ISIS After the American Strike - For an indication of the terrorist group’s future, look to its recent past. - link
How a City Close to the Ukraine-Russia Border Has Been Shaped by War - In Kharkiv, a Ukrainian national identity has been fortified by Russian incursions and threats. - link
The Pro-Trump Case for Rejecting the Big Lie - Weston Wamp, a young conservative from Tennessee, is on a mission to convince others on the right that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. - link
The Afterlife of a Las Vegas Spectacular - Nearly two years after “Le Rêve” went dark, cast members are still grappling with what it means to be a performer without a show. - link
When Hip-Hop Was Young - Sue Kwon photographed the artists whose music would go on to change the world. - link
From Vox
Liz Cheney’s censure underscores Republican loyalties to Trump -
Rep. Liz Cheney and Rep. Adam Kinzinger listen as the House select committee tasked with investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol meets on Capitol Hill on October 19, 2021. | J. Scott Applewhite/AP
GOP critiques of the committee investigating the January 6 insurrection serve to further normalize the attack.
On Friday, the Republican National Committee censured Reps. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) for their participation in a congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot — a move that underscores just how closely the GOP continues to align itself with former President Donald Trump and his lies about the 2020 election.
The resolution condemns Cheney and Kinzinger for their involvement in the January 6 select committee in the House, which is dedicated to investigating the circumstances and causes of the insurrection. Though it doesn’t formally expel either member from the party, it all but does so in practice.
The resolution, which was obtained by the New York Times, states that the RNC would “immediately cease any and all support of them as members of the Republican Party for their behavior which has been destructive to the institution of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Republican Party and our republic, and is inconsistent with the position of the Conference.”
It describes their work on the January 6 committee as aiding “Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse,” seemingly downplaying the violence, killing, and destruction that took place at the Capitol and normalizing it. RNC chair Ronna Romney McDaniel released a subsequent statement noting that the committee was focusing on “legitimate political discourse that had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol,” an apparent attempt to clarify the language from the resolution.
An RNC subcommittee approved the resolution on Thursday, and a majority of the RNC’s 168 members did the same in a voice vote on Friday.
Harmeet Dhillon, one of the resolution’s sponsors, told Politico the resolution is aimed at calling out Cheney and Kinzinger for their decision to “defy party leadership,” and not for their repeated criticism of Trump.
But it’s hard to interpret the resolution as anything other than a rebuke of Cheney and Kinzinger’s unwillingness to stay silent on Trump, given how outspoken both have been regarding the president’s role in spreading lies about the election that fueled the events of January 6. Republicans have been upset, too, about Cheney and Kinzinger’s participation in a committee that’s focused on the role GOP lawmakers played in amplifying false claims about the election.
Cheney and Kinzinger are the only Republicans on the January 6 committee. Originally, the House Homeland Security Committee hoped to create a fully bipartisan committee, but this plan was derailed by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Republicans were left with just two members on the committee ultimately created by Pelosi after McCarthy nominated lawmakers who voted to overturn legitimate election results as committee members. Pelosi invited Cheney and Kinzinger — who are among the House’s most conservative lawmakers — in part because they were among the 10 House Republicans who voted for Trump’s impeachment in the wake of the insurrection.
Following the announcement of the RNC subcommittee’s censure vote, both lawmakers put out statements standing by their participation in the January 6 committee, and criticizing the party for moving forward with this resolution.
“I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump,” Cheney wrote in a statement. “History will be their judge.”
“Rather than focus their efforts on how to help the American people, my fellow Republicans have chosen to censure two lifelong members of their Party for simply upholding their oaths of office,” Kinzinger said.
I’m a constitutional conservative and I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump. History will be their judge. I will never stop fighting for our constitutional republic. No matter what. (2/2) https://t.co/HtgFzrCipd
This is far from the first time Cheney and Kinzinger have faced GOP blowback for how directly they’ve been willing to confront Trump’s lies about the 2020 election results. Previously, House Republicans removed Cheney from leadership for her criticism of Trump, and a GOP organization in Illinois has censured Kinzinger for similar reasons. Cheney also faces a primary challenge from Trump-backed attorney Harriet Hageman for her Wyoming House seat, while Kinzinger has opted not to run for reelection.
The censure, while a rare move, won’t affect Cheney’s or Kinzinger’s current roles in the House. A prior version of the resolution could have had more of an impact: It urged House Republican leadership to kick both members out of the conference. That would have put McCarthy in the difficult position of deciding whether to remove both members, something the House Freedom Caucus has pushed for before, too.
The final version simply criticizes their actions. Ultimately, the censure serves mainly to reaffirm the message that many Republicans aren’t interested in confronting Trump about his role in contesting the election and stoking the January 6 insurrection. If anything, many intend to give their full support to what he says, no matter how dangerous or untrue.
The censure is emblematic of Trump’s influence on the Republican Party
The passage of the resolution is indicative of how many Republicans continue to back Trump and his views.
In fact, the resolution specifically mentions Trump, rebuking Cheney and Kinzinger for working on the committee alongside Democrats, arguing that they “support Democrat efforts to destroy President Trump more than they support winning back a Republican majority in 2022.”
Based on the success of Friday’s vote, most in the RNC appear to share this view. But there is a small group of moderate Republicans who used the vote to make it clear they disagree with the party’s unwillingness to take on Trump and call out the severity of the January 6 insurrection.
Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) were among those who questioned why Republicans were pursuing this censure. Former RNC party chair Michael Steele decried the censure as a “pathetic act of cowardice.” And current RNC member Bill Palatucci said the censure was a “distracting sideshow,” which followed the RNC’s failure to condemn participants in the January 6 attack.
“Shame falls on a party that would censure persons of conscience, who seek truth in the face of vitriol,” Romney wrote in a Twitter post.
Shame falls on a party that would censure persons of conscience, who seek truth in the face of vitriol. Honor attaches to Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for seeking truth even when doing so comes at great personal cost.
The RNC is censuring Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger because they are trying to find out what happened on January 6th - HUH?
— U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (@SenBillCassidy) February 4, 2022
Loyalty to Trump is set to play a role in the midterms
The censure also foreshadows the role that loyalty to Trump is likely to play in the upcoming midterm elections.
Cheney is among the Republican incumbents facing a primary challenge due to their opposition to Trump. The RNC this week also ratified a rule that enables it and the Wyoming Republican Party to financially support Hageman, the candidate challenging Cheney. Other Trump critics including Reps. Tom Rice (R-SC), Fred Upton (R-MI), and Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA) are set to face Trump-backed primary challengers because of their vote to impeach him in January 2021. As the New York Times reports, the incumbent candidates have so far been able to out-raise their opponents.
Trump’s endorsementcould play a significant role in crowded primaries for open Senate seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina. In the past, loyalty to Trump has been a factor in a number of House and Senate primary races, and many — though not all — of his endorsed candidates have won. In 2020, Trump’s backing appeared to help former football coach Tommy Tuberville beat former Sen. Jeff Sessions in an Alabama Senate primary, and buoyed House candidates like Lisa Scheller in Pennsylvania.
In a handful of races, however, his endorsement hasn’t been enough to secure victory. In Texas, Susan Wright lost a special election runoff despite having the former president’s backing, and in a North Carolina House district, Lynda Bennett lost a Republican primary.
That hasn’t stopped candidates from vying for Trump’s endorsement. That’s because, particularly in races in which the incumbent has a cash advantage, Trump’s backing is seen as a powerful way to boost one’s fundraising and legitimacy. And as Friday’s censure proves, it is also a way to signify one’s status as a “true Republican.”
Cheney and Kinzinger’s censure, ultimately, is indicative of how much the Republican Party continues to value allegiance to Trump, sending a signal to candidates and voters ahead of the midterms.
Why Tesla won’t stop -
Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Cars are computers now, but the government hasn’t caught up.
Tesla announced two massive recalls this week related to issues with its vehicles’ software. One of the recalls ordered Tesla to roll back a self-driving feature that caused the company’s cars to break the law. While Elon Musk said “there were no safety issues,” federal regulators disagree. But it’s also increasingly clear that government pressure is unlikely to change Tesla’s brazen approach.
In fact, these recently recalled features are just the latest examples of the company selling potentially dangerous software. This trend is especially concerning because the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the agency thatwill oversee the recalls, can only take action after the Tesla software has been released to drivers. Tesla typically pushes these updates to its vehicles when they’re connected to the internet, so they don’t come at a significant cost to the company. That’s left Tesla free to release and test new features with drivers on the road — until the government catches up and intervenes, or Tesla identifies issues on its own.
Tesla’s first recall this week involved a feature that enabled users to program their Teslas to slow down but not completely stop at all-way intersections with stop signs, under very specific conditions. The company first introduced the so-called “rolling stop” feature back in October 2020 as part of an update to its Full Self-Driving beta software. This advanced version of Tesla’s Autopilot driver-assistance technology is only available to a limited number of Tesla owners who pay $12,000 for the upgrade and is famouslycontroversial. Despite the name, the Full Self-Driving software doesn’t actually turn Teslas into fully autonomous vehicles, but it does give drivers access to semi-autonomous features. The recent recall of the rolling stop feature affected all 53,822 Teslas that had upgraded to Full Self-Driving.
It’s unclear exactly how dangerous Tesla’s “rolling stop” feature was in practice. No warranty claims or injuries were reported to Tesla, and the system only worked if the car was driving at very slow speeds. Elon Musk claims that speed was 2 miles per hour, while official NHTSA notes say it was 5.6 miles per hour. Regardless, rolling through stop signs is illegal in most places, no matter how slow you’re going. As NHTSA noted in a letter to Tesla, “Failing to stop at a stop sign can increase the risk of a crash.” Tesla has now released a software update to address the recall.
Tesla’s second recall came on Thursday after NHTSA said that more than 817,000 Teslas could have a faulty seat belt feature. The agency said that these vehicles, in certain cases, wouldn’t produce an audible chime when people forget to put on their seat belts, a problem that Tesla says it will, again, fix with a software update.
<img alt="A driver with their hand touching the Tesla screen beside the car’s steering wheel."
src=“https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/wevaaO6qbTkMYHcoFRM2yslkTg0=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox- cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23218431/GettyImages_954730186.jpg” /> Andy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty Images
One software update released by Tesla allowed drivers to play video games while their cars were in motion.
These are just the two most recent Tesla safety- related software updates. The automaker has initiated nine recalls within the past three months, and federal safety regulators opening investigations into the company now feel like this is a regular occurrence. At the same time, some of the problems that the software updates are meant to address seem to be ongoing or, in some cases, worsening.
For example, Tesla issued a recall — and a software update — following reports last fall that vehicles using Autopilot would brake without warning after their computers detected hazards that didn’t actually exist. But this “phantom braking” issue actually appeared to get worse in the months following the recall, possibly because Tesla decided to stop using radar-based sensors, in favor of cameras, on some vehicle models, according to a recent report from the Washington Post. Federal regulators are again consulting the company about how to address the problem.
“NHTSA has kind of been playing a game of cat and mouse with Tesla for a number of years now,” explained Michael Brooks, the acting director of the Center for Auto Safety. “Right now, NHTSA seems to be playing a little more active version of a cat.”
Yet Tesla shows no sign of stopping. Again, car recalls don’t work the way they once did. Car owners used to take their recalled vehicles to a dealer or auto shop for a repair, or they would get a replacement or a refund. But in recent years, automakers have had the option of fixing some flaws with an over-the- air software update, just like Tesla has done with all of the aforementioned recalls. Because these recalls are akin to releasing an app update, they’re easier and faster for car owners to address. But they’re also relatively cheap for automakers to execute. So some might argue that, if recalls simply lead to software updates, they’re little more than a slap on the wrist from regulators.
It looks as though Tesla is also using software updates to preempt potential recalls, too. This past summer, the company released a feature called Passenger Play that let people play video games on Teslas’ touchscreens while the vehicles were in motion. But after NHTSA announced an investigation into the feature, Tesla issued a software update in December to disable Passenger Play while the car is in motion. Last August, the agency similarly announced a formal investigation into 11 crashes involving Tesla vehicles with Autopilot or Traffic-Aware Cruise Control engaged that hit stopped emergency vehicles with their lights flashing, and then Tesla pushed a related software update a few weeks later. That prompted NHTSA to ask the company in October why it didn’t file a formal recall notice, implying that Tesla may have used the update as a “stealth recall.”
Other than formal recalls, regulators don’t currently have many other tools at their disposal.NHTSA could update its Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, but that’s a yearslong process, a fact that might help explain why regulations haven’t kept pace with new car technologies. The National Transportation Safety Board can also focus on car safety, but the agency is mostly limited to conducting investigations into crashes and making recommendations. While states are slowly developing their own rules, there still isn’t a nationwide consensus on how to approach vehicles like Teslas.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
The Department of Transportation is still wrestling with how to approach increasingly autonomous vehicles.
That’s why some think it’s time for the government to do more. Last May, Reps. Bobby Rush (D-IL) and Larry Bucshon (R-IN) proposed the Crash Avoidance System Evaluation Act, which would force the Department of Transportation to study how well car crash avoidance tech, like Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, actually works. Meanwhile, Sens. Ed Markey (D-MA) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) urged the Federal Trade Commission in August to investigate Tesla for false and misleading advertising related to those semi-autonomous features. Along with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), they’ve also proposed the Stay Aware for Everyone Act, which would mandate that the DOT analyze driver assistance systems and require carmakers to install driver-monitoring tools.
“These latest developments with Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self- Driving systems are exactly why we’ve long expressed our concerns with this flawed technology,” Blumenthal and Markey told Recode. “Although automated driving and driver assistance systems have the potential to enhance safety, they must be implemented with strong safeguards that will ensure our cars follow the rules of the road and drivers are fully engaged.”
But the reason strong safeguards for semi-autonomous cars don’t exist is that there’s no consensus about how these vehicles should be regulated. Is the driver or the car manufacturer responsible when a software-assisted vehicle does something dangerous? Should autonomous and semi-autonomous cars be programmed to follow the letter of the law, or to drive the way most people actually drive? Regulators haven’t fully answered these questions, and Tesla is taking advantage of the ambiguity.
This all comes at what should be a moment of opportunity for Tesla and its commitment to safety. In the first nine months of last year, the number of US road fatalities rose at the fastest rate since the Transportation Department started tracking them in 1975. Musk has repeatedly argued that Tesla’s AI-powered vehicles save lives and that his vehicles could be a solution to worsening highway safety problems. But the company’s insistence on releasing features that deliberately play with safety, instead of promoting it, seems to be undermining this larger goal.
Why the Olympics opening ceremony felt kinda weird -
The Olympic rings rise over performers during the Opening Ceremony of the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics at Beijing National Stadium on February
| Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Beijing’s opening ceremony featured Vladimir Putin, thousands of Chinese teenagers, and a lot of loaded politics.
The Beijing Winter Olympics kicked off to an expectedly weird start, thanks to the unprecedented challenges presented by the Covid-19 pandemic. Directed by legendary Chinese film director Zhang Yimou (who also directed the 2008 Beijing opening ceremony), this year’s opening ceremony focused on visual spectacle, with giant LED screens covering the floor and lining the stage, and no celebrity entertainers.
Facing a diplomatic boycott from many countries over its human rights violations, including the US — meaning the United States sent no official government envoy to the Games but its athletes are competing as usual — China took a low-key approach to this year’s opening ceremony. But inevitably, the tense geopolitics surrounding the event snuck in.
The production, which dovetailed with the Chinese New Year spring festival, included about 3,000 performers, most of them teenagers, and emphasized peace, world unity, and the people around the world who have battled the pandemic. The unifying aesthetic was about as peaceful as you could get: snowflakes.
In the buildup to the ceremony, China had encouraged athletes to sign a “truce mural” with other nations. The government also rolled out a massive winter sports initiative prior to the Games, claiming it had successfully engaged more than 300 million Chinese citizens in winter sports participation, especially targeting kids and teens. The ceremony emphasized these citizens above all else, with no famous singers or actors performing — a first for any Olympics in recent memory.
This was due perhaps in part to the difficulty of coordinating live celebrity performances while Beijing is still under a period of intense lockdown due to the pandemic. It happens to be in accord with China’s year-long “QingLang” campaign to rein in the status of celebrities and their fans — a sweeping attempt to control both the undue influence of idols as well as their often out-of-control fandoms.
It’s in keeping with China’s messaging since the pandemic began: We’re all in this together, getting through this together, thanks to the tireless commitment of “ordinary heroes” like volunteers and essential workers — who had to execute China’s draconian (though highly successful) Covid policy. Since 2021 was the Chinese Communist Party’s 100th anniversary, that narrative has also aligned with a heavy emphasis on the importance of youth to carry the nation (and Chinese communism) into the future.
That theme played heavily into the opening ceremonies, from the presence of seas of cute children smiling and singing onstage to a video featuring kids not much older than toddlers skiing and skating to the passing of the Olympic torch. For the cauldron lighting, Chinese athletes born in succeeding decades passed the torch along to one another, ending with two athletes born in the 2000s (one of whom embodied a message to the world, but more on that in a second).
Throughout the parade of nations, happy volunteers jumped, danced, and waved alongside the competing Olympic athletes alongside a backdrop of utterly inoffensive European classical music. A bucolic snowflake aesthetic dominated the presentation, apparently emphasizing not the uniqueness of every snowflake, but the calm uniformity of the collective snowfall awaiting spring. Easy to imagine it all as a metaphor for the commonality of the global Olympics audience as we all await an end to Covid surges. At one point, roller skaters made idyllic snowflake patterns to the tune of John Lennon’s “Imagine.”
Despite the banal quality of it all, the scene still held political tension. Viewers watching the NBC live feed of the ceremony got plenty of glimpses of Vladimir Putin, isolated in Russia’s box, attending the event despite being embroiled in a border standoff with Ukraine that threatens to overshadow the Games and their focus on global unity.
As Chinese President Xi Jinping looked on, in the final moments, the Olympic torch was passed to 21-year-old cross-country skier Dinigeer Yilamujiang, who is a member of China’s Uyghur ethnic minority. Human rights experts have accused the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of detaining millions of Uyghurs in forced human labor camps in Xinjiang; the US State Department has described the actions as genocide and alleged China is committing other crimes against humanity like rape, forced sterilization, and torture.
China has claimed, despite significant evidence to the contrary, that the camps don’t exist, that workers’ labor is voluntary, and that accusations to the contrary are “the lie of the century.” So the decision to prominently feature Yilamujiang to end the opening ceremony is a deeply political one — and one that will significantly complicate the message of unity conveyed in the Olympics’ opening ceremony. (Yilamujiang isn’t the first Uyghur athlete to carry the torch for China; Kamaltürk Yalqun, who carried the torch at age 17 in the 2008 Olympics, now lives in the US and has spent years protesting China’s persecution of the Uyghurs.)
China also welcomed separate delegations from Taiwan (competing as the “Chinese Taipei” team) and Hong Kong, despite its attempts to bring those regions more tightly into its orbit and its emphasis on a “One China” policy. As Yale professor Jing Tsu explained during NBC’s coverage, these contradictions are somewhat inherent to China’s political strategy: The country doesn’t necessarily expect to change minds, globally, with its message — but still, it is a clear one: unity, the future, and peace on earth. “We’ll see if there are any takers,” Tsu said.
Still, it’s always worth noting that China and its people are not a monolith, nor are they synonymous with the CCP and its human rights abuses — whatever the CCP might want you to think. While China’s Olympic delegation obviously got the biggest cheer of the night from the hometown crowd, the Beijing Olympics Committee stressed a warm welcome to all the participating nations, from the Mexican athletes wearing Day of the Dead jackets to the solo American Samoa delegate who arrived shirtless, fully Vaselined, and ready to play.
Perhaps the opening ceremony did remind us of one thing: No amount of strange precedence or geopolitical tensions can fully suppress the thrilling and unexpected pleasures of the Olympics, from the weird and wacky to the groundbreaking and heroic. Let the Games begin!
From The Hindu: Sports
National selection trials for athletics to begin on February 9 - The selection trails are open to both boys and girls between the age group of 16 to 21 years
India vs West Indies, 1st ODI | Ishan Kishan will open with me as he is only option available: Rohit Sharma - The announcement comes as Mayank Agarwal is still serving the mandatory quarantine period
Beijing Olympics | Xi to meet with leaders of Serbia, Egypt - Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and Serbia’s Aleksandar Vucic are among more than a dozen world leaders who attended the opening ceremony on Friday night
Jehan Daruvala faces ‘make-or-break year’ in quest to reach F1 - The 23-year-old Indian needs to be fighting for the 2022 championship in Formula 2, the category just below the pinnacle of single-seater racing, to have a shot at realising a long-cherished dream
India vs West Indies | Middle-order in focus as India look for ‘fresh ODI template’ in Rohit-Dravid era - India will be playing its 1000th ODI in Ahmedabad on Sunday
From The Hindu: National News
Farmers in Karnataka flock to online classes for latest trends in agriculture practices - Online lessons by District Agricultural Training Centre in Mysuru are reaching farmers not only in remote and inaccessible areas on the periphery of forests and national parks in Mysuru district, but also benefiting farmers located across Karnataka
India not to be intimidated by new experimentation being done by Pak., says Jitendra Singh - He said if there is any pending issue between Pakistan and India it is that part of Jammu and Kashmir which continues to be under the illegal occupation of the neighbouring country.
Reconnecting with roots at tuber mela in Mysuru - The mela will introduce the younger generation to the nutritional value of roots and tubers to wean them away from junk food
Dead bodies of cattle found floating in River Ganga in U.P. city - 37 dead cattle were found floating at the confluence of river Kali and river Ganga, Kannauj DM said citing a report from the Chief Veterinary Officer
A cyber security company successfully implements a truncated working week - The outbreak of the pandemic was what served as a triggering point for the new arrangement.
From BBC: Europe
Iceland whaling: Fisheries minister signals end from 2024 - A fall in demand for Icelandic whale products means the controversial practice is no longer profitable.
EuroMillions: UK player wins £109.9m jackpot - A UK player matches all seven numbers to take the biggest prize of the year so far.
China joins Russia in opposing Nato expansion - Moscow and Beijing release a statement showcasing agreement on a wide range of geopolitical issues.
Putin’s Olympic trip signals warmer Russia-China ties - Russia’s president heads to the Chinese capital, Beijing, in his first visit since the Covid pandemic.
German anger as Russia shuts international broadcaster Deutsche Welle - Germany and the EU condemn a decision to shut down Deutsche Welle’s bureau in Moscow.
From Ars Technica
A fight over the right to repair cars turns ugly - Massachusetts Subaru and Kia dealers disabled remote start and maintenance alerts. - link
The Orville: New Horizons jumps 400 years into the future in teaser footage - Originally slated for March, new season will now debut June 2 on its new home: Hulu. - link
CDC turns to poop surveillance for future COVID monitoring - Sewage can detect surges and variants before testing, CDC says. - link
“Deprioritized” Google Stadia to pivot to “Google Stream” white-label service - After a consumer failure, Google wants to salvage the Stadia technology. - link
Mozilla apparently makes and is discontinuing a VR version of Firefox - Wolvic browser, maintained by Igalia, picks up where Firefox Reality left off. - link
From Jokes Subreddit
a teenage boy keeps depositing one million dollar in his bank account every day -
one day, Mrs. Mary the bank manager asks him to provide the source of all the money he’s depositing
“I win it through gambling” he answers
“nobody can win that much money so consistently through gambling”
“wanna proof? how about we bet on 1000$ that I’ll kiss my eye right here”
“what? that’s impossible, ok I accept”
so the boy removes his fake eye, kisses it and returns it, “hand me my 1000$ please”
Mrs Mary got angry and decided to gamble again, so the next day she demanded a rematch
“ok, do you bet on 3000$ that I’ll lick my ear ?”, she thoroughly examined his ears, and after getting sure they’re real she accepted, so the boy removed his fake tongue and licked his ear
the next day, Mrs Mary asked for a rematch, but no cheap tricks this time
“ok, I bet 5000$ that you have pierced nipples”
“ha, no”, yelled Mrs Mary as she removed her top and showed her unpierced boobs
“fair enough, here’s your 5000$, now allow me to collect my money", and she was confused as all the employees at the bank were paying the boy </p> <p>"what have you done this time" she said </p> <p>"oh, I bet each one of them 10 000$ that I’ll make you flash me your tits”
A priest kept chickens at his village. One evening the cock went missing. At the church pass prayer gathering, the priest asked: -“Who has a cock?”…All the men got up. -“No I meant who has seen a cock?”…All the women got up. -“No,no, Who has seen a cock that isn’t theirs?”…Half the women got up. “Oh for heavens sake, who has seen my cock?”…All the nuns got up.
/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23218426/GettyImages_1236004428.jpg)
Drew Angerer/Getty Images