diff --git a/archive-covid-19/05 December, 2020.html b/archive-covid-19/05 December, 2020.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4262953 --- /dev/null +++ b/archive-covid-19/05 December, 2020.html @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ + + + + + + 05 December, 2020 + + +Covid-19 Sentry + +

Covid-19 Sentry

+

Contents

+ +

From Preprints

+ +

From Clinical Trials

+ +

From PubMed

+ +

From Patent Search

+ +embedded image +

+ +

wherein the ’ position of the nucleoside sugar is substituted. The compounds, compositions, and methods provided are particularly useful for the treatment of Lassa virus and Junin virus infections.

+ + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/archive-daily-dose/05 December, 2020.html b/archive-daily-dose/05 December, 2020.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1adf24f --- /dev/null +++ b/archive-daily-dose/05 December, 2020.html @@ -0,0 +1,565 @@ + + + + + + 05 December, 2020 + + +Daily-Dose + +

Daily-Dose

+

Contents

+ +

From New Yorker

+ +

From Vox

+ + +

+Ending oil production by 2050 has been welcomed — and criticized +

+

+The move was also hailed by EU government officials including Finnish Minister of the Environment and Climate Krista Mikkonen, who applauded the decision via Twitter saying that the world needs more leaders on climate change. +

+

+Some other environmental groups were also happy. “This is a huge victory for the climate movement,” Helene Hagel of Greenpeace Denmark said in a statement. She added that Denmark has “a moral obligation to end the search for new oil to send a clear signal that the world can and must act to meet the Paris Agreement and mitigate the climate crisis.” +

+

+Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was far less impressed, though, tweeting that the decision means Denmark will continue extracting oil and gas for another 30 years. +

+
+
+

+The real news here is that Denmark will apparently go on extracting fossil fuels for another 3 decades.
To us children, this is not the “good news” that some people seem to think.
We’re in a climate emergency. Act accordingly.https://t.co/3ywKQNQXA0 +

+— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) December 4, 2020 +
+
+

+Denmark’s decision shows that Paris and regional and national commitments to reducing emissions are starting to have some real impact — and that’s good. +

+

+As the top oil producer in the European Union, Denmark’s move is significant, but other oil producing nations must take a similar pledge if there’s any hope of achieving the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting warming to 2 degrees Celsius. +

+

+“You’re going to need a lot of other countries, especially major oil and gas producers, to step up,” Burns told me. “Norway and the UK both feel pressured to remain leaders on pursuing the climate agenda.” +

+

+While the UK and Norway are both major oil-producing countries and located outside the EU, the desire to lead on climate change could push the nations to make stronger commitments. +

+

+On December 3, the UK announced ambitious plans to cut emissions by 68 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2030. A report also calls on UK oil and gas firms to phase out production in the North Sea and make the transition to renewable energy sources. Peer pressure could also help further pave the way. +

+

+Neighboring Norway, Burns noted, is a much larger producer of fossil fuels, so a commitment to end oil and gas extraction would be a much more dramatic step for that country to take. +

+

+“If the US, this year or next year, starts to return as a positive force on climate, that along with measures like this one from Denmark might put pressure on other countries to do so,” Burns said. +

+ +

From The Hindu: Sports

+ +

From The Hindu: National News

+ +

From BBC: Europe

+ +

From Ars Technica

+ +

From Jokes Subreddit

+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 6575f87..0efed0c 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ Archive | Daily Reports
  • Covid-19
  • Daily Dose

    -