Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/16 January, 2023.html

682 lines
89 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>16 January, 2023</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Investigations of Joe Biden Begin</strong> - A new Republican House subcommittee and a new special counsel pose more of a political threat to the President than a legal one. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-investigations-of-joe-biden-begin">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Message for the Federal Reserve in the New Inflation Data</strong> - As a new report shows price pressures easing, should the central bank rethink its strategy of raising interest rates? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/a-message-for-the-federal-reserve-in-the-new-inflation-data">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Californias Devastating Storms Are a Glimpse of the Future</strong> - Even as the state weathers a megadrought, climate change is increasing the risk of catastrophic floods. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/californias-devastating-storms-are-a-glimpse-of-the-future">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>How Eric Adams Started Mentoring a Con Man</strong> - Eric Adamss friends and allies have puzzled over his relationship with Lamor Whitehead, a fraudster Brooklyn church leader. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/how-eric-adams-started-mentoring-a-con-man">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Origins of Joe Bidens Document Mess</strong> - At the end of his Vice-Presidency, all official documents should have been transferred to the National Archives. How did some end up elsewhere? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-origins-of-joe-bidens-document-mess">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>Are we too worried about misinformation?</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="A graphic representation of a newspaper page with the words true and false acting as headlines." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/zgmy67DwinlV-Z1ZlTek6Fjt6Ko=/0x689:5512x4823/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71870693/GettyImages_1314497914.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Getty Images/iStockphoto
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Resist trying to make things better”: A conversation with internet security expert Alex Stamos.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Z2i0Xu">
Im old enough to remember when the internet was going to be great news for everyone. Things have gotten more complex since then: We all still agree that there are lots of good things we can get from a broadband connection. But were also likely to blame the internet — and specifically the big tech companies that dominate it — for all kinds of problems.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PrzOwO">
And that blame-casting gets intense in the wake of major, calamitous news events, like the spectacle of the January 6 riot or <a href="https://www.vox.com/world/2023/1/8/23545130/brazil-bolsonaro-supporters-lula">its rerun in Brazil this month</a>, both of which were seeded and organized, at least in part, on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Telegram. But how much culpability and power should we really assign to tech?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2xDt8Q">
I think about this question all the time but am more interested in what people who actually study it think. So I called up Alex Stamos, who does this for a living: Stamos is the former head of security at Facebook who now heads up the <a href="https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io">Stanford Internet Observatory</a>, which does deep dives into the ways people abuse the internet.
</p>
<aside id="MYOUvI">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9QTiBW">
The last time <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/12/10/20996869/facebook-political-ads-targeting-alex-stamos-interview-open-sourced">I talked to Stamos, in 2019</a>, we focused on the perils of political ads on platforms and the tricky calculus of regulating and restraining those ads. This time, we went broader, but also more nuanced: On the one hand, Stamos argues, we have overestimated the power that the likes of Russian hackers have to, say, influence elections in the US. On the other hand, he says, were likely overlooking the impact state actors have to influence our opinions on stuff we dont know much about.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JrA990">
You can hear our entire conversation on the <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/recode-media/id1080467174"><em>Recode Media</em> podcast</a>. The following are edited excerpts from our chat.
</p>
<h4 id="8Djmk6">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gDDcBK">
I want to ask you about two very different but related stories in the news: Last Sunday, people stormed government buildings in Brazil in what looked like their version of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack">January 6 riot</a>. And there was an immediate discussion about <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-64223574">what role internet platforms like Twitter and Telegram</a> played in that incident. The next day, there was a study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35576-9"><em>Nature</em></a> that looked at the effect of Russian interference on the 2016 election, specifically on Twitter, which concluded that all the misinformation and disinformation the Russians tried to sow had essentially no impact on that election or on anyones views or actions. So are we collectively overestimating or underestimating the impact of misinformation and disinformation on the internet?
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="UkGaNM">
<q>“There was a massive overestimation of the capability of mis- and disinformation to change peoples minds — of its actual persuasive power”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<h4 id="EqjcEP">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ANFGrH">
I think what has happened is there was a massive overestimation of the capability of mis- and disinformation to change peoples minds — of its actual persuasive power. That doesnt mean its not a problem, but we have to reframe how we look at it — as less of something that is done to us and more of a supply and demand problem. We live in a world where people can choose to seal themselves into an information environment that reinforces their preconceived notions, that reinforces the things they want to believe about themselves and about others. And in doing so, they can participate in their own radicalization. They can participate in fooling themselves, but that is not something thats necessarily being done to them.
</p>
<h4 id="ox6PJ0">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KrmMSb">
But now we have a playbook for whenever something awful happens, whether its January 6 or what we saw in Brazil or things like the <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/new-zealand-mosque-shootings">Christchurch shooting in New Zealand</a>: We say, “what role did the internet play in this?” And in the case of January 6 and in Brazil, it seems pretty evident that the people who are organizing those events were using internet platforms to actually put that stuff together. And then before that, they were seeding the ground for this disaffection and promulgating the idea that elections were stolen. So can we hold both things in our head at the same time — that weve both overestimated the effect of Russians reinforcing our filter bubble versus state and non-state actors using the internet to make bad things happen?
</p>
<h4 id="koCFqh">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="57dCBf">
I think so. Whats going on in Brazil is a lot like January 6 in that the interaction of platforms with whats happening there is that you have kind of the broad disaffection of people who are angry about the election, which is really being driven by political actors. So for all of these things, almost all of it were doing to ourselves. The Brazilians are doing [it] to themselves. We have political actors who dont really believe in democracy anymore, who believe that they cant actually lose elections. And yes, they are using platforms to get around the traditional media and communicate with people directly. But its not foreign interference. And especially in the United States, direct communication with your political supporters via these platforms is First Amendment-protected.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MQ9QD6">
Separately from that, in a much smaller timescale, you have the actual kind of organizational stuff thats going on. On January 6, we have all this evidence coming out from all these people who have been arrested and their phones have been grabbed. And so you can see Telegram chats, WhatsApp chats, iMessage chats, Signal, all of these real-time communications. You see the same thing in Brazil.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CPV72k">
And for that, I think the discussion is complicated because that is where you end up with a straight trade-off on privacy — that the fact that people can now create groups where they can privately communicate, where nobody can monitor that communication, means that they have the ability to put together what are effectively conspiracies to try to overthrow elections.
</p>
<h4 id="8TUD9w">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Wqa8Oq">
The throughline here is that after one of these events happens, we collectively say, “Hey, Twitter or Facebook or maybe Apple, you let this happen, what are you going to do to prevent it from happening again?” And sometimes the platforms say, “Well, this wasnt our fault.” Mark Zuckerberg famously said that idea was <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/10/13594558/mark-zuckerberg-election-fake-news-trump">crazy</a> after the 2016 election.
</p>
<h4 id="FXUyA1">
Alex Stamos<strong> </strong>
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NQfJ2s">
And then [former<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/13/facebook-role-in-capitol-protest/"> Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg] did that again, after January 6</a>.
</p>
<h3 id="DAGvlo">
“Resist trying to make things better”
</h3>
<h4 id="L74N2N">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bnPoNz">
And then you see the platforms do whack-a-mole to solve the last problem.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ay3DNH">
Im going to further complicate it because I wanted to bring the pandemic into this — where at the beginning, we asked the platforms, “what are you going to do to help make sure that people get good information about how to handle this novel disease?” And they said, “Were not going to make these decisions. <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/27/21270280/facebook-twitter-youtube-coronavirus-pandemic-misinformation-political-controversy-face-masks">Were not not epidemiologists</a>. Were going to follow the advice of the CDC and governments around the world.” And in some cases, <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/10/google-bans-ads-for-medical-face-masks-amid-coronavirus-outbreak.html">that information was contradictory or wrong</a> and theyve had to <a href="https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/10922326?hl=en">backtrack</a>. And now were seeing some of that play out with the release of the <a href="https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394">Twitter Files</a> where people are saying, “I cant believe the government asked Twitter to take down so-and-sos tweet or account because they were telling people to go use ivermectin.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QDUAji">
I think the most generous way of viewing the platforms in that case — which is a view I happen to agree with — is that they were trying to do the right thing. But theyre not really built to handle a pandemic and how to handle both good information and bad information on the internet. But theres a lot of folks who believe — I think quite sincerely — that the platforms really shouldnt have any role moderating this at all. That if people want to say, “go ahead and try this horse dewormer, whats the worst that could happen?” they should be allowed to do it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WoLY3n">
So you have this whole stew of stuff where its unclear what role the government should have in working with the platforms, what role the platforms should have at all. So should platforms be involved in trying to stop mis- or disinformation? Or should we just say, “this is like climate change and its a fact of life and were all going to have to sort of adapt to this reality”?
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="ROgJWZ">
<q>“People generally believe that if something is against their side, that the platforms have a huge responsibility. And if something is on their side, [the platforms] should have no responsibility.”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<h4 id="c2Nnf4">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bfBzdq">
The fundamental problem is that theres a fundamental disagreement inside peoples heads — that people are inconsistent on what responsibility they believe information intermediaries should have for making society better. People generally believe that if something is against their side, that the platforms have a huge responsibility. And if something is on their side, [the platforms] should have no responsibility. Its extremely rare to find people who are consistent in this.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xuXZoG">
As a society, we have gone through these information revolutions — the creation of the printing press created hundreds of years of religious war in Europe. Nobodys going to say we should not have invented the printing press. But we also have to recognize that allowing people to print books created lots of conflict.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nS3KKP">
I think that the responsibility of platforms is to try to not make things worse actively — but also to resist trying to make things better. If that makes sense.
</p>
<h4 id="J5uI2Q">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gXS06u">
No. What does “resist trying to make things better” mean?
</p>
<h4 id="Vd5bWO">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="v7fP64">
I think the legitimate complaint behind a bunch of the Twitter Files is that Twitter was trying too hard to make American society and world society better, to make humans better. That what Twitter and Facebook and YouTube and other companies should focus on is, “are we building products that are specifically making some of these problems worse?” That the focus should be on the active decisions they make, not on the passive carrying of other peoples speech. And so if youre Facebook, your responsibility is — if somebody is into QAnon, you do not recommend to them, “Oh, you might want to also storm the Capitol. Heres a recommended group or heres a recommended event where people are storming the Capitol.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="AA10TO">
That is an active decision by Facebook — to make a recommendation to somebody to do something. That is very different than going and hunting down every closed group where people are talking about ivermectin and other kinds of folk cures incorrectly. That if people are wrong, going and trying to make them better by hunting them down and hunting down their speech and then changing it or pushing information on them is the kind of impulse that probably makes things worse. I think that is a hard balance to get to.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OnFRHA">
Where I try to come down on this is: Be careful about your recommendation algorithms, your ranking algorithms, about product features that make things intentionally worse. But also draw the line at going out and trying to make things better.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OPpDqX">
The great example that everyone is spun up about is <a href="https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/">the Hunter Biden laptop story</a>. Twitter and Facebook, in doing anything about that, I think overstepped, because whether the New York Post does not have journalistic ethics or whether the New York Post is being used as part of a hacking leak campaign is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/25/business/media/hunter-biden-wall-street-journal-trump.html">the New York Posts problem</a>. It is not Facebooks or Twitters problem.
</p>
<h3 id="yjoram">
“The reality is that we have to have these kinds of trade-offs”
</h3>
<h4 id="5VMqMS">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FkGIJb">
Something that people used to say in tech out loud, prior to 2016, was that when you make a new thing in the world, ideally youre trying to make it so its good. Its to the benefit of the world. But there are going to be trade-offs, pros and cons. You make cars, and cars do lots of great things, and we need them — and they also cause lots of deaths. And we live with that trade-off and we try to make cars safer. But we live with the idea that theres going to be downsides to this stuff. Are you comfortable with that framework?
</p>
<h4 id="abBInc">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Qheego">
Its not whether Im comfortable or not. Thats just the reality. Any technological innovation, youre going to have some kind of balancing act. The problem is, our political discussion of these things never takes those balances into effect. If you are super into privacy, then you have to also recognize that when you provide people private communication, that some subset of people will use that in ways that you disagree with, in ways that are illegal in ways, and sometimes in some cases that are extremely harmful. The reality is that we have to have these kinds of trade-offs.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SWTJQE">
These trade-offs have been obvious in other areas of public policy: You lower taxes, you have less revenue. You have to spend less.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zhJgZZ">
Those are the kinds of trade-offs that in the tech policy world, people dont understand as well. And certainly policymakers dont understand as well.
</p>
<h4 id="gzKWGg">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m7MYTp">
Are there practical things that government can impose in the US and other places?
</p>
<h4 id="l50UlY">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TlZ7OP">
The government in the United States is very restricted by the First Amendment [from] pushing of the platforms to change speech. Europe is where the rubbers really hitting the road. The <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package">Digital Services Act</a> creates a bunch of new responsibilities for platforms. Its not incredibly specific on this area, but that is where, from a democratic perspective, there will be the most conflict over responsibility. And then you see in Brazil and India and other democracies that are backsliding toward authoritarianism, you see much more aggressive censorship of political enemies. That is going to continue to be a real problem around the world.
</p>
<h4 id="zD7QyK">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="h1o5y0">
Over the years, the big platforms built pretty significant apparatuses to try to moderate themselves. You were part of that work at Facebook. And we now seem to be going through a real-time experiment at Twitter, where <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/23440075/elon-musk-twitter-layoffs-check-mark-verification">Elon Musk has said</a> ideologically, he doesnt think Twitter should be moderating anything beyond actual criminal activity. And beyond that, it costs a lot of money to employ these people and Twitter cant afford it, so hes getting rid of basically everyone who was involved in disinformation and in moderation. What do you imagine the effect that will have?
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="7iPrbc">
<q>“One article about Donald Trump is not going to change your mind about Donald Trump. But one article about Saudi Arabias war [against Yemen] might be the only thing you consume on it.”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<h4 id="xUvepe">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NYLkPB">
It is open season. If you are the Russians, if youre Iran, if youre the Peoples Republic of China, if you are a contractor working for the US Department of Defense, it is open season on Twitter. Twitters absolutely your best target.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BdV92r">
Again, the quantitative evidence is that we dont have a lot of great examples where people have made massive changes to public beliefs [because of disinformation]. I do believe there are some exceptions, though, where this is going to be really impactful on Twitter. One is on areas of discussion that are “thinly traded.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Guhwsz">
The battle between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was the most discussed topic on the entire planet Earth in 2016. So no matter what [Russians] did with ads and content was nothing, absolutely nothing compared to the amount of content that was on social media about the election. Its just a tiny, tiny, tiny drop in the ocean. One article about Donald Trump is not going to change your mind about Donald Trump. But one article about Saudi Arabias war [against Yemen] might be the only thing you consume on it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7OfsDb">
The other area where I think its going to be really effective is in attacking individuals and trying to harass individuals. This is what weve seen a lot out of China. Especially if youre a Chinese national and you leave China and youre critical of the Chinese government, there will be massive campaigns lying about you. And I think that is whats going to happen on Twitter — if you disagree, if you take a certain political position, youre going to end up with hundreds or thousands of people saying you should be arrested, that youre scum, that you should die. Theyll do things like send photos of your family without any context. Theyll do it over and over again. And this is the kind of harassment weve seen out of QAnon and such. And I think that Twitter is going to continue down that direction — if you take a certain political position, massive troll farms have the ability to try to drive you offline.
</p>
<h3 id="CfOzQ3">
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_(harassment_campaign)">Gamergate</a> every single day”
</h3>
<h4 id="Fz9gk3">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="k5bWLs">
Every time I see a story pointing out that such-and-such disinformation exists on YouTube or Twitter, I think that you could write these stories in perpetuity. Twitter or YouTube or Facebook may crack down on a particular issue, but its never going to get out of this cycle. And I wonder if our efforts arent misplaced here and that we shouldnt be spending so much time trying to point out this thing is wrong on the internet and instead doing something else. But I dont know what the other thing is. I dont know what we should be doing. What should we be thinking about?
</p>
<h4 id="ZUMuS7">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iyAQ5p">
Id like to see more stories about the specific attacks against individuals. I think were moving into a world where effectively it is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_(harassment_campaign)">Gamergate</a> every single day — that there are politically motivated actors who feel like it is their job to try to make people feel horrible about themselves, to drive them off the internet, to suppress their speech. And so that is less about broad persuasion and more about the use of the internet as a pitched battlefield to personally destroy people you disagree with. And so Id like to see more discussion and profiles of the people who are under those kinds of attacks. Were seeing this right now. [Former FDA head] Scott Gottlieb, who is on the Pfizer board, is showing up in the [<a href="https://twitter.com/alexberenson/status/1612814320777449474">Twitter Files</a>] and <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1612548694762745856?s=20&amp;t=wFI4lYpBLiRIlYyqpgXx7w">hes getting dozens and dozens of death threats</a>.
</p>
<h4 id="kj5Sou">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Mi7lDV">
What can someone listening to this conversation do about any of this? Theyre concerned about the state of the internet, the state of the world. They dont run anything. They dont run Facebook. Theyre not in government. <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/12/10/20996869/facebook-political-ads-targeting-alex-stamos-interview-open-sourced">Beyond checking on their own personal privacy to make sure their accounts havent been hacked</a>, what can and should someone do?
</p>
<h4 id="WBZmG6">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tLAPiR">
A key thing everybody needs to do is to be careful with their own social media use. I have made the mistake of retweeting the thing that tickled my fancy, that fit my preconceived notions and then turned out not to be true. So I think we all have an individual responsibility — if you see something amazing or radical that makes you feel something strongly, that you ask yourself, “Is this actually true?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZigcOv">
And then the hard part is, if you see members of your family doing that, having a hard conversation about that with them. Because part of this is theres good social science evidence that <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586">a lot of this is a boomer problem</a>. Both on the left and the right, a lot of this stuff is being spread by folks who are our parents generation.
</p>
<h4 id="Zh5ruB">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GvEdDJ">
I wish I could say thats a boomer problem. But Ive got a teen and a pre-teen and I dont think theyre necessarily more savvy about what theyre consuming on the internet than their grandparents.
</p>
<h4 id="7kHHSn">
Alex Stamos
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QNbP4E">
Interesting.
</p>
<h4 id="qjYhp0">
Peter Kafka
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="x8FXHA">
Im working on it.
</p></li>
<li><strong>The biggest animal welfare crisis youve never heard of</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/Hgg0j46tQ-QG4WM6gd6tThI0INs=/429x0:3900x2603/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71870629/WAM9943a.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Sheep in Australia are loaded for transport with an electric prod. | Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals Me
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Farm animals starve and drown while shipped overseas for slaughter. Europe is considering a ban on the trade.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7fvCKI">
In 2019, a shocking accident at sea drew the worlds attention to one of the meat industrys cruelest practices: the transport of live farm animals on long, perilous, and often fatal journeys by ship.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sLsMBF">
Late that year, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/25/rescue-mission-for-14000-sheep-on-sinking-ship-abandoned-black-sea">the Queen Hind</a>,<strong> </strong>an export ship carrying more than 14,000 sheep from Romania for slaughter in <a href="https://www.palaureg.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/QUEEN-HIND-MARINE-SAFETY-INVESTIGATION-REPORT-PALAU-FLAG-STATE.pdf">Saudi Arabia</a>, capsized, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/29/world/europe/sheep-rescue-ship-romania.html">resulting in the drowning</a> of nearly every animal. Disturbing images emerged of the corpses of sheep floating in the Black Sea.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8vBzQl">
That sinking was one of the deadliest for animals in recent history, but it wasnt unique. High-profile reports of animals drowned or abused on ships have prompted a growing movement in Europe and other regions to end the live export of farm animals for slaughter. While the global live animal trade isnt a focus for the farm animal welfare movement in North America, where exports are relatively less common and tend to occur by <a href="https://awionline.org/awi-quarterly/fall-2018/usda-begins-enforcement-new-animal-export-rule">land rather than sea</a>, in Europe, its excoriated for its <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/may/13/eus-live-export-trade-puts-welfare-of-millions-of-animals-at-risk-report">cruelty</a> and has emerged as one of the most visible — and potentially winnable — fights for animal advocates.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="Floating dead sheep are seen in the sea alongside a sideways partially capsized ship. " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/aPA_qfhoz-MQ_Kh91JhsCzabut0=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24356383/85755_20191125_sinking_Queen_Hind_Midia_RO_7.jpg"/> <cite>Animals International</cite>
<figcaption>
Drowned sheep after the capsizing of the Queen Hind off the Romanian port of Midia in the Black Sea.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YRn0Xf">
Countries including <a href="https://chronicle.lu/category/agriculture-viticulture/39727-luxembourg-prohibits-exports-of-live-animals-for-slaughter-to-third-countries">Luxembourg</a> and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/29/new-zealand-bans-live-animal-exports-from-april-2023">New Zealand</a> recently banned the trade, and even Romania, a top sheep exporter, has been considering an end to the trade after the Queen Hind tragedy. In October, Germany <a href="https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2022/148-tiertransporte.html#:~:text=Das%20Bundesministerium%20f%C3%BCr%20Ern%C3%A4hrung%20und,vom%201.%20Juli%202023%20zur%C3%BCckgezogen.">became</a> the biggest economy to announce it would end live export to countries outside the European Union, and called for an EU-wide ban on the practice. That came as a surprising policy reversal, given the importance of the livestock trade to the country. The EU is the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jan/27/eu-revealed-to-be-worlds-biggest-live-animal-exporter">worlds biggest</a> livestock exporter, and Germany is one of the top players in that bloc, selling almost <a href="https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2021-01/2020_01_27_efa_transport_white_paper_0.pdf">315 million</a> cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry birds to other EU countries and almost 9 million animals outside the EU in 2019. <a href="https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2021-01/2020_01_27_efa_transport_white_paper_0.pdf"></a>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OC3T8a">
But the <a href="https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2022/148-tiertransporte.html#:~:text=Das%20Bundesministerium%20f%C3%BCr%20Ern%C3%A4hrung%20und,vom%201.%20Juli%202023%20zur%C3%BCckgezogen.">German government</a>, according to its recent announcement, could “no longer stand by and watch as animals on long transports suffer or die in agony.”
</p>
<h3 id="c6GP3k">
Live animal export, explained
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VQFUtu">
Almost 2 billion of the worlds <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production#number-of-animals-slaughtered">80 billion</a> or so land animals raised for food every year, the majority of them chickens, are <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/20/two-billion-and-rising-the-global-trade-in-live-animals-in-eight-charts">exported alive</a> to different countries, according to 2021 data from the United Nations. This can happen for a host of reasons: In an interconnected global economy, farm animals are traded just like other commodities, and different countries have become hyper-specialized in different parts of the livestock supply chain. Some nations produce a surplus of animals — either deliberately or as a by-product of their livestock industries — which are exported to other buyers.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wQrglx">
Male calves born into Irelands booming dairy industry, for example, have no value in dairy production because they cant make milk, so theyre sold to the Netherlands or Spain for fattening and then either slaughtered for veal or exported again for slaughter elsewhere. Other countries <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jan/27/eu-revealed-to-be-worlds-biggest-live-animal-exporter">specialize</a> in breeding and exporting certain baby animals: Denmark, for example, is a leader in <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/24/high-risk-of-injuries-in-denmarks-live-piglet-export-trade-audit-warns">piglet exports</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zSruFb">
And then theres the demand side. Countries that cant efficiently raise their own livestock because of limitations like low water supplies or warfare, like <a href="https://www.arab-reform.net/publication/water-politics-in-libya-a-crisis-of-management-not-scarcity/">Libya</a>, can find it cheaper to import animals, particularly when those animals come at a good price thanks to farm subsidies in their countries of origin. This also reduces the need for importing countries to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/30/this-one-has-heat-stress-the-shocking-reality-of-live-animal-exports">refrigerate fresh meat</a>.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="A bar chart of numbers of animals exported by the top 10 biggest exporting countries. The highest is Germany its 315 million animals exported to other EU nations and 8.9 million exported to non-EU nations, and lowest is Slovakia, with 36.3 million exported to EU nations and 981.7 thousand exported outside the EU." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/soSdhfWV5wlAGFrrDh9mFijy4Mw=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24357753/qSoGV_the_european_union_exports_hundreds_of_millions_of_animals_for_slaughter_abroad_2.png"/>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WWrog2">
But animals arent inanimate widgets on a spreadsheet, and when theyre hauled hundreds of miles by land and sea, theyre treated as cargo, not passengers, which means their welfare is the least of anyones concerns.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eyL2lj">
And animal transport is inherently stressful. Trucks and ships are miserable places for animals to be crowded into, and painful tools like <a href="https://mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/911/direct">electric prods</a>, boards, and sticks are used to force them on board. In the US, too, being trucked to slaughter is among the <a href="https://animaloutlook.org/investigations/animal-transport-torture/">worst parts</a> of a farm animals life. American truck transport conditions are so dire that, according to a recent analysis by the Guardian, more than <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/15/more-than-20-million-farm-animals-die-on-way-to-abattoir-in-us-every-year">20 million animals die</a> every year before they reach a slaughterhouse because of factors including physical trauma, slipping and falling in their own waste, lack of food and water, and extreme heat or cold.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HORkVU">
As bad as being transported by land can be, sea transport is even worse, increasing the length of time animals spend in transit to weeks or even months.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W0sSYv">
“Livestock vessels are terrible places for animals,” said Caroline Rowley, founder of Ethical Farming Ireland, a nonprofit that has long campaigned against Irelands export of cows, calves, and other livestock. Most ships used to transport farm animals are past their prime, and theres the added risk of stormy weather and sinking — something livestock vessels like the Queen Hind are estimated to do at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/oct/28/exclusive-livestock-ships-twice-as-likely-to-be-lost-as-cargo-vessels?ref=hvper.com">twice the rate</a> of standard freight ships. Delays at sea, which strain limited feed supplies and increase the buildup of excrement, stress, and injury, are another common risk.
</p>
<h3 id="q1aL5z">
Livestock ships are an animal welfare disaster
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="84kfCK">
Although much of what happens at sea goes unnoticed by the public, a run of recent tragedies pushed livestock shipping into international headlines. After the Queen Hind accident in 2019, a company tasked with bringing the ship back to shore discovered <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/03/secret-decks-found-on-ship-that-capsized-killing-thousands-of-sheep">secret, unauthorized decks</a> on the vessel, raising concerns that it might have been carrying an unsafe number of animals. The Romanian government, which has helped the country become the EUs top sheep trader, didnt address allegations about secret decks but told me in a 2021 statement that the ship was carrying an appropriate number of animals.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fHr2TJ">
In 2020, <a href="https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1141260/Animal-harm-What-to-do-about-livestock-carriers">41 people</a> and nearly 6,000 cows died after the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/03/typhoon-maysak-ship-with-43-crew-and-nearly-6000-cattle-missing-off-japan">Gulf Livestock 1</a>, a cargo ship traveling from New Zealand to China, capsized. In an <a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/gulf-livestock-1-loved-ones-of-missing-stockman-william-mainprize-share-tributes-two-years-on/news-story/3fe8dc8ad5787683da4bbae0a0edaa9b">interview</a> last year, the girlfriend of one of the missing crew members said he had spoken of low food supplies on the ship. <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-11/why-did-gulf-livestock-1-sail-into-typhoon-maysak/101739560">An investigation</a> by Australias ABC cited concerns about the Gulf Livestock 1s safety, and <a href="https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/sitecollectiondocuments/biosecurity/export/live-animals/livestock/compliance-and-investigations/report-144.pdf">photos</a> from an <a href="https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/export/controlled-goods/live-animals/livestock/regulatory-framework/independent-observer-reports#_2019">independent observers report</a> produced for the Australian government revealed animals on the same ship in 2019 thoroughly covered in feces. The disaster galvanized protests against shipping animals, leading to New Zealands recent ban on <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/29/new-zealand-bans-live-animal-exports-from-april-2023">live exports</a> by sea.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4heLVy">
Last year, another botched livestock shipment horrified the public in France: 780 bulls that had been sailing to Algeria had to be <a href="https://splash247.com/nearly-800-animals-die-in-bureaucratic-spat-between-france-and-algeria/">sent back</a> due to a disagreement over their health paperwork — after which they were killed and disposed of. Similarly failed journeys were reported in 2021, when two ships from Spain bound for Turkey, the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/31/how-nearly-3000-cattle-came-to-be-stranded-at-sea-for-three-months">Elbeik and the Karim Allah</a>, together carrying about 3,000 young bulls, were forced to return home after being stranded at sea for three months. The animals were killed on arrival without entering the food supply.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0jNjAo">
A veterinary report on conditions inside the Karim Allah detailed a range of welfare failures, including dead bulls being <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/01/cattle-stranded-on-ship-to-be-destroyed-in-port-as-second-vessel-returns-to-spain">chopped up</a> and thrown overboard, and animals with joint inflammation, skin conditions, eye ulcerations, abscesses, and broken horns. On the Elbeik, feces buildup was severe, and many bulls were found dead, starving, or dehydrated.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HGwW8r">
Even when a livestock ship arrives at its destination without incident, what happens next is just as controversial. In the EU, slaughter regulations typically require that animals be stunned to render them unconscious before killing to reduce pain and distress, but in North Africa and the Middle East, this is often <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154608/">avoided or limited</a> in accordance with kosher and halal slaughter rules. Ritual slaughter laws are a highly contentious issue both in European politics and in the animal movement, contributing to debates about religious liberty, pluralism, and animal welfare. And in many countries, halal rules are evolving: In Turkey, for example, more halal butchers are <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/31/animal-stunning-slowly-being-accepted-by-turkeys-halal-butchers-say-activists">embracing stunning</a> before slaughter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GBGvMu">
Activists often use videos of slaughter abroad to draw attention to what they see as the horrors of live export. Just ahead of Germanys announcement that it would end exports, the minister of food and agriculture, Cem Özdemir, received <a href="https://vimeo.com/763325727">undercover footage</a> from the organization Animals International that appeared to show workers in two Lebanese slaughterhouses using ropes to bring cows down onto an already bloody floor. The cattle, identified as German by their ear tags, slip on the floor, have fingers pushed into their eye sockets and, once down, have one leg hoisted upward to immobilize them before their throats are cut. (These apparent abuses arent tied to halal slaughter; rather, they reflect cruelty thats common anywhere in the world where animals are slaughtered.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4IhCMQ">
The German agricultural ministry, responding to my questions about the video for a previous story, did not reference it directly but said it was “unbearable” to see “pictures of dead and injured animals during animal transport and of other animal welfare violations in third [non-EU] countries.”
</p>
<h3 id="mcEKmN">
More nations are banning live export — but that may not be enough
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KyS1Sn">
Ending live exports is popular with the public: A recent <a href="https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/aw_eval_revision_swd_2022-329_en.pdf">report</a> on EU animal protection laws <a href="https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/files/eurogroupforanimals/2022-03/090166e5ea55b805%20%281%29.pdf">found that 94 percent</a> of citizens surveyed supported ending animal shipments to non-EU countries.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="u6BFBv">
The animal trade poses serious human health concerns, too, that might make EU nations inclined toward a ban: Long animal transport times are known to increase the risk of antibiotic resistance, a recent EU report <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7586">noted</a> — a problem that the continent has been making a <a href="https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/sales-veterinary-antimicrobial-agents-31-european-countries-2021-trends-2010-2021-twelfth-esvac_en.pdf">concerted effort</a> to address. “Every time you transport animals, you create opportunities for disease spread,” said Ann Linder, a research fellow at Harvard Law School studying zoonotic disease. “Stress lowers immunity, and poor ventilation in trucks also helps spread … there is a real risk of pathogens lingering on surfaces, so you are potentially bringing healthy animals into a contaminated environment, and then locking them in there.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LpDGKR">
So far, the route to a ban has been different for each country. In New Zealand, the loss of human life on the Gulf Livestock 1 was a defining moment. In Germany, activists have had a sympathetic ear in agriculture minister Özdemir, a vegetarian who, as Vox has <a href="https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23273338/germany-less-meat-plant-based-vegan-vegetarian-flexitarian">reported</a>, has championed efforts to make Germany more plant-based.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wUUwk4">
Unsurprisingly, European livestock producers vehemently oppose a ban on live animal exports and have argued the trade <a href="https://www.ifa.ie/farm-sectors/live-export-trade-vital-for-our-e3bn-livestock-sector/">boosts livestock prices</a> by creating more demand for their products. And even for European countries that have prohibited live export to non-EU states, theres a catch: re-export. Because EU member countries cant ban exports to each other, nations that restrict animal exports out of the EU can simply sell animals to countries without one. Under Germanys ban, for example, the sale of cattle to Spain will continue unimpeded. From Spain, where no ban exists, animals are fattened and shipped to non-EU countries for slaughter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VBLuPi">
Spain is one of the EUs key <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/12/how-a-spanish-tourist-spot-became-a-global-hub-for-live-animal-export">fattening and re-export</a> hubs. Although the Spanish agriculture ministry did not respond to questions for this story, <a href="https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/comercio-exterior-ganadero/informecexgan-septiembre2022_tcm30-636129.pdf">recent government data</a> shows the country exports hundreds of thousands of animals annually to the Middle East, North Africa, and Latin America. A 2022 EU <a href="https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/960c2212-d7e6-11ec-a95f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en">report</a> put the annual value of Spains beef exports at about $1.2 billion, of which 35 percent is live animals.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sj9Zp7">
To keep the beef trade flowing, Spain buys calves from all over Europe, making it the regions biggest importer. The country imported 292,000 calves per year between 2015 and 2020, according to the same EU report. One of Spains key sources is <a href="https://www.bordbia.ie/farmers-growers/prices-markets/cattle-trade-prices/live-cattle-exports/">Ireland</a>, whose dairy industry was worth <a href="https://www.bordbia.ie/industry/irish-sector-profiles/dairy-sector-profile/">$5.5 billion</a> in 2021.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5QO9JO">
To produce that much milk, the Irish dairy sector impregnates its almost <a href="https://www.irishtimes.com/business/agribusiness-and-food/census-confirms-record-numbers-of-cattle-on-irish-dairy-farms-1.4751491">1.6 million</a> dairy cows every year. Since half their offspring are male and unable to produce milk, theyre eventually slaughtered for meat. Some of the calves remain in Ireland and are reared for beef, but tens of thousands are exported for meat or veal production in other EU countries.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xXvdHC">
Irelands island geography means that process involves a journey of at least 18 hours, inside trucks parked on ferries bound for the nearest EU mainland ports in France. From there, the calves are typically trucked to the Netherlands or Spain. Trucks dont have milk for the calves, so they make the 18-hour ferry journey, plus a few hours for collection and waiting time on either side, without food. A 2020 video, taken by the European animal welfare groups <a href="https://www.l214.com/">L214</a> and <a href="https://www.eyesonanimals.com/">Eyes on Animals</a>, showed weeks-old calves arriving in France, apparently desperate to nurse, being <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/02/secret-footage-shows-calves-from-ireland-beaten-and-kicked-in-france">beaten and kicked</a> to get them off of feeders provided at rest-stops.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="P3nXo5">
In response to questions from Eyes on Animals, the European Commission, the EUs executive branch, <a href="https://www.eyesonanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Time-Water-Feed-Roll-On-Roll-Off.pdf">suggested</a> that <a href="https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/hungry-stressed-reveal-plight-thousands-27366370">failure to feed calves</a> on such long journeys violated EU regulations. But Ireland has continued to ship calves overseas without food, exporting over <a href="https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/almost-222000-cattle-exported-to-date-this-year/">220,000</a> of them last year.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="A calf that appears to be dead or dying lies on the ground outdoors" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/q0CAoRmNSaQkwsSF6L_MVY_KQqc=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24356398/1920.jpg"/> <cite>Eyes on Animals/L214</cite>
<figcaption>
An investigation by European animal welfare groups Eyes on Animals and L214 uncovered mistreatment of calves traveling through a French port.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K4SxHq">
Rowley of Ethical Farming Ireland (EFI) said her group regularly sends evidence of problems with live export to the Irish government, “but the department repeatedly ignores us, or sends platitudes in return.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qyLkLP">
EFI and three other NGOs sent <a href="https://www.animalsinternational.org/media/irish_live_export/">an open letter</a> to Irelands Department of Agriculture, Food, and the Marine in November, asking for a face-to-face discussion about the possibility of Ireland following Germanys lead in banning exports outside the EU. “While the Germans are restricting live exports, our government is expanding them, actively seeking new markets,” Rowley said. “Its totally the wrong direction.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="47rF4V">
In an email to Vox, the Irish government said that its “work in this area is conducted on the basis that no one shall transport animals, or cause animals to be transported, in a way likely to cause injury or undue suffering.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W7OMYi">
The UK in 2020 <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/03/uk-to-become-first-country-in-europe-to-ban-live-animal-exports">promised</a> to end live exports and is expected to soon enact a ban, which might motivate the Irish government to do the same, Rowley said. But an EU-wide ban was equally or potentially more important, she added.
</p>
<h3 id="K4ESQF">
An EU-wide ban might soon be within reach
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mSydkR">
While individual country bans are helpful, only an EU-wide ban can close the re-export loophole and prevent long shipments and slaughter without stunning, said Gabriel Paun of Animals International.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lkQf7T">
“The ethical, economical, and social benefits for the EU to ban live export are clear,” Paun said. Those advantages, he said, include not just mitigating unnecessary suffering, but also the economic benefits of killing and processing animals in Europe instead of sending them to other countries to do the slaughtering. The biggest hurdle, he added, is the myth that Middle Eastern countries with halal regulations would rather import live animals than accept meat slaughtered elsewhere. The reality, based on Pauns experience in those nations, is that packaged halal meat is already being imported and that people dont want to import “dirty, wounded [EU] animals.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HVSBkp">
Similarly, in Israel, where animals are slaughtered according to kosher laws, the public is alarmed by the treatment of imported animals, and multiple bills have been introduced in the Israeli parliament to ban the trade, according to Hila Keren of Animals Now, an Israeli NGO. “A <a href="https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5304573,00.html">survey</a> conducted in Israel showed that 86 percent of the public support the legislation and 91 percent believe live export involves cruelty to animals,” said Keren. “The price of imported chilled and frozen beef is generally cheaper than the meat of cows slaughtered in Israel,” she added.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="A cow looks out from the side of a livestock ship, appearing to be gazing at her surroundings." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/KCpS8MGbnERKbbq6tF9ZC3wf3ak=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24356401/WAM7965.jpg"/> <cite>Jo-Anne McArthur / Israel Against Live Shipments / We Animals Media</cite>
<figcaption>
A ship carrying between 20,000 and 30,000 sheep and cows from Australia arrives in Israel after almost three weeks at sea.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZWXENT">
An opening for a European live export ban is not far off, with <a href="https://food.ec.europa.eu/animals/animal-welfare/evaluations-and-impact-assessment/revision-animal-welfare-legislation_en">an overhaul</a> of the EUs animal welfare and transport laws scheduled for late this year. Countries expected to support ending live exports include Germany, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden, given that all five recently <a href="https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11061-2022-INIT/en/pdf">called for</a> greater restrictions on animal shipments outside the EU. Luxembourg, which banned live animal exports <a href="https://chronicle.lu/category/agriculture-viticulture/39727-luxembourg-prohibits-exports-of-live-animals-for-slaughter-to-third-countries">last March</a>, is another supporter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VFqWlA">
But opposition is significant. Nations with ports that move large numbers of animals, including Spain, France, Ireland, and Romania, are likely to object to a ban, said Anja Hazekamp, a Dutch European Parliament member and vice chair of a recent <a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/anit/about">animal transport inquiry</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="g02Bqr">
The Spanish agriculture ministry did not respond to questions about export bans. The French government said it “remains opposed to a ban on the export of live animals to third countries for fattening/slaughter,” adding that it would “pay attention” to the upcoming EU revision of animal protection laws.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xcZfdK">
Irelands government didnt answer questions about whether it would support an EU-wide ban but told Vox that it “demands the highest standards of animal welfare during transport” and “facilitates [live export], recognizing its critical importance to the agri-sector.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NgMwYU">
Despite the intransigence of live-exporting nations, Germanys move to end direct exports to non-EU countries, along with this years EU talks, represents the strongest opportunity yet for a change of direction. The outcome will ultimately depend on negotiations between EU countries and a majority vote; a ban could pass over the objections of live-exporting nations.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="s7zDH2">
Arguments for a ban are currently being tested in Romania, a country that exported over 1.8 million sheep outside the EU in 2019. Dragoş Popescu, a progressive senator there, has championed legislation to end live exports by 2025. But hes faced steep challenges, with his own party deserting him on the issue, which meant he had to introduce the bill by himself in December, he told Vox.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="B840E2">
The challenge is to make people aware of live exports cruelty, he said. “People dont know about the treatment of the animals. We will need a campaign to raise awareness,” Popescu explained. His campaign will aim to build on the Queen Hind tragedy. “People were shocked by the Queen Hind, by the reality of live export,” he said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KXULX8">
Hopeful as he is, a recent WhatApp message from Popescu reflected just how difficult the fight might be: “The debate [on the bills introduction], as expected, was hard. The sheep owners were very loud,” he wrote, adding a bullhorn emoji.
</p></li>
<li><strong>Japans plan to ramp up military spending, explained</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="President Joe Biden sits with Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio in the White House" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/vsMEo5FspqKZ9_OiQ6S6gAdRJvM=/243x0:4114x2903/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/71869117/1456220203.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
US officials are sold on Japans new military posture. Japans public might not be.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DjT7o2">
US officials this week affirmed their commitment to Japans plans for rapidly scaling up defense spending amid rising tensions with China and North Korea after decades of limited investment post-World War II. But despite the support of the US and other allies, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishidas plan to turn Japans Self-Defense Forces into an army to counter threats from their neighbors<strong> </strong>will depend on Japanese peoples willingness to pay for — and staff — the surge.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5wX6p3">
Japans new security posture will increase the nations military budget by 56 percent, from about 27.47 trillion yen <a href="https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Comment/Why-a-record-budget-is-just-the-first-step-to-boost-Japan-s-defense">over five years</a> to about 43 trillion yen (an increase from<strong> </strong>about $215 billion to $324 billion as of market close on Friday). Historically, Japan has kept security spending low due to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/29/world/asia/korea-missile-japan-pacifism.html">its constitutional commitment to avoid war</a>, but the country does have a defense budget and has maintained the Self-Defense Forces since 1954.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m8eLJS">
US President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin met with their Japanese counterparts over the past week, putting into motion the new postures outlined in Japans new strategy. “Were modernizing our military alliance, building on Japans historic increase in defense spending and new national security strategy,” <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/13/us/politics/biden-kishida-japan.html">Biden said in his meeting with Kishida Friday</a>, telling reporters that the US is “fully, thoroughly, completely committed to the alliance.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NNTY5H">
Blinken, <a href="https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/870708/dvpcc/false/?dvpTag=Defense+on+Demand%3Ca+href=#DVIDSVideoPlayer581">in a press conference</a> Wednesday with Japanese Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi, Austin, and Japanese Minister of Defense Hamada Yasukazu, promised that Japan, under the new security plan, would “<a href="https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3265802/secretary-of-state-antony-j-blinken-secretary-of-defense-lloyd-j-austin-iii-jap/">take on new roles</a>” in the Indo-Pacific region and “foster even closer defense cooperation with the United States and our mutual partners,” although Blinken did not specify what those new roles would be.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m7amx5">
Kishida has <a href="https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3206863/east-asia-could-be-next-ukraine-japans-kishida-tells-g7-leaders">cited Russias invasion of Ukraine</a> as a warning of the threat Japan and other East Asian nations face from an increasingly militarized China — and has also used Ukraines successes on the battlefield in gaining support from international partners to explain Japans latest military posture.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="AphHoI">
Despite this weeks fanfare and the <a href="https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3267110/dod-japan-mod-sign-technology-and-security-of-supply-arrangements/">commitment of the US and other partners to Japanese military expansion</a>, doubts remain as to whether Kishida can convince the Japanese people to agree to commit both the financial and human capital that his proposed scale-up would require.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GAJ9GM">
Both US and Japanese leadership have attempted for years to increase Japans defense spending; the US under Trump pushed NATO allies in particular to increase their defense spending to the 2 percent required under NATO member defense spending protocols. Japan has long fostered close ties with NATO, in spite of not being a member state; <a href="https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/ep/page4e_001264.html">Kishida in June</a> attended a NATO ally summit, the first Japanese leader to do so. But increased spending and coordination dont necessarily mean a stronger military, and the “victory laps” as one expert put it, around the announcement have overshadowed the difficulty Kishida and Japan will face in pulling the proposed expansion.
</p>
<h3 id="6OxHfC">
Japans historic military investment, reframed
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wBqGrM">
Theres no doubt that Kishidas plan to ramp up defense spending is significant, but to frame Japans new posture as a 180-degree turn from pacifism is misguided. Japan does have its defense forces, and its defense budget <a href="https://thediplomat.com/2022/12/japan-approves-26-3-increase-in-defense-spending-for-fiscal-year-2023/">has increased each year for the past nine years</a>; for the fiscal year 2023, Kishidas government approved a 26.3 percent budget increase, bringing proposed defense spending to 6.82 trillion yen, or $51.4 billion.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="egQhkv">
<a href="https://thediplomat.com/2022/12/japan-approves-26-3-increase-in-defense-spending-for-fiscal-year-2023/">Already in 2023</a>, the government plans to purchase eight F-35A Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters and eight F-35B Lightning multirole fighter aircraft, part of a much larger package of F-35s its set to acquire from the US. Japan will also continue its development of a sixth-generation fighter with the militaries of Italy and the UK, purchase 500 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US as it develops its own counterstrike missile capabilities, and ramp up domestic production of missiles including a hypersonic model.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GP6cLp">
But as Tom Phuong Le, an associate professor of politics at Pomona College, told Vox, the new posture puts more emphasis on acquiring tech and weapons systems rather than recruiting people to serve. Particularly in a cultural context in which people often have good jobs by the time they graduate from university and no familial or cultural ties to military service, “whats the incentive in joining the military and dealing with Russia, and China, and North Korea when you can have a pretty comfortable job in the regular economy?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3Ws15T">
Theres no doubt that the security environment has gotten more dangerous, both in East Asia and elsewhere. Between China antagonizing Taiwan, North Korea testing missiles and nuclear warheads, and Russias invasion of Ukraine, there is reason for many nations — Japan included — to worry about the future and the possibility of conflict.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rtxswN">
Those concerns have created an environment for proposed policy changes that “the elites have been pursuing for some time now,” according to Phillip Lipscy, director of the Center for the Study of Global Japan at the University of Toronto. “The willingness of the Japanese public to go along with a more muscular defense has probably changed, or at least the leadership has perceived that public sentiment has changed in part due to the war in Ukraine.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QHk8zu">
But, as Mike Mochizuki, associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, explained, the circumstances in which Japan would be pulled into direct conflict with either North Korea or China are very limited; “North Korea is not going to attack out of the blue,” he said, and Chinas threat to Japan isnt a direct attack. “The threat is […] a military conflict over the Taiwan Strait and because of Japans geographic proximity, because of the US-Japan alliance, and because US military assets in Japan are seen as critical for any kind of viable US military intervention in the Taiwan crisis — because of that, if there is any kind of Taiwan conflict, there is a high probability that China would attack Japanese territory.”
</p>
<h3 id="FYc8l0">
The political reality in Japan complicates Kishidas plan
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="V8Qtz6">
Kishidas plan to increase defense spending means hell likely have to raise taxes — a difficult prospect given Japans aging population, whose care is requiring an ever-increasing share of resources. Japans <a href="https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2022/08/10/waking-up-from-the-japanese-debt-dream/">public debt</a> in comparison to its GDP is already the highest of any G7 country, and has been since 1998; increasing the debt burden could strain the Japanese economy.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="04OrB5">
Kishida himself is unpopular, tainted by the scandal of his deceased predecessor <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/22/japan-begins-inquiry-into-unification-church-in-wake-of-shinzo-abe-killing">Shinzo Abes</a> and the ruling Liberal Democratic Partys (LDP) alleged association with the Unification Church, Phuong Le and Mochizuki told Vox. Revelations of the links between the Church, which many in Japan see as an extortive cult, and the government after Abes assassination in July torpedoed Kishidas popularity. Should he decide to hold an election prior to his proposed tax hikes, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-27/japan-s-kishida-says-election-to-come-before-tax-hike-for-defense">as he said in late December he likely would</a>, it could essentially be a referendum on that proposal. If that happens, “there are many Japanese saying [Kishidas] <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/f3c457e5-82ee-462f-b8f3-c701a8e4840e">not going to last very long,</a>” Mochizuki told Vox.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TeG1uJ">
As Mochizuki explained, “Kishida himself is quite moderate, and he comes from the faction knowns as the Kochikai, which has been more moderate on defense issues, much more open to stable relations with China, and his foreign minister, Hayashi, has those same views.” However, Kishidas unpopularity has pushed him and Hayashi toward the more hawkish elements of the LDP. “Hes basically acquiesced to the defense side of things,” Mochizuki said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tvZAW3">
“What Kishidas been trying to do is to get Biden to embrace him,” Mochizuki said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jaeon7">
That political environment, combined with pressure from the US and legitimate regional threats “makes it more likely that Japan is going to take bigger steps,” as Phuong Le said. And though US officials have demonstrated their solid commitment to the US-Japan alliance this week, plans for Kishidas government to realistically implement the proposed changes have come up short, Phuong Le said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MinofV">
“Both sides arent talking about it because they dont have solutions.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="G1WsPW">
<strong>Correction, 9 pm: </strong> an earlier version of this story stated that Japans military budget would increase from 27.47 billion yen to about 43 billion yen. The amount is 27.47 trillion yen to about 43 trillion yen.
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Count Of Savoy and Alpha Domino catch the eye</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Devils Magic, Shabelle and Bellator please</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>FIR by Delhi Police over indecent remarks on cricketers' daughters: Maliwal</strong> - Indecent comments were made on social media on the daughters of India cricketers Virat Kohli and M.S. Dhoni</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Viacom18 wins Womens IPL media rights for ₹951 crore</strong> - The much-awaited Womens IPL will be starting from March 2023 to be held in a one-month window</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Gauff sets up blockbuster Raducanu clash</strong> - Coco Gauff defeated Katerina Siniakova to set up a second-round clash with Emma Raducanu in the Australian Open</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>First G20 Health Working Group meeting in Thiruvananthapuram from January 18-20</strong> - India assumed Presidency of the G20 on December 1, 2022. It is currently part of the G20 Troika, which also includes Indonesia and Brazil.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Local bodies in Kerala empowered to ensure 100% collection of solid waste through Haritha Karma Sena</strong> - Civic bodies can ask the public applying for its services to submit a copy of the user fee card/payment receipt, says the department</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andhra Pradesh: Goda Kalyanam in Tirupati turns out to be a feast for devotees</strong> - The event marks the end of Dhanurmasam</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andhra Pradesh: Mini Annadanam complex to come up in MBC area of Tirumala</strong> - TTD EO inspects the land available in the area to study the feasibility of constructing the complex</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Rajya Sabha session from January 31 to April 6</strong> - Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman will present the Union Budget 2023-24 on February 1.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Italys most-wanted mafia boss Matteo Messina Denaro arrested in Sicily</strong> - Matteo Messina Denaro, Italys most-wanted mafia boss, is captured after 30 years on the run.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andrew Tate: Romanian police widen probe into controversial influencer</strong> - The British-American influencer is in custody over allegations of human trafficking and rape.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Christine Lambrecht: German defence minister resigns after blunders</strong> - Christine Lambrechts exit comes amid pressure to allow the delivery of German-built tanks to Ukraine.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ukraine war: Chances of more survivors from Dnipro strike minimal - mayor</strong> - The death toll rises to 36 after a Russian missile wrecked an apartment block in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Lützerath: German police oust climate activists after clashes near coal mine</strong> - Riot police remove protesters trying to stop the expansion of a coal mine in western Germany.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Kyle and Andrew dissect The Last Of Us television premiere</strong> - Theres plenty to <em>ahem</em> chew on as the infected move from prestige game to prestige TV. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1909973">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Amazons Kindle Scribe is pen-centric hardware let down by book-centric software</strong> - Review: Despite excellent hardware, the writing features feel tacked-on. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1904449">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Watch live: SpaceX set to launch first of five Falcon Heavy missions this year</strong> - A trickle of Falcon Heavy launches may soon turn into a flood. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1909835">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>COVID, RSV and the flu: A case of viral interference?</strong> - Viruses, it turns out, can block one another and take turns to dominate. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1910055">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>ChatGPT has investors drooling, but can it bring home the bacon?</strong> - As Microsoft eyes $10B investment, its unclear what products can be built on the tech. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1910050">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>To the person who hacked my account, I will find you</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Edit: No you wont
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/BearEatingToast"> /u/BearEatingToast </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10coc1c/to_the_person_who_hacked_my_account_i_will_find/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10coc1c/to_the_person_who_hacked_my_account_i_will_find/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>I need a few brief jokes to tell to a group of elderly people. The punchlines need to be easily understood, and they need to be clean and not making fun of anyone with any kind of disability. Have any brief and fairly original jokes?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
This one is good, although Ill probably have to emphasize the mispronouncing words part, and instead of blonde, the dummy will be me:
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
<em>A blonde is flying in a Boeing for the first time. She starts jumping on her seat shouting “Boeing Boeing Boeing”. The pilot, clearly annoyed by this, walks up to her and says “Be silent”. After a couple of seconds the blonde starts jumping again on her seat shouting “Oeing Oeing Oeing”</em>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
And this is okay but Id like them slightly longer:
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
<em>Aman called his twin brother from prison. “Hey remember when we were kids and use to finish each others sentences?”</em>
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/LanceFree"> /u/LanceFree </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cmzk6/i_need_a_few_brief_jokes_to_tell_to_a_group_of/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cmzk6/i_need_a_few_brief_jokes_to_tell_to_a_group_of/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A man, obsessed with trains finally steals one and immediately crashes it, killing several people…</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
At the trial, the man is found guilty of multiple murders and is sentenced to death.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Before he is sentenced, he is offered a last meal, and asks for a single banana, which is given to him. The next day, he is led to the electric chair. They strap him in, pull the switch, and… nothing happens.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
There has never been a failure before. Since you cannot punish a person twice for the same crime, the court is forced to let him go free.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Within a weeks time, naturally, the man, who is obsessed with trains, goes and steals another one. He doesnt care that he cant drive it or that he failed catastrophically before; he is obsessed with trains and his only desire is to operate one. As before, he crashes it, and kills several people. Again, he stands trial, and again, he is sentenced to death, showing no remorse, only delight that he got to operate the train.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
His last meal request is again a single banana.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
When he goes to the chair, the executioner pulls the switch, but nothing happens. As before, he goes free again.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The train-obsessed maniac, once more on the loose, wastes no time in hijacking a train and crashes it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
His trial is swift, as this has already happened twice, and he is again sentenced to death. They ask him what he would like for his last meal.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“A single banana,” he says.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Oh, no you dont, you son of a bitch. Were on to you, now. We know all about your little banana trick, and youre not escaping this time!” The guards refuse his request, and instead serve him a standard last meal of steak, potatoes, and berry cobbler.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The next morning they strap him into the electric chair, pull the switch, and… nothing happens.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Did you give him the banana?” demands the head guard.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“No, sir! He asked for the banana but we didnt give it to him, we swear!” says one of the guards.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Turns out the banana had nothing to do with anything. He was just a really bad conductor.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/enlightenedFool721"> /u/enlightenedFool721 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10d6195/a_man_obsessed_with_trains_finally_steals_one_and/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10d6195/a_man_obsessed_with_trains_finally_steals_one_and/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Blonde Joke.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Guy says to a Blonde girl.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I bet I can guess when you were born just by fondling your tits,
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
no way says the Blonde, go on then, so 20 minutes later the
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Blonde says OK when was I born?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Guy says: Yesterday.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Blonde says dont be fucking stupid, have another go…
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Buddy2269"> /u/Buddy2269 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cw2kh/blonde_joke/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cw2kh/blonde_joke/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A boy comes home from school and says to his parents and grandfather, “My teacher assigned me to talk about the American government in class tomorrow. Can you explain it to me?”</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The grandfather walks into the living room with the boy. “Well,” he says, “Im the head of the family, so lets call me the president. Your father makes all the money for the family, so lets call him the economy. Your mother does all the chores at home, so lets call her the working class. Your baby brother is our familys future, so lets call him our countrys future.” But before the old man can say anything else, he falls fast asleep on the couch.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
That night, the boy is about to go to sleep in his bedroom, when he wakes up to a terrible smell, followed by crying. The boy knows that his baby brother in the bedroom next to his needs his diaper changed.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The boy rushes to his parents room and finds them having sex in their bed. He tries to tell them about the diaper that needs to be changed, but the parents are too busy having sex to notice him.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Then the boy goes downstairs and finds his grandfather still fast asleep on the couch. He tries to wake up his grandfather, but the old man is a very heavy sleeper.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The next day at school, the boys teacher says, “Yesterday, I asked you to talk about the American government. Can you explain it to the rest of the class?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The boy explains to the class, “The economy is screwing the working class, the president is fast asleep, and our countrys future is in deep, deep shit.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/wimpykidfan37"> /u/wimpykidfan37 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cop0x/a_boy_comes_home_from_school_and_says_to_his/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/10cop0x/a_boy_comes_home_from_school_and_says_to_his/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>