Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/05 August, 2021.html

673 lines
79 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2021-08-05 13:53:29 +01:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>05 August, 2021</title>
<style type="text/css">
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Is This Finally It for Andrew Cuomo?</strong> - A damning new report packed with alarming and previously unreported details corroborates allegations of sexual harassment and other abuses by New Yorks governor. Will it be enough for Democrats to impeach him? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/is-this-finally-it-for-andrew-cuomo">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Simone Biles Takes the Bronze</strong> - The gymnast said that her return to Olympic competition on Tuesday was something she did for herself. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/sports/replay/simone-biles-takes-the-bronze">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Its Crunch Time for Joe Biden and the Democratic Party</strong> - This week, the President and congressional leaders must hold the Party together if they hope to enact a landmark economic agenda. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/its-crunch-time-for-joe-biden-and-the-democratic-party">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Its Not the Heat, Its the Damage</strong> - Two questions lie at the heart of the climate crisis. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/its-not-the-heat-its-the-damage">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>A Near Press Blackout in Afghanistan</strong> - The war that Americans forgot is ending in chaos and secrecy. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-near-press-blackout-in-afghanistan">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>Georgia Republicans didnt waste any time in using their new voter suppression law</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-
cdn.com/thumbor/SnCzcT5zJy5hjmw1-5LI_e7tdk0=/74x0:1989x1436/1310x983/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69682195/1229968766.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
President Donald Trump leaves a rally in December in Georgia, a state he lost in the 2020 election. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Republicans have begun a legal process that could allow them to disenfranchise much of Atlanta.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JvoBJY">
Late last month, 27 Republican members of the Georgia state Senate sent an <a href="https://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-news/georgia-republicans-take-first-step-to-fulton-elections-
takeover/MQ7CABNYFZBINMLPRCAFJE7HAM/">ominous letter</a> to the state elections board, touting a misleading claim about the 2020 election popularized by <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/15/here-is-latest-baseless-
voter-fraud-allegation-brought-you-by-trump-tucker-carlson/">Fox News host Tucker Carlson</a>. A few days later, several Republican members of the state House sent a similar letter seeking a “<a href="https://apnews.com/article/elections-
georgia-local-elections-voting-rights-election-2020-d7d7dfffd60f3ce0a93f4c522c4d3370">performance review</a>” of election officials in the Democratic stronghold of Atlanta.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0JE9sj">
In a post-Trump GOP, it <a href="https://www.vox.com/22417310/arizona-audit-ballots-cyber-ninjas-uv-lights-qanon-conspiracy-theory-vote-
suppression-fraud">might</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/22533994/trump-violence-election-raffensperger-threats-voting-
rights-big-lie">seem</a> <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/5/5/22419504/liz-cheney-trump-big-lie">unremarkable</a> that elected officials are spouting off about some lie or half-truth broadcast by conservative media. But these letters set in motion a chain of events that could end in mass disenfranchisement of voters in the Democratic stronghold of Atlanta for the 2022 statewide and midterm elections.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lCR2wH">
In March, Georgia Republicans passed SB 202, a sweeping new election law that <a href="https://www.vox.com/22352112/georgia-voting-sb-202-explained">erects obstacles between Georgia voters</a> and their right to cast a ballot. While some are relatively minor or even popular, the most ominous provisions of this new law allow the state election board, which is dominated by Republicans, to seize control of county election boards. Those boards can disqualify voters, move polling precincts, and potentially even refuse to certify an election count.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GSdLyP">
The letters from Republican lawmakers are the first step in the legal process Republicans may use to take over elections in Fulton County, the most populous county in the state, which encompasses most of Atlanta. In 2020, nearly <a href="https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/GA/Fulton/105430/web.264614/#/summary">73 percent of Fulton County voters</a> cast a ballot for President Joe Biden. Biden won the county by nearly a quarter-million votes, enough to push him ahead of former President Donald Trump in a state decided by 11,779 votes overall.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WnInSX">
Both letters ask the state elections board to begin a “performance review” of the local officials who oversee elections in Fulton County. The senators claim that such a review is justified because “nearly 200 ballots were scanned twice last fall” during the initial vote count in Fulton — a claim that was <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/15/here-is-latest-baseless-voter-fraud-allegation-brought-you-by-
trump-tucker-carlson/">previously featured on Tucker Carlsons show</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Wh7m0Z">
The reality is much more nuanced, and it suggests that the states existing systems worked exactly as they were supposed to work. Although <a href="https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-
recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/">nearly 200 ballots were double-counted</a> during the first count of Fulton Countys ballots, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/15/here-is-latest-baseless-voter-fraud-
allegation-brought-you-by-trump-tucker-carlson/">Georgia conducted both a machine recount and a hand recount of all its ballots</a>, given how close the statewide result was. And theres no evidence that any ballots were counted twice in the final tallies that showed Biden ahead of Trump.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="r4c7sz">
It appears likely that a poll worker in Fulton County made a minor clerical error, and this error was corrected in the subsequent recounts.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1DmrCP">
Nevertheless, it is probably inevitable that the GOP-controlled state elections board will open an investigation into Fulton County. And once this investigation concludes, the state board can <a href="https://legiscan.com/GA/text/SB202/id/2348602">use it as a pretext</a> to remove Fulton Countys local elections board and replace it with a temporary superintendent who can undermine voting within that county.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8TlPUt">
Georgia law provides, for example, that <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-6/21-2-230/">any voter in Fulton County</a> “may challenge the right of any other elector of the county or municipality, whose name appears on the list of electors, to vote in an election.” If Republicans appoint a temporary superintendent in Fulton, that GOP official will adjudicate these challenges. That means that Republicans could potentially flood the zone with frivolous voting challenges — which could be sustained by a partisan superintendent.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mUvRlK">
The outcome of Georgias 2022 statewide elections, in other words, may not be determined by the states voters. It could hinge on a sham investigation into Fulton Countys election administration — and by a partisan boards subsequent decision to place a partisan official in charge of counting most of the votes in Atlanta.
</p>
<h3 id="ZbMFAP">
How Georgias new law allows Republicans to take over local election boards
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pa8Lcv">
If you were unaware of Trumps <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/7/31/22603477/trump-efforts-overturn-election-results-rosen-donoghue">failed efforts to overturn the 2020 election</a>, or if you did not know that SB 202 is <a href="https://www.vox.com/22307937/voting-
rights-georgia-arizona-voting-by-mail-republican-absentee-donald-trump">part of a wave of election bills</a> introduced by Trump loyalists, then the process for state takeovers of local election boards might seem reasonable.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CkKzQG">
The <a href="https://legiscan.com/GA/text/SB202/id/2348602/Georgia-2021-SB202-Enrolled.pdf">relevant provisions of SB 202</a> appear to be outwardly neutral — they arent written to explicitly benefit Republicans over Democrats. Among other things, SB 202 removes Georgias elected secretary of state as the chair of the five-person State Elections Board, and replaces them with “a chairperson elected by the General Assembly.” It also allows certain state lawmakers to demand that the board conduct “an independent performance review” of a countys top election officials.
</p></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="vDLtZe">
After conducting such a review, the state board may appoint a temporary superintendent to oversee a countys election administration if three members of the board determine that the countys top election officials recently “committed at least three violations” the states election laws and regulations, or if these board members determine that the local officials “demonstrated nonfeasance, malfeasance, or gross negligence in the administration of the elections.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="o8XJ9R">
Yet, while these provisions might be reasonable and nonpartisan if they were administered by reasonable and nonpartisan officials, they entrench Republican power in two ways. Firstly, SB 202 increases the Republican Partys grip on the State Elections Board by bringing the total number of board members appointed by the legislature to three.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="69GxVE">
Before SB 202, the state board was chaired by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who refused Trumps suggestion that Raffensperger “<a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/1/4/22213031/trump-georgia-crime-criminal-brad-raffensperger-election-call-fraud-
felony">find 11,780 votes</a>” and award them to Trump — thus giving the defeated president an illegitimate victory over Biden. SB 202 allows the Republican-controlled state legislature to <a href="https://www.vox.com/22352112/georgia-
voting-sb-202-explained">appoint a more pliable chair</a> (the seat is currently vacant).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GHn3R3">
GOP lawmakers already appointed two of the other board members: One of these seats is appointed by the state senate, and another by the state House, both of which have Republican majorities. (Theoretically, control of one or both houses could flip to the Democratic Party in the future, giving them more power over the board of elections, but thats no reassurance for anyone worried about the administration of the 2022 elections <strong></strong>and Republicans can use their current majorities to <a href="https://www.vox.com/22537146/joe-manchin-voting-rights-for-the-people-john-lewis-
act-gerrymandering-voter-id-democrats">pass gerrymanders that could lock them into power</a>.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tuFFuM">
And Republicans actually have even more control of the board: The two remaining seats are filled by the state Democratic and Republican parties, meaning Republicans currently control four of the five slots.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DXzLb3">
This brings us to the second way SB 202 entrenches Republican control of the 2022 elections: A supermajority on the board enables the GOP to take over local election administration, even if a Republican member of the state elections board dissents. Thats because only three of the boards five members need to support a state takeover of a local election board for that takeover to happen.
</p>
<h3 id="yghf9q">
So what happens next?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DagQiP">
Under <a href="https://legiscan.com/GA/text/SB202/id/2348602/Georgia-2021-SB202-Enrolled.pdf">SB 202</a>, Republicans still need to jump through several procedural hoops before they can claim control Fulton Countys election administration. The process from here on out looks like this:
</p>
<ol>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nRhyBJ">
After lawmakers formally request a review, the state board “shall appoint an independent performance review board within 30 days.” This review board will have three members — one state election official and two local officials from outside of Fulton County — and will produce a written report.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DiPF3Z">
After the performance review is complete, the state elections board may pursue “extraordinary relief,” which may include removing the county election board. Before voting on whether to remove Fulton Countys local board, the state board must conduct at least one “preliminary hearing,” within 30 to 90 days from when it formally decides to consider removing the local board.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="IeIOfl">
After this preliminary hearing has happened, the state board may vote to suspend the local board — it takes three state board members to do so. If that happens, the state board may also appoint a temporary superintendent who will take over election administration in Fulton.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="DGvkkc">
In theory, the ousted county officials may petition the same state board that just removed them from office for reinstatement. The more likely path to Fulton reasserting control of its elections, though, is that nine months later the county regains the power to remove the temporary superintendent and appoint its own election administrators.
</li>
</ol>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zMI7qy">
Because Fulton is likely to remove a GOP-appointed superintendent as soon as it can, Republicans need to time this entire process carefully if their intent is to skew the 2022 election in their favor. To gain maximum advantage, Republicans need to ensure that the temporary superintendents nine months in office overlaps with the 2022 election and the post-election period when that election is being certified.
</p>
<h3 id="9QUFfd">
Once Republicans take over the Fulton County election board, they gain broad new powers to disenfranchise voters
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XgED3S">
In those nine months, the temporary superintendent gains all the powers that would normally be held by local election administrators — at least three of which could potentially be wielded to disenfranchise voters.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="O0Hoo2">
First, county election boards normally have the power to <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-6/21-2-230/">adjudicate claims that a particular voter is not lawfully allowed to vote</a>, so this power would be transferred to a GOP-appointed superintendent. If a county board (or a temporary superintendent) determines that a particular voter is “not qualified to remain on the list of electors,” the voter will be disenfranchised and removed from the list of registered voters.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="j3itYu">
Moreover, because state law permits <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-6/21-2-230/">any Fulton County voter to challenge the right of any other Fulton County voter</a> to cast a ballot, the temporary superintendent could potentially be inundated with requests to disenfranchise individual voters.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nW0ILD">
State law does permit a voter disenfranchised in this way to <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-6/21-2-229/">appeal to a state court</a>, but thats an onerous process that many voters will struggle to navigate. Imagine, for example, that a Republican superintendent declares thousands of Fulton County voters ineligible. These voters would need to find lawyers, file an appeal, and hope that the states <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Georgia_(U.S._state)">GOP- dominated judiciary</a> doesnt uphold the superintendents actions.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="aE2Azq">
Meanwhile, voters in other, less Democratic counties would be free to cast their ballots normally.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="RLrMCu">
A temporary superintendent also <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-7/21-2-265/">has the power to relocate polling sites</a>, and they have some authority to <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-7/21-2-261/">divide, reshape, or combine existing polling precincts</a>. In the worst-case scenario, a Republican superintendent might attempt to shut down most of the polling places in Atlanta, forcing voters to wait in long lines to cast a ballot. At the very least, such a superintendent might move around many voters polling places, confusing voters who are accustomed to voting in a particular location.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WBSxaZ">
Finally, county election boards (or a superintendent appointed to replace that board) must <a href="https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-12/21-2-497/">certify the results of an election</a> once all the votes in that county are tallied. Its not at all clear what happens if local election administrators refuse to certify an election because they dont like the result. But the statewide bodies that could plausibly resolve such a dispute — including the State Elections Board, the state legislature, and the state supreme court — are currently controlled by Republicans.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xSvmNa">
So, while it remains to be seen what the state GOP will do with its authority if it does take over elections in Fulton County, the Republican Party could potentially gain the power to rig the 2022 election.
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The surprisingly okay state of consumer debt</strong> -
<figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/7frcLyfloP2NN3vARoomZmt-
lT4=/341x0:5784x4082/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69682133/GettyImages_1251297881.0.jpg"/></p>
<figcaption>
Getty Images/EyeEm
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The pandemic didnt create a full-blown consumer debt crisis. Heres why.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="kf9CSB">
I know were all eager to forget, but lets reflect back on spring 2020 for a moment. It was a season marked by the illogical, unharmonious totems of a looming pandemic: celebrity hand- washing videos, apocalyptic grocery store runs, waves of viral content involving windowsill singing and pot-banging. This global camaraderie might have been heartwarming, if it werent all so utterly terrifying. And in addition to the very real fear of a pandemic, many Americans also faced the looming dread of a financial crisis both sweepingly national and disarmingly personal.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xXY3Po">
In the second quarter of 2020, <a href="https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R46554.pdf">US unemployment reached 14.8 percent</a>, its highest rate since the record began in 1948. Americas GDP <a href="https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product-2nd-
quarter-2020-second-estimate-corporate-profits-2nd-quarter">plummeted at an annual rate of 31.7 percent</a> in the same time period. Across a spectrum of industries — mental health care, marketing, hospitality — my friends and loved ones expressed a sense of financial disequilibrium and tightrope-walking economics that followed us well into summertime.
</p></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wTnEqm">
As a reliable income evaporated for a significant contingent of Americans, you might assume national credit card debt increased as those in need leaned on the lifeline — but youd be wrong.
</p>
<div class="c-float- right">
<aside id="6aMGRq">
<q>Credit card balances actually declined sharply, by $76 billion, in the second quarter of 2020</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="oUdYpx">
<a href="https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R46578.pdf">According to a recent congressional report</a>, credit card balances actually declined sharply, by $76 billion, in the second quarter of 2020. You might also assume that, with the guillotine of joblessness hanging precipitously in the balance, Americans might defer large purchases, like homes or cars. Again, youd be wrong: By the fourth quarter of 2020, <a href="https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/interactives/householdcredit/data/pdf/hhdc_2020q4.pdf">mortgage debt grew to $10 trillion</a> (compared to a fourth-quarter 2019 statistic of $9.56 trillion), and auto loan debt reached $1.4 trillion.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="emVllI">
Desperate times, it seems, did not lead to desperate measures. If Americans were facing what many anticipated would be the largest financial slump since the Great Depression, or at least the Great Recession, why were their spending and debt accumulation habits so … healthy? Sociologist and demographer Teresa Sullivan has some ideas.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iu3m9X">
Sullivan, who teaches at the University of Virginia, has studied consumer bankruptcy for decades, publishing award-winning books on the subject alongside co-authors Elizabeth Warren (yes, that Elizabeth Warren) and bankruptcy specialist Jay Lawrence Westbrook. She says its “impossible to look at” consumer bankruptcy without also considering consumer debt. In June, I spoke with Sullivan to parse the patterns of Americans personal finances and debt before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="OCxCFF">
Our interview has been edited for length and clarity.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0mu3Ha">
<strong>The phrase “consumer debt” is one that I think the public tends to misinterpret. What is consumer debt, and what does it look like in America?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BLZPuU">
In my own work on consumer bankruptcy, “consumer” debt is any debt incurred by an individual or couple (as opposed to a business) — so that would be mortgages, car debt, student debt, bank loans, etc. The Federal Reserve Consumer Credit G.19 report excludes any debt secured by real estate, so it omits mortgages. Of course, the consumer cant omit the mortgage. The Federal Reserve reported $14.56 trillion of consumer debt after the fourth quarter of 2020.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="57DeyA">
<strong>What was the consumer debt landscape like in America directly preceding the Covid-19 crisis? Who was particularly vulnerable?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hJtsFR">
First of all, it took the United States a long time to recover from the recession of 2008. People were very cautious about taking on new debt then, but they became less cautious as we moved on in the decade of the teens. So by 2019, the year before Covid hit, total consumer debt was a little over $14 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve and Experian.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VRfmtl">
There were a lot of people whose finances were in balance, but only barely. They didnt have emergency savings to fall back on, and when they lost their job, their steady source of income disappeared. The vulnerability was the lack of a cushion.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="brZRJQ">
<strong>What were the immediate impacts of Covid-19 on consumer debt?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TTeqA2">
During the worst part of Covid, people were pretty cautious. Debt did rise, but not all debt rose. For example, the US experienced the largest recorded quarterly decline in credit card balances (about $76 billion, see the <a href="https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R46578.pdf">Congressional Research Service study of May 6, 2021</a>). For one thing, people stopped spending; they really just cut back on expenditures. Thats one of the reasons that businesses were so hard-hit: Aside from the lockdowns and all the rest of it, people werent buying stuff.
</p>
<div class="c-float- left">
<aside id="fB0v0u">
<q>“I would say that what really saved it from being a total disaster was the three stimulus checks.”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="BtDeoK">
But I would say that what really saved it from being a total disaster was the three stimulus checks. That first stimulus check was spent almost entirely on expenses, and it appeared that was the period of highest unemployment. When the second stimulus check came out, people were more likely to spend that on debt; that may be one reason that we began to see a decline in credit card debt. And then by the time we got to the third stimulus check, some people were spending it, some people were buying down debt, but a surprising number saved it. The personal savings rate actually reached a high in April of 2020. Who would have believed it?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3BGXay">
<strong>How did the financial impacts of Covid-19 shift as the pandemic continued through 2020 and into 2021? </strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Y53H59">
When Congress moved through the CARES Act and the subsequent acts to provide relief for Americans, one of the things they did was provide mortgage forbearance, which meant that if you were delinquent on your mortgage payment, basically, the lender had to put up with it for a while. In fact, the lenders could not tell the credit bureau that you were delinquent. At the same time, they also extended repayment on student loans, and the CDC said you cant evict rental tenants because of the health crisis.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dfLYei">
Federal relief almost surely made a huge difference because people could buy groceries and other necessities, and the forbearance on mortgages and evictions meant they could postpone mortgage or rent payments (but those obligations did not disappear). The larger unemployment benefits also provided cash to the unemployed, sometimes more than their lost earnings.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="o0OppN">
But it appears that discretionary spending rebounded slowly. Many purchases could be and were postponed (such as clothing). There was a notable decline in college attendance, which meant that students were not paying tuition, room, and board.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="10f506">
The biggest increase in consumer debt was for mortgages. And the biggest group there, at least in percentage terms, has been Generation Z, our youngest generation. Experian says they had a 67 percent increase in mortgage debt. Its still small, relative to how much debt the older generations are carrying, but it was the biggest increase. This may reflect the fact that theyre trying to get into the housing market.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="lu5uhZ">
<strong>You mentioned that credit card debt declined during the worst of the pandemic. A report by Creditcards.com found that 51 percent of adults with credit card debt (about 51 million) actually </strong><em><strong>added</strong></em><strong> to their balance in 2020, and 44 percent of them blame the pandemic. Why do you think there is a discrepancy in the statistics, and can both be true?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="g6gEm5">
Its possible that both are true. Experian reports that credit card debt is down 9 percent between 2019 and 2020. I do think that consumers have become much more savvy about the fact that their highest interest rate is on their credit card balance. You know what your interest rate is on your mortgage, but often with your credit card, youre not really sure what it is, because with some credit cards, it can fluctuate. Because of the uncertainty and high rates of credit card debt, for some people, if they had money to pay off a debt, thats what they paid off. I think one of the things the stimulus check did was it gave them an alternative to using the credit card to pay for their everyday expenses.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="WBFyXu">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MJUd5Q">
Now, having said this, there probably were people who put their groceries and everything else on their credit card because they didnt have any other way to get it. What I would look at, if you could get to it, and you cant, would be the composition of what people were buying on credit cards. They werent buying restaurant meals because the restaurants were closed. They werent buying airline tickets. But they could have been using their credit card at the grocery store, at the pharmacy, and in many cases, they could even pay their rent on a credit card. Only the credit card companies could tell you if there has been a change in the composition of the use of the card.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WUDMjs">
<strong>What do we have to look forward to?</strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HozDPS">
First of all, I think it depends not only on the unemployment rate, but also on what happens to wages. If there is some rise in wages, that may give people a bit of a cushion.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="WG3GEW">
The troubling signs to watch will be student loan defaults (after forbearance ends), foreclosures, and evictions. I would watch for any increase in homelessness recorded in the school districts this fall. And the holiday season will be important to watch, as well.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cEMjEe">
We know that consumer bankruptcy filings dropped a lot in 2020, but they are now rising again. In March, we had 40,000 consumer bankruptcies; in April, we had 38,000. It is a truism among some bankruptcy professionals that people wait to file until they have exhausted every alternative. With the mortgage and eviction protection ending, we will almost surely see more people filing in Chapter 13 to try to save their homes. One way to basically buy more time with an eviction or a foreclosure is to file bankruptcy. Usually when those bankruptcies go up, it could well be associated with an increase in evictions and foreclosures.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Mp2hO2">
The congressional research study I mentioned above notes that compared with the Great Recession of 2008, more homeowners during the pandemic had more home equity, and so they were in a better position to refinance. And the real estate market is booming in many areas, so distressed homeowners may seek to sell their homes and pay off their lenders. Similarly, some people who fall behind on their car loans might be able to sell their cars because there is high demand for used cars right now.
</p>
<div class="c-float-left">
<aside id="IBb0YM">
<q>“26 percent of respondents said they were having trouble paying their household expenses. Thats a red flag.”</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="5C0C68">
The Census Bureau began doing a survey that was very helpful during the pandemic called the Pulse survey, which comes out every week and asks people about their economic difficulties. In the <a href="https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2021/demo/hhp/hhp30.html">survey that covered May 12 through 24</a>, there were still 26 percent of respondents who said they were having trouble paying their household expenses. Thats a red flag. And 9 percent of adults were in households where they said that at least some time in the past week, there had not been enough to eat. So it appears to me that the people who have been in dire straits are not going to get out of those dire straits any time soon.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7XeLIK">
<strong>The people who you mentioned experienced the greatest vulnerability pre-pandemic were those who didnt have a cushion or savings. Do you think that will change? </strong>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qdnuX0">
The people who are sort of scraping by, theyre still scraping by. Life is not necessarily going to get better for them any time soon. Now, there are states that are raising their minimum wage; that could help. But what I would say, just in conclusion, is this whole thing would have been a whole lot worse had there not been the effort to provide stimulus.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wQnvoT">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mZxhOt">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qyqgUY">
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X8fTqB">
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Biodiversity is more controversial than you might think</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Photo illustration collage of wildlife surrounding a person carrying an injured animal." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/F_PNzhaSp1-irz3Vw_zwJ_FaUTM=/243x0:1594x1013/1310x983/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69681991/biodiversity_board_3.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Christina Animashaun/Vox
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Theres just a lot of drama.” 
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="tf2lLN">
<em>This story is part of </em><a href="https://www.vox.com/down-to-earth">Down to Earth</a><em>, a Vox reporting initiative on the science, politics, and economics of the biodiversity crisis.</em>
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="M4whL3">
In 2017, an evolutionary biologist named R. Alexander Pyron ignited controversy with a Washington Post<em> </em>commentary titled <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/we-dont-need-to-save-endangered-species-extinction-is-part-of-
evolution/2017/11/21/57fc5658-cdb4-11e7-a1a3-0d1e45a6de3d_story.html?utm_term=.ff7c665c6c14">“We dont need to save endangered species. Extinction is part of evolution.”</a> He wrote: “Conserving a species we have helped to kill off, but on which we are not directly dependent, serves to discharge our own guilt, but little else.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HWjMIT">
Pyrons take challenged the decades-old idea that biodiversity is a good thing — that humans should strive to preserve all forms of life on Earth and their interconnectedness across ecosystems. It prompted scientist and writer Carl Safina to <a href="https://e360.yale.edu/features/in-defense-of-biodiversity-why-protecting-species-from-
extinction-matters">mount</a> a passionate defense of biodiversity, calling Pyrons stance “conceptually confused” and containing “jarring assertions.” Safinas most cutting rebuke was that belittling biodiversity derails environmental conversations. “Its like answering Black lives matter with All lives matter,’” he wrote. “Its a way of intentionally missing the point.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Kwx4t1">
<a href="https://www.wypr.org/show/the-environment-in-
focus/2018-01-03/scientists-article-about-the-upside-of-extinction-triggers-firestorm-of-criticism">Nobel Prize winners co-signed</a> more rebuttals. Professors blogged <a href="https://evol-eco.blogspot.com/2017/11/of-course-we-need-to-
save-endangered.html">long meditations</a> on why endangered species need to be saved. There were scientists who had previously questioned a hyperfocus on saving species, <a href="https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2016/01/20/biodiversity-and-pizza-an-extended-analogy/">to be sure</a>, though none had done so in such a public and broad-sweeping manner as Pyron. Josh Schimel, an ecologist at UC Santa Barbara, <a href="https://schimelwritingscience.wordpress.com/2017/11/30/do-species-matter-responding-to-an-op-ed-by-r-
a-pyron-in-the-washington-post-as-a-piece-of-writing/">wrote</a>: “Remember, you are a scientist — it is not your job to be right. It is your job to be thoughtful, careful, and analytical.” Pyron declined a request for comment for this story.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="6DiRn2">
Ginger Allington, a landscape ecologist and professor at George Washington University who tracks the scientific debate around “biodiversity,” says this scientific back-and-forth reflects increasing conflict about the importance of<strong> </strong>biodiversity and species loss.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="r3emYM">
The most common way to measure biodiversity is to count the number of species in a certain place, also known as “species richness.” But critics question the usefulness of this number and argue that the concept has always been fuzzy, even to scientists, akin to a “<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/56133?seq=1">new linguistic bottle for the wine of old ideas</a>.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Wmtb9d">
A handful of scientists <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3783519?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents">want to do away with the term biodiversity</a> altogether — and have been trying to do so since the late 1990s. The concept, they say, is hard to quantify, hard to track globally over time, and actually isnt an indication of what people commonly picture as a “healthy” ecosystem. (Scientists are generally reluctant to describe ecosystems in terms of “healthy” or “unhealthy,” which are value judgments.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4ZmIbr">
Last year, the United Nations reported that the world has <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/15/every-global-target-to-stem-destruction-of-
nature-by-2020-missed-un-report-aoe">failed to reach even one of the major biodiversity conservation targets</a> it had set for itself in 2010. In the face of accelerating species and habitat loss, countries are now committing to protecting 30 percent of land and water by 2030. This fall, 193 nations are set to attend the virtual Convention on Biological Diversity to hash out a plan to stop biodiversity loss. (A <a href="https://www.cbd.int/article/draft-1-global-
biodiversity-framework">draft</a> of that plan was published last month.) In the US, the Biden administration has proposed its own <a href="https://www.vox.com/2021/5/7/22423139/biden-30-by-30-conservation-initiative-historic">game- changing approach to nature conservation</a>. Meanwhile, a coronavirus pandemic that may have begun in animals reminds us that we are fundamentally linked to the animals in these critical habitats.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="M8ihkC">
Against this backdrop, a new generation of scientists is taking up the debate about what to do about “biodiversity” itself — the scientific concept, its popular understanding, and indeed the very word. As Allington told Vox: “Theres just a lot of drama.”
</p>
<h3 id="qjSmww">
The backstory of biodiversity
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="42nZok">
Before there was biodiversity, there was BioDiversity. A key moment in the evolution of the word came at the National Forum on BioDiversity, held at the Smithsonian Institution and National Academy of Sciences, in 1986. Speakers included Jared Diamond, who later authored <em>Guns, Germs, and Steel, </em>and the biologist E.O. Wilson, who most recently popularized the idea of <a href="https://go.redirectingat.com?id=66960X1516588&amp;xs=1&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalgeographic.com%2Fenvironment%2Farticle%2Feo-
wilson-conservation-legend-90-save-space-for-nature-save-
planet&amp;referrer=vox.com&amp;sref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2F22584103%2Fbiodiversity-species-conservation-debate" rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" target="_blank">protecting half the planet</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iv0E7K">
Diamond and Wilson — along with seven other white male scientists in attendance — dubbed themselves the “Club of Earth” and held a press conference, <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1310274?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents">telling reporters</a> that biodiversity loss was the second-biggest “threat to civilization.” The first? Thermonuclear war.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="CwiJSc">
Few women scientists or non-Western experts were featured. And not everyone felt comfortable crowning biodiversity as a scientific silver bullet, for that matter. One <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1310274?seq=1">news report</a> from the time quoted biologist Dan Janzen, who said at the forum that “one shouldnt use the number of species as the only criterion for earmarking an area for conservation.” Janzen would later call the forum “an explicit political event” and said that the word biodiversity got “punched into that system at that point [in time] deliberately.”
</p>
<div id="UWc5Yb">
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0;">
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ic9j0f">
Still, the forum drew 14,000 in-person attendees. Another 10,000 watched a live “teleconference” of key panelists beamed around the world. “BioDiversity: The Videotape,” a campy <a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/989/biodiversity#resources">VHS recording</a> of the teleconference spliced with wildlife footage, sold out. The New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, and Time all covered the event, marking “the first time that biological diversity … had received such a broad public airing,” a December 1986 <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1310274?seq=1">article</a> in the journal <em>BioScience</em> noted. The forum not only streamlined the term — thanks to a suggestion by biologist Walter Rosen — but brought the buzzword to the forefront, as the growing rate of global species extinctions was given both a name and an urgency. “The biodiversity crisis,” Wilson said at the forum, “is a real crisis.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4gBK0z">
Against the odds, the idea of biodiversity spread outside of science and around the world. “Id compare the market penetration of biodiversity to Madonna,” said Stuart Pimm, a conservation biologist at Duke University.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="boeMI2">
Pimm witnessed the words use rise suddenly <a href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=biodiversity&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2019&amp;corpus=26&amp;smoothing=3&amp;direct_url=t1%3B%2Cbiodiversity%3B%2Cc0">in the 1980s</a> as a young associate professor. Before then, Pimm had no simple name for the kind of research he was doing — now called conservation biology — and, more problematically, no term for what he was measuring out in the field. And so biodiversity “hit several things simultaneously,” he said. “Its easy to popularize, it captures peoples imagination, and its scientifically credible.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EeT5GT">
Three ecologists shaped “biodiversity” into the kind of science that goes mainstream, according to Pimm. Thomas Lovejoy coined the term “biological diversity” in the 1980s. Elliott Norse defined it as the variety of genes, species, and ecosystems in a given area. And Wilson, who initially deemed the contraction biodiversity “too glitzy,” ultimately popularized the word. In 1992, the UN codified the word biodiversity — and Norses definition — into the Convention on Biological Diversity, a multilateral treaty.
</p>
<aside id="sS9o0h">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="yYZEGj">
Biodiversity was thus conceived to capture two notions: a world teeming with wildlife, and the political problem of stopping extinctions. The idea had become “a force” capable of influencing global society, as the late climate and environmental law expert David Takacs wrote in his 1996 book <em>The Idea of Biodiversity</em>. “It is difficult to distinguish biodiversity, a socially constructed idea, from biodiversity, some concrete phenomena,” Takacs wrote.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="doL7dW">
But over the years, biodiversity has come to mean many things to different people — from “local species” to “wildness” to “natural balance” to just “a fancy word for nature,” according to a study of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320706005313?casa_token=KkoQ4LCwfUgAAAAA:fTGStDbT8pa5dut-
wR31mcMWr6hMr03kepj9gezTuTCQt4Q1_h3wjadHSn9hgg-h_AjA-8gnmw#!">public opinion in Scotland</a>. Researcher R.A. Lautenschlager, in a 1997 scientific article titled “<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3783519?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents">Biodiversity is dead</a>,” put it more bluntly: “Biodiversity has become so all-inclusive that it has become meaningless.”
</p>
<h3 id="kAnUab">
“We need to be careful about what we are saying”
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="iQX6Jp">
A practical question flows from this history: Does saving every species still matter?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ggyRhd">
Allington has seen colleagues try to address this kind of question publicly, and their answers, she says, tend to get misinterpreted. “We need to be careful about what we are saying,” she said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uXbTp9">
To unpack this question in her college courses, Allington — who considers biodiversity to be “multifaceted” — passes out bags of mixed candy to her students, illustrating a key point: “The bags show that not all species play the same role in the ecosystem,” she said. Some species, like oysters, make key contributions to the ecosystem, and their disappearance would threaten all the rest. “The problem is that we still dont know what functions the majority of species actually provide,” she said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="K9bi9w">
Scientists in todays save-all-species debate disagree about where the<strong> </strong>science ends, and where the subjective idea of right and wrong begins. In this sense, debates about biodiversity may ultimately be debates about ethics, <a href="https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-biodiversity-conservation-paradox">implicit human values</a>, and <a href="https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21397/0">whose ecological knowledge matters</a>.
</p></li>
</ul>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="p4gIzE">
“Does every species matter?” asked Mark Vellend, a plant ecologist at University of Sherbrooke in Canada. “You cannot even give an answer unless you say, matter for <em>what</em>?”
</p>
<h3 id="BHiZDC">
How to measure “goodness”
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UxX8iM">
The late biologist Michael Soulé, the “<a href="https://news.ucsc.edu/2020/06/soule-
obituary.html">father of conservation biology</a>,” was unequivocal that biodiversity is good — though its goodness, he wrote, “<a href="http://www.web.uvic.ca/~darimont/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Soule-1985-What-is-Conservation-
Biology.pdf">cannot be tested or proven</a>.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="d1ImHm">
But in specific places, biodiversity for biodiversitys sake is <a href="https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-biodiversity-conservation-paradox">not necessarily good</a>. On islands, for example, plant diversity is generally increasing because non-native species are arriving; some rare island plant species may go extinct as a result, <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/105/Supplement_1/11490">but not always</a>. Biodiversity might also be the wrong lens in ecosystems that werent diverse to begin with, like boreal forests close to the Arctic, which have low numbers of species that rarely face extinction even in the face of logging.
</p>
<figure class="e-image">
<img alt="A
colourful aurora over the wind-shaped trees of the boreal sub-Arctic forest at the Churchill Northern Studies Centre,
March 18, 2020. Arcturus is rising between the two trees right of centre. This is a single 15-second exposure at f/2
with the Venus O" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/JAdcjB1c2__ZlHfX-pXfUbTpya8=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-
cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/22763141/1288682432.jpg"/> <cite>Alan Dyer/VW PICS/Universal Images Group via Getty Images</cite>
<figcaption>
An aurora over the wind-shaped trees of the boreal sub-Arctic forest at the Churchill Northern Studies Centre, March 18, 2020.
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4JbtdT">
Many scientists<strong> </strong>recognize biodiversity as an imperfect yardstick. The total number of species, and how it changes, doesnt capture all the ways that humans and other forces alter landscapes. “More biodiversity is not a universal prescription for conservation,” journalist Michelle Nijhuis writes in <em>Beloved Beasts</em>, a history of the conservation movement.
</p>
<div class="c-float-right">
<aside id="FqzJUv">
<q>“We have to really rethink biodiversity conservation” —Paul Leadley</q>
</aside>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pOermP">
It also doesnt capture the human experience of nature. A 2013 study — “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204613001357?casa_token=JolgWu5i_bsAAAAA:zIoKKDSptXHv4iiMIoMvHOUpsKEXE_xJ2c0uWQfJ2D_-K76qVV9sM5sFYY8oW27m1rt7buipPg">Is biodiversity attractive?</a>” — found that when it comes to outdoor recreation, visitors dont actually prefer species- rich urban spaces. “Especially during the pandemic people [are] flocking to natural, wild spaces,” said Vellend. “Whether in those spaces there are 1,000 species or 100, to me thats a pretty small part of the overall story.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gsZ0TM">
For many people, the on-ramp to nature is not through science. “Their point of entry is aesthetic,” Barry Lopez, the nature writer and <em>Arctic Dreams</em> author, <a href="https://www.weber.edu/weberjournal/Journal_Archives/Archive_C2/Vol_18_3/BLopezConv.html">said</a> in a 2001 interview. “Its not that they dont know what biodiversity is, but it doesnt have the pull,” he added. “The door for them lies elsewhere.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="x8yd6Q">
A more measurable dimension of a places “goodness” within the human story, some scientists think, is ecosystem function. Forget the number of species, in other words, and focus on what each does for keeping an ecosystem enjoyable and humming, like the <a href="https://www.audubon.org/news/new-research-further-
proves-native-plants-offer-more-bugs-birds">life-supporting role of oak trees</a> — which support hundreds of species of caterpillars, a mainstay in most songbird diets — in North American hardwood forests. Using this framework, land managers would <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534714001542?casa_token=O5DAjaM440sAAAAA:h6I5c1GigSwWUj2_qB2XQI4dVbbRdCYASrmoLJgW1ntyZnhpx4ObK2vvvaQce2BarGIfZUUiD">focus their conservation efforts on species that appear to play the most crucial role</a> in a given ecosystem. (An 80-page US National Park Service <a href="https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/654543">report</a>, called “Resist-Accept- Direct,” recently called for this triage approach.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mO8uik">
Pimm, for his part, thinks this framework is “total bullshit” — and he is <a href="https://www.enricsala.com/">not alone</a> in that sentiment. Its hard to develop a conservation plan around the emerging concept of ecosystem function, according to Pimm, precisely because we still know so little about the role of any given species in a place. “What does one even mean by ecosystem function?” he asked. “It doesnt have any operational meaning.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rBNage">
The concept of biodiversity is becoming even more influential in the realm of climate policy: In June, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its first- ever joint report with the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Yet one of its authors, the Paris-Saclay University ecologist Paul Leadley, said while introducing the report that current on-the-ground approaches to saving species are essentially outdated. “We have to really rethink biodiversity conservation,” he said.
</p>
<h3 id="XVklR1">
There is a broader movement to expand the meaning of “biodiversity”
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qekXkJ">
So if the idea that saving every species saves the planet is imperfect, should we now abandon biodiversity?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LiN5V3">
“A concept cant truly die until its got a replacement,” said Vellend. He says that the 1980s version of biodiversity should be seen as a starting point, with plenty of room for improvement. “Until somebody comes up with something better, were stuck with it.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="A2MQ6H">
Even R. Alexander Pyron, the author of the explosive Post piece, cautioned against dropping “biodiversity” in a <a href="https://twitter.com/PREAUX_FISH/status/936425440151040000?s=20">mea culpa</a> he posted on his Facebook page after blowback from his peers. “I succumbed to a temptation to sensationalize parts of my argument,” Pyron wrote.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7Nyswh">
But others see an opportunity to expand the notion of biodiversity into<strong> </strong>something more inclusive and more just. Campaigns like <a href="https://luchoffmanninstitute.org/thought-piece-revisiting-biodiversity-
in-a-village-of-mixed-perspectives/">#BiodiversityRevisited</a> have created virtual dialogues and in-person workshops where an array of voices discuss ways of breathing new life into “biodiversity.” These discussions have pushed out possible replacement terms, like “<a href="https://luchoffmanninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Biodiversity-
Revisited-Seeds-of-Change_FINAL.pdf#page=62">fabric of life</a>,” that might better capture the full range of life on Earth, from thriving trees to <a href="https://www.npr.org/2021/07/09/1014593425/china-giant-pandas-endangered-
vulnerable-iucn">prospering pandas</a> to healthy people.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MroK07">
One starting point might be to broaden the biodiversity concept to include humans, breaking down the barrier between our species and other animals. “My well- educated scientist colleagues will often slip and say mammals and humans. Every time, I get a chill down my spine,” said Hopi Hoekstra, an evolutionary biologist and curator at Harvard Universitys Museum of Comparative Zoology. Humans are<em> </em>mammals, after all. That even experts make these slips of the tongue “just highlights that there is still something to overcome there,” Hoekstra said.
</p>
<aside id="iRZXbu">
<div>
</div>
</aside>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="G7wdNN">
Conservationists could also gain from a broadened notion of biodiversity that <a href="https://www.vox.com/22524908/indigenous-knowledge-
memories-saving-species-fish-crab">centers Indigenous and traditional knowledge</a>, which has long been diminished by establishment science. Research shows that lands managed by Indigenous people are home to much of the worlds biodiversity, and that biodiversity <a href="https://ipbes.net/global-assessment">tends to decline</a> more slowly on those lands.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X0Cd3d">
“Many of these Westernized concepts, we dont see ourselves in them,” Andrea Reid, a fisheries scientist at University of British Columbia and a citizen of the Nisgaa nation, said. Indigenous concepts of conservation “include people within the system,” said Reid, who monitors diversity in British Columbias coldwater streams by counting species in ways that have cultural meaning to Indigenous people.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wkHpmT">
Reid has been working with Indigenous “knowledge keepers” who will go to a stream and look for certain species of dragonfly — for them, a “cultural indicator” that marks a healthy ecosystem. Other scientists might go to the same place and tally all insect species to measure local species richness. These measures can be used together, Reid says, to assess the overall condition of the stream over time.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="B69JLP">
This kind of <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-021-00694-7">“pluralistic” perspective</a>, as some scientists call it, aligns with what Reid calls “two-eyed seeing” — a way of bringing together Indigenous and Western understandings. “Its not about throwing something out, or just walking away from biodiversity and its metrics,” Reid said. “Its about enriching our understanding by bringing multiple perspectives to bear.”
</p>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Diamond And Pearls, Esteva, Right Move and Hebron impress</strong> - Diamond And Pearls, Esteva, Right Move and Hebron impressed when the horses were exercised here on Thursday (Aug. 5). Inner sand:800m: Esteva (rb) 57</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Tokyo Olympics | Ravi Dahiya loses final bout, wins silver</strong> - Indian wrestler Ravi Dahiya (57kg) has clinched silver medal in Olympics after losing 4-7 in final to Russian Olympic Committees Zavur Uguev.Despite</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Man held for passing casteist remarks against hockey player Vandana Katariya</strong> - After the teams defeat against Argentina, two men allegedly danced and burst firecrackers outside her house.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Cash award of ₹ 1 crore for each of Punjab players in bronze winning team</strong> - Punjab sports minister tweeted that each of the 4 players from Punjab who were part of the team will receive the cash award</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>New Zealand cricket team to tour Pakistan after 18 years</strong> - Top teams have avoided touring Pakistan citing security concerns after the 2009 attack on a bus carrying Sri Lanka cricketers to the Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Actor Roshan Mathew says he was intimidated by Kuruthi cast and didnt want to be the weak link</strong> - The film, set to release on Amazon Prime Video on August 11, follows the story of Ibrahim, played by Roshan Mathew, who is haunted by the ghost of his past</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Stories of Wayanad, all the way to Toronto film fete</strong> - Nithin Lukoses feature debut Paka to be featured in Discovery segment</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Organised cricket betting racket busted, property worth ₹95.33 lakh seized</strong> - The sleuths froze ₹69.63 lakh in various bank accounts and seized ₹15.70 lakh in cash, a Suzuki Baleno car, four mobile phones, eight credit cards, all worth ₹95.33 lakh from the possession of the accused.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Kerala Agriculture Minister says Kerafed to procure raw coconuts directly from farmers</strong> - Agriculture Minister P. Prasad informs Kerala Assembly that in the first phase, procurement will be carried out in three districts where prices have fallen below the procurement price of ₹32 per kg</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Jaishankars Tehran visit significant for timing on Afghanistan</strong> - It also signals easing of bilateral tensions</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Belarus sprinter Krystina Timanovskaya arrives in Poland</strong> - Krystina Timanovskaya was granted a humanitarian visa after she refused orders to fly home early.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Belarus protests: Trial of opposition figures begins</strong> - Protest organiser Maria Kolesnikova has been charged with threatening national security.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Greece wildfires force people to flee island by boat</strong> - Scores of people on Evia were forced to evacuate by sea as wildfire spread rapidly, destroying homes.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Covid travel: France moves to amber list and green list expands</strong> - Up to 6,000 Britons are currently in Mexico, which is moving to the red list, Grant Shapps says.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Migrant Channel crossings: 281 people reach the UK</strong> - The Home Office says the rising number of people making the “dangerous” crossing is unacceptable.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Critical Cobalt Strike bug leaves botnet servers vulnerable to takedown</strong> - New exploit available for download lets hackers crash Cobalt Strike team servers. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1785160">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Indiana University wins in suit over its mask, vaccine mandates</strong> - But state laws that block these precautions are also likely to be legal. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1785180">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Microsofts Windows 11 outreach efforts arent going very well</strong> - Overly heavy-handed moderation tends to cause more problems than it solves. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1785157">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Netflix is still trying to find its female John Wick with trailer for Kate</strong> - Mary Elizabeth Winstead follows up <em>Birds of Prey</em> role with a fierce action thriller. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1785095">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>CenturyLink selling copper network in 20 states instead of installing fiber</strong> - Private-equity firm Apollo will take on 1.3 million CenturyLink Internet users. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1785119">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>My little daughter came to me all excited, saying, “Daddy! Daddy! Guess how old Ill be this August!” I chuckled, “Oh I dont know princess, why dont you tell me?” She gave me a huge smile and held up four fingers.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Its now three hours later, the police are annoyed and she <em>still</em> wont say where she got them!
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/808gecko808"> /u/808gecko808 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oyesf0/my_little_daughter_came_to_me_all_excited_saying/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oyesf0/my_little_daughter_came_to_me_all_excited_saying/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A farmer buys a young cock. As soon as he gets home it fucks all of his 150 hens. The farmer is impressed. At lunch, the cock again screws all 150 hens.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Next day its fucking the ducks and the geese too
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Sadly, later in the day the farmer finds the cock lying on the ground half-dead and vultures circling over its head. Farmer yells , “You deserve it, you horny bastard!”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The cock slowly opens one eye, looks up at the sky and whispers , " Shhhhhh, Theyre about to land!!!"
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/littleboy_xxxx"> /u/littleboy_xxxx </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oy3slp/a_farmer_buys_a_young_cock_as_soon_as_he_gets/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oy3slp/a_farmer_buys_a_young_cock_as_soon_as_he_gets/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A Russian and an Irish wrestler were set to square off for the Olympic gold medal.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Before the final match, the Irish wrestlers trainer came to him and said, “Now, dont forget all the research weve done on this Russian. Hes never lost a match because of this pretzel hold he has. It ties you up in knots. Whatever you do, do not let him get you in that hold! If he does, youre finished.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The Irishman nodded in acknowledgment. As the match started, the Irishman and the Russian circled each otherseveral times, looking for an opening. All of a sudden, the Russian lunged forward,grabbing the Irishman and wrapping him up in the dreaded pretzel hold. A sigh of disappointment arose from the crowd and the trainer buried his face in his hands, for he knew all was lost. He couldnt watch the inevitable happen.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Suddenly, there was a Long, High Pitched Scream, then a cheer from the crowd and the trainer raised his eyes just in time to watch the Russian go flying up in the air. His back hit the mat with a thud and the Irishman collapsed on top of him, making the pin and winning the match.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The trainer was astounded.When he finally got his wrestler alone, he asked, “How did you ever get out of that hold? No one has ever done it before!”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The wrestler answered, “Well, I was ready to give up when he got me in that hold but at the last moment, I opened my eyes and saw this pair of testicles right in front of my face. I had nothing to lose so with my last ounce of strength, I stretched out my neck and bit those babies just as hard as I could.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The trainer exclaimed, “Oh, so thats what finished him off?!!”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Not really. Youd be amazed how strong you get when you bite your own balls.”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/CrackSnap7"> /u/CrackSnap7 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oya7yx/a_russian_and_an_irish_wrestler_were_set_to/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oya7yx/a_russian_and_an_irish_wrestler_were_set_to/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>Jill decides to take her husband Jack to a strip club for his birthday.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
They arrive at the club and the doorman says, “Hey, Jack! How ya doin?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Jill is puzzled and asks if he has been to this club before. “Oh no,” says Jack. “Hes on my bowling team.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
When they are seated, a waitress asks Jack if he would like his usual and brings over a Budweiser.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Jill is becoming increasingly uncomfortable and says, “How did she know that you drink Budweiser?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Shes in the Ladies Bowling League, honey. We share lanes with them.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A stripper then comes over to their table, throws her arms around Jack, and says “Hi Jack ! Want your usual table dance, big boy?”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Jill, now furious, grabs her purse and storms out of the club.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Jack follows and spots her getting into a cab. Before she can slam the door, he jumps in beside her.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He tries desperately to explain how the stripper must have mistaken him for someone else, but his wife is having none of it.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She is screaming at him at the top of her lungs, calling him every name in the book.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The cabby turns his head and says, “Looks like you picked up a real bitch tonight, Jack”.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/littleboy_xxxx"> /u/littleboy_xxxx </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oxyvtx/jill_decides_to_take_her_husband_jack_to_a_strip/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oxyvtx/jill_decides_to_take_her_husband_jack_to_a_strip/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><strong>A man playing on a new golf course got confused as to what hole he was on. He saw a lady playing ahead of him, so he walked up to her and asked if she knew what hole he was playing…</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF -->
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She replied, “Im on the 7th hole and youre a hole behind me, so you must be on the 6th hole.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He thanked her and went back to his golf.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
On the back nine, the same thing happened and he approached the lady, again with the same request.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She said, “Im on the 14th, you are a hole behind me, so you must be on the 13th.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Once again, he thanked her.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He finished his round, went into the club house and saw the lady sitting at the end of the bar.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He went up to her and said, “Let me buy you a drink to show my appreciation for your help.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He started a conversation and asked her what kind of work she did.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She said she was in sales and he said he was in sales also.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
He asked what she sold.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She replied, “If I told you, you would only laugh.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“No, I wouldnt.” he said.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She said, “I sell tampons.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
With that he fell on the floor laughing so hard.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
She said, “See, I knew you would laugh.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
“Thats not what Im laughing at!” he replied. “Im a toilet paper salesman, so Im STILL one hole behind you!”
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/littleboy_xxxx"> /u/littleboy_xxxx </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oyfctp/a_man_playing_on_a_new_golf_course_got_confused/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/oyfctp/a_man_playing_on_a_new_golf_course_got_confused/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>