complex and main protease (M^(pro)) inhibitory actions by in silico modeling to explore their possible dual viral entry and replication machinery inhibition. Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters (ADMET) formulating drug- likeness were computed….</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Insights into forsythia honeysuckle (Lianhuaqingwen) capsules: A Chinese herbal medicine repurposed for COVID-19 pandemic</strong> - CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the available reports and evidence that support the use of LH capsules as potential drug candidates for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. However, TCM exerts its effects through multiple targets and multiple pathways, and LH capsules are not an exception. Therefore, the relevant mechanisms need to be further improved and experimentally verified.</p></li>
|
||
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Potential benefits of ginseng against COVID-19 by targeting inflammasomes</strong> - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pathogenic virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with major symptoms including hyper-inflammation and cytokine storm, which consequently impairs the respiratory system and multiple organs, or even cause death. SARS-CoV-2 activates inflammasomes and inflammasome- mediated inflammatory signaling pathways, which are key determinants of hyperinflammation and cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. Additionally,…</p></li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-patent-search">From Patent Search</h1>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html> |