Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/05 September, 2021.html

857 lines
100 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>05 September, 2021</title>
<style type="text/css">
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Link Between Texass New Abortion Law and Its New Voting Laws</strong> - For decades, Republican strategists have seen exploiting both issues as a way to hang on to power. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-link-between-texass-new-abortion-law-and-its-new-voting-laws">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Its Still the Coronavirus Economy</strong> - A disappointing jobs report shows that mass vaccination hasnt yet broken the link between the pandemic and our economic fortunes. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/its-still-the-coronavirus-economy">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andrew Cuomo Left Behind a Rent-Relief Debacle</strong> - As many as a million households in New York qualify for pandemic rental assistance, but the state has failed for months to get the money out the door. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/andrew-cuomo-left-behind-a-rent-relief-debacle">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>S.B. 8 and the Texas Preview of a World Without Roe v. Wade</strong> - The new law, an employee of Whole Womans Health said, has been “nothing short of devastating for our providers, our staff, and our patients.” - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/sb-8-and-the-texas-preview-of-a-world-without-roe-v-wade">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Surprisingly Big Business of Library E-books</strong> - Increasingly, books are something that libraries do not own but borrow from the corporations that do. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-communications/an-app-called-libby-and-the-surprisingly-big-business-%20of-library-e-books">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>The “g-word” of urban policy</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/DgdIsImHADSj0prOW2Y7VL5Rox4=/0x0:2667x2000/1310x983/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69819068/GettyImages_497765130_copy.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
The Artist Studio Affordability Project capped a day of protest in front of the Brooklyn Museum in 2015 with a tongue-in-cheek installation of indoor furniture and signs decrying the displacement incurred by gentrification. | Andy Katz/LightRocket via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The worst problems are in the neighborhoods that arent gentrifying.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="z9JElf">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lzQBXu">
“Was anyone really asking for a gentrified <em>Gone Girl?”</em> reads a one-line, half-star <a href="https://app5.letterboxd.com/comrade_yui/film/promising-young-woman/">review of<em> Promising Young Woman</em></a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zdDmOf">
“Graphic Novels Are Comic Books, But Gentrified” one <a href="https://jacobinmag.com/2019/12/graphic-novels-comic-books-gentrification">headline</a> to a Jacobin article proclaims.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="M6qjKv">
Gentrification appends so many words these days — “<a href="https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMRFNMTec/">graffiti</a>,” “<a href="https://twitter.com/kanaruaizawa16/status/1428459593781366793">rock music</a>,” “<a href="https://twitter.com/412goose/status/1428306759651897352">font</a>,” “<a href="https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMRFNufos/">thrifting</a>” — that it bears scant similarity to its original definition. In 1964, sociologist Ruth Glass coined the term gentrification. As Steven Thomson <a href="https://archive.curbed.com/2014/11/5/10028070/tracing-the-history-of-a-word-as-gentrification-turns-50">explained for Curbed</a>, Glass was describing a “class phenomenon … by adapting the British-ism gentry” to describe the process of “middle class liberal arts intelligentsia” moving into her primarily working-class London neighborhood.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CMHOQJ">
The term flew across the Atlantic and made its home in the United States where similar trends would begin making their way through cities over the last few decades of the 20th century. Google Books <a href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gentrification&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2019&amp;corpus=26&amp;smoothing=3&amp;direct_url=t1%3B%2Cgentrification%3B%2Cc0">data</a> shows the term gentrification didnt really take off in the US until the late 90s and has been steadily growing in use ever since.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ipm7MJ">
There isnt an agreed-upon empirical definition of gentrification among scholars, which makes it difficult to talk about it with any certainty. But talk we do: From <a href="https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/2021/08/05/indianapolis-martindale-brightwood-neighborhood-
gentrification-housing-real-estate/5400399001/">Indianapolis</a> to <a href="https://www.insider.com/photos-east-austin-
cooleast-neighborhood-changed-gentrification-
holly-2019-11#:~:text=Holly%20is%20in%20the%20accelerated,pricing%20out%20low%2Dincome%20residents.">Austin</a>, on a <a href="https://www.ourhomes-ourvotes.org/post/joe-biden-gentrification-foe-has-a-housing-plan">presidential debate stage</a> and on a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnH6zf3CLP8">panel on bike lanes</a>, and of course, on <a href="https://twitter.com/humancomedian/status/877652828000575488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E877652828000575488%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2Farticle%2Fbehind-
tweet-gentrification-ebt-humancomedian">Twitter</a>. Any time we talk about housing, the g-word inevitably pops up.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><img alt="A chart showing the rise of the term “gentrification” in books scanned by
Google, spiking in the year 2000 and after." src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/0UMj0c3-SlSDMUK8xA0CL3jLGsY=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22822361/Screen_Shot_2021_09_02_at_9.30.58_AM.png"/> <cite>Google Books</cite></p>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pNhqlN">
Our focus on gentrification might lead people to believe that it is the dominant form of inequality in American cities (our outsized focus on the phenomenon may be due in part to the fact that gentrification scholars, journalists, and consumers of digital media tend to <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-08/how-many-gentrification-critics-are-actually-gentrifiers-
themselves">live in gentrifying neighborhoods themselves</a>). But the core rot in American cities is not the gentrifying neighborhoods: It is exclusion,<strong> </strong>segregation, and concentrated poverty.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZI1b49">
White wealthy neighborhoods <a href="https://www.vox.com/22335749/housing-prices-connecticut-segregation-
zoning-reform-democrats-adu-parking-minimum">that have refused class and racial integration</a> have successfully avoided much scrutiny as gentrification has taken center stage in urban political fights. On the other hand, predominantly Black and brown neighborhoods often dont<em> </em>gentrify due to disinvestment and <a href="https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/12/4/20953282/racism-housing-discrimination-keeanga-yamahtta-taylor">centuries of racist and classist policies</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YF7tb2">
And yet, gentrification captures our imagination, providing the visual juxtaposition of inequality. While stagnant, segregated neighborhoods are an accepted backdrop of American life, fast-changing, diverse neighborhoods and the culture clash that accompanies gentrification are the battlefield where all the disagreements come to the forefront.
</p>
<h3 id="nScvrk">
Gentrification as the juxtaposition of the haves and have-nots
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UKMxaS">
In his 2019 paper <a href="https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-
abstract/106/2/390/5545787">“Hoboken Is Burning: Yuppies, Arson, and Displacement in the Postindustrial City,”</a> Princeton historian Dylan Gottlieb documented the violent displacement Puerto Rican residents faced between 1978 and 1983 as the city of Hoboken, New Jersey, gentrified. As thousands of young professionals flooded into Hoboken, the potential sale or rent price for converted units rose precipitously, and “property owners faced powerful incentives to displace low-income tenants.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5t5Cbt">
As a result, “nearly five hundred fires ripped through tenements and rooming houses in the square-mile city,” Gottlieb writes. “Most [displaced residents] never returned to Hoboken. Nearly every fire, investigators determined, had been the result of arson.” In sum, 55 people died and over 8,000 were made homeless.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DmVzTd">
Today, this sort of violent displacement is not what most people mean when they talk about gentrification. But what, exactly, theyre talking about is less clear, and the muddled debate often produces muddled policy goals.
</p>
<aside id="N451iQ">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TpeZit">
A <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/17/realestate/black-homeowners-gentrification.html">recent New York Times article</a> features a Black Brooklyn homeowner who went to talk to a new white neighbor and was mistaken as a panhandler: “I went over to strike conversation and before I could finish a sentence, he told me that he didnt have any money,” the man told the Times. Stories like this of Black homeowners watching their neighborhoods change around them abound, often with the earlier residents experiencing culture shock as the new entrants treat them or longstanding cultural markers with disdain.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fj0bgP">
In a Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/ericabuddington/status/1428006088104980481">thread</a> about the article, educator and historian Erica Buddington recounted how when a package was mistakenly delivered to her new neighbors house and she went to retrieve it, the neighbor immediately assumed she was a salesperson and shut the door in her face.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Zeh6Fd">
Beyond these frustrating and racist microaggressions is the concern about displacement and harms that might befall those who stay. A 2020 <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/cico.12473">study</a> by then- University of Florida sociologist Brenden Beck showed that “on average, calls to the police increased after a neighborhoods middle-class population grew.” While Beck did not find that those calls translated into more stops or low-level arrests, he did find that “police made more order-maintenance and proactive arrests following real estate market growth.”
</p>
<div id="X8W2WL">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
This is absolutely the way my new neighbors are. My package was delivered to the wrong house, and a guy answered the door and said, “I dont want anything your selling.” <br/><br/>When I told him that I was looking for a package, he said, “What the post office does isnt my problem.” <a href="https://t.co/Qtmm8OWdS2">pic.twitter.com/Qtmm8OWdS2</a>
</p>
— Erica Buddington</blockquote></div></li>
</ul>
<ol class="example" type="1">
<li><a href="https://twitter.com/ericabuddington/status/1428006088104980481?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 18, 2021</a>
</li>
</ol>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wcIqID">
Yet while gentrifying neighborhoods create those types of interactions between neighbors or heavier “order maintenance” policing, the gentrification isnt the root issue. Segregating neighborhoods does not get rid of these sentiments or the harms they cause: It simply hides them. In a wealthy, white enclave like the Upper East Side, there arent somehow fewer people who assume any Black person on their street is begging for money than there are in gentrifying neighborhoods. In fact, there are <a href="https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/man-behind-upper-east-side-racist-rant-offers-apology/2531928/">likely more</a>. Gentrifying neighborhoods pull back the veil and allow for these worlds to collide, displaying the vast differences in income, access to education, and government protection and investment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2JxlmE">
All of the problems people worry about when they invoke gentrification — displacement, police action against people of color, lack of investment, predatory landlords — are also present in segregated neighborhoods, <a href="https://now.tufts.edu/articles/how-racial-
segregation-and-policing-intersect-america">often even more so</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pJTrVd">
As George Washington University professor Suleiman Osman wrote in his 2011 book <em>The Invention of Brownstone Brooklyn</em>: “Stories abounded of renters [in Brooklyn] being pressured by landlords to leave revitalizing areas. But non-revitalizing blocks with high rates of abandonment and demolition saw rates of displacement that were just as high.”
</p>
<h3 id="ZRlwWJ">
What is gentrification?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RYIHAz">
Defining gentrification is hard, even for the experts.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mZe4Wb">
The Urban Displacement Project, a research and policy group at the University of California Berkeley, defines it as:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="AMBSvn">
a process of neighborhood change that includes economic change in a historically disinvested neighborhood — by means of real estate investment and new higher-income residents moving in — as well as demographic change — not only in terms of income level, but also in terms of changes in the education level or racial make-up of residents.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WfZVhb">
While this covers the conceptual ideas, determining which neighborhoods are gentrifying has been difficult for researchers. Not for lack of trying:<strong> </strong>MIT urban studies PhD candidate Benjamin Preis and his study co-authors compared four different models of gentrification and displacement risk and found “striking differences between the models.” For instance, one weighted “access to public transit” as a gentrification risk factor while the others didnt, and another didnt include data on racial composition.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="G1684q">
The researchers applied all of the models to Boston and found that there are “only seven [census] tracts that all four models agreed were either gentrifying or at risk of gentrification or displacement.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="68So2P">
“[The models] disagree on the front end, they disagree on what we call gentrification, and then not surprisingly, they really disagree on the back end to actually map out what those neighborhoods are,” Preis told Vox. “You end up with radical disagreement. One method identified nearly 120 tracts facing displacement pressure and another had just 39.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vemi8i">
As Columbia University researcher Brett McMillan <a href="https://shelterforce.org/2021/06/18/a-case-to-stop-saying-gentrification/">explains</a> in the publication Shelterforce, while people often assume that gentrification happens predominantly in overwhelmingly Black or brown neighborhoods, that is not actually the case. He details research finding “<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122414535774">Chicago neighborhoods with Black populations of greater than 40 percent</a> experienced significantly lower rates of gentrification” and <a href="https://www-jstor-
org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/stable/24541839?pq-origsite=summon&amp;seq=6#metadata_info_tab_contents">“white invasion into census tracts</a> with Black populations of 50 percent or more has been a relatively infrequent phenomenon.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NkDfn2">
The other big issue with defining gentrification is attempting to quantify physical displacement. Widely viewed as the most pernicious byproduct of gentrification, the evidence that gentrification causes physical displacement is a mixed bag.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DUTaz8">
Displacement is another phenomenon that is difficult to define. The reasons people move are not cataloged in any database, and poor Americans are notably transient due to financial insecurity.<strong> </strong>Additionally, defining “forced” displacement is difficult — if someone can afford a one-bedroom apartment in their community but not a larger home, are they being displaced if they have a kid and move to a more affordable neighborhood? People move for a variety of reasons: In 2015, FiveThirtyEight <a href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-many-times-the-average-person-moves/">calculated</a> that the average American moved more than 11 times in their lives, indicating that there are very few “longtime residents” of anywhere.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RH0mfZ">
Importantly, <a href="https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mdesmond/files/desmondgershenson.ssr_.2016.pdf">research</a> by preeminent eviction scholar Matt Desmond “found no evidence that renters residing in gentrifying or in racially- and economically- integrated neighborhoods had a higher likelihood of eviction.” But perhaps increasing rents can cause displacement without evictions. (The way to avoid that would be to keep rents low by building more housing and preserving existing affordable housing, but more on that later.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7xIXck">
While the arson in Hoboken was a clear-cut case of forced displacement, measuring the insidious ways that financially insecure Americans could be nudged out of their neighborhoods is extremely difficult.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gd8ypd">
The research literature in this space is mixed. Some researchers have <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360408976337">found</a> that “rather than rapid displacement, gentrification was associated with slower residential turnover among [disadvantaged] households.” Other <a href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1010.9471&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf">research</a>, however, found that “between 8,300 and 11,600 households per year were displaced in New York City between 1989 and 2002 . … between 6.6 and 9.9 percent of all local moves among renter households.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UEBPzU">
Overall, the research literature leans toward the view that gentrifying neighborhoods can lead to displacement, but they dont have to. Gentrification can<strong> </strong>bring with it the promise of integration and sorely needed investment that can increase residents quality of life — but only if disadvantaged residents are set up to take part in the benefits of increased investment.
</p>
<h3 id="7YnmSu">
Most urban dwellers live in poor neighborhoods that stay poor, or in higher- income neighborhoods doing their damnedest to stay that way
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TAs7XB">
The cry of “fire, fire gentrifier” spread through city neighborhoods last year during some of the racial justice protests. The battle lines in these neighborhoods are not clear but the anger directed at the yuppies brunching on the sidewalks was palpable. The group that conspicuously gets to avoid this conflict? Wealthy (often white) urban and suburban homeowners who have long refused to allow either integration or even yuppies to live in their segregated neighborhoods.
</p>
<div id="03IbW8">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
Chants of “Fire fire, gentrifier. Black people used to live here!” as the crowd makes their way through Logan Square this evening in Chicago <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chicago?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chicago</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AdamToledo?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AdamToledo</a> <a href="https://t.co/04S1qHUQvU">pic.twitter.com/04S1qHUQvU</a>
</p>
— Brendan Gutenschwager (<span class="citation" data-cites="BGOnTheScene">@BGOnTheScene</span>) <a href="https://twitter.com/BGOnTheScene/status/1383222382786060294?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xTiRl5">
While there are very real harms that accompany gentrification, its important not to lose the forest for the trees.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RKwtz9">
Gentrifying neighborhoods are “very tiny pieces of the story,” says UC Berkeley professor of city and regional planning Karen Chapple, who leads the schools Urban Displacement Project (UDP), which has worked to map gentrification in several US cities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Kpg3yW">
When Chapple was doing her first map of the Bay Area in 2005, she says, “about 10 percent of the neighborhoods were gentrifying but about 40 percent were just getting poorer over time. And it wasnt the story that anybody wanted to hear. … Systemic poverty and racism is so hard … and [gentrification] is also much more visible.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="a3PDWI">
Looking at UDPs work in <a href="https://www.urbandisplacement.org/los-angeles/los-angeles-gentrification-and-displacement">Southern California</a>, they find that in San Diego County only “7 percent of tracts experienced risk of or ongoing gentrification/displacement.” In Chicago, they <a href="https://www.urbandisplacement.org/chicago/chicago-
gentrification-and-displacement">find</a> that only 18 percent of low-income households “live in low-income neighborhoods at risk of, or already experiencing gentrification and/or displacement.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1FQrHs">
Whats happening in the rest of the neighborhoods? Segregation and/or concentrated poverty, which have been constant companions to disadvantaged communities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pgRBku">
In Denver, Colorado, they <a href="https://www.urbandisplacement.org/denver/denver-gentrification-and-displacement">find</a> that while only “17 percent of neighborhoods were at risk of gentrification,” and “45 percent of Denvers moderate-to-high-income neighborhoods demonstrated risk of or ongoing exclusion of lower-income households.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SU9k2P">
Racial and income segregation locks low-income people in <a href="https://www.vox.com/2016/6/6/11852640/cartoon-poor-
neighborhoods">a trap of concentrated poverty</a>. The best schools are relegated to the highest-income neighborhoods, good jobs often exist in either exclusive or gentrifying neighborhoods, and businesses are less willing to take root in an area of concentrated poverty because there are fewer customers. All of this is a vicious cycle that traps low-income Americans. It also hinders their ability to foster growth on their own because financial insecurity makes people transient and lacking in time and energy to build community.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="l3aP2c">
Meanwhile, homeowners in well-off neighborhoods have cemented systems of local control through rules like exclusionary zoning to keep their neighborhoods prohibitively expensive for lower-income Americans, including many Black and brown Americans.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bdhGDv">
Zoning laws are the rules and regulations that decide what types of homes can be built where. While this can sound innocuous, exclusionary zoning is anything but. These rules have a <a href="https://www.vox.com/22252625/america-racist-housing-
rules-how-to-fix">dark history in the United States</a> as a tool of racial and economic segregation, used explicitly to keep certain races, religions, and nationalities out of certain neighborhoods. And while the explicit racism has been wiped from the legal text, the effect of many of these rules remains the same: keeping affordable housing and the people who need it away from the wealthiest Americans.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bItWAF">
City by city, the message is clear: Segregation and concentrated poverty are the true blights of urban life, despite our fascination with gentrification.
</p>
<div id="lf3PYY">
<div class="volume-video" id="volume-placement-274">
</div>
<div class="caption">
Local zoning rules often keep affordable housing and the people who need it away from the wealthiest Americans.
</div>
</div>
<h3 id="HVi6eY">
How to ethically create integrated neighborhoods
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PaGCwt">
Gentrification does carry with it real harms, but there are ways to reduce those and to provide a pathway for integrated, equitable cities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fOm97b">
Integration is not a panacea, but research <a href="https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-
papers/2019/wp19-30.pdf?la=en">shows</a> that following gentrification, “children benefit from increased exposure to higher-opportunity neighborhoods, and some are more likely to attend and complete college.” Further, gentrification can allow existing homeowners in a community to benefit from the rising property values, as long as anti-displacement policies exist to ensure property tax payments dont price people out.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8lHUh1">
There are a few other policies the US could pursue to mitigate the harms that accrue to disadvantaged communities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZBmMUb">
First, the economic literature is clear that increased housing production reduces rents. It also ensures<strong> </strong>that new entrants dont bid up the price of existing homes but rather turn to new construction for their housing needs. The evidence that does exist showing that modern-day gentrification leads to displacement links that displacement to rising rents. Reducing that pressure is paramount to stopping unwanted displacement. In Hoboken, New Jersey, during the violent evictions and arsons, the vacancy rate fell below 1 percent by the start of the 1980s. This supply crunch contributes to the incentive for property owners to push out lower-income tenants.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Ff20OA">
Second, tenant protection policies could help forestall some evictions. A <a href="https://www.law.georgetown.edu/poverty-journal/blog/who-
deserves-a-lawyer-the-case-for-a-right-to-counsel-in-housing-proceedings/">right to counsel</a> in housing proceedings, for example, would rebalance power between low-income tenants and property owners seeking to evict due to potential profits from selling or converting the property for higher-income use. Its also important for cities to work to <a href="https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/preserving-affordable-housing-what-works">preserve existing affordable housing</a>, especially as new housing gets built.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6DgYu0">
Third, we need to rezone wealthy white segregated neighborhoods to slow the speed at which gentrifying neighborhoods change and to tackle segregation. Slowing gentrification can ensure that local officials can respond to protect existing residents while also allowing the benefits of the phenomenon to accrue.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="crz1fs">
These types of interventions can provide a roadmap for how to ethically integrate urban neighborhoods.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wYbVHB">
None of this is to undermine the very real cultural conflict that gentrification brings. Even if youre able to stay in your neighborhood and your home, watching store after store pop up that doesnt serve your community or isnt available to you at your income level can be deeply alienating. Its no wonder that people who have faced centuries of disinvestment grow angry as public and private money flows into their neighborhoods only after high-income college-educated people choose to move there. Even if those people are not wholly responsible for the inequality, the blatant injustice is hard to ignore.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="i6BnRK">
Taken all together, it becomes clear why we focus on gentrification while the unseen culprits (segregated enclaves) are able to avoid controversy: Gentrification is the most visual manifestation of inequality in urban life.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Zh23W9">
“Gentrification is a cultural sphere to work out feelings of resentment around inequality. … Those feelings arent to be discounted,” Gottlieb argues. “This is a manifestation of a long-running sense of I am not welcomed in the city, I dont have a right to the city. Sometimes those feelings can be worked out in the cultural terrain of gentrification, even indeed if the people moving in arent the proximate cause for them leaving.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uH15bc">
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Weve been radically underestimating the true cost of our carbon footprint</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="A photomontage of pollution from an airplane, an oil refinery, and a coal truck." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/f9rcqxYxy4tGy2vuVLKSJRzmscc=/400x0:3600x2400/1310x983/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69816834/fp_carboncost02.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Amanda Northrop/Vox
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The Biden administration needs to factor in climate changes cost in human lives — and what we owe to future generations.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uijffP">
More than a dozen Republican-led states are suing President Joe Biden over a number: 51.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PQIqFm">
Back in January, Biden signed an executive order that tasked a working group with determining a <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/9/26/17897614/climate-change-social-cost-
carbon">social cost of carbon</a> (SCC) — a measure, in dollars, of how much economic damage results from emitting 1 ton of carbon dioxide. For now, the working group decided to go with $51 per ton, the same SCC the Obama administration used, until it can study the matter in depth and release its final determination early next year.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jyI9Yu">
Being able to discuss the damage in terms of a precise dollar amount is important because it allows scientists and policymakers to show when the benefits of averting global warming are greater than the costs. At some point it just becomes cheaper to switch to sustainable systems rather than coping with all the wildfires, floods, droughts, and heat waves that result from unsustainable systems.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8OWqPQ">
The SCC has underpinned a lot of US climate policy for years. But new data is always coming to light, which means successive administrations have had to redetermine a social cost of carbon thats updated to the latest science. Thats where things get tricky.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="cuZzpx">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gW07gu">
Although the Obama administration had set the SCC at $51 per ton, the Trump administration put it as low as $1, in part because of a decision to factor in only domestic, not global, impacts of emissions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KBS8k2">
Compared to $1, the $51 price tag the Biden administration reverted to is high — and the coalitions of red states that have brought lawsuits against Biden, one in Missouri and another in Louisiana, are not happy with it. (A federal judge just <a href="https://www.eenews.net/articles/judge-scraps-red-state-lawsuit-over-biden-carbon-metric/">scrapped the suit filed in Missouri</a>, but the red states plan to appeal; the Louisiana suit is still pending.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="igmfFH">
But according to some top environmental economists, we have good reason to believe the true cost of emitting carbon is actually a lot higher than that price tag suggests.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WyFYT6">
There are a couple of reasons for that. First, until now, the economists who calculated the SCC had barely factored in one of the biggest harms that climate change can cause: human mortality. Second, the way the SCC had been calculated rested on a problematic premise: that damage in the future counts for significantly less than damage in the present.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fl1T4z">
Lets look at each of these issues in turn to understand why some experts now say the true cost of carbon per ton should really be much, much higher than wed thought. In addition to having major policy implications, this discussion has major moral implications: It goes to the heart of our ethical responsibility to care for future generations.
</p>
<aside id="X9sASA">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<h3 id="BEY5Nj">
The cost of our carbon footprint — in human lives
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0193R8">
Summer 2021s record-shattering temperatures, which led to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/07/01/heat-wave-deaths-pacific-
northwest/">hundreds of deaths</a> in the Pacific Northwest and Canada, made it painfully obvious that climate change isnt a far-off threat — its already killing people.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wjNsbA">
So you might think that the SCC would also include a decent estimate as to the number of climate-related deaths per ton. But due to a lack of reliable data, it didnt. There was no centralized data source enabling scientists to access daily temperature-related mortality figures for each country, so deaths barely factored into the calculation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ArRKPq">
Danny Bressler, a PhD candidate in sustainable development at Columbia University, recently published <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24487-w">a study</a> in the journal <em>Nature Communications</em> that attempts to rectify that shortcoming. His paper<strong> </strong>updates the SCC based on findings that have emerged in the last few years about heat-related deaths.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PEnfdf">
When Bressler factored in the projected deaths — what he calls “the mortality cost of carbon” — the SCC jumped to a whopping $258 per ton.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="abbn9t">
To break that down a bit: Bressler found that adding 4,434 metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere would result in one heat- related death this century. Thats equivalent to the lifetime emissions of 3.5 Americans.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="heEdGV">
People in other nations emit much less. For example, it would take the combined lifetime emissions of 146.2 Nigerians to kill one person.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nqmrJm">
This highlights one of the injustices of climate change. On a per-capita basis, people in richer, cooler countries produce far more emissions than people in poorer, hotter countries who suffer most of the damage.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PMHqpc">
Its important to emphasize that Bresslers estimate is only taking into account temperature- related mortality.<strong> </strong>(That means the net effect of having more hot days and fewer cold days.) But we know there are a lot of other climate-related events that can lead to death, including flooding, crop failures, disease transmission, and wars. Bressler told me he couldnt factor them in due to a lack of rigorous data.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="imMltm">
“But if you add in those other pathways,” Bressler said, “yeah, that would probably make the number go up.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Gq1duM">
At this point, you might be wondering where, exactly, these sorts of numbers come from.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aTP9iS">
In the early 90s, American economist William Nordhaus first figured out how to attach a price tag to the damage caused by 1 ton of carbon dioxide, a contribution deemed so valuable that he won a Nobel Prize for it. His model was dubbed the “Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy,” or DICE (to emphasize that were playing dice with the planets future).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="c5PPdo">
Bressler used Nordhauss original DICE model to calculate the SCC. He left all the parameters the same but added in the mortality costs of carbon, which the original model didnt properly incorporate. Thats what made the SCC jump to $258.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="64ToDq">
Some experts say that number <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/climate/carbon-emissions-death.html">might be too high</a>. But even if its somewhere in the right ballpark,<strong> </strong>that means its extremely worthwhile — not only morally but also in purely economic terms — to reduce emissions fast. More specifically, the main policy implication of the revamped model is that we should commit to full decarbonization by 2050. Note that while your choices as an individual factor into this, we can make a much greater impact by focusing on what governments and businesses do. “If you want to make as large-scale change as possible, do things at the level of policy or the level of business,” Bressler said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hF5paz">
If we fully decarbonize by 2050 rather than letting emissions grow in line with Nordhauss baseline scenario (which sees our emissions plateau close to the end of the century), we could bring down the expected number of heat- related deaths this century from 83 million to 9 million, according to Bressler. In other words, we could save 74 million lives. Thats roughly the number of people who died in <a href="https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-
ii/world-war-ii-history">World War II</a>, the deadliest conflict in history.
</p>
<h3 id="2Gbqjq">
The rate at which were “discounting” the future is too high
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="szv7Si">
Unless youve studied economics, you may have never heard about discount rates. But its a key idea to wrap your head around, so lets go ahead and unpack it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="b0YLnu">
The basic idea behind discount rates is that future damages or benefits are worth less than those in the present. That might sound unintuitive, but we all use discounting, whether we realize it or not.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cH0eYx">
For example, think about the value of getting $100 today versus the value of getting $100 next year. Its common sense that if I give you $100 today, thats better for you because you can invest it and potentially earn a nice return by next year.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1ZnL4P">
If instead I gave you $100 next year, the relative value of that gift would be “discounted.” But by how much? That depends on market realities like interest rates. Lets say the market dictates that theres a discount rate of 3 percent per year. That means what I give you a year from now is worth only 97 percent of what I give you this year. And the picture gets worse and worse with each passing year, since any earnings would have compounded over time if youd been able to invest earlier.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UwbTie">
When environmental economists talk about discounting, theyre typically operating with the underlying assumption that society is likely to be richer in the future, as thats the <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-2020">pattern weve seen over the past couple of centuries</a>. So a benefit worth $100 is going to be worth less to us in the future than today. Likewise, $100 worth of damage from climate change will matter less to us.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9tLPee">
But how much less? Economists disagree vehemently on the answer.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tAJqEt">
Nordhaus, the Nobel winner who created the DICE model, was a proponent of using a 3 percent discount rate. British economist Nicholas Stern argued in his famed 2006 <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-economics-of-climate-change-the-stern-review/">Stern Review</a> for using a lower discount rate of 1.4 percent, which would lead to a higher SCC.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WdwCwJ">
To understand their disagreement, consider that there are two main reasons to discount the future. The first is the reason we just covered: An extra dollar is worth less to a wealthy person than to a poorer person, and the assumption is that future people will be wealthier. Nordhaus and Stern<strong> </strong>wouldnt disagree about that.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tDThki">
But the second reason for discounting is more contentious. It has to do with the fact that people tend to value the future less than the present. In wonky terms, this is called the “rate of pure time preference.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="q6GYSp">
As Bressler explained, “Nordhaus would say people are naturally myopic — they naturally discount the future relative to today — and its not up to us as economists to tell people what to think. Whereas Stern would say, Well, we need to consider all the generations in our economic analysis, not just the present one, and we shouldnt discount the future just because its in the future.’”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hlNb6M">
This argument gets at a core problem of climate advocacy: Its hard enough to get people to invest in their own future, and persuading them to highly value future generations who cant advocate for themselves is even harder. But because Stern thought it wrong to implicitly discriminate against the future generations who will bear the brunt of our emissions,<strong> </strong>he put less value on the rate of pure time preference, and as a result came up with a lower discount rate.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DnYnMy">
Interestingly, what Bresslers study shows is that even when we assume Nordhauss higher discount rate and just add in the mortality impacts, we still get a big increase in the social cost of carbon.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JQJOWx">
And what happens to the SCC if we try using Sterns lower discount rate?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HxGIZg">
“Oh, it goes way up,” Bressler told me. “Way, way up. It goes into the thousands of dollars.”
</p>
<aside id="HGp747">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SUx9Gm">
Laurie Johnson, former chief economist of the Natural Resources Defense Council and now executive director at<strong> </strong>the Climate Cost Project, didnt bat an eye at the idea of a social cost of carbon in the thousands. She told me thats a reasonable number per ton.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="euTBmk">
“People are suffering and dying, and more people will be suffering and dying,” she said, emphasizing that Bresslers mortality estimates account for only a small fraction of the deaths well see.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZvRSSC">
Other experts likewise <a href="https://www.vox.com/2015/12/8/9869918/economists-climate-consensus">believe</a> the US has been using an overly high discount rate and thus underestimating the SCC. Economists Tamma Carleton and Michael Greenstone, for example, argued in <a href="https://legacy-
assets.eenews.net/open_files/assets/2021/01/14/document_cw_01.pdf">a paper published in January</a> that the discount rate should be no higher than 2 percent. When they plugged in that rate, it resulted in a SCC of $125.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="82qlBy">
Carleton said the need for a lower discount rate is justifiable on purely economic grounds. “As you might have noticed if youve tried to buy a house recently (among lots of other things), interest rates look very different. Capital markets have changed, and interest rates are lower,” she told me.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zjVm2K">
But there are also very strong ethical reasons to think the discount rate used to date is much too high.
</p>
<h3 id="jDPoGu">
The discount rate is not objective — its a subjective moral judgment
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yEk25D">
People do tend to value the present more than the future. You may grab for that chocolate chip cookie today, for instance, even though you know it means youll have to lean into the diet extra hard tomorrow. But that doesnt necessarily mean our climate models should follow suit. In fact, some philosophers think baking in peoples rate of pure time preference is a terrible idea.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qwjCeG">
“Were basically just measuring a form of human impatience and irrationality, then trying to add it into political decision-making,” Toby Ord, a senior research fellow at the <a href="https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/">Future of Humanity Institute</a> at Oxford University, <a href="https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/why-the-long-run-future-
matters-more-than-anything-else-and-what-we-should-do-about-it/">argued</a> on the <em>80,000 Hours</em> podcast in</p></li>
</ul>
<ol start="2017" type="1">
<li>“It doesnt seem to be the kind of thing that one should be respecting at all. Its just like finding a cognitive bias that we have, and then adding it back into your economic analysis in order to make your analysis biased in the same way.”
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"></p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oMEaIO">
One classic reason individuals undervalue future events is because theres a chance theyll no longer be alive when those events happen, so they<strong> </strong>wont be affected. That might make sense when it comes to individual choices, like eating a bunch of chocolate chip cookies. But in the case of climate change, respecting that bias means accepting that future generations will face centuries of climate disaster because of the choices weve made (and continue to make).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aAlPyZ">
Theres an implicit intergenerational trade-off here. And although theres no philosophical consensus about the right way to handle such trade-offs, many philosophers think we have a moral responsibility to care for future generations.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W2CcPf">
Frank Partnoy, now a Berkeley Law professor, <a href="https://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/the-social-cost-of-carbon-how-to-do-the-math/">argued this point</a> in a 2012 interview with the New York Times. “A human life is often estimated to be worth around $10 million,” he said. “But if you apply a 3 percent discount rate to this, that means that a human life 500 years from now is only worth $3.81 today.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="og9mIh">
Most people would agree that seems ridiculous. Philosopher Derek Parfit and economist Tyler Cowen underscored the absurdity of a social discount rate in a 1992 paper, <a href="https://d101vc9winf8ln.cloudfront.net/documents/27957/original/Cowen___Parfit_-
_Against_the_social_discount_rate.pdf?1523454279">writing</a>: “Why should costs and benefits receive less weight, simply because they are further in the future? When the future comes, these benefits and costs will be no less real. Imagine finding out that you, having just reached your twenty-first birthday, must soon die of cancer because one evening Cleopatra wanted an extra helping of dessert. How could this be justified?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="R8F2zH">
Now, thats not to say the pure rate of time preference should be absolutely zero. As Carleton and Greenstone <a href="https://legacy-
assets.eenews.net/open_files/assets/2021/01/14/document_cw_01.pdf">wrote</a>, “Perhaps the most compelling explanation for a nonzero pure rate of time preference is the possibility of a disaster (e.g., asteroids or nuclear war) that wipes out the population at some point in the future, thus removing the value of any events that happen afterwards.” Ord has made the same argument, <a href="https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/why-the-long-run-future-matters-more-than-
anything-else-and-what-we-should-do-about-it/#transcript">suggesting</a> we should discount the future by the extinction risk to humanity, and no more.
</p>
<aside id="DpVsNr">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K9GsLz">
Whatever you think about discounting, intellectual honesty requires us to admit that how we choose to answer the question of what we owe to future generations gets baked into the discount rate and thus into the SCC. And any answer to that question will be a subjective moral judgment, not some objective mathematical truth.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TFI1uZ">
“Ultimately, we cant rely on only numbers — we have to make really hard value judgments,” Partnoy told the New York Times. “We should stop pretending this is a science and admit it is an art and talk about this in terms of ethics and fairness, not what we can observe in the markets.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tZWA03">
The Climate Cost Projects Johnson agrees. “Some economists like to do a lot of smoke and mirrors and pretend that everything is objective and not based on values,” she said. “But it is based on values.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jY57ET">
She pointed out that even the first purely economic reason to discount the future (society will be wealthier in the future, and damages matter less the wealthier you are) is not some objective truth. She doesnt take it for granted that economic growth will continue, since climate change could hamper or even reverse it. But many economists, she said, have an “irrational love affair” with the idea of ongoing economic growth.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X32fHk">
“Theres a blind spot there among some economists — they really think growth can just continue like this,” Johnson said. “But its a delusion.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mHOxy9">
Because Johnson thinks the first and second reasons to discount the future are deeply flawed, she does not think it makes sense to continue talking in terms of a social cost of carbon. Instead, she said we should simply set an emissions target and then determine the most cost-effective ways of reaching it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1GshCs">
Shes not alone. Even Stern, one of the main economists to shape the idea of the SCC, advocated for the same shift in a February <a href="https://www.eenews.net/articles/seriously-flawed-experts-clash-over-social-
cost-of-carbon/">report</a> he co-authored with Nobel laureate and Columbia professor Joseph Stiglitz.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vy9L2U">
Realistically, though, the Biden administration will almost certainly set a social cost of carbon, as its promised to do so by early next year. The experts I spoke with expect the new SCC to factor in the latest empirical data. That includes what we now know about the mortality cost of carbon as well as data on what the market is doing; as Carleton noted, interest rates have dropped, and it wouldnt be surprising to see that reflected in a lower discount rate — and thus a higher SCC.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SU295s">
The Biden administration may well follow <a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24651/valuing-climate-damages-updating-estimation-of-the-social-cost-of">the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicines general guidance</a> on how to determine the SCC. One important aspect of those recommendations is that they “put uncertainty center stage,” Carleton said, meaning they “price in the uncertainty we face about future economic growth — and hence future discount rates.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SHRmaQ">
This careful treatment of uncertainty would go some way toward accounting for Johnsons objection that economic growth may not continue in the era of climate change. However,<strong> </strong>“I think the discussion still needs to be honest about what the real ethics are,” Johnson said. “You cant reduce this problem to a mathematical equation.”
</p></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li><strong>Millions of Americans dont have drinkable water. Can the infrastructure bill fix that?</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/grHw9TbOzZDymAmJDMhpgmaw62c=/333x0:3000x2000/1310x983/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69816685/GettyImages_1305853814.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Volunteers help to distribute water in Jackson, Mississippi on March 7. Residents in parts of the city have been without running water since mid-February. | Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Simply allocating more money wont necessarily solve the problem.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Dd6lZG">
Laurie Bertram Roberts has been drinking bottled water for years.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1yICXn">
Often, the tap water where she lives is questionable, she says. And sometimes, its straight- up brown.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1HOnHx">
A longtime resident of Jackson, Mississippi, Bertram Roberts has dealt with the citys water issues since she was a college student. In her time there, century-old pipes in Jackson have meant numerous water main breaks, recurring boil water notices, and constant anxiety about water quality for many of its residents.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XkgjYu">
To cope, Bertram Roberts and her family rely on 5-gallon jugs of bottled water for drinking and cooking, and filtered water for showers and baths.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6nWdOP">
“Ive lost track of the number of boil water notices weve had,” says Bertram Roberts, executive director of the Yellowhammer Fund, an abortion rights group.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EuoVsd">
Jacksons problems — which have long affected the southern and western parts of the city — came to a head this past winter when an unexpected cold snap caused pipes to freeze and burst, leaving <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/month-without-water-jackson-mississippi-struggling-residents-fear-next-
outage-n1261016">roughly 40,000 residents</a> without any water for <a href="http://wjtv.com/news/legislative-leaders-
kill-key-proposal-to-address-jackson-water-crisis/">more than two weeks</a>. In the interim, residents used <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/02/us/jackson-mississippi-water-crisis-trnd/index.html">disinfectant to wash their dishes</a>, snow to flush their toilets, and <a href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/briannasacks/jackson-water-
crisis-costs">baby wipes to keep themselves clean</a>. Local organizers, meanwhile, rallied to bring in pallets of bottled water, which frequently sold out in nearby stores.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gJobsG">
“It was crazy,” says Morris Mock, a board member for the grassroots organization Mississippi Rising Coalition. “You had mud, [or] whatever gunk, coming out of the faucets.”
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/wTNPsQZhhIrqY8BR3SBl1ekPOX4=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22820895/GettyImages_1305853771.jpg"/> <cite>Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A water distribution line in Jackson. The February water shutdown — which lasted nearly a month for some residents — was the longest the city has ever seen, and followed similar lapses in 1989, 1994, 2010, 2014 and 2018.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XuF1Qi">
Jackson, a majority-Black city, is among a number of places across the country struggling with aging infrastructure and water access, problems which have had a disproportionate impact on communities of color. As <a href="https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2021/0721/First-Flint-then-
Jackson.-Is-America-ready-to-fix-its-water-supply">the Christian Science Monitor reported,</a> a 2019 report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) found that “drinking water systems that constantly violated federal safety standards were 40% more likely to occur in places with higher percentages of residents of color.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="etmdna">
Now city officials are pinning their hopes on Congresss infrastructure plan. The <a href="https://www.vox.com/22598883/infrastructure-deal-bipartisan-bill-biden-manchin">$1 trillion bipartisan proposal</a>, which passed the Senate on August 10 and is waiting on a vote in the House, includes about <a href="http://uswateralliance.org/resources/blog/bipartisan-infrastructure-package-achieves-historic-investments-more-
needed">$48 billion in new spending</a> for drinking water and wastewater projects. It wouldnt necessarily solve all the citys challenges — Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba estimates that repairs and maintenance could <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/03/26/in-jackson-miss-a-water-crisis-has-revealed-the-racial-costs-
of-legacy-infrastructure/">cost as much as $2 billion</a> — but it could provide a boost thats been needed for years.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="n0P1em">
Whether the money has that effect, however, will depend heavily on if the funding in the bill actually winds up making it to the city.
</p>
<h3 id="Vhh7Bl">
Jacksons water infrastructure is simply too old
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DQ1vDT">
Many cities are navigating declining water infrastructure, from pipes in <a href="https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/1-trillion-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-heres-how-georgia-could-
benefit/3KZQ4GJXSBHQVMYPJPHX7UTLXQ/">Atlanta</a> that havent been replaced for decades to lead service lines in <a href="https://www.wbez.org/stories/despite-a-promise-chicago-has-made-no-progress-on-removal-of-lead-
pipes/02644e18-4cd5-4e7e-b595-3ebc111c62a6">Chicago</a> leeching contaminants into the water.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="R9KzgU">
Jacksons recent water outage, while it marks one of the most extreme and high-profile failures of the USs water systems, is indicative of this broader problem. The February shutdown — <a href="https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/03/26/the-jackson-mississippi-water-crisis-and-americas-crumbling-water-
system">which lasted nearly a month for some residents</a> — was the longest the city has ever seen, but it followed <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/24/why-jacksons-water-system-is-broken/">similar lapses in 1989, 1994, 2010, 2014 and 2018</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NqHOeX">
Much like other places, the issue Jacksons facing has long been the same: Its infrastructure is simply too old.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="Jackson, Mississippi Struggles With
Lack Of Water 3 Weeks After Winter Storms" src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/K-6HdKl074q2_RvuQ9aI8saxPzQ=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22820509/1306008628.jpg"/> <cite>Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images</cite></figure></li>
</ul>
<figcaption>
Workers in Jackson make repairs at the site of a water main break on East Pascagoula Street.
</figcaption>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jS4V3R">
“In some areas, weve got 100-year pipes,” says Charles Williams, former head of the Jackson Public Works Department. “Theyve been in the ground for a very long time, and weve been patching the system due to lack of availability of funds.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HWM1Cn">
As a result, issues like water main breaks have become more common, contributing to stoppages in service and cracks that make it easier for contaminants to get into the water. Williams estimates that in the past year alone, there have been more than 100 water main breaks.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DjJTgn">
Equipment at the citys water treatment facilities — including <a href="https://www.wlbt.com/2021/05/27/ob-curtis-could-be-operating-
full-capacity-this-fall-public-works-director-says/">machines at the O.B. Curtis Water Treatment Plant</a>, which froze during Februarys winter storm — are old too, causing further delays in making sure the water is clean and drinkable. Much of this equipment hasnt been properly weatherized either, so its especially vulnerable during cold snaps.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xTDgo3">
“If you dont make the critical upgrades and the desired maintenance, its going to break,” Williams says.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2IW3Wf">
While the <a href="https://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2021/may/12/epa-jackson-water-safe-
drink-despite-system-proble/">EPA has deemed Jacksons water safe to drink</a> as long as there isnt a boil water notice, its also called for major repairs at its treatment facilities in order to better address potential contaminants. In 2015, annual water reports showed that lead levels in the citys water were nearly 50 percent higher than the acceptable standard, <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2021/07/22/environmental-protection-
agency-jackson-miss-water-issues/8056918002/">the Clarion Ledger reported</a>. Government analyses in June 2016 also found that more than a fifth of Jackson homes had water that exceeded the federal governments “action” lead level, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/17/high-levels-lead-mississippi-water-flint-michigan">according to the Guardian</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SsjbiT">
Earlier this year, city officials laid out a plan for increasing staffing at treatment plants and fixing machines there. The <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2021/06/30/councilmembers-study-epa-mayors-plan-fix-jacksons-water-
system/7794448002/">estimated costs</a> include $70 million to address maintenance at two treatment plants and $100 million to repair the distribution system — though Williams notes that the full price tag of a water overhaul is likely to be much higher. (Lumumbas <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/03/26/in-jackson-miss-a-water-
crisis-has-revealed-the-racial-costs-of-legacy-infrastructure/">$2 billion estimate</a> for complete repairs to Jacksons water and wastewater systems easily dwarfs the citys <a href="https://www.wlbt.com/2021/03/02/jackson-
seeking-sales-tax-hike-cover-water-sewer-needs/">annual $300 million budget</a>.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pYvqoH">
One reason the city hasnt been able to fix its water issues is that it just hasnt had the funds to do so. Over time, the city has seen its population and tax base decrease, significantly reducing its revenues for utilities and other services, as <a href="https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2021/0721/First-Flint-then-Jackson.-Is-America-ready-to-fix-its-water-
supply">the Christian Science Monitor explained</a>:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="clVhML">
As in other metro areas nationwide, school integration led to white flight, and in later decades other factors including rising crime rates fueled a further exodus to the suburbs among Jacksons white and Black middle class alike.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pszqrD">
With them, too, went a large portion of a tax base that Mississippis largest city has historically depended upon.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="l8T00x">
Federal <a href="http://www.uswateralliance.org/sites/uswateralliance.org/files/publications/VOW%20Economic%20Paper_0.pdf">funding for water infrastructure has also sharply dipped</a> since the 1970s, forcing states and localities to try to cover these gaps. (According to <a href="http://www.uswateralliance.org/sites/uswateralliance.org/files/publications/The%20Economic%20Benefits%20of%20Investing%20in%20Water%20Infrastructure_final.pdf">the US Water Alliance</a>, federal funding accounted for 63 percent of capital spending on water infrastructure in 1977, a number thats since dwindled to less than 10 percent.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XOdrWx">
To raise more infrastructure funds, Jackson previously instituted a 1 percent hike to its sales tax in 2014, <a href="https://www.wlbt.com/2021/03/02/jackson-
seeking-sales-tax-hike-cover-water-sewer-needs/">which brings in roughly $14 million a year</a>. It also <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/25/billions-will-flow-to-mississippi-from-rescue-act-where-will-it-
go/">received $47 million as part of the American Rescue Plan</a> earlier in 2021, some of which is being allocated to water-related repairs. And state lawmakers granted Jackson <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/30/jackson-
wanted-47-million-for-water-crisis-lawmakers-are-providing-3-million/">$3 million in funding</a> for water plant fixes.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fM41HT">
These measures still arent enough to solve Jacksons water problems, though. And given the funding shortages its experienced, the city has focused on using its limited water budget to stem the damage rather than fixing it wholesale.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SIxwWO">
More federal funding could be significant in helping the city address the overwhelming expenses it still has, if its properly targeted. ”This kind of package from the federal government is truly our only hope,” Jackson City Council President Virgi Lindsay <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2021/08/11/lumumba-biden-discuss-jackson-water-issues-virtual-
meeting/5566452001/">said recently</a>.
</p>
<h3 id="LJknwn">
The infrastructure bill may not be targeted enough to be effective
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZwVbRP">
Getting much-needed funding to Jackson will depend on how Mississippi ultimately chooses to dole out its infrastructure money.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bng4Mh">
The EPA manages two programs to send federal dollars to states to help fix their water systems: the <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf">Drinking Water State Revolving Fund</a> and the <a href="https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf">Clean Water State Revolving Fund</a>. But the amount they typically parcel out is small compared to the scope of needs in a city like Jackson. Under the Senate-passed infrastructure plan, much of the federal money for water systems would flow through those programs, which are administered by the states, rather than going directly to cities and municipalities in need.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/tcgNACsnUaTKQM8ofy7LeU3Uj5Q=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22820887/GettyImages_1306015415.jpg"/> <cite>Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba addresses the citys water problem during a press conference on March 8.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rDVVlo">
In 2021, the federal government sent $1.1 billion to states via the <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf/2017-2021-allotment-federal-funds-states-tribes-and-
territories">Drinking Water State Revolving Fund</a> (DWSRF) and an additional $1.6 billion via the <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/documents/2021_cwsrf_allotments.pdf">Clean Water State Revolving Fund</a> (CWSRF). Mississippi received about $26 million of those funds, which it is distributing to local governments in the form of loans and grants. (Because of how the state revolving funds are set up, they also include more money than the annual federal allocations places receive. In total, <a href="https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/44,0,127.html">Mississippis drinking water fund</a> has roughly <a href="https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/resources/7992.pdf">$37 million to distribute in 2021</a>, for instance.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="bG2wqE">
According to <a href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/mississippi/articles/2021-07-22/jackson-
reviews-water-system-staff-to-comply-with-epa-order">the Associated Press,</a> “Jackson has received almost $20 million over the past four years and is seeking an additional $27 million [in 2021]” from the DWSRF.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="c31OI7">
In the past, residents and organizers have raised concerns about whether Jacksons water needs were getting adequate attention from the state government: During Februarys water crisis, Mississippi officials moved slowly to <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2021/03/09/city-gives-update-water-shortage-distribution-
sites/4641728001/">submit a disaster declaration</a> or offer additional aid to the majority-Black city.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mnFa7G">
And while Jackson received $47 million in federal stimulus funds from the American Rescue Plan, the state <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/30/jackson-wanted-47-million-for-water-crisis-lawmakers-are-
providing-3-million/">approved only $3 million of another $47 million</a> in funding that the city had asked for to recover from its water emergency, a situation that has led some residents and activists to question if racial bias has been playing a role in some officials treatment of the city. Previously, the state legislature <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/30/jackson-wanted-47-million-for-water-crisis-lawmakers-are-
providing-3-million/">sunk another proposal</a> for a sales tax increase to raise more infrastructure funds as well.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="F2SDzb">
“If it was a majority-white city of the same size, I dont think people would have drug their feet to come help,” Bertram Roberts says. The governors office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. <a href="https://mississippitoday.org/2021/03/30/jackson-wanted-47-million-for-water-crisis-lawmakers-are-
providing-3-million/">Mississippi Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann</a> has pointed to how much federal money the city was poised to receive when discussing the states decision to allocate just $3 million earlier this year.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DaKWP7">
Money from the DWSRF and CWSRF, meanwhile, is separate from the support Jackson got from the state and federal governments following its water emergency, and its allocated through state agencies.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><img alt="Jackson, Mississippi Struggles With Lack Of Water 3 Weeks After Winter Storms" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/3gBavme5XygoOiHo0hMgAbc8pSY=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22820429/1305564041.jpg"/> <cite>Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images</cite></p>
<figcaption>
Charles Williams (not pictured), former head of the Jackson Public Works Department, estimates that in the past year alone, there have been more than 100 water main breaks.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BUNQhL">
According to data from the EPAs Project Benefits Reporting System, which was shared with Vox by the Environmental Policy Innovation Centers Katy Hansen, Jackson received about $20.2 million of $253.9 million in funds allocated via the DWSRF between 2010 and 2020, roughly 8 percent of the total pot of money. Jacksons 170,000 residents also make up roughly 6 percent of the states total population of 3 million, though factors other than a citys size, such as a places reliance on low-cost financing, contribute to need for these funds. (Data from the Mississippi Department of Health also showed that the initial loan awards for the city were $23.8 million between 2010-2020, in addition to an emergency loan it received of $467,000.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VIq1F7">
Whether the money in the infrastructure bill will effectively be distributed to places in need like Jackson is an open question. Jim Craig, Mississippis Director of Health Protection, noted that state legislation would end up determining how the process would work, and added that officials have approved past loans to the city that have exceeded the $5 million maximum loan amount that had been set for the program.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rzummv">
A <a href="https://www.eenews.net/articles/report-racial-disparities-afflict-epa-drinking-water-funds/">report from the Environmental Policy Innovation Center (EPIC)</a> co-authored by Hansen, a senior water adviser at EPIC, previously looked at 10 states allocation of DWSRF money and found that several states struggled to deliver this aid equitably: Smaller localities and places with a higher proportion of people of color have historically received less money from the program both because they had less resources to pursue this funding and because much of it was dispensed as loans instead of grants. <a href="http://policyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/SRFs_Drinking-Water-Analysis.pdf">The study</a> did not include Mississippi, though Sri Vedachalam, EPICs director of water, noted that the dynamics of the report were likely to be relatively consistent across states.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EX2ItS">
“We see this pattern where money is given to certain types of communities while others struggle to secure that type of money,” says Vedachalam. Because states have significant control over where these funds go, the boost the bill provides doesnt necessarily guarantee that Jackson would receive sufficient extra money.
</p>
<h3 id="nOxIhW">
How the infrastructure bill could help
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pRNFMs">
The bipartisan infrastructure plan includes about $48 billion in new funds for water-related repairs. As <a href="http://uswateralliance.org/resources/blog/bipartisan-infrastructure-package-achieves-historic-investments-more-
needed">detailed by the US Water Alliance</a>, there is $11.7 billion allocated to the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund over five years, $11.7 billion allocated to the Clean Water State Revolving Fund over five years, and $15 billion allocated to addressing lead service lines over five years that will be distributed via the Drinking Water Fund. Theres also an additional $10 billion total that focuses on emerging contaminants.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="kahheV">
In all, Mississippi is expected to receive $429 million over five years for water infrastructure were Congresss legislation to become law, <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2021/08/12/senate-infrastructure-bill-give-mississippi-
billions/8108212002/">the Clarion Ledger reported</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Puvb7C">
Although the federal government still gives states significant leeway to determine how Drinking Water Funds and Clean Water Funds are targeted, there are some provisions in the legislation that make it more accessible for “disadvantaged communities,” which are classified in Mississippi as having lower median income.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0f1gVC">
Nearly half of the funding for the Drinking Water Fund and the Clean Water Fund will be available as grants, which could mean that this money is more accessible to localities that cant take on loans, including lower-income cities, for example. In the new bill, 49 percent of the new funds in both are available as principal forgiveness loans or grants. Additionally, the bipartisan bill would require that a larger proportion of the funding in the Drinking Water Fund be directed to disadvantaged communities.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/-2JJoQEc09v3387KrQcdYKHU6nE=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22806977/Screen_Shot_2021_08_26_at_11.37.54_AM.png"/> <cite>US Water Alliance</cite>
<figcaption>
A US Water Alliance breakdown of the water funding in the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6Uk0Qa">
The amount of money in the bill — which includes more than $2 billion in spending on both the Clean Water and Drinking Water Funds each year, with an additional $3 billion focused on lead service lines annually — is huge, but far from enough to meet the enormity of the problem.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="A3tC9M">
For replacement of lead service lines alone, for example, the NRDC estimates that costs <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/02/biden-lead-problem-502149">could be as much as $45 billion</a>, so the $15 billion in the bill only begins to address that problem. For water infrastructure more broadly, the costs are also expected to be quite a bit higher than the roughly $48 billion in new funds included in the bill, notes Scott Berry, director of policy and government affairs at the US Water Alliance.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ltHbar">
States also still have pretty broad discretion in determining which projects to prioritize. For now, while Mississippi prioritizes projects on an array of criteria including compliance with drinking water regulations and a cost/benefit analysis, theres relatively wide latitude in what that could entail. This prioritization, depending on how its applied, could leave Jackson without the funding it requires, with state officials instead directing federal funds to other water projects in the state.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HE6Aqr">
Still, this would be one of the largest federal investments in water infrastructure in decades, and what policy experts see as a vital “down payment” on needed repairs.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vqjGE6">
“It is one of, if not the single largest investment in water infrastructure in 50 years,” Berry tells Vox. “Thats not nothing. Will it solve all of the countrys water infrastructure problems? Emphatically no.”
</p>
<h3 id="4z8ZmB">
The costs of failing to address Americas water struggles
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8i9TGL">
The consequences of failing to address this problem are dire.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mTtPnb">
Without access to clean water, Jackson residents are forced to seek out alternative water sources, while continuing to pay <a href="https://apnews.com/article/lawsuits-jackson-
mississippi-424195a903bbb2bb1cf57fa10cb1ed5d">sometimes exorbitant water bills</a>. It also means people are deprived of a resource thats fundamental to their daily lives, a stark reality in a developed country like the US.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Azxaog">
“It was definitely shocking to know that we didnt have clean drinking water to cook with, to just take care of our families,” said Cassandra Welchlin, head of Mississippis Black Womens Roundtable, of Jacksons February water stoppage.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ruouUz">
And even when access to water is secure, theres a different set of worries that people encounter when drinking contaminated water. Lead in drinking water can lead to high blood pressure, brain damage, and kidney problems, for example. Multiple studies have found that the health care risks posed by lead contaminants may have serious effects for childrens growth and reproductive health as well.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/fTJ2nUOckqkKdxoOA80gV3aa_kQ=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22820920/GettyImages_1305695994_copy.jpg"/> <cite>Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A water and food distribution site set up at the planetarium in Jackson, Mississippi, seen in March. There are still 2 million people in the US who dont have access to clean running water.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XVRH7F">
According to the <a href="https://www.nrdc.org/experts/corinne-bell/californias-lead-problem-
partials-arent-good-enough">NRDC</a>, as many as 20 million people are likely getting some of their water from lead pipes, along with others who are sourcing their water via very old equipment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K9gZ6a">
<a href="https://www.wesa.fm/development-transportation/2021-07-05/pwsa-says-its-replaced-half-of-pittsburghs-lead-service-
lines-on-track-for-2026-goal">In 2016,</a> Pittsburgh detected high levels of lead in its water, spurring the city to begin replacing the thousands of lead service lines it still has. <a href="https://www.nola.com/news/article_4ab450da-b9c8-5a92-8355-04fc4cd3a8e8.html">In 2021</a>, New Orleans is still grappling with aging infrastructure and repairs to a water treatment facility that opened more than 100 years ago. <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/two-years-after-newarks-water-crisis-the-city-has-cleaned-up-its-act">In 2019,</a> Newark also found elevated lead levels in its drinking water, pushing the city to replace its pipes with new copper ones.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="drNh8l">
Across the country, the scale of the issue is alarming: Per a <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/2-million-americans-dont-have-access-to-running-water-and-basic-
plumbing-2019-11-20">report from the US Water Alliance</a>, there are still 2 million people in the United States who dont have access to clean running water at all, a problem that disproportionately affects “low-income people in rural areas, people of color, tribal communities, [and] immigrants.” A 2018 study led by UC Irvine water economist Maura Allaire also found that “in any given year from 1982 to 2015, somewhere between 9 million and 45 million Americans got their drinking water from a source that was in violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” <a href="https://www.science.org/news/2018/02/millions-americans-drink-potentially-unsafe-tap-water-how-does-your-county-
stack">Science reported</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="T2txj8">
The bipartisan infrastructure bill has the potential to funnel much- needed funds across the country, but precise implementation will be critical to ensure that different localities really benefit.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hMWNeP">
“I am hopeful that the federal infrastructure funding will address our needs. It absolutely has to,” says Welchlin. “We cant afford to have another water crisis.”
</p>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Eng vs Ind | England claw back with three wickets before lunch on day 4</strong> - At the break, India reached 329 for 6 with Rishabh Pant and Shardul Thakur at the crease.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Indias para-athletes soar high in best ever Paralympics</strong> - Indias medal tally in the Tokyo Paralympic shined with 19 medals, including five gold, eight silver and six bronze medals</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Formulate big plans for next Olympics: Anurag Thakur to sports federations</strong> - According Mr. Thakur, the public perception towards sports has changed with the government giving impetus to athletics, rsulting in Indias impressive performance in the Olympics and Paralympics.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hallucinate, Eagle Prince, Chief Of Command and Tudor excel</strong> - Hallucinate, Eagle Prince, Chief Of Command and Tudor excelled the when horses were exercised here on Sunday (Sept.  5).Outer sand: 600m: Pirates Lov</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Paralympics | Never been so happy and disappointed at the same time in my life: Suhas Yathiraj</strong> - The Noida District Magistrate produced an entertaining performance before narrowly going down to two-time world champion Lucas Mazur of France in badminton mens singles SL4 class summit clash</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Work on construction of Bhogapuram airport, six-lane road will begin soon, says Vijaya Sai</strong> - Pipelines will be laid from Purushothapatnam to Visakhapatnam to supply drinking water</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>States warned of aggressive infiltration by terrorists along Afghan border</strong> - Central intelligence says trained militants could penetrate into Jammu &amp; Kashmir</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>New minority scholarship allotment scheme ready</strong> - Christian students of all denominations together will get minority educational scholarships worth ₹9.60 crore and Muslims ₹13.88 crore from the curren</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Logistics agreement with Russia shortly, in final stages with U.K.</strong> - They improve Navys operational turnaround and inter-operability on the high seas.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>PM Modis approval rating shows popular support to his policies, says BJP</strong> - The data by Morning Consult, which regularly tracks popularity ratings of a host of global leaders, has put Modi with 70% approval</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Montenegro clashes as Serb Orthodox Church leader installed</strong> - The fierce protests reflect tensions in the country, which broke away from Serbia in 2006.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Finnish teenagers jailed for boys murder</strong> - Three boys are sentenced to 10, nine and eight years over the “brutal” death of one of their peers.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>EU and AstraZeneca reach deal to end vaccine row</strong> - AstraZeneca agrees to deliver 200 million doses by next spring, ending the threat of court action.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>US Open: Spanish teenager Carlos Alcaraz stuns third seed Stefanos Tsitsipas</strong> - Spanish teenager Carlos Alcaraz claims a fifth set tie-break to stun third seed Stefanos Tsitsipas in a thrilling third round tie at the US Open.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hungary v England: Fifa opens disciplinary proceedings after racist abuse aimed at players</strong> - Fifa opens disciplinary proceedings after racist abuse was aimed at England players during Thursdays 4-0 World Cup qualifier win over Hungary in Budapest.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Why ransomware hackers love a holiday weekend</strong> - Looking forward to Labor Day? So are ruthless gangs of cybercriminals. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1791952">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The best Labor Day tech deals we can find this weekend</strong> - Dealmaster includes discounts on Apple devices, PS5 games, headphones, and more. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1791144">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>How a flight-sim cockpit helps me get away from it all (figuratively)</strong> - Ars Senior Tech Editor Lee Hutchinson flies us down a flight-sim rabbit hole. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1791282">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Mad God: What happens when the best practical VFX artist, ever, writes a film?</strong> - Phil Tippetts love letter to practical effects and monster creation is <em>be-a-u-tiful</em>. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1791480">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>PAX-demic West impressions: Creating fun out of thin, masked air</strong> - Boots on the ground, mask on the face: We report on the weirdest PAX in years. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1791988">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>The teacher asks the class to use the word contagious in a sentence.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The first kid says" We all have to wear masks because coronavirus is <strong>contagious</strong> “. Teacher says well done. Second kid says”I couldnt play with my friends all summer because I had chickenpox, which is <strong>contagious“. Teacher says well done again. Little Billy gets up and says” Weve got a man painting our house and I heard my dad say to my mum, the speed hes working, its gonna take that cunt ages".</strong>
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/thenez68"> /u/thenez68 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi3dd8/the_teacher_asks_the_class_to_use_the_word/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi3dd8/the_teacher_asks_the_class_to_use_the_word/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Texas:</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Where a virus has reproductive rights and a woman doesnt.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/MrHopefulPessimist"> /u/MrHopefulPessimist </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi08hz/texas/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi08hz/texas/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>What is a pdf file</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
And why is my uncle under arrest for being one
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Z_Maniac_Sidd"> /u/Z_Maniac_Sidd </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi81y0/what_is_a_pdf_file/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/pi81y0/what_is_a_pdf_file/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>The women of King Arthurs court must have been very happy</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
They Camelot
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/dino0509"> /u/dino0509 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/phz9g2/the_women_of_king_arthurs_court_must_have_been/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/phz9g2/the_women_of_king_arthurs_court_must_have_been/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Why are married women heavier than single women?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Single women come home, see whats in the fridge and go to bed. Married women come home, see whats in bed and go to the fridge.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/semtexmex"> /u/semtexmex </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/phwsgn/why_are_married_women_heavier_than_single_women/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/phwsgn/why_are_married_women_heavier_than_single_women/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>