Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/21 February, 2024.html

475 lines
68 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>21 February, 2024</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The New Yorkers Luke Mogelson and Masha Gessen Win Polk Awards</strong> - Mogelson received the Magazine Reporting prize for his work in the trenches in Ukraine, and Gessen was honored for their commentary on historical memory and the Israel-Hamas war. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-new-yorkers-luke-mogelson-and-masha-gessen-win-polk-awards">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Legal Weed in New York Was Going to Be a Revolution. What Happened?</strong> - Lawsuits. Unlicensed dispensaries. Corporations pushing to get in. The messy rollout of a law that has tried to deliver social justice with marijuana. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/02/26/legal-weed-in-new-york-was-going-to-be-just-and-fair-what-happened">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Snake with the Emoji-Patterned Skin</strong> - In the wild, ball pythons are usually brown and tan. In America, breeding them to produce eye-catching offspring has become a lucrative, frenetic, and—for some—troubling enterprise. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/02/26/inside-the-world-of-designer-ball-pythons">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Matt Gaetzs Chaos Agenda</strong> - The Florida Republican is among the most brazen and controversial figures in Donald Trumps G.O.P. Hes also among the most influential. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/02/26/matt-gaetz-profile">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Trials of Alejandro Mayorkas</strong> - The Secretary of Homeland Security has been forced to respond to an unprecedented flow of migrants to the U.S.-Mexico border. Why are Republicans in Congress impeaching him for it? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/02/26/the-trials-of-alejandro-mayorkas">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>Why car insurance rates are soaring</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/_P1HgmSNf6jl3BKsboG9uhR3MHg=/474x0:4450x2982/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/73153593/GettyImages_1953496423.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Cars make their way heading east out of Los Angeles during the evening rush hour on January 25, 2024. | Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Youre paying a lot more for car insurance than you were in 2020. Heres why.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2e46sp">
If you pay for car insurance, youve probably noticed that rates are really high lately. Youre not alone.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="psho2L">
Last weeks Consumer Price Index (CPI) report — the governments method <a href="https://www.bls.gov/cpi/">for tracking what people are paying</a> for goods and services and how thats changing over time — noted that the price of car insurance was up <a href="https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf">more than 20 percent</a> over the same time last year. Whats particularly painful is that rates were already rising: CPI reports have shown that, overall, car insurance rates are up more than 38 percent since January 2020.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rPj4Ve">
Whats going on? The big insurance companies have been relatively quiet about whats driving rates up.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8hYmWj">
Inflation is definitely a big part of the equation. Everything now costs more, including cars and car repairs, and insurance companies are passing those costs on to consumers.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5RA2W6">
But industry insiders and experts I spoke with say there are a few under-the-radar trends also driving rates up, and they relate to <a href="https://www.vox.com/authors/marin-cogan">the subjects I cover</a> at Vox, so lets dive in.
</p>
<h3 id="m9lcdg">
Were driving more dangerously
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Hihdw8">
One reason rates are up is that driving became much more dangerous during the pandemic. People started engaging in risky behaviors like speeding and using their phones while driving more.
</p>
<aside id="nBuAW6">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="p7TWFC">
“Since Covid, we saw this incredible increase in distracted driving,” says Ryan McMahon, senior vice president of strategy for Cambridge Mobile Telematics. “You could almost track it by the day schools started to shut down.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TJ1yIF">
Hes not just speculating: CMT has access to driver data for millions of drivers, who download apps via their insurance companies that measure things like speeding, hard braking, and cellphone use while driving. McMahon told me that the huge jump they saw in distracted behaviors during the pandemic hasnt come down since.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UM4ZVg">
Maybe not surprisingly, the number of <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/23496462/crisis-american-roads-pedestrian-traffic-deaths-safety">fatal accidents spiked</a>; so did the <a href="https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/breaking-news/pandemic-sparks-surge-in-us-auto-claim-severity-453345.aspx">severity of auto insurance claims,</a> meaning cars came in severely damaged and requiring expensive repairs.
</p>
<h3 id="11YXS1">
Costs keep rising
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K5QJLS">
While drivers were getting more dangerous, law enforcement in many parts of the country began <a href="https://www.vox.com/23880418/traffic-safety-enforcement-tickets-rock-creek-crash">pulling back on traffic safety enforcement</a>, likely due to Covid-related staff shortages and criticisms over racial biases following the murder of George Floyd.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9Jk2qB">
Traffic enforcement has always been a deeply imperfect mode of safety enforcement, <a href="https://www.vox.com/23735896/racism-car-ownership-driving-violence-traffic-violations">one that leaves Black drivers susceptible to racial biases</a> from law enforcement. But its also one of the factors insurance companies use to determine individual rates.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ARNct0">
“Ultimately, without traffic violation data, insurers arent able to accurately assess and underwrite a drivers risk. With the compounding cost from accidents, carriers are now increasing rates for everyone, meaning we are all paying for this problem,” Mark McElroy, executive vice president and head of TransUnions insurance business, said <a href="https://newsroom.transunion.com/transunion-insurance-research-highlights-link-between-13-decrease-in-traffic-enforcement-and-22-rise-in-driving-fatalities/">in a recent report</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QCngMO">
Cars have also become more technologically advanced, making car repair more expensive.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uhLNLT">
Think of a car made in 2004 versus a car made in 2024. If the two crashed, the car from 2024 would probably be more expensive to fix because its more likely to have advanced technology like backup cameras and lane sensors.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TfgSXQ">
According to one report by <a href="https://www.cccis.com/news-and-insights/posts/what-is-vehicle-complexity-really-costing-us">industry analysts CCC</a>, the average estimate for a front-end claim in 2022 was $3,706, up more than 15 percent over the year before. Vehicles more than seven years old, meanwhile, were over $1,000 less to repair.
</p>
<h3 id="iPjmWu">
When does it end?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZNs5vd">
This is, needless to say, not good news for consumers.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ivvpKU">
The price of new cars has grown so much that theyre practically <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-02-14/new-car-prices-are-so-high-only-rich-americans-can-afford-them">unaffordable for middle-class consumers</a> now, and these rising costs hit low-income people even harder. Its particularly difficult because for many, a car is often an essential means of keeping a good job.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gFGa7r">
So theyre stuck with a kind of Catch-22: They cant live with the <a href="https://www.vox.com/23753949/cars-cost-ownership-economy-repossession">rising costs of car ownership, but they cant live without them, either</a>. And their rates are already likely to be higher if they have poor credit or live in a high-crime neighborhood. “The people least able to afford it are paying the highest amount,” said the industry insider.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JFkaYV">
The good news — if you can call it that — is that experts dont think rates will keep growing so much over the next year.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="IJZzJe">
“You had this problem where the insurance companies fell behind, so the prices didnt match the costs and they were losing a bunch of money,” another insider told me. Rates rose in an attempt by insurance companies to catch up with costs, but now inflation isnt growing at the same runaway clip and insurers arent seeing the same levels of loss.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="74uhyU">
“Costs shouldnt be as high as last year,” he said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HbERur">
<em>This story appeared originally in </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/today-explained-podcast"><em><strong>Today, Explained</strong></em></a><em>, Voxs flagship daily newsletter. </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/pages/today-explained-newsletter-signup"><em><strong>Sign up here for future editions</strong></em></a><em>.</em>
</p></li>
<li><strong>Why you probably shouldnt blow up a pipeline</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="A photo collage includes images of clouds on a blue sky, solar panels, wind turbines, pipelines, and puffs of smoke." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/iPwk1qN8v9XjBd1MLIVvFzNoHbA=/240x0:1680x1080/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/73153550/Tarini_Sharma_Vox_Final_021224.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Tarini Sharma for Vox
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The revolutionary lefts theory of the climate crisis puts ideology above inconvenient truths.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JH4ODj">
Seventeen years ago, the British novelist John Lanchester puzzled over a “strange and striking” fact: No one was blowing anything up to fight <a href="https://www.vox.com/climate">climate change</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7ti9NV">
This was strange, Lanchester <a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v29/n06/john-lanchester/warmer-warmer">wrote</a>, because “terrorism is for the individual by far the modern worlds most effective form of political action.” Whats more, there was no shortage of soft targets for an anti-carbon terror cell to attack. Gas stations were highly flammable. SUVs, ripe to be keyed, sat unguarded along every citys streets. So why was no one engaging in such property destruction? Why did activists remain committed to pacifism, even as the world hurtled toward catastrophe? Perhaps, Lanchester mused, “even the people who feel most strongly about climate change on some level cant quite bring themselves to believe in it.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="g5xYwx">
The concentration of carbon dioxide in Earths atmosphere is now nearly <a href="https://www.statista.com/statistics/1091926/atmospheric-concentration-of-co2-historic/">10 percent higher</a> than when Lanchester wrote those words. In 2007, limiting the increase in global temperatures to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels remained plausible. Today, <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/1/3/21045263/climate-change-1-5-degrees-celsius-target-ipcc">it is not</a>. The absence of violent resistance to carbon power might therefore seem even more curious in 2024 than it was when Lanchester wrote his essay.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="R74s9I">
Still, there are ways of resolving the apparent tension between the severity of the climate crisis and the absence of ecoterrorism. One is to question whether terrorism is, in fact, “the modern worlds most effective form of political action.” Another is for climate activists to start detonating pipelines.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6T4b4P">
Andreas Malm recommends the latter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HWRUoR">
In 2021, the Swedish academic published a case for climate activists to embrace property destruction titled <a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/2649-how-to-blow-up-a-pipeline"><em>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</em></a> (aspiring bombers will be disappointed by the volumes lack of step-by-step instructions). The book was a surprise bestseller. Mainstream media does not typically shower coverage on calls for violent resistance penned by Swedish <a href="https://jacobin.com/2020/06/andreas-malm-coronavirus-covid-climate-change">Leninists</a>. But given the perennial failure of ordinary politics to answer the demands of climate science, the liberal intelligentsia was ready to hear Malm out. His book won respectful notices in the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/15/opinion/climate-change-energy-infrastructure.html">New York Times</a>, <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/political-scene/andreas-malm-on-the-environmental-movement-and-intelligent-sabotage">the New Yorker</a>, and <a href="https://www.economist.com/the-economist-reads/2022/10/28/what-to-read-to-understand-climate-change">the Economist</a>, among other publications, and even generated a much-acclaimed <a href="https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/how_to_blow_up_a_pipeline#:~:text=Movie%20Info,controversial%20book%20by%20Andreas%20Malm.">cinematic adaptation</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gm43Bu">
Malm and his ideas received a new wave of scrutiny last month, after David Marchese of the New York Times Magazine conducted an <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/14/magazine/andreas-malm-interview.html">adversarial Q&amp;A</a> with the author and activist. Marchese suggested that socialists who endorse left-wing political violence but condemn the far rights attempts to override democratic decision-making through similar shows of force are moral hypocrites. Malm disagreed. Much debate over the permissibility of blowing up pipelines ensued.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BgdQBN">
Yet Malms true failing is not hypocrisy, but dogmatism. And the fundamental problem with <em>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</em> isnt its radical prescriptions, but rather, its doctrinaire diagnosis of the social crisis that it aims to cure.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KEot6E">
In that book, Malm makes some plausible arguments for the efficacy and morality of property destruction in some contexts. But he also paints a deeply misleading portrait of the climate crisis, one that is oblivious to many of the most vexing economic, technical, and political obstacles to rapid decarbonization. Unable or unwilling to see these barriers, Malm fails to articulate a persuasive vision for how they can be overcome in his book (and declined an interview request). Instead, he evangelizes for a course of action that would (almost certainly) undermine the climate movements political standing while doing little to contain global temperatures.
</p>
<h2 id="wEiqrO">
Malms argument, in brief
</h2>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4lXO9l">
The perils of climate change are increasingly vivid. <a href="https://www.vox.com/climate/2023/6/8/23753980/canada-fires-smoke-climate-change-air-quality">Wildfires</a>, <a href="https://www.vox.com/climate/2023/7/11/23791452/nyc-flooding-brooklyn-weather-climate-change">floods</a>, and <a href="https://www.vox.com/22538401/texas-heat-wave-weather-definition-record-temperature-climate-change">heat waves</a> regularly take lives and make headlines. Last year was <a href="https://www.vox.com/23969523/climate-change-cop28-paris-1-5-c-uae-2023-record-warm">the hottest in recorded history</a>. With each passing day, our prospects for preventing global temperatures from exceeding the red lines set by scientists grow more remote. Yet <a href="https://www.vox.com/fossil-fuels">fossil fuels</a> continue to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/fossil-fuels-still-dominate-global-power-systems-2023-11-30/#:~:text=LITTLETON%2C%20Colorado%2C%20Nov%2030%20(,sources%20in%20every%20major%20economy.">dominate</a> the worlds energy grids.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Pjbmis">
This disconnect between ecological necessity and economic reality is central to <em>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</em>. Its case for property destruction rests on the demonstrable failure of nonviolent resistance to bring about the fossil fuel industrys demise. Malm argues that the climate movement has been scrupulously honoring Gandhian principles for decades; disrupting global economic forums, marching through city streets, and appealing to the better angels of policymakers nature. And none of it stopped our species headlong sprint toward ecological collapse.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6qVFWb">
Even if we stopped building new fossil fuel plants tomorrow, Malm writes, the lifetime emissions of existing power plants would be enough to lift global temperatures more than 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Yet capitalists are blithely financing new coal and gas infrastructure that will only pay off if the worlds nations blow past their emissions targets. In Malms words, “these capitalists do not see any wrecking balls coming their way. They think they have nothing to fear.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="28ReIR">
And make no mistake: For Malm, its the capitalist class that is (more or less single-handedly) frog-marching us all to hell. <em>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</em> acknowledges no technical obstacles to rapid decarbonization, nor any regrettable economic trade-offs. Rather, it suggests that an immediate green transition would be relatively painless for ordinary people. Renewable energy is now “consistently cheaper” than the carbon variety, Malm writes. For this reason, the worlds poor and working classes have no compelling interest in even the near-term use of fossil fuels. Malm insists that “all emissions must be brought to zero in no time,” but that such radical measures will “not condemn the poor to eternal poverty, for what they need is not emissions but energy, and with the renewable kind cheaper across the board, the transition does not require the sacrifice of their material aspirations.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="AcfyEE">
With few technical challenges left to resolve, and no lamentable economic downsides to a swift green transition, victory, in Malms view, would seem close at hand — were it not for the greed of the ruling class. The wealthy, he suggests, would rather drown every coastal city than take losses on stranded fossil fuel assets. And since the worlds governments deem capitalist property “sacred,” theyre unwilling to prioritize humanitys future over Shells profits. Climate activists can liberate governments from their ruinous deference to capital, but only if their movement forsakes its sentimental commitment to nonviolence.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="L6xalf">
This is where blowing up a pipeline comes in. By sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure, militants can demonstrate, he says, that “Property does not stand above the earth.” With each “refinery deprived of electricity” or “digger in pieces,” the idea of stranding fossil fuel assets will grow more politically thinkable. And militants can do this without doing bodily harm to a single soul.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JFeSLD">
Property destruction, he argues, can also change the calculus of capitalists themselves. Much fossil fuel infrastructure is highly vulnerable to sabotage. Pipelines traverse long stretches of thinly populated territory and become inoperable if even a single segment is destroyed. If pipelines became subject to routine attacks, they would cease to be attractive investments. Capitalists might not be sensitive to climate risks, but they are highly responsive to financial ones.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="L96OAX">
At the same time, the emergence of a violent, militant wing of the climate movement will make the demands of more mainstream green groups appear more reasonable. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Malm argues, violent resistance helpfully supplemented many of historys most successful, supposedly nonviolent movements.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JOuEuL">
A pipeline cannot suffer. But poor people in frontline communities can. In Malms view, we should not hesitate to do violence to the former to stop CO2 emissions from devastating the latter.
</p>
<h2 id="LFTLFc">
Why soaking the rich wont cleanse the atmosphere
</h2>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X4SleV">
If Malm were right, and the ruling classs power and avarice were the overriding obstacles to a green transition, then the outlook for both ecosocialism and the climate might seem bright. In that circumstance, radicals like Malm would have a decent chance of mobilizing a mass base behind their agenda, which includes an immediate ban on all new C02-emitting devices. Attacks on fossil fuel infrastructure, meanwhile, would be liable to provoke considerable public sympathy, since most people would have no interest in the ongoing production of oil and gas.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zKijC1">
But the ideological convenience of Malms narrative comes at the expense of its accuracy.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NLxMDT">
It is true that rich people in general, and fossil fuel shareholders in particular, wield disproportionate political influence. And in the United States, this influence has long undermined efforts to decarbonize the <a href="https://www.vox.com/economy">economy</a>. The fossil fuel sectors clout has kept the Republican Party from fighting for climate policy of virtually any kind, while constraining the Democrats environmental ambitions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BFtHoP">
Although the political power of Big Oil is an obstacle to decarbonization, it is far from the only one. And the same can be said of <em>How to Blow Up a Pipelines</em> other main target, the carbon-intensive consumption of the super-rich. If every fossil fuel lobby shuttered its doors tomorrow, and all billionaires forfeited their yachts and jets, the climate crisis would persist.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ALErcz">
This is because <em>How to Blow Up a Pipelines</em> narrative is at odds with some basic facts about the climate crisis. Decarbonizing at Malms preferred pace would require technologies that do not yet exist and economic sacrifices that few wish to make. And those sacrifices would not just burden rich people in the West, but also working people in the Global South.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OtNsgE">
Malm is right that, by many metrics, <a href="https://www.vox.com/renewable-energy">renewable energy</a> is now cheaper than carbon power. Yet wind and <a href="https://www.vox.com/solar-energy">solar power</a> remain highly variable, generating more energy than needed during certain times of day and meteorological conditions, and little in others. This liability can be mitigated by massively overbuilding wind and solar assets in geographically diverse regions, and <a href="https://www.freeingenergy.com/solar-wind-intermittency-batteries-curtail-overbuild/">connecting them all to the grid</a> through transmission lines. But such overbuilding could eliminate renewables apparent cost advantage and would require large quantities of land.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qKp2eT">
Advances in <a href="https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/repost-why-im-so-excited-about-solar">battery technology</a> may eventually resolve the intermittency problem. But for now, renewable-heavy electricity grids need to be undergirded by firm (i.e., non-intermittent) power sources. There are some carbon-free sources of firm power, such as nuclear and geothermal energy. But the former has high upfront costs, and the latter is not currently accessible in most areas. In practice, this means that even climate-conscious jurisdictions generally need fossil fuels to avert blackouts when the sun hides and wind grows still.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0vZfRm">
Meanwhile, carbon-free approaches to <a href="https://www.cnn.com/travel/the-long-road-to-guilt-free-flying-climate/index.html">aviation</a> and <a href="https://www.iea.org/articles/the-challenge-of-reaching-zero-emissions-in-heavy-industry">heavy industry</a> remain far from commercial viability.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cL0Cz9">
The global economys persistent demand for fossil fuels derives less from the machinations of nihilistic capitalists than from the genuine difficulties of decarbonization. For this reason, it is not just private investors who are bankrolling new fossil fuel infrastructure, but also developmental states in the Global South.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="brYN1o">
Malms book suggests that the energy <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy">policies</a> of middle-income countries, and the rising living standards of their people, play only a marginal role in the climate crisis. “Look at it which way you will,” Malm writes, “from the angle of investment, production or consumption, it is the rich that drive the emergency[.]” But the truth is far more complicated.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Mm1FTF">
Last year, the worlds annual CO2 emissions increased by 398 million metric tons. <a href="https://www.vox.com/china">China</a> and <a href="https://www.vox.com/india">India</a> accounted for <a href="https://apnews.com/article/carbon-dioxide-climate-change-china-india-aa25e5a4271aa45810c435280bb97879">more than 100 percent</a> of that increase. Take those two nations out of the equation, and global emissions would have fallen in 2023.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cv1yxF">
These trends are poised to continue in the coming decades. According to the International Energy Agency, as much as <a href="https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023/overview-and-key-findings">80 percent</a> of the global growth in demand for electricity between now and 2030 is likely to come from emerging markets and developing economies.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QKT3hE">
None of this says anything about <em>moral</em> responsibility for the climate crisis. The cumulative emissions of Western nations wildly outstrip those of Asia. And the per-capita emissions of an American billionaire vastly exceed those of a middle-class Chinese household. <strong> </strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GWJ9qx">
But the atmosphere does not care about moral responsibility. Through sheer force of numbers, the Indian and Chinese people emit more carbon than American billionaires. Any political strategy for achieving decarbonization must therefore have an answer for how the Global South can industrialize sustainably.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eM2Gd7">
Malms assurance that renewables “are cheaper across the board” does not qualify. Due to wind and solars intermittency problem, and the high upfront costs of renewable infrastructure, it is often more economical for developing countries to rely heavily on carbon power, according to <a href="https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d0c0c6a2-f331-4bb9-b9d1-638d1f039e7d/content">an analysis</a> from the World Bank.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hNvZs9">
To be fair to Malm, global capitalists are implicated in that problem. Lenders generally <a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/02/green-transition-renewable-energy-government-investment-markets">demand higher interest rates</a> when financing renewable projects in developing countries than they do when bankrolling such infrastructure in wealthy nations. These elevated borrowing costs make it even harder for low-income nations to shoulder the large infrastructure expenses that low-carbon grids require.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ydubn3">
Still, the economic incentives for carbon development persist, even when states take the reins from private investors. Take China: Following widespread blackouts in 2021, the Chinese Communist Party has <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/20/business/china-coal-climate-change.html">made a concerted</a> effort to increase its nations reserves of electricity. Theoretically, it could have done this largely through the expansion of renewables. But Chinas wind and solar installations are concentrated in the nations sunny, windy northwestern regions, far from population centers, and would have required the construction of massive transmission lines to transport power to cities. So it was much cheaper and easier for the Chinese state to rapidly scale up electricity production by building new coal plants.
</p>
<h2 id="1EC0fc">
Greening the global economy isnt much like overthrowing apartheid
</h2>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DP0ikX">
None of this is meant to exonerate jet-setting plutocrats and fossil fuel lobbyists, or to deny capitalisms structural defects. Wealthy countries should reduce the CO2 emissions of both their superrich citizens (by redistributing much of their wealth and income) and affluent households (by, among other things, expanding <a href="https://www.vox.com/transportation">mass transit</a> and urban housing). And such nations should also cease subsidizing oil companies, and increase public investment in <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy">clean energy</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nY2eAL">
Nevertheless, contrary to Malms populist rhetoric, the carbon economys persistence cannot be chalked up to the greed of wealthy shareholders, decadence of yacht owners, or corruption of democratic states. In reality, switching out the energy basis of industrial society is a genuinely difficult technical challenge. Abruptly phasing out fossil fuels and carbon-emitting devices would have significant economic costs for ordinary people.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0zS5bw">
Malms blindness to these facts impairs his political analysis. At one point in <em>How to Blow Up a Pipeline</em>, the author mulls the mystery of why people in the Global South havent been sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure. He decides that it must be due to “the demise of revolutionary politics” and “insufficient politicisation of the climate crisis.” The possibility that people in developing countries want to keep the lights on in their homes, and are therefore uninterested in breaking their nations energy infrastructure, goes unconsidered. Which is odd, since many low-income nations are unabashed in their enthusiasm for new fossil fuel pipelines. Indeed, such enthusiasm has driven one of this decades <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/23458617/cop27-fossil-fuels-energy-developing-countries-coal-oil-gas-africa-finance">biggest conflicts</a> in global energy politics: Wealthy states in the Global North have been choking off financing to fossil fuel projects in the developing world, a policy that has generated <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/uganda-other-african-nations-push-for-fossil-fuel-projects-7dbcd006">furious protest</a> from poor countries, which tend to be more concerned with mitigating their extreme poverty than minimizing their emissions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="l4OOdE">
Malm is similarly inattentive to the climate movements political challenges in the Global North. In making his case for the legitimacy and efficacy of property destruction, he notes that many of historys most lauded social movements have featured violence at their fringes. He argues that the Black Power movement served to make Martin Luther King Jr.s demands appear more reasonable. And he observes that the African National Congress had no compunction about deploying political violence in South Africa when it seemed strategically helpful, while violent insurrections abetted Indias independence.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DvyBtJ">
Malm posits that one reason why the struggles against Jim Crow, South African apartheid, and British rule in India succeeded — while the Wests climate movement has thus far failed — is that the former all availed themselves of violence while the latter has largely forsworn it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Tr5ny6">
He acknowledges that Western environmentalists made <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/magazine/earth-liberation-front-joseph-mahmoud-dibee.html">forays into sabotage in the 1990s</a>, and that these experiments yielded far more state repression than tangible progress. But he attributes such failures to both the unpopularity of the saboteurs goals (which included a large reduction in the human population), and the imprecision of their targets. Malm is sensitive to the threat of backlash, and chastises activist group Extinction Rebellion for <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/17/extinction-rebellion-activists-london-underground">attempting to shut down the London Underground in 2019</a>. In his view, inconveniencing ordinary people who are trying to use a low-carbon form of transit advances nothing but the climate movements own marginalization. If activists directly target “the plinth of fossil capital,” however, he believes they are more likely to win <em>some</em> public sympathy, and less likely to undermine their more respectable allies.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nPH8JV">
Yet a commitment to nonviolence is scarcely the only thing that distinguishes the climate movement from all of the auspicious precedents that Malm cites. In many respects, climate radicals simply face a much more difficult challenge than did the celebrated social movements that they wish to emulate.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HFz79N">
The struggles against Jim Crow, apartheid, and British colonialism consisted of mass movements to secure basic rights. The injustice and indignities of apartheid structured Black South Africans daily lives, constraining their economic opportunities and denying their political freedoms. And the same can be said of Jim Crows implications for <a href="https://www.vox.com/race">Black Americans</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="F8Rx4P">
By contrast, the typical Westerner does not find their basic aspirations frustrated by climate change on anything like a daily basis. Extreme weather events periodically call the problem to mind, but even then it is <a href="https://heatmap.news/climate/wildfire-smoke-what-caused">not always clear</a> that rising global temperatures are responsible for a specific flood or fire.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xnduML">
Further, the anti-apartheid and civil rights movements could plausibly promise to redress their animating grievances, and without the advent of any new technology or cooperation of any foreign power. No technical challenge stood in the way of universal <a href="https://www.vox.com/voting-rights">voting rights</a>. Formal political equality could be established with the stroke of pen and enforced by existing institutions of federal law enforcement.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="D5ZgCF">
The climate movement, on the other hand, cannot credibly promise to eliminate the problems that it seeks to politicize. The world is going to get warmer, no matter how much we reduce emissions from this point forward. In any given rich country, climate activists cant honestly say that their agenda will improve climatic conditions, only that it <em>might</em> limit the extent to which those conditions get worse, assuming that other nations enact similar policies. Malms radical vision of decarbonization pairs this meager, uncertain prize with clear and immediate economic costs: Any near-term ban on fossil fuels would dramatically increase energy prices, and undermine the functioning of electricity grids.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ahjZAW">
It is not surprising, then, that Malms cause commands far less widespread and intense support among contemporary Westerners than the anti-apartheid struggle did among Black South Africans or the civil rights movement among Black Americans.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JkCJfl">
In fact, at least in the United States, polling and election results indicate scant public support for decarbonization efforts that entail <em>any</em> significant material costs. Last year, an <a href="https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2023-04/Ipsos%20Global%20Advisor%20-%20Earth%20Day%202023%20-%20Full%20Report%20-%20WEB.pdf">Ipsos poll</a> asked Americans whether they would be willing to pay higher income taxes to combat climate change. Just 25 percent of respondents said yes. That comports with a <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1TR17X/">2019 Reuters survey</a>, which found that nearly 70 percent of Americans backed “aggressive” action on climate change — but only one-third would be willing to pay $100 more in annual taxes to address the crisis.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TTKduV">
Issue polling can be unreliable. Different question phrasings can generate contradictory results. But the idea that Americans are unwilling to shoulder substantial costs for the sake of reducing emissions is buttressed by the electorates political behavior. In deep blue Washington, voters have <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/9/28/17899804/washington-1631-results-carbon-fee-green-new-deal#:~:text=The%20tax%20would%20have%20started,ton%20(in%202016%20dollars).">repeatedly rejected</a> a carbon tax at the ballot box, even when that levy was offset by tax breaks for working-class households. The fact that <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/467897/party-preferences-evenly-split-2022-shift-gop.aspx">roughly half of US voters</a> are open to supporting the Republican Party, despite its unabashed complacency about carbon emissions, further testifies to climate changes limited political salience.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="grkRga">
Perhaps most tellingly, even some climate activists routinely refuse to prioritize decarbonization over conflicting ideological commitments. In recent years, Maines Sierra Club fought to <a href="https://www.thestar.com/business/2021/11/01/hydro-qubec-project-facing-green-opposition-in-maine-ahead-of-tuesdays-referendum.html">block a transmission line</a> that would have enabled Americans to avail themselves of Canadian hydropower, New York environmentalists <a href="https://gothamist.com/news/so-long-indian-point-nuclear-plant-hello-more-fossil-fuels">increased their states carbon emissions</a> by shuttering the Indian Point nuclear plant, and a chapter of the Sunrise Movement <a href="https://www.gazettenet.com/Proposed-moratorium-on-large-scale-solar-projects-in-Amherst-gets-public-support-44506632">backed a moratorium</a> on large-scale solar farms in Amherst, Massachusetts.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="o0Bw78">
There is little reason to believe that climate radicals failure to deliver decarbonization derives from the pacifism of their tactics, rather than the complexity and unpopularity of their demands, and consequent narrowness of their social base.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yDltOo">
All this undermines Malms pragmatic case for pipeline destruction. Acts of violence conducted in the name of goals that the public opposes seem more likely to induce backlash than a leftward lurch in political consciousness.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rQZ0Kv">
To be sure, acts of sabotage dont need to be popular to cost fossil fuel investors money. But to meaningfully deter investment in fossil fuel infrastructure, radicals would need to commit sabotage at an extraordinary scale. This is an inherently difficult feat, which public backlash and state repression would make even more daunting.
</p>
<h2 id="orMpIn">
How to decarbonize the economy (without blowing up a pipeline)
</h2>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="p8vNSm">
Ultimately, Malms account of the climate crisis is at once too rosy and too bleak.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rla7px">
On the one hand, he makes the task facing climate activists look deceptively simple by suggesting that there is only one fundamental problem to be solved: Governments must be forced to subordinate the financial interests of the wealthy to the well-being of humanity.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DFJGi6">
But the actual challenge facing proponents of decarbonization is much more complex and multifaceted.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ww9mUU">
On the other hand, Malm exaggerates the political power of fossil fuel interests. Yes, governments havent found the will to put oil companies out of business by fiat (partly because doing so would increase energy costs for the broader public). But they have allowed market forces to strand all manner of carbon assets, in defiance of industry complaints. <a href="https://www.npr.org/2015/06/23/414926833/how-fracking-is-changing-the-nation-s-electrical-grid">Competition from renewables and natural gas</a>, combined with <a href="https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/05/inside-war-on-coal-000002/">new EPA rules</a>,<em> </em>devastated Americas coal industry over the past decade. By 2026, the US is expected to have <a href="https://ieefa.org/articles/us-track-close-half-its-coal-fired-generation-capacity-2026#:~:text=Key%20Takeaways%3A-,The%20U.S.%20is%20on%20track%20to%20close%20half%20of%20its,by%20the%20end%20of%202030.">only half as much coal power generation</a> as it did in 2011. If we can solve the technical and economic liabilities of non-carbon energy sources — which is to say, if we can make them truly “cheaper across the board” — we can euthanize the fossil fuel industry.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4SayqV">
Doing this will require a great deal of political agitation and policy action. We need to increase public investment in green technologies, slash regulatory barriers to clean energy deployment, provide generous aid and financing to green development projects in the Global South, and solve myriad other problems, all without imposing large costs on electorates, lest support for (relatively) climate-conscious political<strong> </strong>parties disintegrates.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eXFOvx">
Reasonable people can disagree about which political tactics will best advance these goals. But when self-styled climate hawks privilege ideologically flattering dogmas over inconvenient truths, they make progress on all these fronts more difficult.
</p></li>
<li><strong>Wisconsins new legislative maps are a win for democracy</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Tony Evers speaks at a lectern." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/OzvTZmhqJ98RDZgGQZL8cC9RROI=/415x0:5290x3656/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/73152963/1953489513.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers speaks about funding for the I-535 Blatnik Bridge before a visit by US President Joe Biden on January 25, 2024, at Earth Rider Brewery in Superior, Wisconsin.  | Stephen Maturen/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
They could break the GOPs longstanding gerrymandered grip on the state legislature.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XuS5ur">
Wisconsin now has <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/19/us/politics/wisconsin-legislative-maps.html">legislative maps</a> that align more closely with voters political preferences, a significant development that will fuel more competitive contests and could break <a href="https://www.vox.com/scotus/23861973/wisconsin-gerrymander-republican-impeachment-justice-protasiewicz-supreme-court#:~:text=The%20state's%20legislature%20is%20so,of%20the%20assembly's%2099%20seats.">Republicans longstanding grip</a> on its legislature.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ubcxvs">
The maps, which were approved by both chambers of the Republican-led state legislature and signed into law by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers on Monday, change the breakdown of the states Assembly and Senate districts from predominantly GOP leaning to nearly evenly split between the two parties. This redistricting means that Democrats actually have a shot at retaking the majority of the State Assembly in November, a prospect that was virtually impossible under the states prior maps, which the GOP had heavily gerrymandered in its favor.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QwkR7u">
Shifts in the composition of the legislature could be huge for the types of <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy">policies</a> passed and for executive power. Shortly before Evers first took office, GOP lawmakers in the state <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/12/4/18123784/gop-legislature-wisconsin-michigan-power-grab-lame-duck">voted</a> to weaken the governors powers — something Democrats could change. In a state fairly <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/state/wisconsin/party-affiliation/">evenly divided</a> between Democrats and Republicans, the new maps could also make the legislature more representative of the distribution of voters political beliefs. (<a href="https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-redistricting-republican-democrat-9c2677a09e48152df323fbf5c55611ef">Per the AP</a>, of the last 17 statewide elections, Democrats have won 14, but Republicans have maintained control of the legislature for more than a decade.) And new toss-up districts will create real campaigns in purple areas, giving those voters an actual say in who represents them.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="amw9MS">
“When I promised I wanted fair maps — not maps that are better for one party or another, including my own — I damn well meant it,” Evers said. “Wisconsin is not a red state or a blue state — were a purple state, and I believe our maps should reflect that basic fact.”
</p>
<h3 id="i8rFT0">
The key changes to the maps, briefly explained
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3RC1Gd">
<a href="https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2024/02/19/interactive-explore-wisconsins-new-electoral-maps/72664708007/">According to an analysis</a> from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the state will move from having 64 Republican-leaning Assembly seats to 46 out of 99; 45 will lean Democratic, and eight will have no partisan lean. Additionally, it will go from 22 Republican-leaning Senate seats to 15 out of 33. Fourteen will lean Democratic, and four are expected to be true toss-ups.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YUJUUi">
“This is a turning point in the balance of power in Wisconsin state government. It upends over a decade of guaranteed Republican control,” University of Wisconsin-La Crosse political scientist Anthony Chergosky tells Vox. Previously, Wisconsins gerrymandered maps ensured that Republicans would maintain their hold on the legislature even if Democrats won the statewide popular vote in an election.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mux0P2">
The new changes follow <a href="https://www.wpr.org/news/evers-signs-new-maps-into-law-ending-wisconsin-redistricting-lawsuit">significant court battles</a> over Wisconsins legislative maps, which the GOP had been fighting to keep as is. That fight went all the way to the now liberal-leaning state Supreme Court, which <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/wisconsin-supreme-court-calls-for-legislative-maps-to-be-redrawn-in-case-brought-by-democrats">declared the old maps unconstitutional</a> last year. Faced with a choice between adopting a map drawn by the Wisconsin Supreme Court or the maps passed Monday, which were proposed by Evers, GOP lawmakers chose the latter, fearing a court-drawn map would be even more favorable to Democrats.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2vzD5k">
Chergosky noted that the election of liberal justice Janet Protasiewicz in 2023 “utterly transformed the politics of redistricting in this state.” Protasiewiczs presence gave liberals a majority on Wisconsins State Supreme Court for the first time in 15 years.
</p>
<h3 id="v6E2qP">
The impact this could have
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GDEmGn">
The near-term impact of the new maps could be evident this fall, when Democrats have a real chance of winning the majority in the state Assembly. Because half of Wisconsins state Senate terms are up every two years, Democrats wont have a chance to flip enough seats to take the majority in that chamber for at least a few terms. But that they even have the potential to win the state Assembly this year is groundbreaking, and it has major implications for democracy in the state.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YxxImw">
“The most likely outcome this November is that the party that wins the majority of the vote will win the majority of the state Assembly. That has not been the outcome for over a decade in Wisconsin,” John Johnson, a research fellow at Marquette Law School, told Vox.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8MMInE">
Under divided government, with the Assembly controlled by one party and the Senate another, there would likely still be gridlock. But Democratic control of even a single chamber would force more compromise on items like the states budget, which could mean different levels of funding for key priorities like education and child care.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1hOINw">
Longer term, if Democrats gain control of both chambers (and if Evers or another Democrat wins the 2026 gubernatorial race), theyd be able to pass even more expansive policies, with experts noting that <a href="https://www.vox.com/marijuana-legalization">marijuana legalization</a> and Medicaid expansion are likely to be on the docket. Under those circumstances, lawmakers could also approve stronger protections for <a href="https://www.vox.com/abortion">abortion</a> rights in the state, where its Supreme Court is being asked to review whether access to legal abortions can continue.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5uy1Of">
Michigan, which has a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/2/9/23591330/michigan-democrats-whitmer-legislature-midterms">Democratic trifecta</a> in both its legislative chambers and governors office, has rolled back restrictive abortion and labor laws and approved new policies that promote the use of <a href="https://www.vox.com/energy">clean energy</a>, for example. Johnson notes that its a good case study of whats possible with Democratic control.
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>AUS vs NZ 1st T20 | David, Marsh propel Australia to thrilling T20 win over New Zealand</strong> - Having been set 216 to win, Australia skipper Mitchell Marsh hammered 72 off 44 balls before batting partner David (31 not out) sealed a thrilling last-gasp victory</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Terrorist Pannun threatens to disrupt India-England Test; security tightened in Ranchi</strong> - Pannun, who has been designated as a terrorist by the Home Ministry, has also appealed to the banned CPI (Maoist) through a video uploaded on social media to disrupt the match</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Chappell urges Root to play his natural game and drop Bazball philosophy</strong> - Senior batter Root has struggled for runs in the ongoing five-match series against India, registering a set of low scores across six innings</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Jota out for months, says Klopp, as Liverpools injury crisis deepens</strong> - The injury potentially threatens Diogo Jotas involvement in the European Championship in Germany starting in June.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andreas Brehme, scorer of West Germanys winning goal in the 1990 World Cup final, dies at 63</strong> - Andreas Brehme, who scored the only goal as West Germany beat Argentina to win the 1990 World Cup final, has died</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Here are the big stories from Karnataka today</strong> - Welcome to the Karnataka Today newsletter, your guide from The Hindu on the major news stories to follow today. Curated and written by Nalme Nachiyar.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Bar Association felicitates senior lawyers</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Congress Samaragni Yatra to reach Alappuzha on February 23</strong> - The yatra to be given a reception at Thanneermukkom by Congress workers led by District Congress Committee president</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Station upgradation of 15 cities under way in Mysuru railway division</strong> - ₹384.79 crore being spent under Amrit Bharat Station Scheme to shore up passenger amenities</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Karnataka govt admits to mistake in notification on singing of State anthem in schools, issues fresh one</strong> - Minister for Kannada and Culture Minister Shivaraj Tangadagi admitted that the words private schools had been left out from the notification</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Dozens of Russian troops die in Ukraine air strike</strong> - Video of the incident appears to show large numbers of dead in a training area in occupied eastern Ukraine.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>UK sanctions Russian prison chiefs after Navalny death</strong> - The UK freezes the assets of six prison bosses after the death of activist Alexei Navalny in a penal colony.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Grandfather satellite due to fall to Earth</strong> - Europes pioneering ERS-2 Earth observation spacecraft will make an uncontrolled dive to destruction.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>French warships intercept drones from Yemen</strong> - Large explosions can be seen in footage released by France from its patrol zones in the Red Sea.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Egyptian officials on trial over Italian students death</strong> - Giulio Regenis mutilated body was found left in a ditch on the outskirts of Cairo in 2016.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>NASA faces a quandary with its audacious lunar cargo program</strong> - Failure is now an option at the US space agency. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=2004034">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Court blocks $1 billion copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users piracy</strong> - “Cox did not profit from its subscribers acts of infringement,” judges rule. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=2004755">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>After years of losing, its finally feds turn to troll ransomware group</strong> - Authorities who took down the ransomware group brag about their epic hack. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=2004713">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Musk claims Neuralink patient doing OK with implant, can move mouse with brain</strong> - Medical ethicists alarmed by Musk being “sole source of information” on patient. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=2004706">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Walmart buying TV-brand Vizio for its ad-fueling customer data</strong> - Deal expected to close as soon as this summer. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=2004655">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>How many Germans does it take to change a light bulb?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
(As told to be by a German colleague)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“One! Because we are very effective and dont have a sense of humor!”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Same colleague proceeded to explain to me what the colors in the German flag stood for. Red = work Yellow = work Black = work Blue = sense of humor
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ReddutModzRKuntz"> /u/ReddutModzRKuntz </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avnj5t/how_many_germans_does_it_take_to_change_a_light/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avnj5t/how_many_germans_does_it_take_to_change_a_light/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Jokes from UK FHM #001 - September 2001.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
After 3 weeks on the road, a trucker pulls in to a Brothel and bangs £500 on the counter “Young lady” he says to the woman “I want a really tough overcooked steak and the ugliest woman youve got”.<br/> “Listen” cries the madam, “for £500 you can have a five-course cordon bleu meal and the most beautiful girl weve got”.<br/> The trucker glowers at her “listen sweetheart, Im not feeling horny, Im feeling homesick”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/BigBlueMountainStar"> /u/BigBlueMountainStar </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1aw9d7b/jokes_from_uk_fhm_001_september_2001/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1aw9d7b/jokes_from_uk_fhm_001_september_2001/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Upon hearing that her elderly grandfather had just passed away…..</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Katie went straight to her grandparents house to visit her 95 year-old grandmother and comfort her.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
When she asked how her grandfather had died, her grandmother replied, “He had a heart attack while we were making love on Sunday morning.” Horrified, Katie told her grandmother that 2 people nearly 100 years old having sex would surely be asking for trouble.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Oh no, my dear,” replied granny. “Many years ago, realizing our advanced age, we figured out the best time to do it was when the church bells would start to ring. It was just the right rhythm. Nice and slow and even. Nothing too strenuous, simply in on the Ding and out on the Dong.” She paused to wipe away a tear, and continued, “Hed still be alive if the ice cream truck hadnt come along.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/vect77"> /u/vect77 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avogq6/upon_hearing_that_her_elderly_grandfather_had/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avogq6/upon_hearing_that_her_elderly_grandfather_had/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>I have an EpiPen.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
My friend gave it to me when he was dying, it seemed very important to him that I have it.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/James-k"> /u/James-k </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1aw5kyv/i_have_an_epipen/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1aw5kyv/i_have_an_epipen/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Having sex with my girlfriend, she says “well, this is proper boring”</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I go “whoa, thank you!”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/trubol"> /u/trubol </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avzqg6/having_sex_with_my_girlfriend_she_says_well_this/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1avzqg6/having_sex_with_my_girlfriend_she_says_well_this/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>