Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/24 February, 2021.html

886 lines
88 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>24 February, 2021</title>
<style type="text/css">
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Republicans Finally Face Merrick Garland—and Act as if They Were the Ones Unfairly Treated</strong> - Ted Cruzs arrogance is hard to match, but he was not the only Republican whose questioning was, to put it generously, lacking in perspective. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-republicans-finally-face-merrick-garland-and-act-as-if-they-were-the-ones-unfairly-treated">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Awful Uncertainty of the Coronavirus Death Toll</strong> - The new number—half a million Americans dead—is only an approximation of the pandemics real effects. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/the-awful-uncertainty-of-the-coronavirus-death-toll">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Rural Alaskan Towns Leading the Country in Vaccine Distribution</strong> - In Native communities where tribal health organizations are in charge of distributing the vaccine, herd immunity is on the horizon. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/the-rural-alaskan-towns-leading-the-country-in-vaccine-distribution">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Will Bidens Iran Diplomacy Become a Shakespearean Tragedy?</strong> - In principle, the U.S. is again committed to inclusive international diplomacy. In practice, Trump so rattled the global order that the damage endures after he has gone. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/will-bidens-iran-diplomacy-become-a-shakespearean-tragedy">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Whole Foods C.E.O. John Mackeys “Conscious Capitalism”</strong> - Mackey discusses his book “Conscious Leadership,” the labor issues that arose at Whole Foods during the pandemic, his business philosophy, and running a company as part of Amazon. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/whole-foods-ceo-john-mackeys-conscious-capitalism">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>The future of QAnon, explained by 8 experts</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/_QZ4FK16gP7ji68FE60Gf9cHFoc=/30x0:2697x2000/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68866621/q_005.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Trump supporter Jake Angeli is seen at the Capital riots on January 6. | Brent Stirton/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
QAnons prophecies failed to come true. Heres why the conspiracy theory will persist anyway.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UhXBLI">
If youre a hardcore <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory-4chan-explainer">QAnon believer</a>, you had high hopes for January.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3eA5l6">
Among other things, you expected Donald Trump to remain president. You expected mass arrests and public executions. You expected an underground cabal of child-trafficking Democrats to finally be captured.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wvHU9E">
None of those things happened.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3H4z2c">
Instead, Joe Biden was sworn in as the 46th president of the United States. So if youre one of those people — perhaps millions — who were deeply invested in the various QAnon conspiracy theories, the past few weeks likely produced an immense amount of dissonance.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gU1dml">
But for the most die-hard QAnon followers, hope springs eternal! The next big prophecy is supposed to unfold <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-dc-hotel-hiking-rates-qanon-think-sworn-march-4-2021-2">on March 4</a>, which had been Inauguration Day before the ratification of the 20th Amendment in 1933 — and the day Trump will gloriously return to power and retake the White House, according to the febrile imaginings of the QAnon movement.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/CYJXtSWUOKZVLFFmdWldJAfCFSQ=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321373/q_002.jpg"/> <cite>Logan Cyrus/Bloomberg via Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A Trump supporter holds a QAnon flag before a campaign rally in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, on September 8, 2020.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dF0k77">
All of which is to say, QAnon is still with us, and may be with us for a while. <a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/4/11/18291061/trump-ukraine-barr-whistleblower-investigation">Conspiracy theories</a> are powerful precisely because theyre so flexible. They never have to cohere; they just have to explain what seems otherwise inexplicable and, above all, offer the believer a sense of direction in a complicated world.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cxLWDN">
With that in mind, its worth asking what might become of the QAnon movement. Assuming March 4 doesnt go as expected, where do the followers of Q turn next?<strong> </strong>And what does it mean for our politics moving forward if QAnon shape-shifts into an even more nebulous cult?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4Gyu3y">
To get some answers, I reached out to eight journalists and researchers whove covered the conspiracy beat over the past four years or so. Their responses, edited for clarity and length, are below.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YNwHNx">
There wasnt a perfect consensus, but a couple of themes emerged. One, the way to think about QAnon is that its less a political movement than a religion. Two, that is precisely why QAnon will keep going even as its prophecies fail to materialize. Everyone agreed that QAnon will likely persist as a major factor in American politics.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="umAIqa">
If these experts are<strong> </strong>right, and I suspect they are, the problems driving the QAnon movement will probably get worse before they get better, if they get better at all.
</p>
<h3 id="O64pCL">
Its a religion — and religions have staying power
</h3>
<h4 id="wk5eDK">
Andrew Marantz, staff writer, the New Yorker
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zknVBk">
In late April 2011, while walking through Times Square, I stumbled on a group of Christians who were holding a rally to warn about the coming apocalypse. They were followers of the radio evangelist Harold Camping, and they believed not that the end was nigh in some general sense but that it was extremely, specifically nigh: that Jesus would return on May 11, which was then about two weeks away.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NTzgwE">
I asked one of the rallygoers, a firefighter named Jeff who lived on Long Island, how he planned to spend that day. He had no specific plans. Somehow, he agreed to let me spend the afternoon and evening at his house, observing up close what it looks like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails">when prophecy fails</a>. By the time I left Long Island on the uneventful night of the 11th, Jeff had <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2011/05/rapture.html">convinced himself</a> that the world-ending earthquakes were late, but that they would arrive by morning. His wife, who took me aside for a desperate whispered chat, was less convinced.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5tTxHU">
I havent spoken to Jeff since the non-rapture. Maybe he woke up chastened on the morning of May 12 — even while I was with him, friends were already sending him mocking texts — and stayed away from DIY prophecy. Or maybe he kept exploring, swinging from apocalyptic theory to apocalyptic theory like vines leading farther into a forest, until he found his way to Pizzagate and <a href="https://www.vox.com/technology/2018/12/12/18136132/google-youtube-congress-conspiracy-theories">Frazzledrip</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Vy2ruy">
Research suggests that some people are unusually <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180925075108.htm">predisposed</a> to accept implausible conspiratorial beliefs, and that those people may <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550611434786">accept multiple</a> such beliefs at once, even when the beliefs are brazenly contradictory. In any case, the glaring failure of a prophecy is almost never enough to make the prophecy go away. In late May 2011, Harold Camping made a new announcement: He had miscalculated. The rapture would actually arrive in October.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/_QQryV2iDp1eELfbEAABcqvPheo=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321374/q_001.jpg"/> <cite>Stephen Maturen/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A Trump supporter holds a sign referencing the QAnon during a rally held outside the governors mansion in St. Paul, Minnesota, on November 7, 2020.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h4 id="GhedCn">
Jane Coaston, host of <em>The Argument</em>, New York Times
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5f5jYW">
Many observers of the movement have compared QAnons failings — the myriad predictions that did not come to pass, including the very predictions of ultimate Trumpian victory that served as the foundation of the conspiracy theory — to the 1844 “Great Disappointment.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aDpCyy">
During a time of significant religious upheaval in the United States, Baptist minister William Miller predicted that the world would come to an end on March 21, 1844. When Jesus Christ did not return to earth on that date, Miller revised his prediction, saying that the Second Coming would instead take place on April 18, 1844.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right c-float-hang">
<aside id="AsMKiJ">
<q>“Once youve started seeing the world as a massive, interconnected conspiracy orchestrated by bloodthirsty elites, its very hard to stop”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="D2Mokl">
When Christ did not make his return on that date, Miller apologized for the error, but another Millerite preacher, Samuel Snow, declared that Christ would return on the “tenth day of the seventh month of the present year,” and, using the calendar of a Jewish sect he believed to be more accurate than our own, said that that date would be October 22, 1844.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HtbVGp">
Clearly, the world did not end on October 22, 1844. But neither, surprisingly, did the Millerites. Instead, they broke into factions <strong></strong> the most famous of which, the Seventh-Day Adventist Church, came to believe that October 22 did not mark the second coming but rather an event that took place in heaven.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ABLZd4">
Failed predictions will not doom QAnon, as it did not doom the Millerites, because QAnon could perhaps be best understood as a religious movement of sorts that places faith above accuracy, and believes in, above everything else, a final judgment for sinners where, to loosely quote Philippians 2:10-11, every knee shall bend and every tongue shall confess. Its just that to QAnon, “sinners” are “all Democrats, and most celebrities” and the tongues of all would be confessing that Donald Trump has defeated ultimate evil.
</p>
<h4 id="qRKF6X">
Adrienne LaFrance, executive editor, the Atlantic
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pHCIbM">
One of the weirder things I discovered <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/06/qanon-nothing-can-stop-what-is-coming/610567/">when I began reporting</a> about QAnon is that the true believers dont care who Q is. Naturally, I wanted to know who was behind the hoax. But to the QAnon devout, Qs identity simply did not matter. This observation was key to my realization that the QAnon movement doesnt behave merely like a pro-Trump conspiracy theory but instead like a baby religion, born on the social web and spread by Qs acolytes to extremists who feel the movements anti-establishment message in their bones.
</p>
<h4 id="fJvU40">
Jared Holt, Visiting Research Fellow at DFRLab
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CkpKhy">
The QAnon movement is no stranger to failed prophecy. It is not a logical or rational movement, and it cant be simply debunked or cast aside. There are some QAnon believers who are likely to maintain their faith in the distorted reality for the rest of their lives.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ImStqe">
When forecasts that Trump would somehow retake office before or during inauguration failed to materialize, though it shook the faith of a significant portion of believers, it did not end the broader movement. Within the QAnon movement exists a well-practiced ecosystem that reflexively shifted the goalposts to keep followers engaged. Some claimed that their predictions had come true despite appearing not to, and others pushed the deadline for their prediction back a handful of weeks.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/yQfrfGBkkwPKa2QTTd8D78mdGEM=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321375/q_003.jpg"/> <cite>Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A man wearing a QAnon sweatshirt is confronted by US Capitol Police after storming the building on January 6.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h4 id="jzuaq6">
Travis View, co-host, <em>QAnon Anonymous</em> podcast
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tHxrqN">
QAnon followers have been mostly purged from mainstream social media platforms following the January 6 insurrection. While this has hurt their proselytization and propaganda efforts, it has also enhanced their self-image as persecuted renegades.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XVzw10">
A minority of less tech-savvy or less committed QAnon followers have given up on the movement, but the true believers are doubling down on alternate platforms such as Gab or Telegram. They continue to “trust the plan” and will likely do so for the rest of their lives. Theyre now committed to the cause because of the community, the sense of mission, and the time and sacrifice they have already invested.
</p>
<h3 id="e1xiqP">
Where QAnon goes from here
</h3>
<h4 id="RUFzXE">
Charlie Warzel, opinion writer at large, New York Times
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3l71qq">
The short answer is that I dont know where QAnon goes from here, but I do not see it going away. My big fear, though, is that it becomes a political abstraction as it veers out of the fever swamps and is a subject of more mainstream reporting, fascination, and punditry.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JAC0cj">
Thats a real concern because I think if QAnon becomes some kind of vague shorthand for “right-wing loons,” it has two pretty negative effects.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QvuHwP">
First, it flattens and obscures what QAnon really is and that is, as<strong> </strong>Ben Collins [reporter for NBC News] has rather eloquently put it, “a political movement based on the imminent, public executions of political enemies.”
</p>
<div class="c-float-left c-float-hang">
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/VPthIGv3TpO0SSbQzcKSFLAnLEc=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321391/q_004.jpg"/> <cite>Alex Halada/AFP via Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A demonstrator holds a QAnon flag and a poster reading “Freedom” during a protest against coronavirus restrictions in Vienna, Austria, on January 16.
</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Sz4eeK">
Second, it has the potential to mainstream the belief even more. Its one reason why I think Democratic lawmakers need to be very careful about their framing of the GOP as the “QAnon party.” Because while I understand and even agree that the GOP has to be held to account on their embrace of this movement, I also think it could drive the party deeper into the arms of its furthest-right fringe.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lJfFlI">
Basically, our political leaders really underestimate just how much a huge portion of the country values the ability to piss off liberals. And how much those who love to see elites angry/uncomfortable/upset are willing to excuse the people who can deliver on “triggering the libs.” <a href="https://www.vox.com/22254103/marjorie-taylor-greene-david-hogg-obama-hillary-facebook-posts">Marjorie Taylor Greene</a> is a perfect example of this type of person. She is a particular brand of politician who feeds off outrage and uses it to acquire political power. For that reason, I think trying to make her the face of the GOP could absolutely backfire.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Kxa44V">
Its important to note, though, that there is absolutely no good, satisfactory answer here. And that is because one of our two political parties has openly embraced and tolerated a movement whose hallmark is hostility toward democracy. Whatever happens in the short term, this is likely to be the longer-term legacy of QAnon: a process of radicalization against the democratic process, underwritten by increasingly dangerous and absurd conspiratorial fictions.
</p>
<h4 id="LZorqc">
Jane Coaston
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="kPuhvD">
The point of QAnon is not just that Hillary Clinton is already in prison at Guantanamo Bay or that Nancy Pelosi eats children. The point of QAnon is that there will be a point of reckoning in which evil will be punished and good will be rewarded. QAnon offers purpose, direction, mooring in a world that seems threatening, and offers insider knowledge of a “Plan,” one that remains clear no matter what actually takes place in real life. Donald Trump will somehow be president again, or already is president, forever and always, amen.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KwjOAm">
QAnon will change, and likely decrease in popularity but remain critical to the lived experiences of those who remain steadfast. Like the Millerites, Qanon will not be defeated by being wrong. Faith doesnt work that way.
</p>
<h4 id="BS9LEC">
Hilary Sargent, freelance journalist and researcher
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yG9nHY">
Despite the fact that the so-called inside knowledge shared by Q has proven false, time and time and time again, the number of QAnon believers has grown exponentially since its inception. I dont think theres any reason to think that wont continue. QAnon believers are a captive audience, and a vulnerable one.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right c-float-hang">
<aside id="50KY2Y">
<q>“Like the Millerites, Qanon will not be defeated by being wrong. Faith doesnt work that way.”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9h97Nk">
I dont think anyone can say with confidence what will happen in the next year — or the next week — but its safe to assume that bad actors (including those openly encouraging acts of violence) will continue to take advantage of the faith QAnon believers have and are clinging to.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yHO4X9">
I wish I could say that we will see the movements members begin to realize they are being toyed with, but I think thats unlikely on a widespread scale anytime soon. As the major social media platforms crack down on QAnon content, violent extremists are actively working to radicalize QAnon believers for their own purposes. The extent to which this will be successful on a wide scale remains to be seen, but the risks posed by QAnon believers being radicalized and weaponized on even a tiny scale are significant.
</p>
<h4 id="cc3xhg">
Adrienne LaFrance
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fWroyz">
Just as elements of ancient anti-Semitic doomsaying belief systems were recycled into Pizzagate and eventually into QAnon, the QAnon narrative is already evolving and adapting to the current moment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8qOioU">
The Q worldview isnt just highly tolerant of contradictions; its reality-proof. Which is another way of saying QAnon is not going anywhere. It will morph, and may even eventually go by a different name, but for as long as the major political fault lines in this nation are drawn between elites and populists, QAnon — or whatever it warps into — will be with us.
</p>
<h4 id="r3CVfd">
Travis View
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0otBnt">
Some QAnon followers may be recruited by or blend with more militant extremist movements. We can already see this in how they borrowed arguments from the sovereign citizen movement in order to absurdly claim that Trumps <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-dc-hotel-hiking-rates-qanon-think-sworn-march-4-2021-2">true inauguration date will be March 4</a>. Some extremism researchers have also observed <a href="https://twitter.com/_MAArgentino/status/1352082871830384642">neo-Nazis organizing social media “raids”</a> that are part of an effort to recruit disaffected QAnon followers. If these efforts are successful, then the domestic extremism problem in the United States will only become more dangerous.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="c5LBuO">
That, combined with the fact that QAnon followers have grabbed a foothold of real power in the form of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), a <a href="https://twitter.com/AlKapDC/status/1330564468779196420">handful of state legislators</a>, and at least <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-02-05/how-qanon-seized-a-small-town-in-washington-state">one mayor</a>, make me convinced that QAnon, or some form of it, is now a permanent part of the American political landscape.
</p>
<h4 id="Mpms6Z">
Jared Holt
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="copuw4">
In its current form, QAnon exists as a decentralized catchall for conspiracy theories alleging nefarious actions are being conducted in the upper echelons of world power. Even if Q posts and Trump gradually take a backseat role in the movement, many of the tagalong theories — on topics including 5G, vaccines, and alternative medicine — will produce significant risks to the public.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/jT757_BmeinL1Oyxe0NTbNRuwz4=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321385/q_009.jpg"/> <cite>Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Supporters of QAnon gather outside the US Capitol for Trumps “Stop the Steal” rally on January 6.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h4 id="TTSBKv">
Kevin Roose, tech reporter, New York Times
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jgi4AD">
I may be tempting fate here, but I think that QAnon, as it was originally constituted, may be almost over. Without Trump in office or on Twitter, and with no new posts from Q in months, the community is basically running on fumes. Its always conceivable that Q could come back, or that some new development could jolt believers back to their keyboards. But I dont think random tweets from Lin Wood and the MyPillow guy are going to be enough to keep them hopeful and engaged. Theyre pretty dispirited.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YQGAfK">
But even if QAnon dies, I fully expect that many of its core beliefs will get watered down a bit, stripped of the Q-related language, and dissolved into Republican Party orthodoxy. I wouldnt be surprised if there is some kind of a “Patriot Party” made up of ex-QAnon believers and MAGA dead-enders that forms ahead of the 2022 midterms, and I wouldnt be shocked if that cohort pushed the entire Republican Party in a more conspiracy-minded, reality-denying direction. By 2024, Marjorie Taylor Greene may look like a moderate.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/Fs385PNxKk6W0v-U1IYUHXXwL78=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22321395/q_006.jpg"/> <cite>Drew Angerer/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is a first-term representative who has supported the QAnon conspiracy theory.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E2Kvpz">
I also think the QAnon epistemology — the idea that every official narrative and mainstream institution is inherently suspect, and that real knowledge is produced by like-minded strangers working together on the internet to “do their own research” — is likely to become a more or less permanent feature of American life, regardless of what happens to QAnon itself. Once youve started seeing the world as a massive, interconnected conspiracy orchestrated by bloodthirsty elites, its very hard to stop.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JeNGrW">
From now on, every time there is a natural disaster or a political protest or a Hollywood awards show, there may be millions of people squinting at their screens, looking for clues about whos pulling the strings.
</p></li>
<li><strong>The scientist whos been right about Covid-19 vaccines predicts whats next</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/bJedEoo7f8I1uiQz2z7ZydDUteA=/0x0:2667x2000/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68866372/AP_21053081221704.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Nurse manager Sue McGrady receives the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in Sydney, Australia, on February 22. | Toby Zerna/AP
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Hilda Bastian on the most important pandemic vaccine in the pipeline and why were on track for annual booster shots.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YTpwsb">
When <a href="http://hildabastian.net/">Hilda Bastian</a> and I first caught up over Skype to talk about Covid-19 vaccines last autumn, she showed me the boxes and unfinished rooms in her new home in Victoria, Australia. Shed been so busy tracking the global vaccine effort, she hadnt had time to settle in.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nMlyPm">
Bastian — an expert in analyzing clinical trial data, founding member of the Cochrane Collaboration, and a former <a href="https://news.nnlm.gov/mar-newsletter/2013/11/what-is-pubmed-health-and-why-would-i-ever-use-it/">National Institutes of Health</a> official — has gone down rabbit holes before. There was the time she traveled the US on her own dime to research and take historical photos for a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_mathematicians">Wikipedia list</a> of African American mathematicians.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9wDapB">
But her obsession with vaccines in this pandemic has been especially fruitful: Shes called the race right at just about every turn.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-ML6qVX">
<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19-vaccines-with-minor-side-effects-could-still-be-pretty-bad/">Last July</a>, she warned that side effects for some Covid-19 vaccines may be <a href="https://www.vox.com/22158238/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-explained">more severe</a> than were used to with other shots.<strong> </strong>At the time, she says, “I copped flak for it.” Also last July, when the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine was the focal point of media coverage, she <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/07/02/covid-19-vaccine-race-month-6-first-emergency-use-phase-3-trials-2/">praised the rigor of clinical trials for the Pfizer/BioNTech</a> vaccine — the first to receive emergency authorization use in the US — and said it was the one to watch.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-dt98sh">
On the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine, she was among the first to spot the inconsistencies and issues with the clinical trials <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/07/02/covid-19-vaccine-race-month-6-first-emergency-use-phase-3-trials-2/">back in June</a>. She also supported <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/08/13/vaccine-contrasts-massive-volunteer-mobilization-covid-19-vaccine-race-month-8/">emergency use authorization for Covid-19 vaccines</a> last August, when it was still controversial to do so.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/851IefgMiPehwdew3eiIyFGjP-4=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22323882/Hilda_Bastian_2016.jpg"/> <cite>Courtesy of Hilda Bastian</cite>
<figcaption>
Hilda Bastian has accurately predicted how the global race for the Covid-19 vaccine would play out.
</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-5Go9jH">
With all her foresight, Bastian has become something of a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/23/business/media/how-zeynep-tufekci-keeps-getting-the-big-things-right.html">Zeynep Tufekci</a> on pandemic vaccines. Like the prescient computer programmer turned sociologist, Bastian — who does this work independently and without pay — has seen the state of play more clearly than many others. Her <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/">blogs</a>, <a href="https://www.wired.com/author/hilda-bastian/">articles</a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast">Twitter account</a> might also be the most comprehensive look at just about everything published on Covid-19 vaccines anywhere.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ftRG9m">
The Covid-19 vaccine project was born out of concern for her sons, one of whom is immunocompromised and at higher risk of coronavirus complications. “I wanted to do something useful, and I decided early on I thought that it was likely there would be vaccines,” Bastian told me recently.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UY1Ay3">
But another motivation was frustration: The myopic focus in Western media on Europes and Americas vaccine development and rollout missed what was happening in most of the world — in countries like China, Russia, and Cuba, Bastian said. And so much of the coverage was “uncritical of vaccine developers marketing hype. … You couldnt get an accurate perspective of what was going on, without putting a ton of time into it.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nt5Xdv">
Nearly a year into her project, I caught up with Bastian to ask where our blind spots are now and how she predicts the vaccine story — and the pandemic — will unfold. She talked about the need for health officials to acknowledge that coronavirus vaccines have potentially “big differences in efficacy and adverse events,” a time in the future when we may need Covid-19 vaccine boosters every year, and the problem of people in rich countries like the US shamelessly hogging vaccines. The transcript of our conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
</p>
<h3 id="gmail-tycAP0">
Covid-19 arrogance
</h3>
<h4 id="gmail-G2ZLzx">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-M8iMSc">
Early in the pandemic, you pointed out how multiple rich countries, especially in the West, were getting their pandemic responses wrong. They were not learning from our Asian-Pacific neighbors, especially when anti-virus measures didnt fit our preconceived notions. One example is the <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-face-mask-debate-reveals-a-scientific-double-standard/">great mask debate of 2020</a>. What do you think was driving that inability to learn from the experience of Asian-Pacific countries?
</p>
<h4 id="gmail-gw1J2M">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-nfpGa3">
Somebody said that people in many rich countries have got used to thinking that theyve conquered all infectious disease, and so theres this hubris about that, and I think that we found that hubris was more profound than we realized. We felt far too safe, and there was really quite a great degree of arrogance in there.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-IJNWCS">
I [also] started to think, “This is just racism,” an old colonialist-thinking legacy, discounting Asian science and experience, and thats a large part of what this whole theme is. Just that assumption that you are Americans or Europeans and know best over and over again. If this pandemic has taught us anything, it should be not to think that anymore, and, yet, people keep doing it.
</p>
<h4 id="gmail-8r2eBv">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-UEnzbk">
Where do you see that playing out now — the discounting of non-Western or lower-income countries and overestimating the wealthier, Western ones?
</p>
<h4 id="BenmVr">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-aib61e">
Its happening with vaccines, especially thinking its all about the vaccines of a few big EuroAmerican multinationals galloping to the worlds rescue. One of the most fascinating stories is Cuba. I mean, theres this really interesting juxtaposition between Cuba and Canada, ironically. In Canada [where the vaccine rollout has been slow] theres a debate about why did they let <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-roots-of-canadas-covid-19-vaccine-shortage-go-back-decades-154792">their capacity to produce vaccines</a> dwindle away to next to nothing.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/AVCjDwO3QEW_PIVZfaCgMLR2jdg=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22323949/1230701127.jpg"/> <cite>Yamil Lage/AFP/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Technician Yoel Hernandez shows a vaccine at the vaccine production facility of the Finlay Vaccine Institute in Havana, Cuba, on January 20.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-gRZa6d">
Cuba had the exact opposite. Cuba had to become self-sufficient at pretty well everything, and that included producing drugs and producing medical teams. Cuba now exports a lot of medical care to poorer countries. The first two of their vaccines are looking really quite good. The first ones just <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56069577">about to start its big phase 3 trial</a>, and theyve got <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast/status/1337532823780032512">three others</a> coming up behind.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-V4ksxH">
Theyre going to have a massive amount more vaccine than they need. Theyre not going to have any trouble vaccinating their population with home-grown vaccines in 2021. That just does not look remotely like its going to be a problem, and, then, theyre just going to be exporting masses and masses of vaccine.
</p>
<h3 id="gmail-anddie">
Vaccine hype
</h3>
<h4 id="gmail-4IDX8l">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-a4LWrG">
One vaccine group that there was a ton of hype around — and that has under-delivered — is Oxford/AstraZeneca. It was supposed to be the vaccine that saved poor countries, but now there are manufacturing problems, and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/25/business/coronavirus-vaccine-astrazeneca-oxford.html">questions</a> about the quality of their clinical trial data, including whether the vaccine even works in the highest-risk groups, like people <a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n414">over 65</a>. You were, I think, first to point out the troubling signs in their clinical trials, <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2020/07/02/covid-19-vaccine-race-month-6-first-emergency-use-phase-3-trials-2/">back in June</a>, and then <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-data-isnt-up-to-snuff/">followed the story</a> in detail. Where do you think that vaccine is going?
</p>
<h4 id="9FzRKQ">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-vVr3m9">
I wouldnt be surprised if the situation got worse, though I hope it will get better. [They went] about their clinical trial program in such a problematic way. [They] overlapped the early phases of their trials too much. They didnt do early phase tests in older people as a result, leaving us struggling now with the results in a way we dont have to with other EuroAmerican vaccines.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DCkYF9">
The publicly available details about the trial kept changing while it was in progress — and didnt even say clearly what the dose was, for example.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="GcHloz">
<q>Why on Earth did the UKs health regulator greenlight these plans?</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="f67o3a">
The really big question about that is why on earth did the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency [the UKs health regulator] greenlight these plans? Maybe people ceased to be critical enough, and they went over a bit of a cliff.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m8hnAX">
Whether it turns out to be a good vaccine or not, lets leave that to one side. The clinical trials were, the European Medicines Agency [Europes drug regulator] concluded, <a href="https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf">sub-optimal</a>. That shouldnt happen. Were lucky the [Food and Drug Administration] insisted on a large trial. Well hear the results soon.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/yOTZnI_blNB2DRdD5JXJArHxPhk=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22323945/1231237790.jpg"/> <cite>Mlungis Mbele/AFP/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A nurse gets a temperature check before receiving a dose of the Johnson &amp; Johnson vaccine at the Prince Mshiyeni Hospital in Umlazi, South Africa, on February 18.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h4 id="gmail-jMFOEP">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-xgt8FO">
We already saw <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/16/africa/south-africa-astrazeneca-johnson-and-johnson-vaccine-intl/index.html">South Africa halt distribution</a> of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine because of preliminary data suggesting it didnt work as well against the variant that emerged there. If the vaccine doesnt end up being widely distributed in low and middle-income countries, do you think that gap will be filled maybe by the Russian and Chinese vaccines?
</p>
<h4 id="HSDUcJ">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EZAxPT">
[The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine] is already being widely distributed. But China may already have supplied as much as 1 in 5 of the vaccines administered <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast/status/1363247890403979264">globally</a>. And China and Russia are the ones who are there first with batches of vaccine in a lot of countries.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8KhlB5">
The role that people were ascribing to AstraZeneca, I thought always was going to be Johnson &amp; Johnson because [theyre] a huge vaccine company. AstraZeneca is not really a vaccine company. The Johnson &amp; Johnson vaccine is a single dose. They were also doing trials that were seriously geared at international needs. They ran the biggest trial in the most countries, and that matters a lot to people from different ethnic groups.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lRozMX">
Even though the actual doses are a bit more expensive [for Johnson &amp; Johnsons vaccine], the cost of actually vaccinating people is enormously lower if youve only got to vaccinate everybody once. And Johnson &amp; Johnson also committed to affordable, nonprofit vaccine for the emergency. Its going to depend a lot on how many doses actually get delivered in the end, and what happens with variants. Now it seems likely Novavax may be as big a supplier as well — possibly <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast/status/1362559931782586369">more than half</a> of the WHO-provided supply.
</p>
<h4 id="gmail-CGXjAw">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-yf6VnY">
Another vaccine you put a lot of stock in from the start was the one developed by Pfizer/BioNTech — one that got relatively little attention in the US until the big finding of 95 percent efficacy last autumn. Why were you so impressed so early on?
</p>
<h4 id="SKIGSz">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oJzdpI">
That was because BioNTech was doing such thorough work early on — they were developing several versions, and testing them against each other in early trials. They didnt have all their eggs in one basket. Then there was the partnership with Pfizer, which was going to give them an <a href="https://www.statnews.com/2020/08/24/pfizer-edge-in-the-race-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-could-be-a-scientist-with-two-best-sellers-to-her-credit/">important edge</a> in running a massive clinical trial in a pandemic. You had to have both those things — a good vaccine, and a good major trial.
</p>
<h4 id="s1dVJN">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZwIQpy">
Which vaccine group is the next Pfizer/BioNTech?
</p>
<h4 id="AF6riZ">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-NoDEeP">
Novavax is an important one to watch, if the results continue to be as good as their <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2021/01/31/variants-3-new-covid-vaccines-and-contested-efficacy-claims-a-month-of-seismic-shifts-and-confusion/#novavax">first ones</a>, which were similar to the mRNA vaccines. Its a more traditional form of vaccine, so theres more capacity to manufacture it.<strong> </strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xFIJY2">
There are others that could be important globally, like one <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast/status/1363589163115712512">from Thailand</a> that will be cheap and both profit- and royalty-free for lower-income countries, and <a href="https://twitter.com/hildabast/status/1342308656784711680">another</a> that UNICEF is supporting thats also aiming at preventing infection.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/vWOXPbwc_NZvClR7LM-Hhua1YxU=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22323967/1231344680.jpg"/> <cite>Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
A health worker administers the Sputnik V vaccine to a colleague at a public hospital in Caracas, Venezuela, on February 23.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h4 id="gmail-riXlRq">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-8nK2iy">
Can we talk a little more about the Russian vaccine, Sputnik V: The data published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00234-8/fulltext"><em>The</em> <em>Lancet</em></a> looked quite impressive taken at face value — but you werent convinced. Can you tell me why?
</p>
<h4 id="UQabTB">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-AgKF5H">
There wasnt the kind of data about possible adverse reactions that have become <a href="https://absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2021/02/21/a-readers-guide-to-safety-adverse-event-data-from-vaccine-trials/">the scientific standard</a>, for example. Trial participants get asked to record a list of specific possible reactions in the first week — things like fever, fatigue, headaches. We know if you dont do that systematically, youll end up with an underestimate and a too-rosy picture of a vaccine. Because they didnt seem to do that, well stay pretty much in the dark on how tolerable this vaccine is for a while. And theres a lot thats not transparent about this trial, because they played it close to the vest with critical details, like the protocol [or pre-established plan] of the trial.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-MRQGD0">
When we saw the report, we could see the age spread, and it was a pretty young group — about 90 percent were under 60, so thats not where the greatest burden of suffering from this disease is. It was done in Moscow, so theres little diversity — 99 percent of the participants were white, so that was stark, too. There are going to be more trials outside Russia, and thats going to help get data we can more easily compare to other vaccines.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="eZVlWi">
<q>We never grappled with what weve got, which is vaccines with potentially big differences in efficacy and adverse events</q>
</aside>
</div>
<h4 id="K36QOm">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-C4t9hp">
So I guess its pretty fair to say at this point: The vaccine rollout is shaping up to be quite different from what many of us expected.
</p>
<h4 id="URT0XN">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-wj4Y8u">
Yeah, we never really grappled with what weve got, which is, although some people dont seem to want to face it head-on, vaccines with potentially big differences in efficacy and adverse events. So, what are the priorities, then, for the better vaccines versus the vaccines that have less protection and so on? The situation turned out to be far more complex than the experts prepared us for, I think. Communities have a lot of very tough calls to make, under very different levels of urgency.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-9CUdRO">
Most of the trials havent had enough severely ill people to give us a clear picture on how much the vaccines will prevent severe disease, and the differences there might not be as big as other differences. If youre in a community thats very vulnerable to major outbreaks, with a limited supply of vaccines, the differences between them are small compared to the risks to ourselves and our communities of being unvaccinated.
</p>
<h4 id="OVDiLK">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OUKSUz">
Doesnt this raise questions about health officials who are telling the public all <a href="https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/17/the-myth-of-good-and-bad-covid-vaccines-why-false-perceptions-overlook-facts-and-could-breed-resentment/">vaccines are equal</a>?
</p>
<h4 id="sbnNiD">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6VblP8">
Trying to convince people that the vaccines are all equal isnt going to work. People are making claims that go beyond the solid data we have, and thats a risky proposition. Were going to see the differences in rates of adverse events, for example, pretty quickly for ourselves once we know lots of people getting vaccinated.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WUGR2u">
Especially when the fear of major outbreaks subsides — prematurely — and were trying to get younger people to accept vaccination, adverse reactions are going to matter to people.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt=" " src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/qLMeUm8Ky_a7LHYjryzXOX1F8Fg=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22323975/1231336603.jpg"/> <cite>Paul Yeung/Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
Members of the Hong Kong Fire Services Department receive the Sinovac vaccine at a community vaccination center in Hong Kong, February 23.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h3 id="gmail-dNah8h">
“The story of the pandemic”
</h3>
<h4 id="gmail-LYdUkU">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-c56Da5">
Moving forward, whats the big vaccine issue youre going to be tracking?
</p>
<h4 id="i4Gntn">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="w41wK0">
Its still early days for clinical trials, so Ill be tracking those and new boosters against variants, as well as what happens in vaccinated communities. [Im] also watching how the rich countries are cornering vaccines, and those <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/19/coronavirus-vaccine-diplomacy-west-falling-behind-russia-china-race-influence">advancing their geopolitics</a> to fill in the gaps — its actually quite a horrifying thing.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uU22ys">
Very rarely do you see people from one of the rich countries expressing concern that their country may be fully vaccinated within a few months. Im not utopian and that idealistic about it. It was never 100 percent going to happen that way [that the high priority groups in rich and poor countries got vaccinated at the same levels at the same time, per WHO advice], but I hoped at least for something roughly close, and Im really quite shocked how comfortable people are with whats happening.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="tAjaJB">
<q>You cant buy whats already gone from the shelves</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="y9NjQ4">
Some are promoting personal donations to WHO now for vaccines, which just underscores the lack of awareness that the problem is rich countries taking all the doses for ourselves. You cant buy whats already gone from the shelves. There are severe limits to what can be produced this year. Even with recent promises of more money for WHO from rich countries, 2021 looks pretty grim.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="acYEwH">
In a way, for me, thats the story of the pandemic. We had too many people more concerned about their individual rights or about wearing masks or flying for a vacation, or complaining about the restrictions that they faced, than the consequences of those actions for people more vulnerable than themselves. Now, its playing out [with] vaccines, too.
</p>
<h4 id="gmail-uGgTYm">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-NfHhuf">
From a health perspective, why is hoarding so concerning?
</p>
<h4 id="jCKkKQ">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-bWNWdX">
We need to reduce the chances of the virus morphing into more dangerous variants — vaccines might not protect communities enough from new variants sweeping through. And many of the rich countries will have trouble getting enough people vaccinated anyway. The notion that there can be countries where theres going to be 40-year-olds and 30-year-olds vaccinated while there are terrible outbreaks in other parts of the world, and even the health care practitioners are unprotected, isnt okay on any level.
</p>
<h4 id="gmail-TlJVs0">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-4tOtJw">
Even rich countries, though, are having manufacturing and supply issues — like Canada, as you mentioned. Will the world be able to maintain a sustained production capacity for vaccines, or will it see spikes and drops for the next while?
</p>
<h4 id="FNWhMW">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-w16bi8">
It could settle down, particularly if some of the more traditional forms of vaccine, like the one from <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/novavax-covid-19-vaccine.html">Novavax</a>, make it into use and are popular and effective. Vaccines that can tap into more of the existing widespread technical capacity should help. And I guess therell be more movement from the big companies that dont yet have a vaccine of their own.
</p>
<h3 id="gmail-SHOcVT">
How does this end?
</h3>
<h4 id="gmail-tzTOHF">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oGcq3p">
Okay, so now we have multiple effective vaccines on the market, and more coming online soon. But we also have this emerging variant problem and questions about how to use the vaccines weve got. Do we know how this pandemic ends?
</p>
<h4 id="81KPtX">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-3Wuden">
No, I dont think we [do]. I dont think theres been a pandemic quite like this because they were either that the thing went through and did its worst and left horrific death in its wake, or the smaller ones in more contained areas that are recent.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wWAN1D">
But this thing on this scale, while theres this level of antibody-based treatments out there, and vaccines of different efficacy, and all of this stuff that could play in the favor of variants, this situation has never existed before.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UmlEMR">
I dont think that the past tells us where this is going. [But] I believe the people who are saying that we appear to be on a course to eventually get to the point where we get vaccinated against this each year. The path to global eradication — through very high levels of vaccination with a high level of other suppression efforts — seems narrow. That could change, though, and I hope it does.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="f30VZv">
<q>Its going to depend how disabling long Covid turns out to be, and for how many people</q>
</aside>
</div>
<h4 id="gmail-PeDXXx">
Julia Belluz
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-WnGahW">
Do you have any predictions for long-lasting effects of the pandemic, how it changes society?
</p>
<h4 id="7jnDK1">
Hilda Bastian
</h4>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-UFqywx">
For me, one of the things that is a really huge unknown is what happens with <a href="https://www.vox.com/22166236/long-term-side-effects-covid-19-symptoms-heart-fatigue">long Covid</a>. When I lived in Germany, I was trying to understand why issues for people with disabilities were so much better in Germany than any place Id ever spent time in, and on a scale that was really quite extraordinary.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-I6vjOg">
Then, I started to read about the history of the disability movement after World War I, that you had such a huge proportion of young men with major disabilities, whether it was sight, limbs missing — and to have such a massive proportion of your population suddenly with disabilities, changed societies. It happened again after World War II. So, Im thinking about that again, now.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="I7XWy5">
To some extent, its going to depend on how disabling long Covid turns out to be, and for how many people? Are we looking at a really serious big wave of decades-long disability? Because if we are, that is a really profound, sudden change in societies.
</p>
<h3 id="gmail-uqQBXf">
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gmail-leBOHF">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wLvDiS">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="T3Nkpd">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qJ50j4">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="72LbTK">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XKL49C">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DJVQsQ">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="I07RUb">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mhCGsx">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CiUfGJ">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8E3n9b">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lOqreV">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iZvvz0">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="23jIYH">
</p></li>
<li><strong>Joe Manchin voted for controversial Trump nominees but is undecided on Bidens</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/CuJiNtYJFznLQPHlPcbRXRsNnI0=/0x0:4000x3000/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68864611/1231122643.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) runs to the Senate floor for the fourth day of former US President Donald Trumps impeachment trial before the Senate on Capitol Hill on February 12, 2021, in Washington, DC.  | Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Manchin supported more Trump nominees than any other Democrat. Now, he could sink one of Bidens.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="otx4U3">
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) — the lawmaker who voted for more Trump nominees than any other Democrat — could sink at least one of Bidens.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Fafrp4">
Thus far, <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/2/22/22295201/neera-tanden-senate-confirmation-explained">Manchin has already expressed his opposition to Neera Tanden,</a> a nominee for the director role at the Office of Management and Budget, on the grounds that her previous social media posts targeting both Republicans and progressive Democrats were too polarizing.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qNfk7z">
“I believe her overtly partisan statements will have a toxic and detrimental impact on the important working relationship between members of Congress and the next director of the Office of Management and Budget,” Manchin said in a statement, adding later that the decision wasnt “personal.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MEI3M3">
Manchins opposition matters because Biden nominees might end up needing every Democratic vote in the Senate, where the party has the barest 50-person majority, to be confirmed. His decision likely means that Tanden wont make it through, especially since a growing list of moderate Republicans who might have saved her nomination have also said that they wont support her.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dfTToO">
Manchin is also undecided about the <a href="https://www.vox.com/22297585/deb-haaland-confirmation-hearing-interior-department">nomination of Rep. Deb Haaland (D-NM)</a> for Interior Secretary, and the nomination of former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra for Health and Human Services Secretary. Both have been prime Republican targets, given their more progressive views on policies including the Green New Deal and Medicare-for-All, respectively.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7BEK3P">
Signaling that he may ultimately back Haaland, Manchin released a <a href="https://twitter.com/jbendery/status/1364297097873395716">statement</a> on Tuesday afternoon highlighting how she has committed to working on West Virginia priorities with him, and preserving the countrys broader energy independence.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pcSEbc">
At this point, its still unclear how Manchin will ultimately vote on either candidate. His initial hedging, however, has already prompted Democratic blowback and raised questions about why hes been less than supportive of <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/22/biden-nominations-gop-manchin-tanden-471080">a number of nominees who are also people of color</a>. Tanden would be the first Indian American person to become OMB Director if she were to be confirmed, Haaland would be the first Native American Interior Secretary, and Becerra would be the first Latino HHS Secretary. Manchins office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jNnPmO">
Regardless of the reasons behind his concerns, the optics of the situation have earned him rebukes from some prominent progressives.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="b6kcfd">
Former President Donald Trumps first Attorney General “Jeff Sessions was so openly racist that even Reagan couldnt appoint him. Manchin voted to confirm him,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a tweet regarding the senators concerns about Haaland. “Yet the 1st Native woman to be Cabinet Sec is where Manchin finds unease?”
</p>
<div id="kzPUiI">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
Jeff Sessions was so openly racist that even Reagan couldnt appoint him.<br/><br/>Manchin voted to confirm him. Sessions then targeted immigrant children for wide-scale human rights abuses w/ family separation.<br/><br/>Yet the 1st Native woman to be Cabinet Sec is where Manchin finds unease? <a href="https://t.co/wyki5iE36Y">https://t.co/wyki5iE36Y</a>
</p>
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (<span class="citation" data-cites="AOC">@AOC</span>) <a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1363968969707773956?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 22, 2021</a>
</blockquote></div></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nbzT64">
Manchins hesitation to embrace all of Bidens nominees fits into a general pattern the senator has followed for some time: A moderate Democrat who represents a state that voted for Trump by nearly 40 points in the recent election, Manchin has long established himself as someone willing to buck his party — often while citing the importance of bipartisanship, as he did when speaking about Tandens nomination. “At a time of grave crisis, it is more important than ever that we chart a new bipartisan course that helps address the many serious challenges facing our nation,” <a href="https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-opposes-omb-director-nominee-neera-tanden">Manchin recently said</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HMgXF9">
Now, however, progressives like Ocasio-Cortez are among those asking why Manchin was willing to support several problematic Trump nominees — many of whom were focused on partisan priorities — while remaining opposed or uncertain regarding Bidens picks. Its a dynamic thats prompted people to wonder whether the senators litmus test applies differently <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/22/biden-nominations-gop-manchin-tanden-471080">depending on the candidate</a>.
</p>
<h3 id="qDFfQe">
Joe Manchin was the only Democrat who backed a number of Trump nominees
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LqXwAN">
During the last administration, Manchin also set himself apart when it came to nominees: He was the sole Democrat to back numerous Trump picks, <a href="https://www.manchin.senate.gov/about/bipartisanship/legislation">a distinction thats touted on his Senate website</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QDQBB6">
“On nine occasions, Senator Manchin was the only Democrat to vote to confirm Trump nominees, including two cabinet Secretaries, three circuit court judges, and various other nominees,” <a href="https://www.manchin.senate.gov/about/bipartisanship/legislation">a statement reads</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="NzOy2w">
Officials he ultimately supported include former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/14/sessions-family-separation-policy-459423">who pushed for the zero-tolerance policy</a> that prompted the separation of parents from children at the southern border; Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who faced <a href="https://www.vox.com/explainers/2018/9/27/17909782/brett-kavanaugh-christine-ford-supreme-court-senate-sexual-assault-testimony">an allegation of sexual assault during his confirmation process</a>; and former US Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell, who <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-expected-name-richard-grenell-acting-head-intelligence-n1139161">encountered heat for his own tweets criticizing women</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="YPeSSA">
Against this backdrop, its been somewhat jarring for many Democrats to see Manchin oppose or express indecision about Bidens nominees whove garnered GOP blowback for their social media posts, or been dinged by Republicans for their progressive views on health care and energy policy, respectively.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="R2c2mG">
Theres an obvious political reason for Manchin to take such stances: the heavy Trump tilt of his home state, whose other senator is Shelley Moore Capito, a Trump-supporting Republican. But its unclear how much constituents might factor in such votes when weighing his potential reelection in four years or in a theoretical run for governor in the future.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9Om21S">
There are other possible reasons for this approach, too: While Manchins concerns with Tanden center heavily on her partisan statements, <a href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063722643">hes told E&amp;E News</a> that he still has questions about Haalands agenda and her support for banning fracking on public lands. And Manchin, a pro-life Democrat, could also have questions similar to those Republicans have expressed about Becerras past backing for abortion rights.
</p>
<h3 id="W9vVQr">
Multiple nominees facing GOP opposition now are people of color
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jRmRRp">
<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/22/biden-nominations-gop-manchin-tanden-471080">As Politicos Lauren Barron-Lopez and Christopher Cadelago reported</a>, something also causing consternation among Democrats — who have made promoting diversity a priority — is that the Biden nominees whove garnered the most pushback (or who face uncertainty about a successful confirmation) are all people of color, and mostly women. This has raised questions about whether Republicans and Manchin have double standards when it comes to how theyre evaluating Bidens nominees.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3jDRso">
“Is there a pattern here???” Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY), the vice-chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus recently posted in a tweet, responding to the comments Manchin reportedly expressed on Haaland,<strong> </strong>in which he noted he still had “questions” about her candidacy.
</p>
<div id="JtAZHP">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
Is there a pattern here??? Hope theyre using the same standard and not moving goal posts for only certain nominees. <a href="https://twitter.com/DebHaalandNM?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"><span class="citation" data-cites="DebHaalandNM">@DebHaalandNM</span></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/neeratanden?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"><span class="citation" data-cites="neeratanden">@neeratanden</span></a> <a href="https://twitter.com/vivek_murthy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"><span class="citation" data-cites="vivek_murthy">@vivek_murthy</span></a> <a href="https://t.co/TN2oMc05s5">https://t.co/TN2oMc05s5</a>
</p>
— Grace Meng (<span class="citation" data-cites="Grace4NY">@Grace4NY</span>) <a href="https://twitter.com/Grace4NY/status/1363941147584978952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 22, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="FdSuJI">
The issue of whether nominees of color are getting more scrutiny and being more harshly penalized for their actions than white men is one that a number of Democratic lawmakers and advocates have highlighted.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lGvn0D">
<a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/2/22/22295201/neera-tanden-senate-confirmation-explained">As Voxs Ella Nilsen has reported</a>, the irony in lawmakers using Tandens tweets as a reason to oppose her nomination is notable, since Republicans long backed Trump or stayed silent despite his incendiary presence on the social media platform. Grenells prior confirmation process, too, serves as another point of comparison for a nominee who got in trouble for controversial tweets but still received strong party support in the process.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="naKKAv">
“When a white man can get away with vile behavior, but a woman of color cant express deep frustration … lets call it what it is,” <a href="https://twitter.com/vgescobar/status/1364074063908470789">Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-TX) wrote in a tweet about Tanden</a>. “Sexism. And with some, its racism as well.”
</p>
<div id="KPILyF">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
When a white man can get away with vile behavior, but a woman of color cant express deep frustration…lets call it what it is. <br/><br/>Sexism. <br/><br/>And with some, its racism as well.<br/><br/>The subtext in all of this is “she didnt know her place.“ <a href="https://t.co/7HqUoD6sFb">https://t.co/7HqUoD6sFb</a>
</p>
— Veronica Escobar (<span class="citation" data-cites="vgescobar">@vgescobar</span>) <a href="https://twitter.com/vgescobar/status/1364074063908470789?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 23, 2021</a>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iwiuzf">
The final verdict on Tanden, Haaland, and Becerras nominations is not yet certain as they respectively make their way through the confirmation process. But racial justice and gender equity experts emphasize that women of color were central to Democrats presidential and Senate victories and should hold prominent roles in the administration.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OtGIiM">
“Women of color mobilized like never before this past election and delivered the White House, the Senate, and down-ballot seats throughout the country,” groups including She the People and Democracy for America <a href="https://www.shethepeople.org/openletter">write in a letter</a>. “To be clear: We did not deliver the election only to be marginalized once again.”
</p>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Day-night Test | England struggling at 81/4 at tea on Day 1 of 3rd Test</strong> - At the break, Ben Stokes and Ollie Pope were batting on 6 and 1 respectively.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Motera cricket stadium in Ahmedabad renamed Narendra Modi Stadium</strong> - The inauguration was done hours before the start of the day-night third Test between India and England, the first international match at the new venue.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Shorter and convenient quarantine period being planned for shooting World Cup: Rijiju</strong> - Recently, a request was placed before the ministry that shooters be exempted from hard quarantine of 14 days and foreign delegates be given vaccine shots on priority</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>All England draws: Sindhu gets easy passage to quarters, tough for Saina</strong> - The tournament is scheduled to be played in Birmingham from March 17-21</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Qatar and Australia pull out of Copa America due to scheduling conflicts</strong> - Other national teams have already expressed interest in replacing them at the tournament between June 11 and July 10</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>HC issues notice to former wife of judge</strong> - Petition related to divorce and re-marriage</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>IT sector to have an employee welfare fund</strong> - State Cabinet responds to long-pending demand</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Panel to enquire sexual harassment charges against Special DGP</strong> - IAS officer and Secretary of Planning and Development Department Jayashree Raghunandan has been named the Presiding Officer of the six-member panel</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Mamata Banerjee writes to PM, requests him to help West Bengal get vaccines for people before polls</strong> - Election to the 294-member West Bengal assembly is due in April-May</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Cabinet approves PLI scheme for pharmaceuticals</strong> - The PLI scheme for pharma is expected to promote the production of high-value products in the country and increase the value addition in exports</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Syrias ex-intelligence officer convicted in landmark Germany case</strong> - A German court sentences Eyad al-Gharib to jail for complicity in crimes against humanity.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Amnesty strips Alexei Navalny of prisoner of conscience status</strong> - Amnesty said it took the decision after complaints of “hate speech” by the Russian opposition leader.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Ghislaine Maxwell offers to give up French citizenship</strong> - The British socialite is in jail in New York awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Franco: Melilla enclave removes last statue of fascist dictator on Spanish soil</strong> - Workers carry away the monument of the fascist dictator in the Spanish enclave of Melilla.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Brexit: Irish Sea border grace periods to be discussed</strong> - The grace periods mean checks and controls on goods going from GB to NI are not fully implemented.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Report: Frys Electronics going out of business, shutting down all stores</strong> - Former king of build-your-own-PC retailers couldnt survive COVID, consignment shift. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1744739">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Scientists create new class of “Turing patterns” in colonies of E. coli</strong> - Computer science pioneer Alan Turing first proposed the patterning mechanism in 1952. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1744613">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Garden-variety germs may explode in COVIDs wake, study suggests</strong> - In coronavirus wake, garden-variety germs may come roaring back. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1744646">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Attack of the Murder Hornets is a nature doc shot through horror/sci-fi lens</strong> - Director Michael Paul Stephenson brings his unique sensibility to documentary genre. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1744035">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Grab a recommended Anker indoor security camera for $30 today</strong> - Dealmaster also has deals on Nintendo Joy-Cons, gaming monitors, and more. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1744435">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>Why was Yoda afraid of 7</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Because 9 7 8
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Enzerly"> /u/Enzerly </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lr3fth/why_was_yoda_afraid_of_7/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lr3fth/why_was_yoda_afraid_of_7/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Do they allow laughing in Hawaii?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Or just a low ha
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Qrow_pine"> /u/Qrow_pine </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lr2sdn/do_they_allow_laughing_in_hawaii/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lr2sdn/do_they_allow_laughing_in_hawaii/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>An old priest died and arrived at the Gates of Heaven</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Next to him was a young Uber driver who died seconds ago from his reckless driving.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The priest was called first, and St Peter said, “For your life long career working for the church, we will give you a small studio where you can stay at for the rest of eternity.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Then St Peter turns to the Uber driver, and said, “For your 2 years as an Uber driver, we will give you a giant mansion by the lake, and a Ferrari in a heated garage.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The priest thought it was strange and unfair, and protested, “Why does the Uber driver deserve so much more than me, when I have devoted my whole life to the church and God?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
St Peter explained, “You see - during your sermons, half of the audience was sleeping, and the other half was just looking at their phones; but when the Uber driver was driving, everyone was praying!”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
(Translated and modernized from an old joke in a different language)
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Theutates"> /u/Theutates </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqqiac/an_old_priest_died_and_arrived_at_the_gates_of/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqqiac/an_old_priest_died_and_arrived_at_the_gates_of/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A drunk man</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A drunk man stumbles out of bar and runs into 2 priest. The drunk man looks at the 1st priest and says,
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Hey, Im Jesus Christ.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The 1st priest tells the man, “No, my son, youre not.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Then the man turns to the 2nd priest and says the same thing. “Hey, Im Jesus Christ.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The 2nd priest tells the man, “No, my son, youre not.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The drunk man tells the priests that he can prove it. So he takes the 2 priests into the bar and the bartender says,
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Jesus Christ. Youre back again?”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Cold-Dragonfruit-353"> /u/Cold-Dragonfruit-353 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqztzs/a_drunk_man/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqztzs/a_drunk_man/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>She did what he said</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The retiring mailman
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The mailman who had been on the same route for 10 years was leaving the job.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He had made many friends on the route and decided to put a note in their mailboxes informing them.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Many on his route came out of their houses to wish him well and some even gave him an envelope with a card and/or a gift.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
When he walked onto the porch of one house, the door opened and a young woman in a sheer nightgown invited him in.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She took his hand and led him upstairs to the bedroom where she undressed him and they had wild sex.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Afterwards she led him back downstairs to the dining room where there was a sumptuous lunch laid out.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
As he was leaving, she handed him a five dollar bill.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Why are you doing this for me?”, he asked.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Ive never even seen you look out the window when I was delivering your mail.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“When I got your note, I wasnt sure what I should do”, she replied.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“My husband is older than I and knows more about how things should be done so I asked him.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He said, “Fuck him, give him 5 bucks.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The lunch was entirely my idea.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/boa_constrictor"> /u/boa_constrictor </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqik3g/she_did_what_he_said/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/lqik3g/she_did_what_he_said/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>