Daily-Dose/archive-daily-dose/01 April, 2023.html

463 lines
63 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2023-04-01 13:42:48 +01:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="" xml:lang="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="pandoc" name="generator"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport"/>
<title>01 April, 2023</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
</style>
<title>Daily-Dose</title><meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" name="viewport"/><link href="styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><link href="../styles/simple.css" rel="stylesheet"/><style>*{overflow-x:hidden;}</style><link href="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.css" rel="stylesheet"/><script src="https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js"></script></head>
<body>
<h1 data-aos="fade-down" id="daily-dose">Daily-Dose</h1>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" data-aos-anchor-placement="top-bottom" id="contents">Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-vox">From Vox</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</a></li>
<li><a href="#from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</a></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-new-yorker">From New Yorker</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Donald Trump Is Indicted and Threatens the Rule of Law: An American Tragedy, Act III</strong> - The indictment of the former President by a Manhattan grand jury begins a perilous new phase in the Trump saga. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/an-american-tragedy-act-iii">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Unimaginable Horror of Evan Gershkovichs Arrest in Moscow</strong> - Its painful and surreal to write these words: Evan Gershkovich, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, is being held by Russian authorities on espionage charges. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-unimaginable-horror-of-a-friends-arrest-in-moscow">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>The Wait for the Trump Indictment Is Finally Over</strong> - A press stakeout of Manhattans Criminal Courthouse dwindled down to a single cameraman. Then the news that a grand jury had voted to indict the former President arrived. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/the-wait-for-the-trump-indictment-is-finally-over">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Whats the Point of Reading Writing by Humans?</strong> - Maybe one day journalism could be replaced with an immense surveillance state with a GPT-4 plug-in. Why would we want that? - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/whats-the-point-of-reading-writing-by-humans">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Has Modi Pushed Indian Democracy Past Its Breaking Point?</strong> - With the media and judiciary already under attack, the Prime Ministers main opponent was just banned from Parliament. - <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/has-modi-pushed-indian-democracy-past-its-breaking-point">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-vox">From Vox</h1>
<ul>
<li><strong>How the relentless drive for optimization made baseball impossible to watch</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="Swing and a miss." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/h9K7PINM_QadtOlvM4yiItdSiYU=/200x0:3400x2400/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72137063/GettyImages_1243964215.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Philadelphia Phillies left fielder Kyle Schwarber strikes out on a pitch from Atlanta Braves relief pitcher Raisel Iglesias during Game 2 of the NLDS between the Atlanta Braves and the Philadelphia Phillies on October 12, 2022, at Truist Park in Atlanta. | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
The unlikely similarity between modern baseball and the AI boom.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fgV85s">
Heres a question for major league baseballs opening weekend: What does Philadelphia Phillies left fielder Kyle Schwarber have in common with artificial intelligence?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HHuo10">
At first glance, not much. Schwarber — who has the rough physical dimensions of a human keg of beer — is best known for hitting the baseball really, really far when he hits it. Counting the regular season and postseasons, he hit a National League-leading 52 regular and postseason home runs last year — <a href="https://rotowear.com/products/kyles-schwarbombs-shirt">Schwarbombs</a>, as Philly fans like to call them — including one against San Diego in the National League Championship Series that <a href="https://www.mlb.com/video/kyle-schwarber-homers-1-on-a-fly-ball-to-right-field-u53kjh">may have been able to achieve orbital flight</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Q9wuBd">
GPT-4 is capable of doing many things, but <a href="https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/kyle-schwarbers-home-run-inspires-awe-amazement-in-phillies-nlcs-game-1-win/#:~:text=Schwarber's%20home%20run%20off%20Yu,119.7%20mph%2C%20according%20to%20Statcast.">mashing a baseball 119.7 mph for a total of 488 feet</a>, as Schwarber did against San Diegos Yu Darvish, is not currently one of them.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="HYl6ty">
But viewed another way — and I say this as a lifelong Phillies fan — Schwarber is the roly-poly human incarnation of an out-of-control AI. Hes Skynet madly <a href="https://www.slugger.com/en-us/explore/baseball/kyle-schwarber">swinging a 31-ounce Louisville Slugger</a>. Hes HAL from <em>2001</em> in <a href="https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/phillies/kyle-schwarbers-custom-home-run-derby-kicks-are-masterpiece">custom Home Run Derby cleats</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="s50lXb">
And he must be stopped.
</p>
<h3 id="TD3DG5">
The relentless pursuit of optimization
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VtP7Ue">
Allow me to explain.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fl1m2P">
In 2022, counting the regular season and the postseason,<strong> </strong>Schwarber <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/schwaky01.shtml">had 743 plate appearances</a>. Along with those 52 home runs, he walked 101 times and struck out a truly mind-boggling 218 times. That means that almost exactly 50 percent of the time Schwarber came to the plate, he achieved one of baseballs “<a href="https://www.mlb.com/glossary/idioms/three-true-outcomes">three true outcomes</a>”: a strikeout, a walk, or a home run.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dTajWV">
A true outcome means that the ball isnt put in play and no member of the defense is involved beyond the pitcher throwing the ball and the catcher attempting to catch it. That means no fielder trying to make a Gold Glove play on a batted ball. It means no speedy runner trying to go first to home on a ball hit in the gap.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="KMO2dc">
The three true outcomes are baseball at its most bloodlessly — and boringly — efficient. And over the past 20 years or so, efficiency as represented by the three true outcomes is precisely the direction baseball has been headed.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="utbXes">
On the defensive side, that has meant teams loading up on pitchers capable of throwing the ball really, really hard, in search of strikeouts. A ball put in play, after all, could fall for a hit. The average four-seam fastball last year <a href="https://apnews.com/article/mlb-sports-baseball-rob-manfred-8bf105d6dd6431a0201a4544f37b2362">was 93.9 mph</a>, up from 93.1 mph in 2015, the first year such data was collected.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QCmHWE">
It used to be that only <a href="https://bleacherreport.com/articles/808985-mlb-the-28-hardest-throwers-in-baseball-history">freaks of nature like Nolan Ryan</a> could hit triple digits on the radar gun, yet last year there were 3,356 pitches <a href="https://apnews.com/article/mlb-sports-baseball-rob-manfred-8bf105d6dd6431a0201a4544f37b2362">thrown at 100 mph or higher</a> — nearly twice as many as the year before, and far and away the most in baseball history.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qyGtUm">
On the offensive side, the emphasis is on the other two outcomes: walks and home runs. I never believed it when my Little League manager used to tell me that “a walk is as good as a hit” — kids like to swing the bat — but thats now gospel in the majors, especially if that walk is followed up by the next batter hitting it out of the park for a multi-run homer.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PsW5tW">
With pitchers throwing harder than ever, just making contact is difficult enough, so batters have tried to compensate by focusing on <a href="https://www.bruinsportsanalytics.com/post/launch-angle#:~:text=While%20the%20true%20%E2%80%9Cideal%E2%80%9D%20launch,between%2015%20and%2020%20degrees.">raising the launch angle generated by their swings</a>, increasing the chance that when they do put wood to ball, it has the lift to leave the park. Schwarbers titanic shot off Darvish, for instance, had a <a href="https://www.sportingnews.com/us/mlb/news/kyle-schwarber-home-runs-schwarbomb-phillies-2022/kyhdcahth1n71akxt2mtvkwd">launch angle of 25 degrees</a>, well above the league average, which is higher than it used to be.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XLJXqV">
The downsides of taking all those Ruthian uppercuts, especially if youre facing a guy throwing 100-mph gas, is that much of the time you will swing and miss. That means <a href="https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/home-runs-strikeouts-and-low-averages-are-trending-throughout-baseball/#:~:text=While%20MLB's%20strikeout%20rate%20has,2014%20to%2021.0%25%20in%202021.">lots of strikeouts</a> and considerably <a href="https://www.foxsports.com.au/baseball/baseball-news-2022-mlb-problems-changes-to-the-baseballs-stats-strikeouts-no-small-ball-how-to-fix-rob-manfred/news-story/18fb94347df1110942f2193d64063216">fewer balls put into play in the field</a>. In addition, the recent adoption of <a href="https://www.si.com/mlb/2022/04/26/shifts-increasing-the-opener">advanced defensive positioning</a> has meant that managers are moving fielders before the pitch to where they think a hitter is most likely to put the ball, whats known as a shift.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2VM4FH">
No batter in the National League <a href="https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/phillies/kyle-schwarber-mlb-defensive-shift-banned">faced the shift more often last season</a> than Schwarber, who would often see three infielders on the right side — where a left-handed power hitter like him pulls the ball — with a second baseman essentially playing shallow right field. Those tactics meant that even when hitters like Schwarber made solid, non-home-run contact, they were less likely to result in a hit. Partially as a result, league-wide batting average <a href="https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/35631564/2023-mlb-rule-changes-pitch-clock-end-shift-bigger-bases">fell to .243 last year</a>, the lowest since 1968, while the humble base hit is practically an endangered species.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="co2vmn">
The result is a game that is highly efficient and highly boring, with lots of strikeouts and way fewer hits, punctuated by the occasional burst of dingers. Just look at last years World Series, which featured Schwarbers Phillies against the Houston Astros. Game 3 <a href="https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI202211010.shtml">saw</a> the Phillies win 7-0, with all seven runs coming on five homers, including one by Schwarber. And then came Game 4, when the Phillies became <a href="https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/world-series-no-hitter-four-astros-pitchers-combine-to-blank-phillies-in-second-fall-classic-no-no-ever/live/">only the second team in baseball history to be no-hit</a> in the World Series, with an incredible 14 strikeouts.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="d8LemE">
Yes, as a Phillies fan, it was considerably more fun to watch the glorified home run derby that was Game 3 than seeing them be no-hit the next night. But even in their win, the Phils struck out 11 times. All in all, the Fall Classic, baseballs crown jewel, mostly involved watching pitchers throw the ball really hard, batters swinging really hard (and generally missing), and everyone else pretty much just standing around.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="1ziv2j">
The upshot is that the most efficient, effective way to win baseball — a strategy basically every team is pursuing — happens to have produced as a side effect the most boring kind of baseball to watch, as evidenced by <a href="https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2022/12/20/is-baseball-a-dying-sport/#:~:text=Even%20the%20World%20Series%2C%20the,year%20(Gough%2C%202022).">declining ratings and attendance</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="MPG0uI">
In the relentless pursuit of optimization, baseball may be killing itself.
</p>
<h3 id="TaVD3A">
Unaligned on the diamond
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="rg3CtV">
So what does this have to do with AI? It helps to go back two decades to the Moneyball Oakland As and their general manager Billy Beane, the <a href="https://terminator.fandom.com/wiki/Miles_Dyson">Miles Dyson</a> of baseballs Skynet situation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="8oibLS">
The As had a problem: They were broke. (As Beane, played by Brad Pitt, put it in the movie <em>Moneyball</em>: “There are rich teams and there are poor teams. Then theres fifty feet of crap, and then theres us.”) Unable to compete with rich teams like the Yankees for free agents, Beane had to compensate by using statistical analysis derived from the work of <a href="https://www.npr.org/2011/09/26/140813409/the-man-behind-the-moneyball-sabermetrics">maverick figures like the statistician Bill James</a><strong> </strong>to identify players who were undervalued for their actual production.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qoMM1S">
This meant going against the conventional wisdom, which valued players for things like speed and batting average, and pursuing players who could reliably get on base any way possible, as this scene from the film shows:
</p>
<div id="Vhw4LF">
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0; padding-bottom: 56.25%;">
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="gIaMpk">
The surprising success of the Moneyball As helped speed a league-wide revolution in using advanced statistical models in baseball. Out were <a href="https://batflipsandnerds.com/2018/11/03/analytics-and-its-effects-on-the-mlb-the-stolen-base/">traditional numbers like stolen bases</a> (the risk of getting thrown out and losing one of the 27 outs a team has in a game was higher than the reward of advancing a base). In were <a href="https://library.fangraphs.com/offense/obp/">stats like on-base percentage</a> (which measures the most important thing a batter can do — not make an out, whether through a hit, a walk, or getting hit by a pitch).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UJcRlj">
Rosters were constructed in the front office and teams were managed in the field with an eye toward maximizing the three true outcomes. No one broke any rules. (If anything, baseball became cleaner in the 2000s and 2010s, as performance-enhancing drugs were phased out). The problem was that the most efficient way to win baseball games under the rules as they existed turned out to be highly inefficient for the purpose of entertaining the spectators and TV audiences who make major league baseball major. (Not incidentally, Beane didnt watch his teams play. He feared that the act of spectating <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/billy-beane-doesnt-watch-games-2014-9">would lead to a “visceral reaction”</a> that might outweigh his Moneyball rationality.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="j4IibG">
In the world of artificial intelligence, this is an example of “misalignment.” Through highly detailed rules, which now <a href="https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/mlb/atcjzj9j7wrgvsm8wnjq.pdf">run to 191 pages</a>, the creators of baseball tried to construct a game that would be entertaining — meaning action, running, excitement. Think Wille Mays making an <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bLt2xKaNH0">over-the-shoulder catch</a> in the World Series or Rickey Henderson <a href="https://bleacherreport.com/articles/430984-stealing-home-or-why-babe-ruth-is-a-better-thief-than-rickey-henderson">stealing home</a>. That was their goal.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="3iP3Ej">
But the goal of the teams that play baseball is to use the rules to win games. Excitement doesnt factor into it. Which is more or less how you end up with the 2022 Phillies, a team explicitly built to hit a bunch of home runs while also <a href="https://www.crossingbroad.com/2022/11/the-phillies-set-a-world-series-record-for-strikeouts.html">setting a record for the most strikeouts in a World Series</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="t01JFB">
Weve seen this <a href="https://vkrakovna.wordpress.com/2018/04/02/specification-gaming-examples-in-ai/">happen repeatedly in artificial intelligence</a>, especially in games. One AI that was <a href="https://openai.com/research/faulty-reward-functions">trained to play a boat racing game</a> learned that the most efficient way to score the most points wasnt to win the race — which is what the designers and presumably most humans would aim to do — but instead to drive around repeatedly in a circle, hitting a handful of targets over and over. This was not fun to watch — seeing the boat mindlessly spinning around and around reminded me of watching Game 4 of the World Series — but that didnt matter to the AI. What mattered was racking up points by any legal means necessary.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="PCkn85">
To its credit, baseball is trying to fix its alignment problem by changing some of the rules to encourage more hits and more action. So this season, extreme defensive shifts of the sort faced by Schwarber <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/09/sports/baseball/mlb-bans-shift.html">are outlawed</a> — two infielders have to be on either side of second base when the pitch is thrown, and infielders wont be allowed to start in the outfield.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Fj3uJS">
Baseball has also added a pitch clock of 15 seconds per pitch (20 seconds when a runner is on), which should both speed up the game and tilt some of the advantage back toward the batter. And bases themselves were increased in size from 15 sq. ft. to 18, partially in the hopes of encouraging more stolen bases. (There were just <a href="https://www.baseball-almanac.com/hitting/hisb3.shtml">2,487 stolen bases last year</a>, down from 3,264 three decades ago.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZcXh29">
Will it work? Through spring training, games <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/27/sports/baseball/rob-manfred-mlb-new-rules.html">have been shorter, stolen bases have gone up</a>, and slightly more balls put in play <a href="https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/impact-of-mlbs-new-rules-shorter-games-more-steals-and-higher-averages-with-pitch-clock-shift-ban-in-place/">are going for hits</a>. That may not be enough to save baseball — few disciplines, after all, are as relentless in their <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/10/sabermetrics-analytics-ruined-baseball-sports-music-film/671924/">pursuit of optimization as professional sports</a>, and players like Schwarber will ultimately be judged on their stats and their win-loss records, not how entertaining their playing style is.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="txc2EF">
But at least baseball is taking proactive steps to nudge their sport in the direction that fans might actually enjoy. On Opening Day, the average length of a game <a href="https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-opening-day-overreactions-adley-rutschman-for-mvp-another-60-homer-year-for-aaron-judge-same-ol-angels/">was down, while stolen base attempts were up</a>. As for Schwarber, he <a href="https://www.mlb.com/gameday/phillies-vs-rangers/2023/03/30/718779/final/box">went 0-5 in an offense-heavy 11-7 loss</a> to the Texas Rangers, striking out twice for a three-true-outcome rate of 40 percent. Which I guess counts as improvement, albeit not the sort that any Phillies fan is likely to applaud.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LszGr9">
As humanity faces down large language models that can throw the equivalent of 100 mph or more, its worth being very, very careful about the rules and the goals we program them with — lest we end up in an eternal no-hitter.
</p></li>
<li><strong>How to tell when an investigation is politicized</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="People gather outside of a Manhattan courthouse as the nation waits for the possibility of an indictment against former president Donald Trump by the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Braggs office on March 21, 2023 in New York City." src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/Z_0TNE3sh62f8cZXD0L7XLVq-ds=/113x0:1936x1367/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72136993/GettyImages_1249028799.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
People gathered outside a Manhattan courthouse on March 21, 2023 in New York City. | Spencer Platt/Getty
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
A simple theory of when probes can be described as politicized — and whether the Manhattan DAs case against Trump qualifies.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZlP5z4">
As someone whos been covering investigations into leading political figures for the past decade, Ive thought a lot about the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/8/28/21358181/trump-barr-justice-department-second-term-agenda">politicization of the rule of law</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eRvyN0">
On the one hand, politicians shouldnt be above the law — if they commit crimes, and theres evidence to show that, they should be charged.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7wRxuO">
But on the other hand, criminal law shouldnt be weaponized for political reasons against the opposing partys enemies. When that happens in other countries, we generally view it as a sign of dysfunction or corruption.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="dWA8L0">
So how do we know whether thats happening?
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="sZt7iS">
Often, its harder than it may seem. Avid political partisans are very good at talking themselves into justifications for why their enemies are obviously criminals who deserve to be locked up, while their allies are clearly being unfairly persecuted with weak cases.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="okYOEi">
But Ive come to think that prosecutions and investigations that can fairly be characterized as politicized tend to share several of the following traits:
</p>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="U2lypj">
Theyre fishing expeditions — starting focused on one topic, and sprawling very far afield, often lasting years.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ReikEV">
They focus on obscure or technical matters.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UsHZRJ">
They feature novel legal theories.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="948Qiw">
They resemble few previous prosecutions.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="JnLnn6">
Investigators are internally divided on the cases strength.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="jK0Ttk">
They involve scrutiny and an investment of resources that would not have been put on anyone else.
</li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Rfcpyr">
Those in charge of them have obvious political motives.
</li>
</ul>
<div class="c-float-right">
<div id="ONrwDx">
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ORXe02">
The more politicized an investigation is, the more the end purpose seems to be to “get” a particular political figure, with the exact crimes at issue being a matter of secondary importance.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="QpnKPB">
Many of these traits were evident in the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/8/28/21358181/trump-barr-justice-department-second-term-agenda">investigations Trump tried to order</a> into his political opponents during his presidency. Many were also present in investigations into Bill Clinton in the 1990s, which started as the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2015/4/13/8397309/hillary-clinton-whitewater">“Whitewater” investigation</a> and sprawled outward.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="045JUe">
And they also all fit whats been reported about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Braggs investigation and prosecution of Donald Trump.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fvq8Jt">
This indictment hasnt yet been unsealed, so perhaps theres something in it to change this assessment — but what we know so far does not exactly suggest this was an apolitical effort.
</p>
<h3 id="3Lmg0D">
Why the Manhattan DAs probe looks politicized (but other Trump investigations do not)
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Zwb0fV">
Ill start by saying Im not particularly inclined to defend Donald Trump as a sterling adherent to the rule of law.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="mC8ztu">
The <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23518814/trump-investigations-jack-smith-january-6-classified">investigations into him</a> — special counsel Jack Smiths federal probes into Trumps attempt to overturn Bidens election win and his classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, as well as the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/us/politics/fani-willis-trump-investigation.html">Georgia probe</a> into whether Trump tried to steal the election there — seem well-founded. Guess what? If you try to steal the election, you should be rigorously investigated and charged if the evidence and law merit it. But Alvin Bragg got there first.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZrKI6k">
Another caveat is that we dont yet know the details of Braggs indictment — perhaps it will be rock-solid, convincing, and put many concerns to rest. But a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/1/31/23579526/trump-indictment-grand-jury-stormy-daniels-felony">whole lot has been reported</a> about the background of the investigation itself — and much of it doesnt look great.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="0XfDZR">
<strong>Is it a fishing expedition?</strong> Arguably — its certainly been a <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2023/1/31/23579526/trump-indictment-grand-jury-stormy-daniels-felony">tangled tale</a>. The previous DA, Cyrus Vance Jr., opened the case back in 2019 to focus on hush money payments made to Stormy Daniels. Vance then put that aside and spent years probing the Trump Organizations business practices, specifically regarding real estate valuation.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nYK6tn">
To try and make that case, he pressured Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg to flip on Trump by <a href="https://www.vox.com/22555751/allen-weisselberg-indictment-trump-grand-larceny">charging him</a> (and the company) with tax fraud related to fringe benefits Weisselberg had received. Then, when Bragg took over as DA last year, he wasnt impressed by the real estate valuation case and put a hold on it, spurring two prosecutors <a href="https://www.vox.com/2022/2/23/22947946/trump-prosecutors-new-york-bragg">to resign in protest</a>. Bragg then returned to the hush money payments and indicted Trump based on that.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="eOF7eA">
<strong>Does it focus on an obscure or technical matter?</strong> The charges reportedly pertain to New York business records law — and specifically about whether the Trump Organizations repayments to Michael Cohen for $130,000 in hush money hed paid Stormy Daniels were inappropriately logged as legal expenses. Obviously, a lot of people with opinions about this indictment, including me, have never given New York business records law a second thought before. The<strong> </strong>more small-scale charges like this after a long investigation seem, the more they suggest prosecutors landed on them because they tried to make a bigger case that didnt pan out.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="XiHb7E">
<strong>Does it feature novel legal theories?</strong> It may, in part. The business records law violation appears pretty open and shut. However, Bragg has <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/30/nyregion/trump-stormy-daniels-grand-jury.html">reportedly</a> wanted to charge it as a felony rather than a misdemeanor, and can only do so if the records were falsified to cover up another crime.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wji6Ve">
Federal prosecutors investigated the hush money as a violation of federal campaign finance law, but Bragg is a state prosecutor tasked with enforcing state law, and he <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/30/nyregion/trump-stormy-daniels-grand-jury.html">reportedly </a>explored several possibilities of crimes he could assert to justify the felony charge.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="TQpbi5">
We dont yet know what Bragg eventually decided. But the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/09/nyregion/trump-potential-criminal-charges-bragg.html">New York Timess assessment</a> a few weeks before the indictment came down was that “the case against the former president hinges on an untested and therefore risky legal theory involving a complex interplay of laws, all amounting to a low-level felony.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="9hQMJJ">
<strong>Does it resemble previous prosecutions?</strong> Its unclear. Even the assertion that hush money payments violate the law at all — specifically, that they violate federal campaign finance law — is hotly debated. The closest precedent may be that Democratic politician John Edwards <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-senator-and-presidential-candidate-john-edwards-charged-alleged-role-scheme-violate">was indicted in 2011</a> with charges of violating campaign finance laws in connection with payments made to Rielle Hunter (whom hed had an affair and fathered a child with), but he <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-hush-money-case-compared-democrat-john-edwards/story?id=98053273">was acquitted</a> on one count and the jury couldnt reach a verdict on several others.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="LkDbkA">
<strong>Are investigators internally divided on the cases strength?</strong> Yes. This has been an unusually leaky investigation, with acrimony between members of the prosecution team frequently spilling into public view.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="4GYeYK">
As mentioned, Bragg wasnt impressed by the real estate valuation case that lead prosecutor Mark Pomerantz had been building, and Pomerantz resigned and wrote a book complaining about Bragg. This led others on the team to complain about Pomerantz to <a href="https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/02/mark-pomerantzs-revealing-fight-with-alvin-bragg-over-trump.html?utm_source=tw">Ankush Khardori of New York Magazine</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Lj4WLb">
One regular sticking point is Michael Cohens usefulness as a witness. Federal prosecutors looked into the hush money too, as recently as early 2021, and according to CNN legal analyst Elie Honigs recent book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Untouchable-How-Powerful-People-Away/dp/0063241501?ots=1&amp;slotNum=2&amp;imprToken=54c39c33-2f6e-3adf-eea&amp;ascsubtag=%5B%5Dvx%5Bp%5D23343567%5Bt%5Dw%5Bd%5DD"><em>Untouchable</em></a>, they had mixed opinions about the case and ended up taking a pass.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xyvt2M">
<strong>Does it involve scrutiny and an investment of resources that would not have been put on anyone else?</strong> Its hard for me to imagine that this years-long investment of resources into this topic would be brought against anyone other than Trump.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="B3qPux">
<strong>Do those bringing the case have obvious political motives?</strong> Bragg is an elected Democrat who, if he runs for another term, would be running in Democratic New York City. When he initially put the brakes on Vances investigation, <a href="https://www.vox.com/2022/2/23/22947946/trump-prosecutors-new-york-bragg">he faced intense backlash</a> from progressives who thought he was letting Trump off the hook. So, yes, he has a motive to get back on progressives good side.
</p>
<h3 id="11Favn">
Defending democracy and the rule of law?
</h3>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VCOBCs">
Now, there is a difference between the politicized cases Trump wanted to bring against his political enemies, and this current situation, which is: Many liberals believe Donald Trump is a grave threat to democracy. (And I think theyre correct.)
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="E6Tj5t">
The right has long tried to portray Trump as the victim of endless witch hunts from investigators. And of course, Republicans managed to convince themselves Hillary Clinton was tremendously dangerous for American democracy, too (remember the <a href="https://www.vox.com/2016/9/12/12862434/flight-93-election">“Flight 93 election</a>?”).
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ZLqcee">
But again, Trump did go to extraordinary lengths to try and steal the 2020 election, which really should end all talk of him as some kind of unfairly persecuted innocent. A second Trump term, should he win, <a href="https://www.vox.com/2020/8/28/21358181/trump-barr-justice-department-second-term-agenda">would probably also be</a> quite dangerous for the rule of law.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="81bu7V">
Many liberals who have been hoping and arguing for Trumps indictment seem to have this justification in mind, even if few will say it explicitly. In 2021, when it looked like Braggs predecessor, Vance, might bring charges, he was <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/03/22/can-cyrus-vance-jr-nail-trump">profiled in the New Yorker</a>, and the former presidents niece Mary Trump weighed in. “Its incredibly urgent that Vance prosecutes Donald now,” she said, because the Republican Party certainly wasnt going to stop him.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="pspnzb">
Per this mindset, it would be naive to have academic concerns about politicization of the rule of law, when the nations continuing existence as a democracy is at stake. Find some crimes, and lock him up!
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fCh3lu">
Maybe it will work — <a href="https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3870">polls</a> <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/americans-see-trump-investigation-political-also-believable-reutersipsos-2023-03-21/">show</a> that though most Americans say they think Bragg has political motives, most also think the investigation is significant and should disqualify Trump for office.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hTeMkL">
Or maybe this prosecution will backfire, spurring Republican voters to rally around him and easing his path to the GOP nomination, and making our countrys divisions even worse.<strong> </strong>Well find out soon enough.
</p></li>
<li><strong>Elon Musk wants to fill your Twitter feed with paid accounts</strong> -
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/T7pOfNsHpmIASY2KGi2_-fJr1Mg=/322x0:3878x2667/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72133667/1246506636.0.jpg"/>
<figcaption>
Elon Musk outside court in San Francisco in January 2023. | Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Its a broken version of the digital town square.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cxH0Qr">
When Elon Musk took over Twitter, he said he wanted to protect its place as a “digital town square,” where ideas from all corners of the internet could flourish. But soon, if you want your voice to really be heard in the town square, youll need to pay.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="X802Ri">
Earlier this week, Musk tweeted that, starting <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1640502698549075972?s=20">April 15</a>, Twitter will only recommend content from paid accounts in the For You tab, the first screen users see when they open the app.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="EnyrSO">
This means that if you dont start paying <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/11/4/23438917/twitter-verifications-blue-check-elon-musk">$8 a month for Twitters subscription plan, Twitter Blue,</a> youll have a harder time getting your tweets seen by the masses. For people viewing but not posting on Twitter, youll be seeing a lot more content from paid accounts, which currently make up only <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/musks-twitter-has-just-180-000-u-s-subscribers-two-months-after-launch">0.2 percent of all users</a>. After Twitter users started complaining about the new plan, Elon <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1640800519894736896">clarified</a> that people you follow will also show up in the For You feed. Plus, if users dont like the For You feed, they can switch to the Following feed, which ranks tweets chronologically.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Iz3sfG">
But the main point still stands: Musk wants to fill your Twitter feed with a higher ratio of paid accounts, and is pressuring more free users to pay for what was once considered a given.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="VgUqBb">
This move is the next step in Musks plan to try to get more people to subscribe to Twitter Blue. Musk says that on April 1 hell <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/23/twitter-will-kill-legacy-blue-checks-on-april-1/">remove “legacy” verification checkmarks from notable accounts</a> that had them for free, including news organizations, politicians, and researchers. On Friday, some <a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/03/31/twitter-verification-white-house-biden-check-mark">major accounts like the White House</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/KingJames/status/1641836984195743749">LeBron James</a> said they would not be paying for a checkmark — not a good sign for the impending rollout. <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/status/1640706670509846528?s=20">Many are concerned</a> that it could become even easier for public figures who dont pay for a checkmark to be impersonated.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="uGXMUo">
The checkmark part of Musks plan <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/11/4/23438917/twitter-verifications-blue-check-elon-musk">has received a lot of attention</a> — in part because it involves famous people — but its the changes to Twitters feed that are potentially just as, if not more, impactful.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="fLIzRy">
Thats because Musk is changing the incentives to Twitters core product, its recommendation algorithms, to an extent that it could potentially fill the average users experience with lower-quality content.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Avc57V">
“The notion that by virtue of being willing to pay $8 a month means that you are a higher-quality account or worthy of being verified is a really reductive analysis,” said Jason Goldman, a VP of product at Twitter from 2007 to 2010. “Theres plenty of people who are complete trolls and are looking to just get attention for ridiculous behavior for whom $8 a month is a pittance to pay.”
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Upiu3E">
In his explanation of the upcoming feed change, Musk said that Twitter has to charge users to make sure people arent actually spam bots. But theres a simpler reason thats also driving this push: Twitter needs to make more money. The company, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/26/elon-musk-twitter-value-leaked-memo-less-than-half-paid">which is now valued at half</a> of what it was when Musk bought it, is <a href="https://www.vox.com/technology/2023/3/23/23651151/twitter-advertisers-elon-musk-brands-revenue-fleeing">still bleeding advertisers</a> that are put off by Musks antics. Not enough people have subscribed to Twitter Blue: There are only about 180,000 subscribers, <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/musks-twitter-has-just-180-000-u-s-subscribers-two-months-after-launch?rc=eh9iin">according to the Information</a>. They bring in roughly $28 million in annual revenue, less than 1 percent of the $3 billion Musk aimed to make in 2022. Now, in an effort to get more people to sign up for Twitter Blue, Musk is essentially threatening to make using the app harder for Twitter users who dont pay.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="g7g6MF">
Moreover, the fact that Musk is seriously proposing turning your Twitter homepage into a place where you dont see tweets from the users you care about and only see the people who spent money shows how much hes willing to compromise the basic utility of the app. Hes pushing an extreme version of an <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2023/2/21/23609375/meta-verified-twitter-blue-checkmark-badge-instagram-facebook">increasingly popular “pay-to-play”</a> model for social media, one that goes against some of the basic ideas that made apps like Twitter popular in the first place.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="wu8oXH">
Early signs that people are buying into Musks vision for social media are not looking good.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="zQhwFm">
First of all, the company is already planning major exceptions: Twitters top 500 advertisers and 10,000 most-followed organizations keep to their checkmarks for free, according to a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/technology/elon-musk-ftc-chair.html">recent report in the New York Times</a>. That eliminates a major pool of potential customers that Twitter may have wisely realized were not going to pay.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="Olu52U">
Some of the largest newsrooms in the country, like the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico,<em> </em>have said they <a href="https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1641460482480504832">will not be buying a Twitter Blue verification</a> for their company accounts (a one-year subscription for a company costs $12,000), nor do they intend to subsidize individual reporters subscriptions. In its rationale, the LA Times said that “verification no longer establishes authority or credibility.” A few celebrities, like Seinfeld star <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jason-alexander-twitter_n_6423e024e4b0a10577baa1ae">Jason Alexander</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/status/1640706675295543302">William Shatner</a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/FINALLEVEL/status/1641173898053009411">Ice-T</a> have recently joined other actors, writers, and comedians who <a href="https://twitter.com/StephenKing/status/1587042605627490304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1587312517679878144%7Ctwgr%5Edfc9ca59f560b0ca49db06a858a4789a5d4642cf%7Ctwcon%5Es2_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.9news.com.au%2Ftechnology%2Felon-musk-twitter-blue-tick-charge-stephen-king-lynda-carter-and-other-celebrities-threaten-to-leave%2Fb7c2eaae-81a6-41eb-95ae-7fd3fb2f977c">previously threatened</a> to leave if Musk took away their checkmark. If more famous people refuse to buy Twitter verification and subsequently find less value in Twitter, they could leave for other platforms.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="hsrxkb">
Meanwhile, Twitters <a href="https://www.vox.com/technology/2023/2/16/23603155/elon-musk-twitter-worse-degrading-quality-glitches-superbowl-boost-feed">technical quality has been degrading</a> since Musk took over. Features have been more frequently buggy, the site has had embarrassing outages, and source code <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/26/technology/twitter-source-code-leak.html">has been leaked online</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="7Ge5L7">
“I think [changes to the For You feed and verification] are only going to expedite that decline and demise of a platform that is really in its death rattle right now,” said social media consultant Matt Navarra.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="qSRJgz">
Even though Musk acquired Twitter to democratize it from the hands of elite users, in many ways his actions are doing the opposite.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="ycp4or">
A major part of social medias appeal in the past two decades of its existence is the idea that anyone, from anywhere, at any time, could go viral — for better or worse. And in turn, users see the most compelling, “engagement”-worthy media. Companies like Meta, TikTok, and YouTube are in the business of carefully fine-tuning algorithms that recommend the content they know well want to click, whether thats cat videos, political debates, or beauty tutorials. A major part of Twitters appeal was about seeing random interactions between powerful people and everyday citizens, like someone seeing a tweet from a senator, replying to it, and actually getting a reply back.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="m0YG0l">
If Musk starts making it harder for an average user to stumble on and participate in viral exchanges, hes taking away from the basic democratic promise of social media.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="L2E0S0">
Already, under Musks leadership, Twitter has been promoting certain content according to the whims of the companys new owner. Twitter has recently boosted <a href="https://www.platformer.news/p/yes-elon-musk-created-a-special-system">Musks own tweets</a>, and for months it has boosted those of certain people the company designated as VIPs, like LeBron James, Ben Shapiro, and (somewhat surprisingly, since shes a known foe of Musk) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, <a href="https://www.platformer.news/p/the-secret-list-of-twitter-vips-getting">according to recent reports in Platformer</a>.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UxwgLX">
Its important to note here that theres a good chance Musk will not go through with this, given his track record of missing deadlines for major changes at Twitter. In the few months since he took over, Musk has promised to share revenue with creators (<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/3/23623927/twitter-blue-ad-revenue-one-month-missing">hasnt happened</a>) and <a href="https://bgr.com/tech/elon-musk-says-twitter-will-open-source-its-recommendation-code-on-march-31/">to make Twitters recommendation algorithm open source</a> (delayed). Hes <a href="https://www.axios.com/2022/11/09/twitter-official-label-select-verified-accounts">warned</a> for months that Twitter will remove blue checkmarks, but he hasnt actually done it yet.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="GxAWXj">
The chance that Musk changes his mind is even higher considering that his key deadline to rid “elites” of their blue checkmarks is literally on April Fools Day.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="nhJLoc">
Regardless of whether Musk executes his plans, he is to some extent doing what many social media platforms have often done in private: tinker with secretive algorithms and give special treatment to high-profile users. TikTok was found to be <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/20/23564242/tiktok-heating-view-boosts-creators-businesses">“heating” certain VIP user content</a>, showing it more in peoples For You feeds. Facebook and Instagram have let <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-files-xcheck-zuckerberg-elite-rules-11631541353">celebrities</a> get away with breaking the companys policies. The two apps, which are owned by Meta, also recently started charging users for verification and some basic services like access to customer support.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="cskwvN">
But even if these companies give certain users benefits over others, theyre doing it within reason. Musk is pushing pay-to-play to the extreme. If he goes too far, celebrities and the everyday users who follow them could leave Twitter in a mass exodus. So far, though, they havent. Twitters biggest benefit is that there is <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/12/6/23496363/twitter-mastodon-hive-musk-replacement">no good Twitter alternative</a>. The most viable contender, Mastodon, while popular with some journalists, hasnt reached nearly the same level of mainstream appeal as Twitter.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="2NXykk">
Regardless, if Musk wants Twitter Blue to succeed, hell need to get celebrities and everyday people not just to stay on Twitter, but to pay for an $8-a-month subscription service.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="xKC898">
Well see if his plan to turn Twitter into a for-sale popularity contest will work.
</p>
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom" id="UXYGqb">
<em><strong>Update, March 31, 5 pm ET:</strong></em><em> This story has been updated with new details about celebrities reacting to Twitters planned changes.</em>
</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-sports">From The Hindu: Sports</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>IPL 2023 | Kolkata Knight Riders elect to bowl against Punjab Kings</strong> - For KKR, Afghanistan player Rahmanullah Gurbaz is making his IPL debut.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>IPL 2023: SRH vs RR | Up against Hyderabad, Rajasthan keen to recreate last year magic</strong> - Over the years, the Royals have built the reputation of being gritty opponents that do not surrender an inch of their territory.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Australian GP 2023 | Verstappen takes pole position for Red Bull, ahead of Mercedes 2-3</strong> - Twice world champion Fernando Alonso will start fourth on the grid ahead of fifth-placed Carlos Sainz</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>IPL 2023 | Impact player rule makes captains job tough: Hardik Pandya</strong> - Chennai captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni said the team should have set a bigger target</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>IPL 2023 | If Ruturaj continues the way he is batting, he will do wonders for Indian cricket: Hardik</strong> - Ruturaj Gaikwads classy knock of 92 off just 50 balls took Chennai Super Kings to 178 for 7</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-the-hindu-national-news">From The Hindu: National News</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Paddy farmers disillusioned as Supplyco sets restrictions in procurement</strong> - Paddy procurement from farmers limited to five acres and that too only 2,200 kg paddy per acre, say farmers. Officials say the issues related to procurement will be sorted out.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Jails overcrowded, courts should ensure that trials are taken up and concluded speedily: SC</strong> - A bench of Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta made the observation while enlarging a man accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act on bail</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andhra Pradesh: Technological changes will provide many opportunities for students, says VSP General Manager</strong> -</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>PM Modi flags off Bhopal-Delhi Vande Bharat train</strong> - The Vande Bharat Express will run between Rani Kamlapati and Hazrat Nizamuddin</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Raja Singh booked for hate speech in Ram Navami Shobha Yatra</strong> - Police book a case based on videos of clash between two groups near Charminar that were shared on social media</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-bbc-europe">From BBC: Europe</h1>
<ul>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Russia assumes UN Security Council presidency despite Ukrainian anger</strong> - Ukraines foreign minister said Russia leading the UN Security Council is “the worst joke ever”.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Im still alive jokes Pope as he leaves hospital</strong> - The 86-year-old was admitted to Gemelli Hospital in Rome on Wednesday with breathing difficulties.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate moved to house arrest</strong> - The Tates and two associates are moved to house arrest following a ruling by a Romanian judge.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns</strong> - The countrys data-protection regulator has serious privacy concerns over the technology.</p></li>
<li data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>King Charles at Hamburg memorial for Allied wartime air raids</strong> - King Charles laid a wreath remembering those who died in Allied wartime bombing raids on Hamburg.</p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-ars-technica">From Ars Technica</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Nvidias GameStream is dead. Sunshine and Moonlight are great replacements.</strong> - What started as a hackathon project is now a full-fledged streaming platform. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1906410">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>As glaciers retreat, new streams for salmon</strong> - Insects move in, alders and willows spring up, and spawning fish arrive in thousands. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1928383">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Hackers exploit WordPress plugin flaw that gives full control of millions of sites</strong> - Elementor Pro fixed the vulnerability, but not everyone has installed the patch. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1928488">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Twitter posts the code it claims determines which tweets people see, and why</strong> - Posted algorithm code includes “is_democrat,” “is_republican,” and “is_elon.” - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1928420">link</a></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>GM kills more than CarPlay support, it kills choice</strong> - The software-driven vehicle is supposed to be a place of choice. - <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1928486">link</a></p></li>
</ul>
<h1 data-aos="fade-right" id="from-jokes-subreddit">From Jokes Subreddit</h1>
<ul>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>What word means the same thing with several letters added?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Mailbox
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/geminirich"> /u/geminirich </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128c57k/what_word_means_the_same_thing_with_several/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128c57k/what_word_means_the_same_thing_with_several/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Whenever I get a stack of resumes on my desk at work, I always pick half at random and throw them out</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Dont need unlucky people working in my department.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/EvilChefReturns"> /u/EvilChefReturns </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/127v8oe/whenever_i_get_a_stack_of_resumes_on_my_desk_at/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/127v8oe/whenever_i_get_a_stack_of_resumes_on_my_desk_at/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Why should you never brush your teeth with your left hand?</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Because a toothbrush works better.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Stationary-Event"> /u/Stationary-Event </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128874h/why_should_you_never_brush_your_teeth_with_your/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128874h/why_should_you_never_brush_your_teeth_with_your/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>Doctor: Im sorry, but I had to remove your colon.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
Me Why?
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/madazzahatter"> /u/madazzahatter </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128hxf0/doctor_im_sorry_but_i_had_to_remove_your_colon/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/128hxf0/doctor_im_sorry_but_i_had_to_remove_your_colon/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
<li><p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"><strong>My doctor told me that I had a healthy prostate.</strong> - <!-- SC_OFF --></p>
<div class="md">
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom">
I was deeply touched.
</p>
</div>
<!-- SC_ON -->
<p data-aos="fade-left" data-aos-anchor-placement="bottom-bottom"> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/1963Jan"> /u/1963Jan </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/127ly3k/my_doctor_told_me_that_i_had_a_healthy_prostate/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/127ly3k/my_doctor_told_me_that_i_had_a_healthy_prostate/">[comments]</a></span></p></li>
</ul>
<script>AOS.init();</script></body></html>