Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/29 December, 2020.html

399 lines
44 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
<meta content="text/css" http-equiv="Content-Style-Type"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Plague Year</strong> - The mistakes and the struggles behind Americas coronavirus tragedy. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/01/04/the-plague-year">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Deep Origins of Latino Support for Trump</strong> - The leaders of the Hispanic Republican movement today havent felt such momentum for twenty years. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/the-deep-origins-of-latino-support-for-trump">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Can Wall Streets Heaviest Hitter Step Up to the Plate on Climate Change?</strong> - More significant than BlackRock executivess pledges is the firms continued inclusion of fossil-fuel companies in its index funds. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/can-wall-streets-heaviest-hitter-step-up-to-the-plate-on-climate-change">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Trump Directs His Wrecking Ball at the COVID-19 Relief Bill and Mitch McConnell</strong> - After a week spent largely out of the public eye, the President reappeared with a flurry of pardons and an attack on the House Speakers coronavirus relief bill. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/trump-directs-his-wrecking-ball-at-the-covid-19-relief-bill-and-mitch-mcconnell">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Georgia Trump Fans Say the Last Election Was a Sham. Will They Vote in This One?</strong> - Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue are trying to placate the President and run for the Senate at the same time. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/us-journal/georgia-trump-fans-say-the-2020-election-was-a-sham-will-they-vote-in-this-one">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The House just voted to override Trumps veto of a $740 billion defense bill</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/DR65RQFD849ZkEXUiqoqPnBlSzA=/883x0:7978x5321/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68590824/1290579853.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Army soldiers retrieve their duffel bags at Fort Drum, New York, after they returned home in December from a nine-month deployment to Afghanistan. | John Moore/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The National Defense Authorization Act had passed both chambers of Congress with veto-proof majorities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E2xx1c">
The House voted on Monday to override President Donald Trumps veto of a sweeping $740 billion defense bill that previously passed in both chambers of Congress with veto-proof majorities.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="W2XD5f">
Though some Republicans sided with the president, the 322-87 vote marked a rare bipartisan rebuke of Trumps agenda during his final days in office. The House needed 288 votes to override the veto. The Senate is expected to vote on the bill on Tuesday, where a two-thirds majority will also need to support overriding the veto in order to secure pay increases for troops and ensure that training regimens can continue.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="IZPUcl">
Trump had vetoed the bill, which is known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), on the basis that it did not repeal Section 230, a law that shields private internet companies from liability for what users post on their websites and allows them to take down or restrict content at their discretion. In a public message to Congress last week, he <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-veto-message-house-representatives-h-r-6395/">said</a> that the law “facilitates the spread of foreign disinformation online, which is a serious threat to our national security and election integrity.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2jk1ef">
But Trumps targeting of Section 230 appears to be personal in nature: He has recently sparred with Twitter about its decision to place warnings on and restrict engagement with his <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2020/11/6/21552471/trump-twitter-restricted-false-election-claims-moderation">false tweets about widespread election fraud</a>. The company has also suggested that Trump could get <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2020/11/18/trump-will-lose-protected-twitter-status-after-his-presidency/">banned</a> from the platform once he is no longer in office.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6T0dq1">
Trump also took issue with provisions in the bill that require the military to rename facilities named after figures in Confederate history, limit the amount of defense funds that could be used to construct his US-Mexico border wall, and impose additional oversight on the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vKsjtY">
“Unfortunately,” Trump wrote, “the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our militarys history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a gift to China and Russia.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="j2RPdN">
The NDAA, which sets the defense priorities for the nation and distributes resources to US troops, has been passed every year for 59 years without fail. The House had previously passed the bill <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/08/politics/defense-bill-house-vote-trump-veto-threat/index.html">335-78</a> and the Senate had passed it <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/11/politics/senate-defense-bill-trump-veto-proof-majority/index.html">84-13</a>, both over the two-thirds threshold needed to override a veto.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sPUBfV">
Trumps veto of the bill — one of nine over the course of his presidency — pitted members of his own party against each other. Before Monday, Congress had not successfully overridden any of his vetoes.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jCVB41">
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who previously voted for the bill, and members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus had <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-freedom-caucus-presidents-ndaa-veto-threat-military">announced</a> their intentions to reject the veto override ahead of Mondays vote. But others, including Rep. Mac Thornberry, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, signaled that they would override the veto. Though he did not mention Trump directly, Thornberry told his GOP colleagues in a note <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/24/republicans-armed-services-ndaa-veto-450387">obtained by Politico</a> that they should ignore “distortions or misrepresentations” of the bill, and distributed fact sheets about the provisions of the bill with which the president took issue.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fg7Ubc">
“Your decision should be based upon the oath we all took, which was to the Constitution rather than any person or organization,” he reportedly said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZtoqBf">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eCrsOB">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="04Gobc">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OeYoSd">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oDDG8Q">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xYCJoN">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7tkbHH">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9DNwnS">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4TXPzc">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SytxQq">
</p>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Netflixs Death to 2020 rehashes jokes we all spent the last 12 months making</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/1hQg7aG-FL1aoY09fw9_RxFs3RU=/200x0:3400x2400/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68590700/DEATH_Unit_00892R.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Tracey Ullman as Queen Elizabeth II in Death to 2020. | Keith Bernstein/Netflix
</figcaption>
</figure></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Death to 2020s most urgent 2020 commentary is that social media is ruining everything. Wow.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LJhI6G">
In the opening moments of Netflixs new comedy special <em>Death to 2020</em>, Samuel L. Jackson, playing a jaded veteran reporter named Dash Bracket, asks the fictional filmmakers what their fictional documentary is for.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SV3UMB">
The offscreen interviewers never answer the question, and that lack of clarity sums up this hour-long parody. A mockumentary “year in review” from Charlie Brooker, a.k.a. the <a href="https://www.vox.com/black-mirror"><em>Black Mirror</em></a> guy, <em>Death to 2020</em> is an experiment that never justifies itself.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oJS4N1">
Star-studded and full of rote archival footage, <em>Death to 2020</em> is aggressively bland, as if something about 2020 defied Brookers attempts to parody it. Its not as if he doesnt make the effort: The skit-filled satire boasts nearly 20 writers. There arent 20 jokes to be found in this retrospective, however, and thats not because the subject isnt rife with absurdity.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qPRZTn">
But unlike Brookers more shrewd comedic efforts — for example, the acerbic satire of <em>Black Mirror</em>s Gamergate-inspired season four episode “<a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/12/29/16804664/black-mirror-uss-callister-recap-season-4-review">USS Callister</a>” — this outing is completely toothless. Most of the shows 67 minutes just tell us what we already know, because we just lived through it. The premise of <em>Death to 2020</em> seems to be that the audience will enjoy reliving the year, much in the way that <a href="https://go.redirectingat.com?id=66960X1516588&amp;xs=1&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rifftrax.com%2Fabout&amp;referrer=vox.com&amp;sref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2F22203327%2Fdeath-to-2020-review-social-media" rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" target="_blank">Rifftrax</a> fans enjoy subjecting themselves to bad movies. But the horrors of 2020 arent exactly A-list box office draws or must-watch material — and without quality commentary to enliven the trip down memory lane, the film is a tedious hour wasted.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="SjQKOy">
From the beginning, <em>Death to 2020 </em>is palpably unfunny. Hugh Grant dons a blond wig and plays a historian who snarks about politicians. Tracey Ullman dons a blonde wig and plays the queen, who snarks about Meghan Markle. Theres an Elon Musk parody named Bark Multiverse (<a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3529685/?ref_=tt_cl_t4">Kumail Nanjiani</a>), who builds a survival bunker, because of course there is and of course he does. A scientist named Pyrex Flask (<a href="https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4478685/?ref_=tt_cl_t6">Samson Kayo</a>) drops the mildest humor imaginable about Covid-19 and the pandemic.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Yfl07y">
Its all incredibly banal and deeply uninspired. The most stringent thing the documentary has to say about Republicans who support Trump is — wait for it — theyre <em>creating their own reality. </em>The most stringent thing it can find to fling at Joe Biden is — wait for it — hes <em>really old</em>. I bet you can already guess exactly what the writers think of <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/12/30/20879720/what-is-cancel-culture-explained-history-debate">cancel culture</a>. Thats right: Theyre not fans!
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="J9BRPd">
This type of paint-by-numbers humor doesnt really lend itself to tackling deeper aspects of the culture war, such as the ongoing <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/2/16588964/america-epistemic-crisis">epistemic crisis</a> or the protests against <a href="https://www.vox.com/police-violence">police brutality</a>, but Brooker and company have, of course, given themselves the assignment of raising those issues too. Its all in the service of painting the coronavirus as a four-in-one apocalyptic horseman, bearing down on us for our sin of spending too much time screaming at one another on Twitter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6sxo1u">
<a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/6/5/18648965/black-mirror-smithereens-recap-season-5-review">Brooker does love skewering</a> narcissistic, extremely online types for being too addicted to social media. But if that sermon felt empty when it was dressed up in <em>Black Mirror</em>s fancier clothing, here, where its framed as the mockumentarys main, threadbare takeaway, it just comes off as vapid and unoriginal. Perhaps <em>Death to 2020</em>s absolute worst offense is that it wastes <em>Stranger Things</em> <a href="https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/10/30/16569330/dad-steve-harrington-stranger-things-2-memes">resident teen dad, Joe Keery</a>, on its dumb social media jokes, tarnishing his hitherto flawless track record. We get it, Charlie Brooker: YouTubers and influencers are all shallow and clout-obsessed, and 2008 wants its punchlines back. Thank u, next.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LIrDSx">
Brooker achieves something close to meaningful commentary on the year only when he and the rest of the writers stop cracking tired jokes and allow the absurdity of the years images to speak for themselves. For example, during a clip from an anti-Covid-19 protest, one would-be patriot holds a sign that proclaims, “The vaccine is in the boxcar” — an apparent reference to the Holocaust. This moment goes unaddressed by the film, because its nearly unaddressable. How do you respond to that level of disconnect from reality?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="k88H0p">
Unfortunately for us, those moments of silent commentary are much too rare. Brooker and his army of writers cover every major beat from the last 14 months — if not exhaustively, then exhaustedly (and exhaustingly). The infamous US presidential debate? “A rap battle in a senior home.” As for Trump, perhaps hed have been less susceptible to Covid “if someone told him white hoods protect against the virus.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PnFs3C">
I take it back. The worst offense of <em>Death to 2020</em> isnt that it wastes so many of its star-studded cast members, from Leslie Jones to Lisa Kudrow. Its that, for all it wants to paint social media as the enemy, every bit of its humor feels like a social media rehash. Its as if the humor writers searched Twitter for the algorithmically generated “top” tweets on every one of their assigned topics, scribbled down anything with more than 1,500 likes, and called it a day.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="56WjMR">
Maybe if you truly werent paying any attention to world news, or social media, during the last 12 months, you might get something out of this hit parade. But otherwise, <em>Death to 2020</em> is ultimately just more of the same painfully humorless noise thats made up most of the year.
</p>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The House has voted to increase stimulus checks to $2,000</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Nancy Pelosi at the podium wearing a mask." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/gzzi0iee5fr5a_BJFREUvZlcfEg=/304x0:5168x3648/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/68590606/1292320951.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a press conference on Capitol Hill on December 2020. | Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Its probably dead in the Senate.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="afLys0">
The House of Representatives has voted to increase the latest round of <a href="https://www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19">Covid-19</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/22193651/second-stimulus-check-2020-update-when-how-much">stimulus checks</a> from $600 to $2,000. Even though President <a href="https://www.vox.com/donald-trump">Donald Trump</a> supports the move, it is unlikely to get far in the Senate.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E2JApO">
On Monday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi held a recorded vote on a standalone bill to increase “economic impact payments” — in other words, stimulus checks — to $2,000. House Democrats attempted a vote by unanimous consent on the matter on Christmas Eve, but <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/12/24/22197748/stimulus-checks-2000-congress-trump-pelosi-mcconnell">it was blocked by House Republicans</a>. This time, it passed the House by a 275-134 vote.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="M3NVLI">
The <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/12/21/22193134/covid-19-stimulus-deal-house-senate">$900 billion stimulus package</a> passed by Congress last week and signed into law by President Trump on Sunday has in it stimulus checks for $600 for individuals who made up to $75,000 a year in 2019, or $1,200 for couples who made up to $150,000 as well as an additional $600 per child. Many politicians, activists, and experts have called for that number to be higher — under the CARES Act in the spring, stimulus checks were for $1,200 for individuals.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0TIX4Y">
Negotiators settled on $600, and the general belief was that Trump agreed with whatever Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who called the bill “fabulous,” agreed with. But then after Congress passed the bill and went home, Trump <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341537886315950080?s=20">released a video</a> on Twitter slamming it as a “disgrace” and calling for checks to be bumped up to $2,000.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="z65LB6">
Democrats were quick to act and tried to use the presidents support for bigger checks as leverage to get Republicans in Congress to budge on the issue — or at the very least highlight that they wont. Pelosi <a href="https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/1341557535732604935">responded</a> to Trumps tweet saying that Republicans had “repeatedly refused to say what amount” the president wanted for checks and that “at last” he had agreed to $2,000. “Lets do it!” she wrote.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="grxc3o">
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) echoed Pelosis sentiment, noting that she and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) had <a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1341572295769415682">co-written an amendment for $2,000 checks</a>. The House voted on <a href="https://waysandmeans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chairman-neal-introduces-cash-act-provide-2000-payments-americans-need">the CASH Act</a> to increase stimulus payments, which was put forth by House Ways and Means Committee Chair Richard Neal (D-MA) on Christmas Eve.
</p>
<div id="udrOOn">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" dir="ltr" lang="en">
Me and <a href="https://twitter.com/AOC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"><span class="citation">@AOC</span></a> have the amendment ready. Send the bill back, and we will put in the $2,000 weve been fighting for that your party has been blocking. <a href="https://t.co/GGXtJt77D9">pic.twitter.com/GGXtJt77D9</a>
</p>
— Rashida Tlaib (<span class="citation">@RashidaTlaib</span>) <a href="https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1341568309955874818?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 23, 2020</a>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rWH2G2">
After the president signed the stimulus bill on Sunday, Pelosi <a href="https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/122720">said in a statement</a> that he “must immediately call on Congressional Republicans to end their obstruction and to join him and Democrats in support of our stand-alone legislation to increase direct payment checks to $2,000,” to be brought to the floor on Monday. “Every Republican vote against this bill is a vote to deny the financial hardship that families face and to deny the American people the relief they need,” she said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dGD4H2">
Mondays House vote was conducted under a “<a href="https://about.bgov.com/news/what-to-know-in-washington-trump-yields-and-signs-virus-package/">suspension of rules</a>,” which required a two-thirds majority for it to pass.
</p>
<h3 id="7E0jTD">
Just because Trump is into $2,000 stimulus checks doesnt mean the rest of his party is
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6V6OsO">
The big question after the vote on $2,000 stimulus checks passed the House on Monday is what happens next. And the answer is probably not much.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xuedHe">
Many Republicans have never been into the idea of bigger stimulus checks — Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) tried to advocate for $1,200 checks alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and <a href="https://www.axios.com/ron-johnson-hawley-stimulus-checks-e5bff298-9207-407e-bcc2-79caa833c37c.html">was blocked by a member of his own party</a>. As <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/12/23/22197037/trump-2000-stimulus-checks">Voxs Li Zhou explained</a>, Republicans have chafed at a bigger relief bill because of concerns about the deficit, and one bipartisan proposal in the lead-up to the final deal didnt have checks in it at all.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0aA4sD">
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/1343374127479083008?s=20">said on Twitter</a> that he will move to pass $2,000 checks in the Senate and that no Democrats will object. “Will Senate Republicans?” he asked. The answer is almost surely yes.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eYHdsC">
When asked by reporters whether $2,000 checks would get 60 votes in the Senate, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/pelosi-says-house-vote-bigger-stimulus-payments-after-gop-blocks-n1252335">said they would not</a>. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not weighed in on the matter. His office did not respond to a request for comment on how hes thinking about the issue, but he is unlikely to support it. In a <a href="https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1343365527851429888?s=20">statement</a> commending Trump for signing the $900 billion relief bill on Sunday, he didnt acknowledge the measure at all.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wuJwE9">
The president has complicated the matter further by tacking onto his $2,000 ask some unrelated items. In a <a href="https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1343365527851429888?s=20">statement</a> after signing the stimulus package, Trump said he wants the Senate to “start the process” for a vote on increasing checks, <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/28/21273241/section-230-explained-trump-social-media-twitter-facebook">repealing Section 230</a> — an internet speech law — and commencing an investigation into (unfounded) claims of voter fraud. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1343367962007363584?s=20">has been calling for</a> the Senate to increase checks at the same time it scraps Section 230 as well.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eAXeU6">
One thing does not have to do with the other — getting people much-needed help in a time of crisis and whether Twitter can slap a label onto the presidents false tweets are two different things.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E4u3Yl">
Despite the Houses vote on Monday, it remains unlikely that $2,000 checks are on the way.
</p>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Aus vs Ind | Rahane brought calmness in dressing room, says Ashwin</strong> - Adjudged Player of the Match, Rahane led by example by scoring a century.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Nekhbet, Mzilikazi, Sanctuary Cove, Shelomi and Crown Of Stars excel</strong> - Nekhbet, Mzilikazi, Sanctuary Cove, Shelomi and Crown Of Stars excelled when the horses were exercised here on Tuesday (Dec. 29).Outer sand: 800m: St</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Former New Zealand batsman John F. Reid dies aged 64</strong> - In a Test career that ran from 1979 to 1986 he scored 1,296 runs at an average of 46</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Australia vs India | I have let Ashwin dictate terms, no spinner has done that to me before this: Smith</strong> - The series is currently level at 1-1 after India secured an eight-wicket triumph in the second game here on Tuesday</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Gill and Siraj showed character: Ajinkya Rahane</strong> - Rahane said it is never easy for debutants to be consistently disciplined in their game but Gill and Siraj showed how it is done.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>COVID-19 dry run | Beneficiaries undergo dummy vaccination in Gujarat</strong> - According to a WHO official, the dry run was vital and was being conducted as per the training protocol related to actual vaccination.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Duck deaths in Kuttanad: samples to be sent to Bhopal</strong> - Around 22,000 ducks die in Thalavady, Pallippad</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Government bulldozed three farm laws, agriculture can't be run sitting in Delhi: Sharad Pawar</strong> - The NCP supremo said the Centre has passed farm bills on the basis of their own strength in Parliament, didnt consult the States and that's why all the problems started</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>No mutation in virus reported in Kerala: Minister</strong> - State on high alert and ready to meet any situation</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Services of fully reserved special trains extended</strong> - Hinting at further delay in restoring normal train services in the railway network, the Railways have extended fully reserved special trains, includi</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Russian Covid deaths three times the official toll</strong> - The country's deputy prime minister reveals more than 80% of excess deaths are linked to coronavirus.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Pierre Cardin: French fashion giant dies aged 98</strong> - He helped revolutionise fashion with his futuristic and stylish designs in the 1950s and 60s.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Cardin: Futuristic man of fashion</strong> - The legendary French fashion designer will be remembered for his futuristic designs and huge range.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Bell stolen by Nazis to be returned to Poland</strong> - A Polish church pastor has spent two years looking for the bell, which dates back to 1555.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Coronavirus: Spain to keep register of those who refuse Covid vaccine</strong> - Vaccination will not be mandatory, officials say, and the register will not be made public.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The best accessories and MagSafe gear for your new iPhone 12</strong> - We tested the latest MagSafe cases, stands, and mounts—and some tried and true favorites. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1731447">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Why AI is so power-hungry</strong> - It takes a lot of energy for machines to be trained with data sets. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1732190">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>How your digital trails wind up in the hands of the police</strong> - Phone calls. Web searches. Location tracks. Smart speaker requests. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1732186">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>All I want for Christmas is an awesome new curriculum</strong> - Revitalizing a curriculum in the middle of a chaos-inducing pandemic? Sure. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1731628">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 infections: The more the better</strong> - Oxford University Hospital tracked infections in 12,500 of its healthcare workers. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1732205">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>A local business was looking for office help. They put a sign in the window saying: "HELP WANTED. Must be able to type, must be good with a computer and must be bilingual. We are an Equal Opportunity Employer."</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A short time afterwards, a dog trotted up to the window, saw the sign and went inside. He looked at the receptionist and wagged his tail, then walked over to the sign, looked at it and whined. Getting the idea, the receptionist got the office manager. The office manager looked at the dog and was surprised, to say the least. However, the dog looked determined, so he led him into the office.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Inside, the dog jumped up on the chair and stared at the manager. The manager said, "I can't hire you. The sign says you have to be able to type." The dog jumped down, went to the typewriter and proceeded to type out a perfect letter. He took out the page and trotted over to the manager and gave it to him, then jumped back on the chair. The manager was stunned, but then told the dog, "The sign says you have to be good with a computer." The dog jumped down again and went to the computer. The dog proceeded to demonstrate his expertise with various programs and produced a sample spreadsheet and database and presented them to the manager. By this time the manager was totally dumbfounded! He looked at the dog and said, "I realize that you are a very intelligent dog and have some interesting abilities. However, I still can't give you the job." The dog jumped down and went to a copy of the sign and put his paw on the part about being an Equal Opportunity Employer. The manager said, "Yes, but the sign also says that you have to be bilingual."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The dog looked at him straight in the face and said, "Meow."
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/throughmethroughyou"> /u/throughmethroughyou </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/klzneg/a_local_business_was_looking_for_office_help_they/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/klzneg/a_local_business_was_looking_for_office_help_they/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A shooting club was holding a competition. The winner was to get a somewhat ugly trophy, the second-placed shooter - a crate of champagne.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
By the end of the final round, two shooters were tied for first place, so they were told to do a tiebreaker round - 5 shots at maximum distance. To keep things more dramatic, they had to shoot at the same time.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
After both had stopped firing and were awaiting the results, one shooter turned to his rival and said with a little smile: "I'm sorry, pal. I put all five shots in the wall."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
"I'm sorry, too," replied the other, "because I put all of mine into your target."
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/NorthernStarLV"> /u/NorthernStarLV </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/km43wl/a_shooting_club_was_holding_a_competition_the/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/km43wl/a_shooting_club_was_holding_a_competition_the/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>I proposed to my Russian girlfriend and she said yes!</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I proposed to my Russian girlfriend and she said Yes!
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
For the wedding, my whole family and friends flew over to her home town of Moscow.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
It was a beautiful ceremony, however I did find some things strange. For instance, the priest never said, "You may now kiss the bride", but I just assumed it was purely an American thing and didn't mind.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Later during the reception, we were both starving and decided to head over to the buffet to get food. On the way we passed the drink table, where about six people were waiting to get a fruity drink from a bowl.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
As we passed, they all said in unison, "You may now kiss the bride!" My wife got giddy and gave me a big kiss, which I of course returned.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
As we walked away I asked, "Why did <em>they</em> tell us to kiss and not the priest?"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
My wife answered,
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
"In Soviet Russia, the punchline tells you!"
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/coolfunaboud"> /u/coolfunaboud </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/km88ff/i_proposed_to_my_russian_girlfriend_and_she_said/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/km88ff/i_proposed_to_my_russian_girlfriend_and_she_said/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A very attractive girl goes to confession (NSFW)</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Forgive me Father for I have sinned"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "What did you do Child?"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "I called a man a son of a bitch."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "Why did you call him a son of a bitch?"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Because he touched my hand."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "Like this?" (as he touches her hand)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Yes father."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "That's no reason to call a man a son of a bitch."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Then he touched my breast."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "Like this?" (as he touched her breast)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Yes father."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "That's no reason to call him a son of a bitch."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Then he took off my clothes, father."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "Like this?" (as he takes off her clothes)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Yes father."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "That's no reason to call him a son of a bitch."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "Then he stuck his you know what into my you know where."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "Like this?" (as he stuck his you know what into her you know where)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "YES FATHER, YES FATHER, YES FATHER!!!"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: (after a few minutes): "That's no reason to call him a son of a bitch."
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Girl: "But father he had AIDS!"
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Priest: "THAT SON OF A BITCH!!!"
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/S2Charlie"> /u/S2Charlie </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/klsmpy/a_very_attractive_girl_goes_to_confession_nsfw/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/klsmpy/a_very_attractive_girl_goes_to_confession_nsfw/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Several years ago, Andy was sentenced to prison. During his stay, he got along well with the guards and all his fellow inmates. The warden saw that deep down, Andy was a good person and made arrangements for Andy to learn a trade while doing his time.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
After three years, Andy was recognized as one of the best carpenters in the local area.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Often he would be given a weekend pass to do odd jobs for the citizens of the community and he always reported back to prison before Sunday night was over.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The warden was thinking of remodeling his kitchen and in fact had done much of the work himself.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
But he lacked the skills to build a set of kitchen cupboards and a large counter top, which he had promised his wife.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
So he called Andy into his office and asked him to complete the job for him.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
But, alas, Andy refused.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He told the warden, "Gosh, I'd really like to help you but counter fitting is what got me into prison in the first place."
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/honolulu_oahu_mod"> /u/honolulu_oahu_mod </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/kmcf6r/several_years_ago_andy_was_sentenced_to_prison/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/kmcf6r/several_years_ago_andy_was_sentenced_to_prison/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>